Course
Profile
English: Contemporary Aboriginal
Voices, Grade 11, College Preparation, Public
Unit 3: Sovereignty
Time: 25 hours
Activity 1 | Activity 2
| Activity 3 | Activity 4
| Activity 5
In this
unit, students examine the evolving nature of the concept of sovereignty. They
demonstrate an understanding of the traditional view of Aboriginal communities,
which reflects the relationships among the Creator, the Land, and the People.
They assess contemporary interpretations of sovereignty, which include such
issues as personal identity, the challenges of Aboriginal empowerment, and the
evolving relationship with Canadian society, through learning activities that
develop critical-thinking skills. Students assess the ways in which various
literary, informational, and media texts reflect the evolving concept of
sovereignty. Knowledge of language conventions and personal voice are key
elements in understanding the various expressions of sovereignty and in
articulating their own views – personal, spiritual, collective, and political.
Strand(s): Sovereignty,
Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.01 -
describe the issues of identity and culture as they relate to sovereignty, as
expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.02 -
describe how sovereignty is expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the language used in Aboriginal works in
connection with sovereignty issues;
SOV.04 -
apply their knowledge of vocabulary and language conventions to read, write,
and speak effectively while identifying, developing, or describing Aboriginal
sovereignty;
SOV.05 -
analyse themes related to sovereignty, as portrayed in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.02 -
select and use appropriate writing forms for various purposes and audiences, focusing
on reports, correspondence, and persuasive essays;
WRV.03 -
use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and
effective written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, focusing on accuracy
of information, clear expression, and consistent use of voice;
WRV.05 -
edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage,
spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as
presented for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources
when appropriate.
Aboriginal
Voices in Literature
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.02 -
assess the impact of Aboriginal sovereignty on Canadian society, as portrayed
in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Connie Fife, Taiaiake Alfred);
SO1.03 -
identify the role and importance of sovereignty in contemporary Aboriginal
communities, as portrayed by Aboriginal writers (e.g., Brian Maracle, Lenore
Keeshig-Tobias, Tomson Highway, Beth Cuthand);
SO1.04 -
describe the responses of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Maria Campbell, Drew Hayden
Taylor, Lee Maracle) to barriers to Aboriginal sovereignty erected by Canadian
society.
Language
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
SO2.02 -
develop an understanding of the language used to affirm Aboriginal sovereignty
(e.g., in statements such as Aboriginal people will never again be the objects
of public policies of assimilation and extinguishment).
Aboriginal
Voices in Media Works
SO3.01 -
demonstrate an understanding of images associated with sovereignty issues in
Aboriginal media works;
SO3.02 -
demonstrate an understanding of an Aboriginal community’s efforts to achieve
sovereignty, as represented in media works by Aboriginal creators;
SO3.03 -
explain how the form, style, and language of a variety of media forms are used
to communicate messages that have sovereignty implications.
Generating
Ideas and Gathering Information
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying information
needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather
information and ideas (e.g., consult a CD-ROM to find information for a report
about the author of a novel; identify the accessibility of relevant sources for
a class presentation on a social issue);
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information and ideas to suit specific forms and purposes
for writing (e.g., sort information from different sources for a report on
effective business practices; organize information to support the arguments for
an opinion piece; use a graphic organizer to make connections between ideas or
to show time order in a narrative);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge and research to develop content
for writing (e.g., interview an employee for an essay about teamwork and
cooperation in business; apply knowledge of characterization techniques to
write a short essay about the major character in a novel by an Aboriginal
writer).
Choosing
the Form to Suit the Purpose and Audience
WR2.01 -
select and use appropriate informational or literary forms to produce written
work for specific audiences and purposes, with an emphasis on reports,
correspondence, and persuasive essays (e.g., summarize a magazine article on a
topic of personal interest for a report to the class; write a letter requesting
information about a college program; write a short essay presenting a solution
to a community problem);
WR2.02 -
select and use a level of language and a voice appropriate to the specific
purpose and intended audience for business, technical, and personal
communications (e.g., use an appropriate voice to convey information about a
policy in a memo).
Organizing
Ideas and Information in Written Work
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns to structure written work
(e.g., use a question-and-answer format to organize an information pamphlet
about a product or service; use chronological order and flashbacks to organize information
about a character in a script; use classification to organize a class anthology
of student writing);
WR3.03 -
apply knowledge of essay structure to organize short essays, using (a) an
introduction that engages the reader’s interest, introduces the thesis or
controlling idea, and previews the organization or content of the essay; (b) a
body that develops ideas logically and coherently and incorporates well-chosen,
relevant evidence to support each idea; and (c) a conclusion that follows
logically from the thesis and ideas developed in the body, summarizes the key
points and organization in the body, and makes a thoughtful generalization
related to the controlling idea;
WR3.04 -
use organizational patterns such as cause and effect, classification, and
definition to present information and ideas in reports and short essays.
