Please note:
This document is best suited for on-screen use. Some layout may have been altered during the creation of this web page.

It is recommended that you download the "pdf" version of this Course Profile for printing and the "Word, Mac, or WordPerfect" versions for working with or adapting the Course Profile to meet your instructional needs.

Course Profile   English, Grade 11, University Preparation, Public

 

Course Overview

 

Course Profiles are professional development materials designed to help teachers implement the new Grade 11 secondary school curriculum. These materials were created by writing partnerships of school boards and subject associations. The development of these resources was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Education. This document reflects the views of the developers and not necessarily those of the Ministry. Permission is given to reproduce these materials for any purpose except profit. Teachers are also encouraged to amend, revise, edit, cut, paste, and otherwise adapt this material for educational purposes.

 

Any references in this document to particular commercial resources, learning materials, equipment, or technology reflect only the opinions of the writers of this sample Course Profile, and do not reflect any official endorsement by the Ministry of Education or by the Partnership of School Boards that supported the production of the document.

 

© Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2001

 

Acknowledgments

Public District School Board Writing Team – English

 

Lead Board

Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

 

Project Manager

Fiona White, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

 

Course Profile Writing Team

Scott Parr, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Jennifer Post, Simcoe District School Board

Cynthia Rankin, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Glenda Morris, Trillium Lakelands District School Board

 

Reviewers

Ann Varty, Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Alice Lynch, Simcoe District School Board

Nora Christos, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Mindy Poley, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Carol Ricker-Wilson, ELAN

Sheila Powell, Thames Valley District School Board

 

 

Special thanks to Lorrie Clark, Department of English, Trent University for providing a destination review.

 


Course Overview

English, Grade 11, University Preparation, ENG3U

Prerequisite:  English, Grade 10, Academic

Course Description

This course emphasizes the development of literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills. Students analyse challenging texts from various periods; conduct research and analyse the information gathered; write persuasive and literary essays; analyse the relationship among media forms, audiences, and media industry practices. An important focus is understanding the development of the English language.

Course Notes

The units and specific material suggested in this course profile, reflect an attempt to introduce senior level, university bound students, to significant literary works that reflect major themes in literature, which address alienation, the nature of good, ambition, natural versus supernatural, and the nature of humanity. Students examine both structure and techniques used in a variety of different pieces.

“Short Pieces” is the title used to describe two units that frame the course. The first unit, “Short Pieces: Form and Method”, introduces students to basic themes, genres, forms, and devices that will be the foundation of literary analysis. “Short Pieces: Language in Poetry and Media”, is positioned at the end of the course to allow students to focus on sophisticated language use in poetry and media.

The two central units, based on analyses of Frankenstein and Macbeth, draw on knowledge and skills acquired in the first unit. Most of the pieces in Units 1 and 4 were chosen because the central themes complement those in the novel and play. Frankenstein and Macbeth were chosen as the core texts because of their enduring qualities:

·         They have great literary merit.

·         They are widely known by students on a superficial “Hollywood” level.

·         They strongly appeal to students and continue to have relevance in today’s society, dealing with such topics as, greed, genetics, and ambition.

·         They contain classical, archetypal, and religious symbolism.

·         They explore themes which address the nature of good, natural and supernatural forces, the dilemma between fate and freewill.

·         They are the original sources for many allusions and also contain many allusions to other great classical literature, mythology, art, and religion.

In the culminating unit, students apply skills and knowledge developed throughout the course in an individualized study of an independently chosen novel. They demonstrate their achievement of the relevant expectations in an oral presentation, which includes a media component. The focus is a particular theme and a full analysis of the novel as it pertains to the classics in literature. The teacher provides opportunities for conferencing and direction on a regular basis. This represents not only a culmination of the students’ work, but also a reflection of the essential structure of the course. The culminating unit provides students with opportunities to demonstrate what the course demonstrates, an examination of key themes and issues across a variety of texts and media.

It is important to introduce the culminating unit tasks to the students at the beginning of the course and to refer to it throughout. Response Journals, Glossary of Terms and Reader’s Notes are also introduced in Unit 1 and assist students in their development of the critical and analytical skills they need in the culminating unit. Students should begin independent reading of the core novel, Frankenstein, during the first unit.

Activities have been planned in each unit to work towards the Culminating Unit. Many smaller activities have been used more than once to facilitate improvement. The Culminating Unit should be mentioned to students throughout the course to focus their attention on the relevant skills and concepts being developed. Some activities from different units occur simultaneously as with Unit 1 and the reading of the novel study in preparation for the first day of Unit 2.

The teacher works with the library staff and members of the English department to develop the different units in this course. Many resources may be effectively substituted based on availability, student cultural mix, and teacher preference. Teachers need to consider ESL students and students with IEPs when choosing strategies to use in their classrooms.

Throughout the course, students are provided with multiple opportunities to refine their writing skills, with a focus on developing the skills they need in a university setting, regardless of the program they enter. It is important for the teacher to model a variety of organizational strategies for developing writing plans and to provide structure and guidance for the writing process, including self and peer editing and revision. Successful writing depends on students achieving the language expectations relating to grammar and spelling. These can be effectively taught through focused mini-lessons, provided by the teacher as appropriate, addressing gaps identified in student work.

Units:  Titles and Times

* Unit 1

Short Pieces: Form and Method

25 hours

Unit 2

Examination of Literary Forms and Issues

28 hours

Unit 3

Exploration of Literary Connections

23 hours

Unit 4

Short Pieces: Language in Media and Poetry

16 hours

Unit 5

Culminating Unit: Pulling it all Together

18 hours

* This unit is fully developed in this Course Profile.

 

 

Unit Overviews

Unit 1:  Short Pieces: Form and Method

Time: 24 hours

Unit Description

Students review and extend their understanding of literary forms and devices through engagement with a variety of short written and media texts. Students apply their understanding in a variety of writing activities, which provide an opportunity for diagnostic and formative assessment. The teacher uses these activities to plan mini-lessons for necessary language skill improvements. Emphasis is placed on the ability to identify and connect pieces with similar themes. In the final activity of the unit, students produce a polished narrative piece of writing on a chosen theme, and also demonstrate their ability to analyse a sight passage. The introduction of a variety of classics also serves as a brief introduction to the Culminating Unit. The students’ investigation of genres and forms ranging from visual art to classic texts provides them with excellent models to build analytical and comparative skills. Research skills and proper MLA bibliography style are used.

Strands & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading; Writing; Language; Media Studies

Overall Expectations:  LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01.

