Course Profile
Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology, Grade 11,
University/College Preparation, Catholic
Unit 1: Self and Others
Time: 38 hours
Activity 1 | Activity 2
| Activity 3 | Activity 4
| Activity 5 | Activity 6
| Activity 7 | Activity 8
| Activity 9 | Activity
10
This
unit is divided into three areas of concentration. The topics within the unit
are organized in a manner that builds upon the understanding and development of
a self-concept, which leads to an examination of how others influence the
development of self-concept, and how socialization occurs. The fundamental
questions that lie at the heart of anthropological, psychological, and
sociological thought must be addressed first. These questions would include:
Who are we? Where do we come from? How do we develop as a society? Why do
humans feel the need to interact with each other? What impact does culture have
on our personal development? etc. Students are asked to evaluate the major
contributions of at least one leading practitioner in each of the disciplines.
It is expected that students use the terminology of anthropology, psychology,
and sociology appropriately as they develop an understanding of the
interrelated nature of the three disciplines. The forces that influence and
shape behaviour are identified and analysed in order to explain why behaviour
varies. The latter part of this unit focuses on identifying the primary and
secondary agents of socialization that influence the development of individuals
within different cultures while applying the theories of anthropology,
psychology, and sociology.
Research
and inquiry skills should be developed throughout the course. This unit
provides an excellent opportunity to develop student understanding of the
foundations of inquiry in anthropology, psychology, and sociology. This could
be accomplished through an introduction to the inquiry process, critical
thinking skills, rudimentary research skills and processes, and an introduction
to the computer as a research tool. Students should begin the ISU (research
paper/assignment) by developing research questions and hypotheses.
|
Activity |
Time |
Expectations |
Ach. |
Tasks |
|
1. “I
am…” |
90 min |
SOV.01,
ISV.01, SO1.01, IS1.01, CGE2b, CGE3e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Students
complete, categorize and share Students
define anthropology, psychology and sociology using a textbook. Students
apply definitions by re-categorizing their “I am…” lists according to the
question each discipline would ask and share in class discussion |
|
2. Theorists
of Psychology |
720 min |
SOV.01,
ISV.01, ISV.02, ISV.03, SO1.02, IS1.03, IS2.03, IS3.02, CGE1e, CGE2c, CGE2d,
CGE2e, CGE3e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Discuss
and apply scientific method to Pavlov’s classical conditioning experiment. Examine
Watson’s and Skinner’s experiments in behaviour. Class
discussion on ethical research and Catholic Church’s position on conducting
scientific research. Students
create plans to change behaviour. Lecture
on Freud’s theory Apply Freud’s theory to an excerpt from a popular novel or
psychological novel. Discuss
Horney’s theory. Discuss
and read Piaget’s and Erickson’s theories. Students create list of behaviours
indicating unresolved issues. Solving
dilemmas and discussing Kohlberg’s theory (Appendix 1.2.1). Discussion
on needs of humans at different points in life and Maslow’s theory |
|
3.
Theorists of Sociology |
270 min |
SOV.01,
SO1.02, CGE2d, CGE3e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Role-play
scenarios to explore how we construct meaning from words and discuss George
Herbert Mead’s theory. Generate
list of non-verbal cues and meanings. Role-play
conflicting action statements scenarios. Discuss
Goffman’s Theory. Discuss
language acquisition and acceptable behaviour. Read
about Harlow monkey experiment and feral children |
|
4. Theorists
of Anthro-pology |
340 min |
SOV.01,
ISV.01, ISV.02, ISV.03, SO1.02, IS1.03, IS2.04, IS2.05, IS2.06, IS3.02,
CGE2c, CGE2d, CGE2e, CGE3e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Group
research and presentation on major contributions of various anthropologists |
|
5.
Personal and Social Development |
60 min |
SOV.02,
SO2.01, CGE2d, CGE4a, CGE4e, CGE4g |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Brainstorm
a list of things that influence personal and social development. Analyse
milestones of human development |
|
6.
Behaviour |
120 min |
SOV.02,
SO2.03, IS1.03, CGE3d |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Analyse
variances in behaviour from film and discussion of how an individual alters
their behaviour to suit their audience |
|
7.
Influence of Media on the Self |
360 min |
SOV.02,
ISV.03, SO2.02, IS3.02, CGE2c, CGE2e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
View
the film Killing Us Softly and then analyse advertisements and the
messages they portray. Analyse
role and prevalence of violence in media |
|
8. Agents of Socialization |
60 min |
SOV.03, SO3.01, SO3.02, SO3.04, CGE1d, CGE6a |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Complete and discuss gender role
socialization handout (Appendix 1.8.1). List and rank five things that have
influenced who you are. Categorize lists into primary and secondary
agents of socialization |
|
9.