Revising
Drafts
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts to ensure consistent use of an appropriate voice and tone (e.g.,
highlight pronouns to check for consistent use of person in a report or memo;
use feedback from a peer conference to assess the appropriateness of voice used
in a set of instructions or tone in a character’s direct speech).
Editing,
Proofreading, and Publishing
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation listed below.
Grammar
and Usage: use parts of speech correctly, including participles and gerunds;
Grammar
and Usage: construct a variety of correct sentences, including compound-complex
sentences, using conjunctions; prepositional and gerund phrases; and noun,
adjective, and adverb clauses;
Grammar
and Usage: make pronouns agree with their antecedents, and subjects with their
predicates, even when widely separated in a sentence or paragraph;
Grammar
and Usage: use active and passive verb voice to suit purpose and audience;
Grammar
and Usage: use correct parallel structure;
Grammar
and Usage: identify and correct sentence errors in their own and others’
writing;
Grammar
and Usage: identify deliberate uses of ungrammatical structures in
advertisements, poetry, and oral language;
Spelling:
demonstrate understanding of a variety of spelling patterns, rules, and
strategies by analysing and correcting spelling errors;
Spelling:
use homophones and commonly confused words correctly;
Spelling:
spell correctly specific business, technical, and literary terms used in course
materials;
Spelling:
use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and
improve spelling;
Punctuation:
use punctuation correctly and for rhetorical effect, including the question
mark, exclamation mark, comma, semicolon, and colon, as well as quotation
marks, parentheses, brackets, and ellipses.
|
Activity
1 |
Reclaiming
a Heritage |
240
minutes |
|
Activity
2 |
Discovering
a Voice |
480
minutes |
|
Activity
3 |
Empowering
through Writing |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
4 |
Challenging
the Obstacles |
300
minutes |
|
Activity
5 |
Shaping
the Vision |
300
minutes |
This unit
builds upon the analytic, reading, writing, oral communication, and thinking
skills developed in The
Teachers should:
·
ensure
that all resources are available in the classroom, the Library/Resource Centre,
and the Arts Department. If resources are not available, then alternative
materials should be selected in conjunction with the school library staff,
other teachers, or information from the Internet;
·
review
An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in English and pre-read the
plays by Drew Hayden Taylor, The Boy in the Treehouse and Girl Who
Loved Her Horses, which comprise the primary texts for Unit 3. Teachers
could also read Drew Hayden Taylor’s Toronto at Dreamer’s Rock, both for
background on the playwright’s work and for insight into the dream vision quest
motif;
·
review
the unit to develop an understanding of the sequence of activities,
assignments, culminating activity requirements, issues addressed, grammar,
usage, spelling, and punctuation conventions;
·
consider
how to establish a safe and collaborative environment in the classroom. This
can be achieved by researching and becoming familiar with contemporary
Aboriginal voices in literature and media works prior to the unit being taught;
·
be
familiar with literature that illustrates the theme of Sovereignty and with
other relevant material.
Campbell,
Maria. Maria Campbell Translated: Stories of the Road Allowance People.
Penticton: Theytus, 1995.
Jaine,
Linda and Drew Hayden Taylor. Voices: Being Native in Canada. Saskatoon:
University of Saskatchewan, 1992. ISBN 0888803265
Johnson,
Basil. Ojibway Heritage. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1984. ISBN
0771044410
Johnson,
Basil. Ojibway Ceremonies. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1987. ISBN
0771044453
Lutz,
Hartmut. Contemporary Challenges: Conversations with Canadian Native Authors.
Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1991. ISBN 092007975X
Moses,
Daniel David and Terry Goldie. An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in
English, 2nd ed. Don Mills: Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 0195412826
Taylor,
Drew Hayden. The Boy in the Treehouse/Girl Who Loved Her Horses.
Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2000. ISBN 0889224412
Taylor,
Drew Hayden. Toronto at Dreamer’s Rock. Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1990.
ISBN 0920079644
Wagamese,
Richard. Keeper ’N Me. Toronto: Doubleday Canada Limited, 1994. ISBN
0385254520
Background
on Riel and the Rebellion
Alfred,
Taiaiake. Peace, Power, Righteousness: an Indigenous Manifesto. Don
Mills: OUP, 1999.