Unit 1 Overview Chart

Cluster

Expectations

Assessment

Focus and Suggested Activities

1.1

Anticipation

 

 

360 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, LAV.02, MDV.02, LS1.01, LS1.03, LS2.01, LS3.01, LS3.02, WR2.01, WR2.03, LA2.01

Communication
Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Application

Focus: Narrative Poem and Song

Introduction to course and initiation of reading Frankenstein

Discussion of themes related to anticipation and analysis of theme in a short story

Analysis of groups of poems to develop understanding of form, style and devices

Extension of study of themes to video and music, with choice of song related to theme presented orally

Creation of a poem

1.2

Conscience

 

 

300 min

LSV.01, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, LAV.02, LS2.01, WR1.02, WR1.04, WR2.02, WR3.03, WR4.04, LA2.02

Communication
Thinking/
Inquiry
Application

Focus: Non-fiction

Examination of conscience and guilt through the game “Two Truths and a Lie”

Reading and analysis of two non-fiction articles about individuals moved by conscience

Research on an organization, which addresses issues to the theme

Preparation of a non-fiction report accompanied by a brief oral presentation

1.3

Alienation

 

 

300 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, WRV.02, WRV.03, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01, LS1.03, LS2.02, LS2.03, WR2.01, WR3.02, LA1.03, LA2.01, LA2.02, MD1.01

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication

Focus: Memoir

Introduction to “freefall” writing and anecdotes

Discussion of alienation and how setting can be used to reinforce it

Development of found poem based on different settings

Analysis of memoirs

“Freefall” writing to develop a draft of a personal memoir

1.4

States of Mind

 

 

300 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01, LS1.02, LS1.04, LS1.05, LS2.02, LS3.01, LS3.02, WR1.02, WR2.01, WR2.02, WR2.04, WR3.02, LA1.01, LA2.01, MD1.01, MD1.03

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: The Short Story

Discussion of states of mind using visuals

Group analysis of short story with theme that addresses states of mind

Exploration of language related to states of mind

Class analysis of short story and summary of elements with model of Readers’ Notes

“Freefall” or other writing activity related to the short story

Analysis of Gothic short story and further writing

Test on literary terms

Development of short story outline

1.5

Universal Themes

 

 

240 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.02, WR2.01, WR2.02, WR2.04, WR4.02, WR5.04, LA2.02

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: Polished Piece of Narrative Writing

Group development of themes

Choice of focus for written piece: narrative poem, non-fiction, memoir or short story, and discussion in small groups

Development of polished piece, including peer editing based on rubric

Sight passage test to apply knowledge and skills acquired in this unit

 

Unit 2:  Examination of Literary Forms and Issues

Time:  28 hours

Unit Description

Students use Frankenstein as the basis for examination of literary forms and issues. They are introduced to features of the Romantic Movement and develop an understanding of the elements of Gothic as they explore the nature of good, of humanity, of the supernatural, and of ambition. Other genres of the period and key Romantic writers are used to draw comparisons to the author and her work. Literary criticism in its many forms, e.g., video, essay, parody, is used to help students understand the various interpretations of and allusions to the text over the last 180 years. Students also choose one of a set of alternative novels for small group study and through analysis draw parallels and make comparisons to elements of Frankenstein and other related literature and media. This leads to the culminating task in which students write a comparative literary essay. Throughout the unit, students are also provided with appropriate opportunities for improving language skills.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading; Writing; Language; Media Studies

Overall Expectations:  LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03 WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01.

Unit 2 Overview Chart

Cluster

Expectations

Assessment

Focus and Suggested Activities

2.1

Judging a Book by its Cover

 

 

210 min

LSV.03, LAV.02, LS3.04, LA2.01, LA2.02, MDV.01, MD1.04

Knowledge/
Understanding

Focus: Introduction to Frankenstein and beginning of Group Novel

Content test on Frankenstein

Class discussion of covers for differing editions of Frankenstein and covers for Group Novel (GN) choices

Class discussion based on reading of essay by Pico Iyer on “Perhaps the Best Article on Blurbs I’ve Written Today”

Review of novels provided for GN choices and with volunteers scanning and presenting book talks

Choice of novel and initiation of reading

2.2

Group Novel Critical Path

 

 

280 min

LSV.01, LAV.02, LS1.03, LA2.01, LA2.02

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry

Focus: Group Schedule for Reading

Students, grouped with those studying the same novel, review Reader’s Notes introduced in Unit 1

Group creation of a common critical path for the study of the Group Novel Maintenance of Reader’s Notes while reading GN

2.3

Predictions, Foreshadowing, Flashback, and Narration (seven types of plot)

 

210 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, LAV.02, LS1.04, LS2.01, LS3.01, LA2.01, LA2.02

Thinking/
Inquiry

Communication

Focus: Narrative Voice

Generation of a note on seven types of plot, subplot and literary definitions.

Group discussions of narrative elements in Frankenstein (the story within the story)

GN discussion of opening narrative predictions made in the Response Journals

2.4

Setting and Symbols

 

 

140 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, LAV.01, LS1.02, LS1.05, LS2.02, LS3.02, WR1.02, LA1.01

Communication

Application

Focus: Setting and Symbolism

Small group (not necessarily GN Groups) reflection on how the main events are reinforced through settings and symbol, focusing on key aspects such as pathetic fallacy, sublime, dramatic landscapes, allusions, and imagery

Student identification of artistic techniques that create sublime atmosphere from a selection of works of art, collected by the teacher, that contain dramatic landscapes followed by presentation of pictures and findings

2.5

Character (archetypes and stereotypes)

 

 

140 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, LAV.02, LS1.04, LS2.02, LS3.02, LA2.01, WR1.02, WR2.04

Thinking/
Inquiry

Communication

Focus: Archetypal Partners

Brainstorming of list of archetypal opposites, such as hero/villain or saint/sinner, using movies and/or classic novels

Small group role play of Dr. Frankenstein and the Creature and with rest of the group choosing scenarios from GN to have these characters interact, deepening understanding of characters’ motivations from both novels

Reader’s Notes comparison of characters between the two novels for possible links to use in the comparative essay as well as examination of bias and stereotyping

2.6

Theme

 

 

210 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, WRV.01, LAV.02, LS1.02, LS2.03, LA2.05, WR1.01, WR1.02, WR1.03

Thinking/
Inquiry

Communication

Focus: Introduction of Literary Comparative Essay using MLA style (5-6 paragraph essay) – comparison between Frankenstein and GN.

Brainstorming of themes in general

With GN partner narrow to more specific themes related to Frankenstein and GN

Generation of thesis statements, notemaking, and development of outline for essay

Development of draft of essay

2.7

Critiques Comparison: Literary and Movie

 

 

210 min

LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, LAV.01, MDV.01, LS2.03, LS3.01, WR1.02, WR1.04, WR2.03, LA1.04, MD1.02, MD1.03

Thinking/
Inquiry

Communication

Focus: Critiques, both Literary and Movie

Reading of a literary critique of Frankenstein, the novel, paying careful attention to form, purpose and audience

Viewing of a video version of Frankenstein and examination of a movie critique of it

Judgement of purpose, audience, and effectiveness of literary and movie critiques in Response Journals

2.8

Exemplars

 

 

140 min

WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR5.03, WR5.04, LA1.04, LA1.05, LA2.07

Thinking/
Inquiry

Focus: Essay and Standards Comparison

Reading and evaluation of a few first year university essays using a rubric

Examination of comparative essay draft using a comparative essay rubric Identification of needs and followed by essay revision

2.9

Literary Essay

 

 

140 min

WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, WR1.02, WR1.03, WR2.01, WR2.03, WR2.04, WR3.01, WR3.03, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR4.04, WR5.01, WR5.02, WR5.04, LA1.05

Thinking/
Inquiry Communication Application

Focus: Peer Revising and Editing

Peer editing and polishing of literary comparison essay within GN group for content

Peer editing and polishing of literary essay for essay structure and conventions of language outside the GN group

Mini-lesson based on common errors identified by peer editors, followed by further proofreading by a peer

Submission of final version of comparative literary essay analysing an aspect of Frankenstein and GN

 

 

Unit 3:  Exploration of Literary Connections

Time:  25 hours

Unit Description

In this unit students explore literary connections through a study of Macbeth while preparing for role-play banquet. Connections between the play and the material covered earlier in the course are made as students examine the characters in the play, their motivations and actions, and the consequences. Students examine the connection between human nature and the natural and supernatural world and the nature of tragedy. Students research the historical background for the play and the period in which it was written, as well as traditional food, manners, music, language, décor, costumes and dance. Students explore the use of language and apply their understanding of the social and cultural context for the play as they choose a role and develop a dialogue for the banquet.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading; Writing; Language; Media Studies

Overall Expectations:  LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.02.