Theories of Socialization |
210 min |
SOV.03,
ISV.01, SO3.03, IS1.02, IS1.03, CGE3e |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Video
creation and presentation demonstrating an understanding of the differences
in the three disciplines studied |
|
10. ISU
Introduction |
60 min |
ISV.01,
IS1.04 |
K/U, T/I, C, A |
Students
develop research questions and hypotheses for independent study project |
Time: 90 minutes
Students
generate a list of statements about themselves. Next the students are asked to
develop categories and classify their statements. Finally, the students are
asked to define anthropology, psychology and sociology, and apply these
definitions to their list of statements.
Strand(s): Foundations of
Anthropological, Psychological, and Sociological Thought; Understanding the
Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology
Overall Expectations: SOV.01, ISV.01.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
demonstrate and understanding of the major questions related to “self and
others” that are posed by anthropologists (e.g., What are the cultural patterns
that help to define the self?), psychologists (e.g., How do defence mechanisms
enable us to cope with others?), and sociologists (e.g., What is the
relationship between the individual and society?);
IS1.01 -
correctly use the terminology of anthropology, psychology, and sociology (e.g.,
functionalism, behaviouralism, feminism).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE2b -
reads, understands and uses written materials effectively;
CGE3e -
adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject
areas and experience.
In preparing
to discuss classification of “I am...”
statements according to the three different disciplines, the teacher needs to
be familiar with the definitions, examples, and analogies of anthropology
(functionalism), psychology (behaviouralism), and sociology (feminism).
1. Students
are asked to complete a list of statements beginning with “I am…” (15-20
statements). Afterwards, they are asked to examine their lists to determine the
major influences/groups with which they identify themselves. Categories are
likely to include: gender, ethnicity, religion, physical descriptors,
interests, etc. Students consider their lists independently and then, in a
“Think/Pair/Share” framework, consult a partner in order to re-evaluate their
lists and categories. With their partners, students analyse their lists to
determine what their lists suggest about themselves and what they suggest about
the communities in which they live. Using their textbooks and other sources,
students will define anthropology, psychology, and sociology. They apply this
new understanding by re-evaluating their lists according to the questions each
discipline would ask, e.g., anthropology – about traditions/culture; psychology
– about internal factors; sociology – about external factors.
2. Students share how they have categorized
their “I am” statements into the three disciplines facilitated by the teacher
to broaden and deepen student understanding of the disciplines comparing
anthropology (functionalism), psychology (behaviourism), and sociology
(feminism).
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of the different approaches to self by the three
disciplines
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ Understanding and Application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during class discussion
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
ESL
students may have problems understanding the use of slang. They may require
encouragement to share their thoughts with the class.
Sproule, W. Our Social World: An
Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and Sociology. Prentice Hall,
2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Time: 720 minutes
Students
will become familiar with some of the different theories and classical
experiments of psychology, such as Pavlov’s classical conditioning, Skinner’s
behaviourism, Freud’s psychoanalysis, Piaget’s cognitive development,
Erickson’s psychosocial states of personality development, Kohlberg’s moral
development and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Students will examine the steps
and ethics involved in applying the scientific method. Finally, students will
explore the Catholic Church’s and personal stances on controversial issues.
Strand(s): Foundations of
Anthropological, Psychological, and Sociological Thought; Understanding the
Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology; Using
Research Skills; Communicating Results
Overall
Expectation: SOV.01, ISV.01, ISV.02, ISV.03.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.02 -
evaluate the major contributions to our understanding of the idea of self in
relation to others by at least one of the leading practitioners in each of
anthropology (e.g., Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict), psychology
(e.g., Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget, Karen Horney), and sociology (e.g., George
Herbert Mead, Irving Goffman);
IS1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the factors that explain human behaviour from
the perspective of anthropology (e.g., myth, kinship), psychology (e.g.,
conditioning, subconscious), and sociology (e.g., socialization and social
interaction);
IS2.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the ethical guidelines of social science
research;
IS3.02 -
effectively communicate the results of their inquiries using a variety of
methods and forms (e.g., graphs, charts, diagrams, lab reports, oral
presentations, written reports, essays, newspaper-style articles, video
presentations).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE1e -
speaks the language of life… “recognizing that life is an unearned gift and
that a person entrusted with life does not own it but that one is called to
protect and cherish it” (Witnesses to Faith);
CGE2c -
presents information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to
others;
CGE2d -
writes and speaks fluently in one or both of Canada’s official languages;
CGE2e -
uses and integrates the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of
the arts, media, technology, and information systems to enhance the quality of
life;
CGE3e -
adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject
areas and experience.
Students
should be familiar with the scientific method studied in Grades 9 and 10
Science.
·
The
teacher will need to comfortable in discussing and explaining the theories of
the following theorists: Pavlov, Skinner, Freud, Piaget, Horney, Erikson,
Kohlberg, and Maslow.