ISBN 0-19-541216-8
Bowsfield,
Hartwell. Louis Riel: the rebel and the hero. Toronto: Oxford, 1971.
ISBN 0195401824
Brown,
R.C. and M.E. Prang. Confederation to 1949. Scarborough: Prentice Hall,
1966. LCCN 6523527
Hacker,
Carlotta. The Book of Canadians. ISBN 0888302436
Howard,
Joseph. Strange Empire: Louis Riel and the Métis People. Toronto: James
Lewis and Samuel, 1952. ISBN 0888620594
Morton,
Desmond. Rebellions in Canada. Toronto: Grolier, 1979. ISBN 0717218007
Six
Nations at Grand River Territory. “Hodinoso:ni World View” The Sacred Trust
of the Hodinoso:ni Confederacy. 1992. Woodland Cultural Centre, 184 Mohawk
St., P.O. Box 1506, Brantford, ON
N3T 5V6, library@woodland-centre.on.ca
www.library.usask.ca/northwest/background/riel.htm
www.escape.ca/~shsb/Riel/erebellion.htm
www.fallenmatyrs.com/canada.htm
www.canadahistory.about.com
http://www.goodminds.com,
helpme@goodminds.com
Time: 240 minutes
This
activity focuses on the definition of sovereignty presented in Drew Hayden
Taylor’s The Boy in the Treehouse. Students study this play to recognize
the importance of cultural identification and heritage in creating a solid
foundation for a sense of personal identity and sovereignty.
Strand(s): Sovereignty, Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.01 -
describe the issues of identity and culture as they relate to sovereignty, as
expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.02 -
describe how sovereignty is expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the language used in Aboriginal works in
connection with sovereignty issues;
SOV.05 -
analyse themes related to sovereignty, as portrayed in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.02 -
select and use appropriate writing forms for various purposes and audiences,
focusing on reports, correspondence, and persuasive essays;
WRV.03 -
use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and
effective written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, focusing on
accuracy of information, clear expression, and consistent use of voice;
WRV.05 - edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly
the grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian
English, as presented for this course, with the support of print and electronic
resources when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.02 -
assess the impact of Aboriginal sovereignty on Canadian society, as portrayed
in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Connie Fife, Taiaiake Alfred);
SO1.03 -
identify the role and importance of sovereignty in contemporary Aboriginal
communities, as portrayed by Aboriginal writers (e.g., Brian Maracle, Lenore
Keeshig-Tobias, Tomson Highway, Beth Cuthand);
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information and ideas to suit specific forms and purposes
for writing (e.g., sort information from different sources for a report on
effective business practices; organize information to support the arguments for
an opinion piece; use a graphic organizer to make connections between ideas or
to show time order in a narrative);
WR1.04 - use information and ideas from prior
knowledge and research to develop content for writing (e.g., interview an employee
for an essay about teamwork and cooperation in business; apply knowledge of
characterization techniques to write a short essay about the major character in
a novel by an Aboriginal writer);
WR2.01 -
select and use appropriate informational or literary forms to produce written
work for specific audiences and purposes, with an emphasis on reports,
correspondence, and persuasive essays (e.g., summarize a magazine article on a
topic of personal interest for a report to the class; write a letter requesting
information about a college program; write a short essay presenting a solution
to a community problem);
WR2.02 -
select and use a level of language and a voice appropriate to the specific
purpose and intended audience for business, technical, and personal
communications (e.g., use an appropriate voice to convey information about a
policy in a memo);
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns to structure written work
(e.g., use a question-and-answer format to organize an information pamphlet
about a product or service; use chronological order and flashbacks to organize
information about a character in a script; use classification to organize a
class anthology of student writing);
WR3.04 -
use organizational patterns such as cause and effect, classification, and
definition to present information and ideas in reports and short essays;
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts to ensure consistent use of an appropriate voice and tone (e.g.,
highlight pronouns to check for consistent use of person in a report or memo;
use feedback from a peer conference to assess the appropriateness of voice used
in a set of instructions or tone in a character’s direct speech);
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation listed below.