Unit 3 Overview Chart

Cluster

Expectations

Assessment

Focus and Suggested Activities

3.1

Background: The Scottish Family Tree and the Great Chain of Being

 

 

210 min

WRV.01, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, WR1.02, WR5.01, LA1.02, LA2.05

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: Background to Macbeth

Introduction to culminating task: The Banquet

Video: Great Castles of Scotland: Glamis Castle (or visuals of castles, Scotland, or life in 1600’s)

Development of note on Chain of Being as social context

Library research of social, cultural, and historical context for the banquet presentation using research notes and MLA style bibliography

Initial planning of the components for the banquet: music, dance, menu, costume and other details

3.2

“When Shall We Three Meet Again” Act 1

 

 

210 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, LAV.01, LS1.05, LS2.02, LS3.02, WR2.04, LA1.01

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: The Language

Choral reading of Act I aloud, followed by discussion of use of iambic pentameter and comparison of language used by the witches - use of verbal contradiction (natural vs. unnatural) pathetic fallacy

Soliloquy: Act I, scene v – rewriting in modern language and explanation of the relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth and connections between Lady Macbeth and “the Creature” in Frankenstein

Dramatic Irony – journal response with examples and impact of its use, addition to Glossary

Identification of common words and phrases used in the text

3.3

“Is this a dagger, which I see before me...” Act 2

 

 

210 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, WRV.03, LS1.01, LS1.02, LS1.03, LS1.04, LS2.02, LS3.02, WR2.01, WR3.01, WR3.03

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: Characterization

Character Sketch of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s changing states of mind

Brainstorming of symbols, images, and themes introduced including the sleep motif and blood imagery – link to Frankenstein in class discussion

Student choice of a character for the banquet and development with a partner of a dialogue using language identified in 3.2

Discussion of Comic Relief and Role of the Fool in the Porter Scene

Development of one page supported opinion on “what is a tragic flaw?” (may use Aristotle’s “Poetics” on Tragic Flaws and Hegel’s Theory of  Tragedy)

3.4

“Thy bones are marrowless; thy bones are cold” Act 3

210 min

LSV.02, WRV.02, WRV.03, LS2.02, WR2.01, WR3.01

Knowledge/
Understanding Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication

Focus: Creation of the Monster

Octosyllabics – Hecate’s Speech – Preparation of short supported opinion on what creates a monster

3.5

“...for none of woman born...”
Act 4

The second prophecy and Macbeth’s nature

210 min

LSV.01, WRV.03, WRV.04, LS1.02, WR3.03, WR4.02

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication

Focus: The Nature of Good

Development of a T-chart organizer of the steps from good of both Macbeth and the Creature from Frankenstein

Rehearsal of dialogues for peer formative feedback of language, pronunciation, and context

3.6

“Tomorrow and tomorrow...” Act 5 Solving the riddles

 

 

190 min

LSV.01, WRV.03, MDV.02, LS1.04, WR3.01, WR3.03, MD2.01

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry Communication
Application

Focus: Self-reflection

Identification of five riddles that are solved in the play in Act 5, and selection of one to convert into a 2-5 panel cartoon showing character’s inner and outer thoughts

Comparison of Macbeth’s conversation with the Doctor in Act 5, scene iii or his speech in Act 5, scene v with the Creature’s self-reflection after killing Frankenstein or Frankenstein’s speech after finding Elizabeth dead – supported opinion: “Are these characters sympathetic?” “Do we feel pathos or empathy for them?”

Further development of dialogues to include an aside expressing a character’s inner feelings and thoughts

3.7

Banquet Activity with Historical and Fictional Characters

 

140 min

WRV.02, LAV.02, WR2.04, LA2.01, LA2.02, LA2.03, LA2.04, LA2.05, LA2.06

Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication

Focus: The Banquet Role-Play

Performance of dialogues, with student feedback of elements of the role-play for content and messages (could invite an audience)

Development of a character sketch for the persona represented at the banquet

 

Unit 4:  Short Pieces: Language in Poetry and Media

Time:  16 hours

Unit Description

Students have the opportunity to explore a range of poetry from various periods in English literature representing several poetic styles. They explore the use of language and poetic devices used in current media and the relationship to language used in poetry. Students read and analyse specific poems at poetry stations in small groups, focusing on poetic language. Through an exploration of excerpts from either Beowulf or The Canterbury Tales, students examine the development of the English language and compare it to language found in innovative poetry. Students write their own poetry and create advertisements based on famous poems. The culminating activity is an in-class essay, in which students select a poem and critically examine it focusing on language and poetic devices. Opportunities for language study are continued as needed.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading; Writing; Language; Media Studies

Overall Expectations:  LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01, MDV.02.

Unit 4 Overview Chart

Cluster

Expectations

Assessment

Focus and Suggested Activities

4.1

The Writing On The Wall

 

 

210 min

LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01, LS2.01, LS3.03, WR2.03, LA1.01, LA2.01, LA2.02, MD1.01, MD1.02, MD1.03, MD1.04

Knowledge/
Understanding
Application

Focus: Poetic Language

Introduction of culminating task and review of elements of literary essay with rubric

Brainstorming and/or selection of ads from television, radio and print followed by analysis of the language devices (some of which were already studied in Unit 1) creating effective word play in these works, such as alliteration, pun, simile, metaphor and allusion

Small group rotation to 5-6 Poetry Stations, at which students analyse a selection of poems linked by form such as ballad, free verse, sonnet, filling out specific Readers’ Notes, for analysing poetry on two poems at each station

4.2

Early Poetry

 

 

210 min

LSV.01, LAV.01, LAV.02, LS1.05, LA1.01, LA1.02, LA2.03

Communication
Thinking/
Inquiry
Application

Focus: Development of the English Language

Reading, listening or viewing an excerpt from either Beowulf or The Canterbury Tales in a readable but not modern translation

Examination of the elements of narrative and poetic devices which have been used in other pieces studied

Examination of the elements of early stages of the English language, such as spelling, etymology, pronunciation, grammar, and syntax based on these writings

4.3

Modern Poetry

 

 

210 min

LSV.03, WRV.02, LS3.02, LS3.03, LS3.04, WR2.02

Thinking/
Inquiry
Application

Focus: Ever Evolving English Language

Introduction to a variety of modern innovative poets such as e.e. cummings, Michael Ondaatje, William Carlos Williams and Gwendolyn MacEwen

Small group examination of the stylistic features that make these poets non-traditional

Experimentation with the style(s) of one or more innovative poets studied in class

Creation of media work for display incorporating their poem, using design elements to complement the poem

4.4

Creating an Ad

 

 

260 min

LSV.01, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.01, MDV.02, LS1.01, LA1.01, LA2.03, MD1.04, MD2.01

Thinking/
Inquiry

Focus: Creating an Ad Based on Poetry

Review of sources of poetry so that students can select a poem for the in-class essay in 4.5.