·
The
teacher should create summary charts or models for each of the above-mentioned
theorists.
·
The
teacher should locate any suggested films or videos that they wish to use and
book required equipment.
·
The
teacher should locate a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church
·
The
teacher should consider assigning research project after discussing scientific
method.
1. The
teacher introduces Pavlov’s classical conditioning experiment through
discussion or video clip. After discussing this classical experiment, the
teacher will review and apply the steps of the scientific method to Pavlov’s
experiment. Some things to consider include:
a) How can you get a dog to respond to a bell?
b) How can you get a dog to associate a bell with food?
c) How can you measure the effectiveness of the conditioning?
Notes created by the students would include the need to develop a
hypothesis, creating a method to test the hypothesis, noting observations and
measurement of achievement, and formulating a conclusion.
2. The
teacher introduces Watson’s and Skinner’s operant conditioning experiments
(behaviour modification) through discussion or video clip. Today experiments
must be conducted in an ethical manner. Students could consider the ethical
questions that arise from Watson’s experimentation on young children and fear.
(Watson’s experiment involved making a loud noise whenever a young child was exposed
to a fury white animal creating a phobia in the child about rabbits. The
experiment initially was planned to later attempt to remove the fear but the
child’s mother immediately withdrew her child from the experiment and therefore
phobia extinction did not occur.) Through a teacher lead class discussion,
students consider the Catholic Church’s position on conducting scientific
research, sections 2292-2294 in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
3. The teacher assigns pairs of students to
develop a behaviour modification plan to change a behaviour, such as
extinguishing a phobia, increasing the frequency of occurrence of a desirable
behaviour, or decreasing the frequency of occurrence of an undesirable
behaviour, based on class discussion of behaviourism. Students will present
their behaviour modification plans to the class for evaluation.
4. The teacher lectures on Freud’s theories.
Students read an excerpt from popular novels or psychological journals in order
to apply Freud’s theories. What might account for a character’s abnormal
behaviour? Responses may be submitted for evaluation. Karen Horney’s theories
are introduced, illustrating how she tried to balance Freud’s approach by
considering both internal and external forces that shape behaviour, where Freud
had only considered the internal forces.
5. Piaget’s theories on cognitive development
are introduced by the teacher through illustrations of how children’s cognitive
processes develop (e.g., show a video excerpt of a child developing an
understanding of object permanence, etc.). Students are directed to relevant
information about Piaget.
6. The students read about Eric Erickson’s
stages of psychosocial development from their textbooks or teacher created
handouts and are asked to generate a list of behaviours that could indicate
that an individual has unresolved issues in one of Erickson’s stages. In
addition the students may generate a list of possible causes for such
behaviours (unresolved issues).
7. In presenting Kohlberg’s theories on moral
development, students are presented with a dilemma and asked in groups to
evaluate different scenarios analysing the reasoning (Appendix 1.2.1). In
addition, students can be challenged to consider the Catholic Church’s position
on a variety of controversial issues, such as:
a) cloning
b) artificial insemination;(section 2376, 2377 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
c) abortion; (section 2270-2275 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
d) separation of conjoined twins to save one life; (section 2296 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
e) eugenics; (section 2268 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
f) euthanasia; (section 2277 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
g) discontinuing medical treatment; (section 2278, 2279 Catechism of the Catholic Church)
8. Students are asked to generate a list in
response to the following question: What specifically do you need to develop as
a human being? To further develop their understanding, small student groups
will brainstorm a list of needs and objectives for a specific age (e.g., a two-year-old,
a ten-year-old, a sixteen-year-old, a twenty-five-year-old, a
thirty-five-year-old, a sixty-five-year-old, and a seventy-five-year-old).
Students, aided by the teacher, would then fit these needs into Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs.
9. The students will write a test or the
students could create an organizer to summarize and compare the different
psychological theories.
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s Understanding of the different approaches to self by psychologists
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during class discussion
·
Peer
and teacher evaluations of behaviour modification presentations
·
Teacher
evaluation of written responses applying Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis to
film
·
Summative
evaluation of the different psychological theories studied or culminating
organizer submitted by students
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Modify
terms or provide a glossary for each theory for ESL students.
·
Provide
preferential seating for identified students during presentations.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with writing difficulties to complete written
tasks and tests.
·
Alternative
assignments such as collages or verbal reports may be substituted for written
assignments.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society.
Catechism
of the Catholic Church
Websites
Psychology.Net
– www.psychology.net
Developmental
Psychology – www.apa.org/journals/dev.html
Social
Psychology Archives – http://swix.ch/clan/ks/CPSPI.htm
Appendix
1.2.1 – Moral Reasoning Dilemmas
1. A man steals expensive drugs to save his
desperately ill wife who will die without the medication. Should he be
punished?
2. A boy steals a loaf of bread to feed his
siblings who, like himself, have been abandoned and live on the street. Should
he be arrested?