Grammar
and Usage: use parts of speech correctly, including participles and gerunds;
Grammar
and Usage: construct a variety of correct sentences, including compound-complex
sentences, using conjunctions; prepositional and gerund phrases; and noun,
adjective, and adverb clauses;
Grammar
and Usage: make pronouns agree with their antecedents, and subjects with their
predicates, even when widely separated in a sentence or paragraph;
Grammar
and Usage: use active and passive verb voice to suit purpose and audience;
Grammar
and Usage: use correct parallel structure;
Grammar
and Usage: identify and correct sentence errors in their own and others’
writing;
Grammar
and Usage: identify deliberate uses of ungrammatical structures in
advertisements, poetry, and oral language;
Spelling:
demonstrate understanding of a variety of spelling patterns, rules, and
strategies by analysing and correcting spelling errors;
Spelling:
use homophones and commonly confused words correctly;
Spelling:
spell correctly specific business, technical, and literary terms used in course
materials;
Spelling:
use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and
improve spelling;
Punctuation:
use punctuation correctly and for rhetorical effect, including the question
mark, exclamation mark, comma, semicolon, and colon, as well as quotation
marks, parentheses, brackets, and ellipses.
This
activity builds upon students’ skills in reading (silently and aloud).
Knowledge of dramatic conventions enhances discussion of the play, as does
knowledge of traditional Aboriginal vision quest concepts and rituals.
Teachers
should:
·
read
The Boy in the Treehouse, identifying the relevant thematic issues
(mixed ancestry, identity confusion, coming of age), and dramatic elements (set
design, stage directions, special effects); also, see Resources for Basil
Johnson’s Ojibway Heritage and Ojibway Ceremonies, which offer a
more specific background on the idea of vision quests;
·
prepare
an introduction to Unit 3 as a whole, which presents sovereignty as an idea
that will develop and evolve through the study of a variety of texts, in a
variety of genres.
1. The teacher introduces Unit 3 with a brief
outline of activities, emphasizing textual variety and a gradual evolution of
the concept of sovereignty.
2. The teacher reads scene one of The Boy in
the Treehouse, which consists of stage directions explicating the set
design and a physical introduction of SIMON, the main character. There is only
one line of dialogue before lights go down to end the scene. Remind students
that the written stage directions are available to a reader, but not to the
audience of a live performance. Ask them to imagine the first impression of
Simon, created only visually and through one line.
3. Read scene two aloud (or use student
volunteers). Students should record their initial impressions of FATHER and of
the relationship between Simon and his father. Either prior to or following
class discussion, students respond to the following questions: What concrete
(factual) information do we discover about Simon in the second scene? What
impression do you have of his father? Is their relationship positive or
negative? What tensions or issues seem to be present? How is the role of the
vision quest presented in the scene?
4. Before the next class, assign individual
reading of scene three.
5. Use a brief, oral quiz on the content of the
first three scenes to review the previous day’s work. Students discuss the
introduction of the character PATTY and debate the realism of the interaction
between Patty and Simon.
6. Read scene four aloud. Lead an oral,
whole-class discussion of the function of the Father-NEIGHBOUR conversation. What
information about Simon and his past is revealed? To what extent is the offer of
food a positive gesture? To what extent might the offer be considered negative?
7. Students read scene five silently; they are
now approximately halfway through the play. Assign a one-page journal response
on the topic of Simon’s character. Frame it in a discussion of sovereignty as
self-awareness (self-concept, personal awareness). Is Simon deficient in
self-awareness? What is Simon looking for? Does Simon seem childish or
immature? Is the play taking Simon seriously or not?
8. Begin class with a review of the play so far
and a brief discussion of the questions posed as journal ideas in the preceding
class. Before looking at scene six, draw students’ attention to the
ever-widening circle of observers: Simon at the centre, then his Father, Patty,
a Neighbour, and now, the Police. Students consider the varying responses of
these different audiences to Simon’s efforts to achieve personal sovereignty.
Read scene six. Read scene seven aloud. Ask students, either orally or as a
written task: How is the playwright changing or developing the impression of
Patty’s character? What questions are being raised about her? What predictions
might you have about her function?
9. For next class, assign the reading of scene
eight. Have students prepare analyses of the following lines from the scene, in
point form, to be used for discussion purposes next day:
· “I don’t think my father has a culture.”
· “What will it take to bring you back down to earth?”
· “This has nothing to do with being Native.”
· “If half of this tree was taken away, do you think it would be able to stand?”
10. Begin
the class with a discussion of the key lines assigned as homework for scene
eight. Draw attention to the impact and connotations of specific words and
phrases (e.g., What implication is contained in the reporter’s question
about Simon “coming back down to earth”?).
11. Prepare students for reading the final scene
by considering the obtuseness and triviality represented in the portrayal of
the media in scene eight. Students contrast this attitude with the attitude of
Simon’s UNCLE CLYDE. Students consider the symbolic significance of Clyde’s
role and the effect of the playwright’s juxtaposition of the REPORTER and
Clyde. Read scene nine.