Random selection, in pairs, of a poem out of hat for reading and analysis

Creation of a media ad: print, television or radio, to sell an appropriately linked product, (e.g., make-up for “Sonnet 130” by Shakespeare)

Partner presentation to the class, involving reading the original poem, analysing it for the class and finally presenting their ad and explaining the connections

4.5

In-class Essay

 

 

70 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.02, LAV.01

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: In-class Essay

Writing of an in-class literary essay based on student’s selection of a poem, in which students critically examine the use of language and poetic devices. Students may write about any poems studied in this course or may select one from another source which is appropriate for the task

 

Unit 5:  The Culminating Unit: Pulling it all Together

Time:  18 hours

Unit Description

Students apply the skills and insights they have acquired throughout the course to the study of an novel that is selected independently. This study requires the students to apply the models of analysis studied in Units 1, 2 and 3, and demonstrate this understanding through a portfolio and a presentation. The portfolio is a reflection of the independent research process and includes: Reader’s Notes, a resource list, final report, and exploration of theme. The final oral presentation includes a media work.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading; Writing; Language; Media Studies

Overall Expectations:  LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.02.

Unit 5 Overview Chart

Cluster

Expectations

Assessment

Focus and Suggested Activities

5.1

Introduction

 

 

60 min

LAV.02, WRV.01, LA2.01, WR1.03

Knowledge/
Understanding

Focus: Independent Novel Study (done concurrent with Unit 2)

Introduction with explanation that the novel study of Frankenstein is a model for the student product (See Unit 2) as well as review of timelines, requirements and rubric

Identification of the theme of their chosen novel and production of a paragraph stating the reason for the choice of novel

5.2

Process

 

 

60 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, WRV.01, WRV.03, LAV.02, LS1.01, LS2.01, LS3.02, WR1.01, WR1.02, WR1.04, WR2.02, WR2.04, LA2.01

Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication

Focus: Reader’s Notes (introduced during Unit 2)

Teacher mini-lesson on the structure of Reader’s Notes for a novel

One entry per week in Reader’s Notes covering plot, setting, theme, symbols, style, significant quotations

Reader’s Notes to be handed in regularly for feedback and included in the portfolio

Group Novel exploration, brainstorming, and listing of possible literature, art, and media related to independent novel with list to be included in portfolio

5.3

Identifying theme

 

 

140 min

LSV.02, WRV.01, LAV.02, MDV.02, LS2.02, WR1.01, WR1.03, LA2.01, MD2.01, MD2.02

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry

Focus: Theme Development

Group Novel identification and development of theme using Reader’s Notes to record ideas for inclusion in portfolio

Identification of media work to be created for oral presentation, e.g., videotape, parody, proposal for further study, adaptation, creative writing, visual art, advertisement, brochure

5.4

Research

 

 

140 min

LSV.02, WRV.05, LAV.02, LS2.02, LA2.01, WR5.01

Thinking/
Inquiry
Knowledge/
Understanding
Application

Focus: Research and Library Skills

Research and note making on a topic of interest, identified in Reader’s Notes, e.g., author background, historical issue, symbols or allusions using library resources and the Internet

Completion of a proper MLA bibliography which is to be included in the portfolio

5.5

Report

 

 

140 min

LSV.02, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.02, LS2.03, WR2.02, WR3.03, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR4.04, WR5.04, LA2.05

Communication

Focus: Report

Development of a report based on the research which examines the connection of the novel with one of the following questions: What influenced the novel? What influence has the novel had on other forms of text, e.g., art, media, drama, or literature?

Peer editing of the reports, with editor’s comments to be included in portfolio

Review of requirements (based on rubric) and planning for oral presentation

5.6

Presentation

 

 

450 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.05, LAV.01, LAV.02, MDV.02, LS2.03, WR1.01, WR1.02, WR2.01, WR2.02, WR2.04, WR3.01, WR5.01, WR5.02, LA1.05, LA2.01, LA2.03, LA2.04, LA2.05, LA2.06, MD2.01

Knowledge/
Understanding
Thinking/
Inquiry
Communication
Application

Focus: Presentation

Submission of portfolio which contains

a) Reader’s Notes and list of related items

b) Summary of theme

c) Research Notes and Bibliography

d) Final Report

e) Planning notes and/or written piece for presentation

Presentation, involving oral component and media component, made either to the class or directly to the teacher

Rubric provided below presents more detail on requirements

5.7

Examination

 

90 min

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03

Knowledge/
Understanding
Communication
Application

Written exam using a sight passage connecting the novel, the play and a selection of short pieces to a common theme and devices used to emphasize this theme.

 

Rubric for Final Presentation Part 1: Portfolio

Criteria

Level 1
(50-59%)

Level 2
(60-69%)

Level 3
(70-79%)

Level 4
(80-100%)

Literary Analysis Knowledge/
Understanding

LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, LS1.02, LS1.03, LS1.04, LS1.05, LS2.01

Evidence shown in:

- Reader’s Notes

- Theme Summary

- Planning for Presentation

- limited understanding of information, ideas, concepts and themes

- limited understanding of relationships among facts, ideas, concepts and themes

- some understanding of information, ideas, concepts and themes

- some understanding of relationships among facts, ideas, concepts and themes

- considerable understanding of information, ideas, concepts and themes

- considerable understanding of relationships among facts, ideas, concepts and themes

- thorough understanding of information, ideas, concepts and themes

- insightful understanding of relationships among facts, ideas, concepts and themes

Written Pieces Thinking/
Inquiry

WRV.01, WRV.03, WRV.05, WR1.01, WR1.02, WR3.01, WR5.01

Evidence shown in:

- Bibliography

- Report

- demonstrates limited inquiry skills in research questions and selection of resources cited

 

- demonstrates limited critical and creative thinking skills in the organization and presentation of the report

- demonstrates some inquiry skills in research questions and selection of resources cited

 

- demonstrates some critical and creative thinking skills in the organization and presentation of the report

- demonstrates effective inquiry skills in research questions and selection of resources cited

 

- demonstrates effective critical and creative thinking skills in the organization and presentation of the report

- demonstrates highly effective inquiry skills in research questions and selection of resources cited

- demonstrates highly effective critical and creative thinking skills in the organization and presentation of the report

Note: A student whose achievement is below level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or activity.