3. A priest takes confession from a man who has
confessed to the brutal murder of a child. What should he do?
4. Man A murders Man B who had sexually molested
man A’s son. Is Man A justified in doing this?
5. A woman accidentally hits a parked car in a parking
lot while attempting to leave. There are no witnesses to the accident. Should
she leave her address or phone number?
6. While walking in the mall the person 10 feet
ahead of you drops a large roll of money from a pocket without noticing it. Do
you tell the person?
7. You have knowledge that your best friend’s
wife is cheating on him. Do you tell him/her?
8. Your father is gravely ill with untreatable
cancer. He is in great pain and on life support. He begs you to disconnect the
machine and let him die. What should you do?
9. You are a soldier in combat. One of your
comrades is critically wounded and can’t be moved. If the enemy captures your
friend he will most certainly be tortured. What are your options?
10. A man and woman married for 15 years discover
they are, in reality, brother and sister, separated and adopted while infants.
They have 3 children. What should they do?
11. You are a doctor in charge of an
invitro-fertilization clinic. You have been substituting your sperm for donor’s
sperm and may have fathered over 200 children. What impact might this have on
our society?
12. You are a single, teenage girl (15) who was
drugged and raped at a party last night by several young men. Your parents are
practicing Roman Catholics, who cannot stand public embarrassment and thought
you were at the library. What should you do?
Time: 270 minutes
Students
will become familiar with some of the different theories and experiments of sociology,
from George Herbert Mead, Irvin Goffman, and Harry Harlow.
Overall
Expectations: SOV.01.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.02 -
evaluate the major contributions to our understanding of the idea of self in
relation to others by at least one of the leading practitioners in each of
anthropology (e.g., Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict), psychology
(e.g., Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget, Karen Horney), and sociology (e.g., George
Herbert Mead, Irving Goffman).
CGE2d -
writes and speaks fluently in one or both of
CGE3e - adopts
a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject areas
and experience.
·
In
this activity, the teacher will need to discuss and explain the theories or
experiments of the following: George Herbert Mead, Irvin Goffman, and Harry
Harlow.
·
The
teacher should construct role-play scenarios or make arrangements for someone
to dramatically interrupt class.
·
The
teacher should locate the videos and equipment required.
1. Propose different scenarios to the students
for role-playing exercises in order to explore how we construct meaning from
words, etc. Males are to assume the role of a female and females to assume the
role of a male. While the role-playing is going, other students are assigned to
be observers. They should be directed to take note of participants’ words as
well as tone of voice, body language, proximity, etc. Afterwards, the class
examines the observations directed by the teacher leading into the application
of George Herbert Mead’s theories of roles, language, and what we think
happened. (Another option would be to make arrangements for the class to be
interrupted by an altercation where the class is then asked to record their
recollections of the event to be examined in light of these theories as well.)
Possible scenarios include:
a) a police officer pulling over a driver on a lonely, dark road
b) an attractive server dealing with a table of patrons of the opposite sex
c) asking someone out on a date
d) teacher-student confrontation
e) doctor-patient in consultation.
f) parent-child; curfew has been broken or the car dented, etc.
2. In
order to study Irving Goffman’s theories students are first asked to generate a
list of ten non-verbal cues and their meaning, e.g., clothing, colours, etc.
Next, students are given an action and a statement to role-play before the
class. The class is to determine what the emotion or message that is being
communicated, e.g., slam the door while saying, “I’m fine.” In addition, or
alternatively, the class could watch an excerpt an acceptable video without the
sound in an effort to determine what they believe is actually going on. After
discussing their interpretation the class would then compare their
interpretation with the reality by watching the same excerpt with the sound.
Finally, students summarize Goffman’s theories.
3. Begin class with a discussion of student
experiences with language acquisition and learning acceptable behaviour. How
did they learn these things? Use resources to review case studies of isolates.
Afterwards, the teacher may start a class discussion on the effect of neglect
on children and the failure to thrive. In addition, students should read about
the Harlow Monkey Experiment. Students, when presented with the premise of the
experiment, could be asked to predict which “mother” the monkeys would choose
and why. Finally, students should read about feral children in their texts.
4. Students will write a brief evaluation of
what they feel is the most important determining factor that is responsible for
the early development of humans (nature vs. nurture).
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of the different approaches to self by the sociologists
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic values
by using probe questions during class discussion
·
Teacher
evaluation of written responses to determining factors responsible for the
early development of humans
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Modify
terms or provide a glossary for each theory for ESL students.
·
Preferential
seating for identified students during presentations.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with writing difficulties to complete written
tasks.