 

Rubric for Final Presentation Part 2: Oral Presentation, including Media Component

Criteria

Level 1
(50-59%)

Level 2
(60-69%
)

Level 3

(70-79%)

Level 4
(80-100%)

Oral Component Communication

LAV.01, LA1.04, LAV.02, LA2.06

Includes one of:

- 15 minute oral presentation to class

- 15 minute portfolio presentation

- presentation shows limited organization and use of rhetorical devices, voice projection, gestures, body language, timing and academic language

- presentation shows some organization and use of appropriate choices of rhetorical devices, voice projection, gestures, body language, timing, and academic language

- presentation shows considerable organization and effective use of appropriate choices of rhetorical devices, voice projection, gestures, body language, timing, and academic language

- presentation shows high degree of organization and is enhanced by choices of rhetorical devices, voice projection, gestures, body language, timing, and academic language

Media Component Application

MDV.02, MD2.01

Includes one of:

- 5-minute audio or video

- Presentation visuals or materials

- Dramatic reading

- Other visual representations

- choice of media form has limited effectiveness for purpose and audience

- limited command of the media form is evident

 

- limited connections between theme and student experiences are evident

- choice of media form has some effectiveness for purpose and audience

- some command of the media form is evident

 

- some connections between theme and student experiences are evident

- choice of media form is effective for purpose and audience

 

- considerable command of the media form is evident

- connections between theme and student experiences are clear

- choice of media form is highly effective for purpose and audience

- thorough command of the media form is evident

- connections between theme and student experiences are clear and compelling

Note: A student whose achievement is below level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or activity.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

A variety of strategies are used to allow students many opportunities to attain the necessary skills for success in this course and at university. Many activities used in the first 4 units are developing skills necessary for success in Unit 5. The teacher uses a variety of whole class, small group and individual activities to facilitate learning.

Whole Class Activities: Due to the historical context and challenging nature of this course, teacher-centred, whole class activities are crucial for establishing necessary depth and challenge. These activities ensure student understanding as each unit progresses. Whole class activities include the following: class discussion, Socratic lessons, brainstorming, modelling of reading and writing strategies such as Reader’s Notes, and development of notes and organizers.

Small Group Activities: Group activities provide opportunities for students to extend and clarify their understanding through discussion and focused tasks. Prior to beginning group activities, the teacher selects groups to reflect a collaborative learning model that is heterogeneous. The teacher needs to review successful group practices with the students, e.g., group reporter, group recorder, group leader, and set clear timelines for activities. The teacher actively engages with each of the groups, ensuring that all group members are participating and to assess the contributions made by individuals within the group. Individual accountability is emphasized. The teacher may also use small groups as a vehicle for focused language lessons. Group activities include: brainstorming, discussion, role-playing, oral presentation, development of organizers and plans for writing, collective writing, e.g., found poem, peer editing, jigsaws, reading groups, and dialogue writing.

Individual Activities: Individual activities provide opportunities for students to develop and consolidate their skills while pursuing their own interests and using their own strengths. During independent activities, the teacher has conferences with individual students to direct their research, reading, and interpretation. The teacher can construct “mini-lessons” based on these individual assessments to address gaps in student knowledge. Individual time is used to provide assistance and accommodate students with exceptionalities and to provide individual students with exemplars and models to improve their work.

Teachers utilize the expertise of other teachers in the school to enrich individual activities. Individual activities include: teacher-student conferencing, response journal writing, Reader’s Notes, graphic organizers, note-taking, research, oral presentation, use of word processing or presentation software, editing and revision, writing assignments including interior monologue, short narrative, parable, review, critique, descriptive paragraph, literary essay, journal, character sketch, panel cartoon, dialogue, parody, and portfolio presentation.

Assessment & Evaluation of Student Achievement

Assessment is the systematic process of collecting information or evidence about student learning; evaluation is the judgment teachers make about the assessments of student learning based on established criteria. Diagnostic assessment is used at the beginning of a unit to help determine a starting point for instruction. Formative assessment provides information to students, as they are learning and refining their skills. Summative assessments, at the end of units and the course, give students an opportunity to synthesize/apply/demonstrate their learning and the achievement of the expectations. Summative assessments are counted toward the students’ final marks.

In order to ensure that assessment and evaluation are valid, reliable, and lead to the improvement of student learning, English teachers must use assessment and evaluation strategies that:

·         address both what students learn and how well they learn;

·         are based on the four broad categories and descriptions in the Achievement Chart for English;

·         are varied in nature, administered over a period of time, and designed to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the full range of their learning;

·         maintain a balance among all four categories of the Achievement Chart;

·         are appropriate for the learning activities used, the purpose of instruction, and the needs and experiences of students;

·         are fair to all students;

·         accommodate the needs of exceptional students, consistent with the strategies outlined in their Individual Education Plans;

·         accommodate the needs of students who are learning the language of instruction;

·         ensure that students are given clear directions for improvement;

·         promote students’ ability to assess their own learning and to set specific goals;

·         include the use of samples of students’ work that provide evidence of their achievement;

·         are communicated clearly to students and parents at the beginning of the course and at other appropriate points throughout the course.

Embedded in this course profile is a wide variety of assessment strategies and tools available to teachers of English: teacher observations, oral presentations, interviews, essays, reports, letters, quizzes, tests, examinations, performance tasks, portfolios, self-assessment, peer assessment, journals, media works, check lists, questions and answers. Many of these assessments can be used for formative assessment by providing students with opportunities for resubmission after they have worked to improve their product, by using self- and peer assessment to help them improve their work, and by using group tasks. However, the final evaluation is the responsibility of the teacher and should be based on individual student performance. Group tasks should allow for individual accountability.

Each unit is developed to end with a culminating activity, which can be used for summative evaluation. A culminating activity provides an opportunity for students to perform, create, or demonstrate significant skills and knowledge. Culminating activities have a real world context, involve higher level knowledge and skills than could be achieved through an isolated application. They establish clear criteria and levels for judging the quality of the performance.

Rubrics focus student attention on the specific knowledge and skills embedded in particular assignments. When they are combined with exemplars of student work, rubrics clarify for students the possible improvements and identify the next steps. Two rubrics are included in the profile, one for the narrative piece, the culminating task for Unit 1, and one for the major project in Unit 5. Many other appropriate rubrics are available in the Grade 9 and 10 English Course Profiles, as well as the other Grade 11 profiles, particularly those for Presentation and Speaking Skills, Media Studies, and English, College Preparation.

Unit 5 was developed so the individual student work can be used as part of the 30% final evaluation. However, recognizing that students need practice in developing exam-writing skills, it is recommended that a final exam form part of the 30% final evaluation. Assessment tasks are also suggested in each of the units, which give students practice and feedback on the types of questions included on the examination such as sight passages and in-class essays.

The student’s final percentage grade is based on achievement of the expectations. Learning Skills are recorded separately on the Provincial Report Card. Learning Skills include the ability to work independently, teamwork, organization, work habits/homework, and initiative.

Accommodations

Students with special needs require additional supports to succeed, as identified in Individual Education Plans. Examples of modifications and aids, which may be helpful include:

·         Provide step-by-step instructions.

·         Help students create organizers for planning writing tasks.

·         Advise Special Education staff in advance when students will be working on major assignments.

·         Record key words on the board or overhead when students are expected to make their own notes.

·         Allow students to report verbally to a scribe (teacher or student) who can then help in note taking.

·         Permit students a range of options for reading and writing tasks.

·         Timelines may need to be extended to give students more time to process language and put their thoughts into words.