·
Alternative
assignments such as collages or verbal reports may be substituted for written
assignments.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Appropriate
video. excerpt to study verbal and non-verbal communication
Websites
– www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/timeline.html
(Sociology Timeline)
– www.spc.uchicago.edu/ssrl/PRELIMS/theory.html
(Classical Sociological Theory)
– www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/family.html
(Marriage and Family Resources)
– www.geocities.com/College
Park/Library/8419/wbpthfnd.html (Socioworld)
Time: 340 minutes
Students
will develop research and Internet skills, as they direct their own learning
experiences. Students will summarize and present the contributions of leading
anthropologists, such as Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict, etc.
Strand(s): Foundations of
Anthropological, Psychological, and Sociological Thought; Understanding the
Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology; Using
Research Skills; Communicating Results
Overall
Expectations: SOV.01, ISV.01, ISV.02,
ISV.03.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.02 -
evaluate the major contributions to our understanding of the idea of self in
relation to others by at least one of the leading practitioners in each of
anthropology (e.g., Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict), psychology
(e.g., Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget, Karen Horney), and sociology (e.g., George
Herbert Mead, Irving Goffman);
IS1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the factors that explain human behaviour from
the perspective of anthropology (e.g., myth, kinship), psychology (e.g.,
conditioning, subconscious), and sociology (e.g., socialization and social
interaction);
IS2.04 -
demonstrate an ability to locate and select relevant information from a variety
of print and electronic sources (e.g., books, periodicals, television, Internet
sites, CD-ROMs);
IS2.05 -
evaluate the relevance and validity of information gathered through research;
IS2.06 -
demonstrate an ability to organize, interpret, and analyse information gathered
from a variety of sources;
IS3.02 -
effectively communicate the results of their inquiries using a variety of
methods and forms (e.g., graphs, charts, diagrams, lab reports, oral
presentations, written reports, essays, newspaper-style articles, video presentations).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE2c -
presents information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to
others;
CGE2d -
writes and speaks fluently in one or both of Canada’s official languages;
CGE2e -
uses and integrates the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of
the arts, media, technology, and information systems to enhance the quality of
life;
CGE3e -
adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject
areas and experience.
The
teacher should book time in the Library/Resource Centre or computer lab in
order to facilitate student research
1. Use
research handouts: a) evaluating websites (Appendix 1.4.1) and b) analysing an
issue
(Appendix 1.4.2). Discuss research project expectations.
2. Students
form groups in order to research the major contributions of anthropologists
such as: Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict, Jane Goodall, Diane Fossey,
the Leakeys, etc. Groups can be evaluated both by themselves, as individuals
and their groups as well as by the teacher. Students could be involved in the
process by being asked to collaborate on setting the criteria for assessment
and evaluation.
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic values
by using probe questions during roving conferences and presentations
·
Peer
and teacher evaluations of presentations.
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance, or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Preferential
seating for identified students during presentations.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
research and written tasks.
·
ESL
students may require greater assistance with understanding through the use of
translation dictionaries or being partnered with cooperative students, and
modified teacher expectations where appropriate.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Websites
– http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/afaq.html
(Anthropology Resources on the Net)
– www.tamu.edu/anthropolgy/news.html
(Anthropology in the News)
– www.ameranthassn.org/careers.htm Careers in
Anthropology
–
www.wsu.edu:8001/vcsusu/commons/topics/culture/culture-index.html (What is
Culture?)
Appendix
4.1.1 – Evaluating The Information Highway
Appendix
4.1.2 – Analysis of An Issue
Evaluating
Websites
There is
no guarantee that all the free information you receive from the Internet is
correct. You can make better decisions and produce more effective work if you
use you critical analysis skills to evaluate information for relevance, bias,
variety of viewpoints, and reliability. Always keep in mind the following three
questions:
1. Who is speaking to me?
2. What is the purpose of the information?
3. Do I have enough information from different
viewpoints to reach an accurate conclusion and express an informed opinion?
Use the following chart to help evaluate a
Website:
|
Website
address |
|
|
How
reliable is it? |
|
|
Who is
the author? |
|
|
Why
have they produced this site? |
|
|
Is the information
backed by research, references, or a bibliography? |
|
|
Is
advertising part of the site? |
|
|
How
well organized is the site? |
|
|
Are
there useful links to other sites? |
|
|
Are the
resources complete, or is there only an index or table of contents? |
|
|
When
was it last updated? |
|
|
How
well designed is it? |
|
|
Is it
visually appealing? |
|
|
Is it
easy to find things on the site? |
|
Source
– Civics Curriculum Resource Manual
Here are
some useful guidelines to keep in mind when analysing information in an
article:
1. Read the article first to gain a general
understanding of its message.
2. What is the purpose of this article?
· to provide information
· to influence
· to entertain
3. Who wrote the article? Do you know if the
writer is connected to the issue?
4. Read the article again and underline any real
facts (not opinions) in a bright colour.
5. In another colour, underline any words or
terms that are new to you, and that you need to investigate for meaning.