·         Where an activity requires reading, provide it in advance.

·         Provide opportunities for enrichment.

Students in English as a Second Language (ESL) programs may require additional supports. Some examples of supports include:

·         Have students keep a dictionary of terms using first language words.

·         Provide reading material in advance.

·         Permit the use of a translation dictionary on assessments.

·         Provide additional time on assessments for dictionary use and processing language.

·         Have the library staff identify resources with appropriate reading level when research is required.

·         Advise ESL staff in advance when significant written work will be required.

·         Require one-on-one assistance to edit and revise written work.

Resources

Note: The URLs for the websites have been verified by the writer prior to publication. Given the frequency with which these designations change, teachers should always verify the websites prior to assigning them for student use.

 

Ontario School Library Association Information Studies: Kindergarten to Grade 12 Toronto: Ontario Library Association, 1999.

Aldiss, Brian, Kurt Vonnegut and Loren D. Estleman. The Ultimate Frankenstein. New York: Dell, 1991.
ISBN 0440 50353-3

Barrell, B.R.C. and R.F. Hammett ed. Advocating Change: Contemporary Issues in Subject English. Irwin Publishing, 2000.

Bennett, Barrie, et al Cooperative Learning: Where Heart Meets Mind. Toronto: Educational Connections, 1991. p. 268-273

Bloom, Harold, ed. Mary Shelley. (Modern Critical Views). New York: Chelsea House, 1985.
0-87754-619-3

Branagh, Kenneth. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, (1994). Kenneth Branagh, Robert De Niro.

Calvino, Italo. translated by Patrick Creagh. “Cinema and the Novel: Problems of Narrative.” The Uses of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich, 1986. 0-15-193205-0

Chud, Larry ed. Coping with the New Curriculum Toronto: OSSTF Educational Services Committee, 1999. ISBN 0-920930-59-X

Costello, Catherine, et al. “Seven Major Types of Plot.” in Contacts: Teaching Communications Across the Curriculum. Toronto: OSSTF, 1997. p. 90

Dickens, Charles. “The Black Veil” Pre-twentieth Century Short Stories. Trowbridge, England: Hodder and Stoughton, 1999. ISBN 0-040-73742-5

Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus. U.S. National Library of Medicine. – www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/frankenstein/frankhome.html
Mounted for museum exhibition – extensive selection of artworks reproduced

Frankenstein – http://www.georgetown.edu/irvinemj/english016/franken/franken.html

Frankenstein – http://us.imdb.com/M/title-substring?frankenstein

Frankenstein Mailart
http://www.cityu.edu.hk/ls/research/frankenstein/index.htm
Includes Haiku poems and limericks written by Hong Kong secondary students about Frankenstein

Fussell, Paul. Poetic Meter and Poetic Form, revised. ed. New York: Random House, 1979.
0-394-32120-0

Iyer, Pico. “Perhaps the Best Article on Blurbs I’ve Written Today.” Classical Tropical: Essays from Several Directions, (1995). pp. 265-268. 0-679-77610-9

Kaplan, Charles and William Anderson, eds. Criticism: Major Statements, 3rd ed.. New York:
St. Martin’s, 1991. 0-312-03502-0

LePan, Don. The Broadview Book of Common Errors in English: A Guide to Righting Wrongs. Broadview Press, 2000. 1-55111-205-1

Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose, Merritt Y. Hughes, ed. New York: Odyssey, 1957.

Mittermaier, Katherine. “Evil and Underlying Unknowability.” Prize Winning Essays II: English Literature. Peterborough: Trent University Academic Skills Centre, 2000. ISBN 1-894674-04-9

Modern Stories in English. Ed. W.H. New and H.J. Rosengarten. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd., 1991. ISBN 0-7730-5127-9

O’Farrell, Kelly. “Enemy Aliens in North America.” Prize Winning Essays IIHistory Peterborough: Trent University Academic Skills Centre, 2000. ISBN 1-894674-04-9

Phillips, Max. “The Mask.” in David Booth’s ABC’S of Creative Writing. p. 127 Toronto: Globe/Modern, 1981. 088996-048-8

Polanski, Roman. Macbeth. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 1986 (1971).

Ryan, D.W.S. and Rossiter, T.P., eds. Literary Modes. Jesperson Press, 1983. ISBN 0-920502-11-3

Serebryakov, Nikolai. Macbeth. Moscow: Shakespeare Animated Limited Soyuzmultifilm Christmas Films.

The Literary Gothic – http://www.litgothic.com/Authors/authors.html
- a thorough timeline of Mary Shelley’s life with links to other pages in the Literary Gothic site – includes links to full text of contemporary reviews of Frankenstein

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited with variant readings an introduction and notes by James Rieger. New York: Bobbs-Merill, 1974. 0-672-51457-5; 0-672-61020-5 (pbk.)

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. With an Afterword by Harold Bloom. Toronto: Penguin, 1994. 0-451-52336-9

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited by D.L MacDonald and Kathleen Scherf. Broadview Literary Texts, 1999. 1-55111-308-2 (Contains extensive appendices with related readings from the period, as well as the changes made for the later editions.)

Shelley, Mary. “Fantasy in the Gothic Novel: Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus” in Literary Modes. ISBN 0-920502-11-3

Shelley, P. B. “Mont Blanc.” in Oxford Anthology of English Literature. Volume II, p. 410-415.
LCCN 72-92355 9 –also widely available)

Summers, Merna. “The Skating Party.” New Worlds: A Canadian Collection of Stories with Notes ed. John Metcalf. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1980. ISBN 0-07-077989-9

Vanier, Jean. Becoming Human. Toronto: Anansi, 1998. 0-88784-631-9 – companion piece to Frankenstein – see chapter on “Loneliness”

Vaughan, William. Romantic Art. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978. ISBN 0-19-519981-2

Wells, H.G. “The Door in the Wall.” in Man and His World. Malcolm Ross and John Stevens. Toronto: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1961. p. 95 – 112

We Animals: Poems of Our World. edited and with essays by Nadya Aisenberg. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1989. 0-87156-679-6; 0-87156-685-0 (pbk)

Videos

Castles of Scotland. ASIN 1569382263

Polanski, Roman. Macbeth. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 1986 (1971).

Frankenstein Movies (limited list – there are many more)

1.   Frankenstein (1931)

2.   Frankenstein (1910)

3.   Frankenstein (1994)

4.   Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1994)

5.   Frankenstein - 1970 (1958)

6.   Frankenstein 80 (1972)

Other possible texts for novel study could include:

Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood

I, Robot by Isaac Asimov

Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen

Wuthering Heights by Charlotte Bronte

Obasan by Joy Kagawa

Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

Dracula by Bram Stoker

The Picture of Dorian Grey by Oscar Wilde

For additional resources see those listed with each activity.

OSS Considerations

Throughout the course, opportunities are provided for the use of technology. These include the use of word processing and presentation software as well as research using the Internet.

Opportunities are also provided to address issues related to violence prevention, bias, and stereotyping.