Transfer them to your notebook and write a definition for them – use a
dictionary or ask someone what they mean.
6. Conduct a Who? What? Where? When? Why?
Analysis, taking information from the article and writing the answers in your
notebook.
· Who? List the main “players” people or groups involved in the issue. Are all the people involved in the issue represented in the article? Is there a missing point of view?
· What? What is the issue? What is the position of each of the main players? Write main points beside each of the “players” in your list.
· Where? Where did the story take place? Are there other important locations involved in the issue?
· When? When did this story take place? Is time an important factor in the story?
· Why? Why is this an issue?
7. What is the main message of this article?
8. Do you have enough information to form your
own opinion on the issue? If not, where would you look to find more?
9. How does this issue affect you? If it is not
a concern in your area, how might it affect a student living nearby? How might
this issue affect us all?
10. Research other sources such as newspapers, the
Internet, or television news stories, to see if other media outlets have also
dealt with the issue. Are there differences or similarities among the different
stories?
Source
– Civics Curriculum Resource Manual
Time: 60 minutes
Students brainstorm
a list of influences that have assisted them in developing a self-identity and
discuss the attainment of various milestones in their lives.
Strand(s): Forces That
Influence and Shape Behaviour
Overall Expectations: SOV.02.
Specific
Expectations
SO2.01 -
identify and assess the major influences that contribute to an individual’s
personal and social development (e.g., heredity, environment, race, gender);
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE2d -
writes and speaks fluently one or both of Canada’s official languages;
CGE4a -
demonstrates a confident and positive sense of self and respect for the dignity
and welfare of others;
CGE4e -
sets appropriate goals and priorities in school, work, and personal life;
CGE4g -
examines and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities, and aspirations
influencing life’s choices and opportunities.
The
teacher should be prepared to deal with possible disclosures of abuse.
1. In groups or as a class, brainstorm a list of
things that influence individual personal and social development, e.g.,
heredity, environment, race, gender, etc.
2. Through a class discussion have students
reflect on a list of milestones in a person’s life focusing on the influence of
heredity, environment, race, gender, etc. The following is a list of milestones
that could be used:
a) When were you toilet trained?
b) When did you start dressing yourself and selecting your own clothing?
c) When did you start school?
d) When were you first allowed to go to school alone?
e) When did you learn to print and recognize your own name?
f) When did you learn to ride a bicycle?
g) When did you learn to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate language/behaviour?
h) When were you first allowed to participate in recreational activities without parental supervision?
i) Have you developed a respect or mistrust for authority figures (e.g., police, teachers, parents, court system, etc.)?
j) When did you learn to drive a car?
k) When, if ever, will you get married?
Using
this list ask the students who helped them reach these milestones and what
characteristics or stages of the three disciplines are reflected in the
achievement of these goals.
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of the different approaches to self-development
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during class discussion
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Time: 120 minutes
Students
will determine the how different contexts may affect an individual’s behaviour.
Strand(s): Forces That
Influence and Shape Behaviour
Overall
Expectations: SOV.02.
Specific
Expectations
SO2.03 -
explain why behaviour varies depending on context and on the individuals
involved (e.g., at work, within a family, in sports, in a crowd, in a large
city or small town or by mental illness);
IS1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the factors that explain human behaviour from
the perspective of anthropology (e.g., myth, kinship), psychology (e.g.,
conditioning, subconscious), and sociology (e.g., socialization, social
interaction).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE3d -
makes decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience.
1. Show excerpts of a film, where the central
characters vary their behaviour according to their audience. Students should be
directed to observe and record the variances in the central characters
behaviour. Students should also suggest possible reasons for the variances in
the central characters differences in behaviour. Student responses could be
submitted for evaluation.
2. Through a class discussion and possible
role-playing have students explore how their own behaviour is influenced by the
context of the situation and the individuals involved. For example, how does
one’s behaviour change on the question of premarital sex or public displays of
affection in the following contexts alone, among peers, family discussions, in
a crowd, etc. Students should also consider cultural differences that influence
these judgments.
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of how situations and context influence behaviour.
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during class discussion.
·
Teacher
evaluations of written responses.
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Preferential
seating for identified students during presentations.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
written task.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Films – (check with your
board to see if films are licensed for use)
Rainman
Three
Faces of Eve
Sybill
Harvey
Harold
and Maude.
Nature
of Things: Do Parents Matter?
Nature of
Things: The Terror of Being Lost.
Time: 360 minutes
Students
analyse various types of media to determine how they manipulate the viewer.
Students also investigate the role and prevalence of violence in various forms
of media.
Strand(s): Forces That
Influence and Shape Behaviour; Communicating Results
Overall
Expectations: SOV.02, ISV.03.
Specific
Expectations
SO2.02 -
analyse the role of the mass media in influencing individual and group
behaviour;
IS3.02 - effectively
communicate the results of their inquiries using a variety of methods and forms
(e.g., graphs, charts, diagrams, lab reports, oral presentations, written
reports, essays, newspaper-style articles, video presentations).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE2c - presents information and ideas clearly
and honestly and with sensitivity to others;
CGE2e -
uses and integrated the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of
the arts, media, technology, and information systems to enhance the quality of
life.
1. Students watch Killing Us Softly or Still
Killing Us Softly, which, while somewhat dated, show how advertisements
manipulate the viewer. Afterwards, students working alone or in partners could
analyse advertisements they have found in the print media in order to determine
how the advertisers package their message and the underlying messages concealed
in the advertisements. Students should be directed to consider the following
elements:
a) Slogan phrasing
b) Product shape
c) Product placement
d) Model posture
e) Appeal to senses
f) Appeal to emotions
2. Through class discussion or small group
discussions have students critically reflect on the following:
a. Do the media feed the violence or does violence feed the media in our society? For example, what makes gangster rap so violent? Is it a reflection of a violent society or is it created merely for profit, feeding society’s need for violence?
b. In the absence of violent news stories to cover do the media generate violence to satisfy a need in our society?
3. In order to determine the influence of
violence in the media, students break up into groups and analyse the role and
prevalence of violence in particular television programs, music, video games,
etc. The class must first create a structure for the evaluation. After the
expert groups present their findings in a jigsaw group, they could then decide
whether one arm of the media is more violent than another and explain why they
feel that way.
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of the media’s influence in individual and group
behaviour
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during class discussions, roving conferences
and presentations
·
Peer
and teacher evaluations of presentations
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Preferential
seating for identified students during presentations.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
research and written tasks.
Textbooks
Sproule, W. Our Social World: An
Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and Sociology. Prentice Hall,
2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Films
Killing
Us Softly
Still
Killing Us Softly
Other
Local
Newspaper
Magazines
(Advertisements)
Time: 60 minutes
Students
will investigate and compare gender role socialization across cultures through
completion of a handout, small group discussions, and class discussions.
Students also create a list of socialization agents and classify these agents
as primary or secondary sources of socialization.
Strand(s): Socialization
Overall
Expectations: SOV.03.
Specific
Expectations
SO3.01 -
explain the role of socialization in the development of the individual;
SO3.02 -
identify the primary and secondary agents of socialization (e.g., family,
school, peers, media, work) and evaluate their influence;
SO3.04 -
evaluate the role of cultural influences in socialization (e.g., as they affect
gender expectations).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE1d -
develops attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to
promote social responsibility, human solidarity and the common good;
CGE6a -
relates to family members in a loving, compassionate and respectful manner.
Obtain
chart paper and markers. If using transparencies, have sufficient quantities of
transparencies and overhead markers on hand.
1. Have students
complete gender role socialization handout individually or in small groups
(Appendix 1.8.1) and discuss in class. Complete this assignment with a cultural
comparison of gender expectations. For example, how are women from Japan, Saudi
Arabia, and Canada socialized differently? (Please ensure you cover
similarities also.)
2. Students
are asked to list five things that have influenced who they are and then rank
the influence of each. Students then share their lists (writing them on the
board, on chart paper, or on transparencies). Lists should later be categorized
(family, church, school, etc.). Lists would then be further defined by
determining those that are primary and those that are secondary sources of
socialization. The teacher would facilitate this by asking students with whom
they spend the greatest amount of time.
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s understanding of the agents of socialization involved in gender
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic values
by using probe questions during class discussion
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
written tasks.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Films
Nature of
Things – Do Parents Matter?
Appendix
1.8.1 – The Andarians: A Gender Role Socialization Exercise
Part I
An
observer has sent back a report describing a new community recently discovered.
Based upon your examination of statements pulled from the observer’s report,
determine the gender of those described in each statement.
1. The Andarian, loaded down with packages,
grasped the child by the hand to cross the street.
2. The heavily muscled Andarian exhibited little
visible sign of pain after being attacked by a creature.
3. This Andarian usually dresses in flowing
robes.
4. Many Andarians enjoy playing a game that requires
great speed and agility. In fact, there is a highly paid professional league.
5. Well educated, the Andarian leader is also a
highly decorated war veteran.
6. Traditionally, Andarians in clerical work and
child-care are paid less than those who are in construction.
7. As a young Andarian couple prepared to go out
together, one was instructed to keep a communication device handy at all times
while the other was threatened with bodily harm should anything “happen.”
8. As children, these Andarians admire the
professional athletes and many assert they too will join “the pros.”
9. Slim, this Andarian is highly sought after
and highly paid as a model.
10. Homemakers are highly respected in the
Andarian community. When homemakers unite on a political issue the government
is quick to take notice.
Part II
Examine
your responses to each of the statements in Part I to answer the following
questions:
A. What were clues that indicated gender, in your
opinion? Why?