 


Coded Expectations, English, Grade 11, University Preparation, ENG3U

Literature Studies and Reading

Overall Expectations

LSV.01 · read and demonstrate an understanding of texts from various periods, with an emphasis on analysing and assessing information, ideas, themes, issues, and language;

LSV.02 · demonstrate an understanding of the elements of fiction, drama, poetry, and non-fiction, with an emphasis on novels and poems;

LSV.03 · describe the elements of style in texts from various periods, and analyse their effects.

Specific Expectations

Understanding the Meaning of Texts

LS1.01 – analyse and interpret information, ideas, themes, and arguments in print and electronic texts (e.g., write a paper analysing a theme in a novel; explain explicit and implicit claims made in a persuasive essay);

LS1.02 – select and use specific and relevant evidence from a close reading of texts to support interpretations, analyses, and arguments (e.g., analyse and describe the organization of an argument in a literary essay; identify the target and explain the criticism in a work of satire);

LS1.03 – select and use a range of effective reading strategies (e.g., make, adjust, and defend predictions while reading a novel; adjust reading pace as the complexity of a text changes; reread a text closely to relate repeated images to a theme);

LS1.04 – compare their own ideas, values, and perspectives with those expressed or implied in a text (e.g., analyse the thinking and response of a fictional character in a crisis and compare them with their own probable reactions; debate two different interpretations of a literary work using specific references to the text to support their arguments);

LS1.05 – explain the influence of social and historical values and perspectives on texts and the interpretation of texts (e.g., relate the social values in a period such as the Industrial Revolution, the Second World War, or the 1960s to a literary work from that period; compare a historical and a contemporary critique of a literary work).

Understanding the Forms of Texts

LS2.01 – analyse and explain how key elements of the novel and poetic forms influence their meaning (intensive study) (e.g., assess the effect of an author’s choice of narrator in a novel; analyse the relationship between character revelation and theme or message in a dramatic monologue);

LS2.02 – analyse how elements of literary forms other than novels and poetry are used to enhance meaning (extensive study) (e.g., compare a parody with the original text to understand the author’s purpose; explain how the conflict and characterization in a short story enhance its social commentary);

LS2.03 – analyse how elements of non-fiction forms influence their meaning (e.g., explain how the pattern chosen to organize an argument is related to the content and purpose of the work).

Understanding the Elements of Style

LS3.01 – analyse how language and syntax are used in texts to create a voice appropriate to the purpose and audience (e.g., compare essays by two authors on a similar theme or topic and determine how each author creates a personal voice; describe how diction is used to establish voice in the opening chapter of a novel);

LS3.02 – describe how authors use rhetorical and literary devices, such as pun, caricature, cliché, hyperbole, antithesis, paradox, wit, sarcasm, and invective, to enhance the meaning of texts (e.g., explain how paradox is used to deepen meaning in poetry; assess the effectiveness of rhetorical devices used to emphasize the social criticism in a satirical essay);

LS3.03 – analyse the effect on the reader of authors’ choices of language, syntax, and literary and rhetorical devices by examining their own and others’ interpretations of the style of texts;

LS3.04 – explain how authors and editors use design elements to organize content and help communicate ideas (e.g., discuss how the captions for illustrations could be written to achieve either a comic or a serious effect; explain the choice of photographs used in a biography).

Writing

Overall Expectations

WRV.01 · use a variety of print and electronic primary and secondary sources to gather and assess information and develop ideas for writing;

WRV.02 · select and use appropriate writing forms for intended purposes and audiences with a focus on essays and on narratives or poems;

WRV.03 · use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and effective written work;

WRV.04 · revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, with a focus on accuracy of information, clear expression, and consistent use of voice;

WRV.05 · edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as prescribed for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources when appropriate.

Specific Expectations

Generating Ideas and Gathering Information

WR1.01 – investigate potential topics by posing questions, identifying information needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather information and ideas from primary and secondary sources (e.g., consult a CD-ROM or on-line database to find information for an essay on a theme in a work studied; search library on-line catalogues to determine the availability of an author’s works);

WR1.02 – organize and analyse information, ideas, and sources to suit specific forms and purposes for writing (e.g., group information and ideas to focus on key concepts for an essay; create a pattern of imagery for writing a sonnet);

WR1.03 – formulate and refine a thesis, using information and ideas from prior knowledge and research (e.g., develop a thesis for an analysis of a satirical novel; integrate information and ideas acquired from a variety of sources for a personal essay on a topic or issue);

WR1.04 – evaluate information and ideas to determine whether they are reliable, current, sufficient, and relevant to the purpose and audience.

Choosing the Form to Suit the Purpose and Audience

WR2.01 – demonstrate an understanding of the uses and conventions of various forms by writing persuasive and literary essays, reviews, short narratives or poems, and summaries (e.g., write a personal essay on a current issue; write an academic essay analysing the themes or imagery of literature studied; write a film review for the school newspaper);

WR2.02 – select and use an appropriate form to produce written work for an intended audience and purpose (e.g., write a poem about being Canadian for a reader in another country; write a report for an academic audience on the historical context of a literary work studied);

WR2.03 – analyse the characteristics of literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes and audiences;

WR2.04 – select and use a level of language and a voice appropriate to the specific purpose and intended audience for a piece of writing (e.g., use colloquialisms to establish an authentic voice for a character in a short narrative; use an appropriate voice in an academic essay on a work of literature).

Organizing Ideas and Information in Written Work

WR3.01 – apply knowledge of essay structure to organize short essays or critiques, using:

q an introduction that engages the reader’s interest, introduces the thesis or controlling idea, and previews the organization or content of the essay;

q a body that develops ideas logically and coherently and incorporates well-chosen, relevant evidence to support each idea;

q a conclusion that follows logically from the thesis and ideas developed in the body, summarizes the key points and organization in the body, and makes a thoughtful generalization related to the controlling idea;

WR3.02 – select and use appropriate organizational devices and patterns to structure short stories, poems, and multimedia presentations (e.g., use flashbacks to present background information in a short story; use extended metaphor in a poem; use a storyboard to establish sequence in a scene from a literary work);

WR3.03 – use organizational patterns such as classification, definition, cause and effect, and chronological order to present information and ideas in essays, reviews, and summaries.

Revising Drafts

WR4.01 – revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by refining the controlling idea; making connections among ideas; integrating details; and reordering information, ideas, and images (e.g., combine several ideas from an early draft to form a controlling idea for an essay; change the order of images in a poem to enhance the emotional impact);

WR4.02 – revise drafts to improve clarity of expression (e.g., find specialized or academic vocabulary in reference resource materials to replace vague or inaccurately used words; review the use of active and passive verb voice in formal writing);

WR4.03 – revise drafts to refine voice in written work (e.g., highlight pronouns to check for consistent use of person in an academic essay; read a passage aloud to listen for a distinctive voice; change the direct speech of characters in a short story to reflect their different personalities; examine writing for use of inclusive and anti-discriminatory language);

WR4.04 – revise drafts to incorporate researched information, ideas, and quotations accurately, ethically, and consistently (e.g., incorporate researched information by using parenthetical referencing according to acceptable research methodology; use appropriate words and phrases to introduce borrowed information and ideas; create charts, graphs, or diagrams to incorporate information from research).