B. What are factors that may have influenced
your view of gender roles? Why?
Time: 210 minutes
Students
effectively demonstrate their understanding of theories and their application
from each of the disciplines studied in this unit, through the creation of a
video presentation.
Strand(s): Socialization Understanding
the Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology
Overall
Expectations: SOV.03, ISV.01.
Specific
Expectations
SO3.03 - demonstrate
an understanding of anthropological, psychological, and sociological theories
that deal with socialization (e.g., enculturation, nature versus nurture,
social isolation);
IS1.02 -
define concepts that are central to anthropology (e.g., evolution, diffusion,
culture), psychology (e.g., perception, cognition, personality), and sociology
(e.g., role, gender, institution);
IS1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the factors that explain human behaviour from
the perspective of anthropology (e.g., myth, kinship), psychology (e.g.,
conditioning, subconscious), and sociology (e.g., socialization, social
interaction).
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE3e -
adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject
areas and experience.
Students
need to know how to operate video equipment, if they tape their own
presentations.
·
The
teacher may arrange to have a videotape and video camera available for taping
student productions.
·
The
teacher may want to
·
If
the classroom space is too confining, the teacher may wish to book a larger
area within the school.
·
The
teacher may want to create an evaluation tool to facilitate student
understanding of the assignment expectations.
1. Students demonstrate their overall
understanding/perception of factors that explain human behaviour, socialization,
or self-development by producing a 10-15 minute video. This video may include
interviews with one theorist from each of the main disciplines or a skit that
effectively illustrates the reasons behind typical human interactions. This
skit may include humour, pathos, etc.
·
Roving
conference by the teacher to ensure the students are on task while in small
groups and to aid students with any concerns they may have
·
Informal
teacher assessment using probe questions to collect evidence of the individual
student’s Understanding of the central concepts and theories in anthropology,
psychology, and sociology
·
Informal
teacher assessment of students’ understanding and application of Catholic
values by using probe questions during roving conferences and presentations
·
Peer
and teacher evaluations of presentations
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
written tasks.
Video
camera
Videotape
Editing
equipment
Time: 60 minutes
Students develop
suitable topics of investigation in anthropology, psychology, or sociology. In
particular the students focus on the formulating research questions and
hypotheses for their intended topic of investigation
Strand(s): Understanding the
Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology
Overall
Expectations: ISV.01.
Specific
Expectations
IS1.04 -
formulate appropriate questions for research and inquiry relating to one or
more of the main areas of concern in the social sciences.
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations
CGE3e -
adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject
areas and experience.
1. Teacher should present the requirements of
the ISU project to the class.
2. Teacher may lead class through an example of
formulating questions and hypotheses on a topic of investigation. Then give
students some class time to develop topics of investigation.
3. Students should sign up for topics of
investigation in order to receive teacher approval. You may want to give
students a day or two to come up with a topic.
Roving conference by the teacher to ensure the
students are on task while in small groups and to aid students with any
concerns they may have
·
Consult
IEPs for any identified students. Accommodations such as having a scribe,
reading assistance or enlargement of text may be necessary.
·
Extra
time is allotted to students with reading and writing difficulties to complete
written tasks.
Textbooks
Sproule,
W. Our Social World: An Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology and
Sociology. Prentice Hall, 2001.
Gerrard,
Dennis. Images of Society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001.
Appendix
1.10.1 – Essay Evaluation Form
|
Student |
Course: |
Grade |
||
|
Topic: |
Date: |
|||
|
Format
(5) |
Title
Page (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Page
Numbering (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Margins/Borders
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Line
Spacing (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices/Graphs
(1) |
|
|
|
|
Introduction
(5) |
Creation
of reader interest (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Movement
from the general topic to specific topic (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly
stated theme or thesis (2) |
|
|
|
|
Content
(40) |
Clarity
of information (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
and coherence of the argument (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
and depth of analysis (supporting facts and details) (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship
of each paragraph to theme (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depth of
research (8) |
|
|
|
|
Organization
(15) |
Sentence
and paragraph structure (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Coherence
of the entire essay (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transition
and coherence of ideas in paragraphs (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity
of topic sentences (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Variety
of sentence structure (3) |
|
|
|
|
Style
(10) |
Appropriate
level of vocabulary (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency
of point of view (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency
of tense (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity
and freshness of style (2) |
|
|
|
|
Mechanics
(10) |
Sentences
structure (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation (5) |
|
|
|
|
Documentation
(10) |
Correct
footnote format (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
of sources (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Correct
Bibliography/References (4) |
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
(5) |
Summary
of thesis or theme |
|
|
|
|
|
Synthesis
of arguments and ideas |
|
|
|
|
General
Comments |
|
|
|
|
Course Overview | Course Profiles Main
Menu