Editing, Proofreading, and Publishing

WR5.01 – cite researched information, ideas, and quotations according to acceptable research methodology (e.g., cite sources using a recognized style such as that of the Modern Language Association [MLA] or the traditional footnote/endnote system known as the Chicago style; use parenthetical referencing; create bibliographies);

WR5.02 – produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology to share writing with intended audiences (e.g., adapt an electronic template for the title page of an academic essay; use effective computer graphics, fonts, and typefaces to format a short story for a literary magazine);

WR5.03 – compare their current writing skills with those required in a variety of university programs and occupations and make action plans to address identified needs (e.g., review samples of their own writing to identify strengths and weaknesses);

WR5.04 – edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation listed below:

q Grammar and Usage: use parts of speech correctly and in a consistent manner in writing (e.g., use the possessive case to modify a gerund);

q Grammar and Usage: communicate complex ideas using a variety of sentence structures (e.g., use coordination and subordination for emphasis and to improve clarity; use parallelism and balance as an aid to clarity);

q Grammar and Usage: use pronouns correctly, with particular emphasis on personal, relative, and reflexive pronouns;

q Grammar and Usage: use verb tenses appropriately and correctly (e.g., use the present perfect tense when expressing general truths, when writing about literature, and when summarizing an author’s views; use the past perfect tense to express an action already completed at some specific time in the past);

q Grammar and Usage: use active and passive verb voice effectively to suit purpose and audience (e.g., use the active voice for clarity of expression; recognize the function of the passive voice as used in history and the sciences);

q Grammar and Usage: use parallel structures correctly and for rhetorical effect (e.g., express equal ideas in the same grammatical form, balancing single words with single words, phrases with phrases, clauses with clauses; use parallel structure in the paragraphs of an essay for clarity and emphasis);

q Grammar and Usage: show understanding that grammar may be used unconventionally for a particular effect in advertising, poetry, and for characterization in fiction and drama;

q Spelling: demonstrate an understanding of a wide range of spelling patterns, rules, and strategies by recognizing and correcting their own and others’ spelling errors (e.g., understand the conventions of Canadian, British, and American spelling; recognize difficulty in spelling words ending in cede, ceed, and sede);

q Spelling: spell correctly specific historical, academic, and literary terms used in course materials;

q Spelling: use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and improve spelling (e.g., understand the limitations of electronic spell checkers; use dictionaries when in doubt about spelling);

q Punctuation: use punctuation correctly and thoughtfully to clarify meaning, to show the grammatical relationships between words, and to add emphasis;

q Punctuation: use commas correctly with restrictive and non-restrictive words, phrases, and clauses;

q Punctuation: introduce and punctuate long quotations correctly in the body of an essay.

Language

Overall Expectations

LAV.01 · apply knowledge of the development of the English language, vocabulary and language structures, and the conventions of standard Canadian English to read, write, and speak effectively;

LAV.02 · use listening techniques and oral communication skills to participate in classroom discussions and more formal activities, with a focus on using academic language appropriately in panel discussions, speeches, and group presentations.

Specific Expectations

Developing Vocabulary and Knowledge of Language Structures and Conventions

LA1.01 – apply a variety of strategies to extend vocabulary while reading, with an emphasis on understanding the denotation, connotation, and pronunciation of words (e.g., discuss diction in a poem or novel to explore personal and historical connotations; use knowledge of phonetics to pronounce words they are not used to seeing in print);

LA1.02 – identify and describe the major influences in the development of the English language (e.g., Angles, Saxons, and Jutes; Vikings; Romans; the Norman Conquest of England; the invention of the printing press; colonialism; mass literacy; computer technology; the influence of other languages; the global use of English);

LA1.03 – apply knowledge of prefixes, suffixes, and roots to expand vocabulary (e.g., use an etymological dictionary to identify the original and expanded meanings of words);

LA1.04 – identify specialized and technical language appropriate to academic discussion and use it with precision in oral and written work;

LA1.05 – recognize, describe, and use correctly, in oral and written language, the language structures of standard Canadian English and its conventions of grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation, as prescribed for this course (e.g., consult recognized style guides for information about language conventions).

Developing Listening and Speaking Skills

LA2.01 – communicate orally in large and small groups for a variety of purposes, with a focus on listening for main ideas and significant supporting details; clarifying and extending the ideas of others; using appropriate academic and theoretical language; and evaluating implicit and explicit ideas using criteria such as relevance, accuracy, and bias;

LA2.02 – communicate orally in group discussions, applying such skills as the following: fulfilling roles as required; preparing for discussion; contributing additional and relevant information; asking questions to extend understanding; making notes to track the discussion; completing assigned tasks for the group; working towards consensus; and accepting group decisions when appropriate;

LA2.03 – use critical listening skills to analyse the content of oral presentations (e.g., assess the validity and persuasiveness of explicit and implicit arguments and the truth of conclusions; make inferences and detect assumptions, omissions, and biases; write a synopsis or review using criteria such as coherence, relevance, and logic);

LA2.04 – analyse elements of oral presentations and assess how effectively they are used (e.g., transition words and phrases, level of language, body language, handouts, visual aids, and opportunities to clarify information or answer questions);

LA2.05 – plan and prepare presentations by researching information and ideas; organizing material; selecting language appropriate to the topic, purpose, and audience; and rehearsing and revising;

LA2.06 – use techniques of oral presentation to communicate effectively, with a focus on coherent organization; correct grammar and sentence structure; the use of rhetorical devices such as anecdote, rhetorical questions, short emphatic sentences, and repetition; and the use of voice projection, gestures, body language, timing, visual aids, and technology;

LA2.07 – compare their current oral communication knowledge and skills with those required in a variety of occupations and university programs and make an action plan to address identified needs.

Media Studies

Overall Expectations

MDV.01 · demonstrate an understanding of a variety of media texts, audiences, and industry practices by analysing representations, forms, and techniques in media works;

MDV.02 · demonstrate an understanding of the relationships among form, purpose, audience, and production techniques by designing or creating media works, independently and collaboratively, based on ideas, themes, and issues examined in this course.

Specific Expectations

Analysing Media and Media Works

MD1.01 – demonstrate critical thinking skills by identifying bias and by analysing explicit and implicit messages in media works (e.g., explain the effect of images used in a film; identify the perspective of a newspaper or magazine);

MD1.02 – explain how the form, technique, style, and language of a variety of media forms create meaning (e.g., compare the coverage of a current event by newspapers, radio, television, and Internet websites);

MD1.03 – analyse the relationship between media works and their audiences (e.g., prepare for a panel discussion on how advertising campaigns target different audiences; identify the demographic profile of the target audience for a television show or radio station and assess how the content and advertising match the audience);

MD1.04 – explain the relationship among media works, media industry practices including marketing and distribution methods, and media industry codes and government regulations (e.g., explain the use of media to launch a new product line).

Creating Media Works

MD2.01 – design or create media works based on ideas, themes, and issues examined in this course (e.g., create media works based on a theme from literature, using available resources; write dialogue for a commercial to promote sales of a novel; create a promotional campaign to sell the same idea or service to two or more different audiences);

MD2.02 – use knowledge of the relationships among form, purpose, audience, and production options to explain choices made in the design or production of media works (e.g., present media works to peers and explain solutions to problems encountered during the production process).

 

 

 

Unit 1 | Course Profiles Main Menu