12. In a final journal response, students respond
to: In the final scene, which of the characters brings the most important or
helpful message to Simon in his search to reclaim his cultural identity? What
is that message?
·
formative
assessment of literature comprehension for Knowledge/Understanding and
Communication, by teacher using a marking scheme
·
formative
assessment of reflective journal for Communication and Thinking/Inquiry, by
teacher using anecdotal comments.
This
activity can involve reading aloud in role. Some students may benefit from
having specific reading responsibilities assigned in advance, to allow for
pre-reading and practice. The written responses are adjusted in length and
frequency, through the provision of scribes, or with oral response alternatives.
Johnson,
Basil. Ojibway Heritage. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1984. ISBN
0-7710-4441-0
Johnson,
Basil. Ojibway Ceremonies. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1987. ISBN
0771044453
Taylor,
Drew Hayden. The Boy in the Treehouse/Girl Who Loved Her Horses.
Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2000. ISBN 0-88922-441-2
Wagamese,
Richard. Keeper ’N Me. Toronto: Doubleday Canada Limited, 1994. ISBN
0385254520
Time: 480 minutes
This
activity provides students with a clear contrast in dramatic expressions of the
search for identity and adds to students’ evolving definition of sovereignty.
Drew Hayden Taylor’s play Girl Who Loved Her Horses demonstrates the
need for full and free expression of the spirit; as well, the play articulates
many of the barriers to sovereignty, which result from the oppression and
suppression of that spirit.
Strand(s): Sovereignty, Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.01 -
describe the issues of identity and culture as they relate to sovereignty, as
expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.02 -
describe how sovereignty is expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.04 -
apply their knowledge of vocabulary and language conventions to read, write,
and speak effectively while identifying, developing, or describing Aboriginal
sovereignty;
SOV.05 -
analyse themes related to sovereignty, as portrayed in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.02 - select and use appropriate writing
forms for various purposes and audiences, focusing on reports, correspondence,
and persuasive essays;
WRV.03 -
use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and
effective written work;
WRV.05 -
edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage,
spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as
presented for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources
when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.03 -
identify the role and importance of sovereignty in contemporary Aboriginal
communities, as portrayed by Aboriginal writers (e.g., Brian Maracle, Lenore
Keeshig-Tobias, Tomson Highway, Beth Cuthand);
SO1.04 -
describe the responses of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Maria Campbell, Drew Hayden
Taylor, Lee Maracle) to barriers to Aboriginal sovereignty erected by Canadian
society;
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
SO3.01 -
demonstrate an understanding of images associated with sovereignty issues in
Aboriginal media works;
SO3.02 -
demonstrate an understanding of an Aboriginal community’s efforts to achieve
sovereignty, as represented in media works by Aboriginal creators;
SO3.03 -
explain how the form, style, and language of a variety of media forms are used
to communicate messages that have sovereignty implications;
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information and ideas to suit specific forms and purposes
for writing (e.g., sort information from different sources for a report on
effective business practices; organize information to support the arguments for
an opinion piece; use a graphic organizer to make connections between ideas or
to show time order in a narrative);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge and research to develop content
for writing (e.g., interview an employee for an essay about teamwork and
cooperation in business; apply knowledge of characterization techniques to
write a short essay about the major character in a novel by an Aboriginal
writer);
WR2.01 -
select and use appropriate informational or literary forms to produce written
work for specific audiences and purposes, with an emphasis on reports,
correspondence, and persuasive essays (e.g., summarize a magazine article on a
topic of personal interest for a report to the class; write a letter requesting
information about a college program; write a short essay presenting a solution
to a community problem);
WR2.02 -
select and use a level of language and a voice appropriate to the specific
purpose and intended audience for business, technical, and personal
communications (e.g., use an appropriate voice to convey information about a
policy in a memo);
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns to structure written work
(e.g., use a question-and-answer format to organize an information pamphlet
about a product or service; use chronological order and flashbacks to organize
information about a character in a script; use classification to organize a
class anthology of student writing);
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR4.03 - revise drafts to ensure consistent use
of an appropriate voice and tone (e.g., highlight pronouns to check for
consistent use of person in a report or memo; use feedback from a peer
conference to assess the appropriateness of voice used in a set of instructions
or tone in a character’s direct speech);
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation listed below.
Grammar
and Usage: use parts of speech correctly, including participles and gerunds;
Grammar
and Usage: construct a variety of correct sentences, including compound-complex
sentences, using conjunctions; prepositional and gerund phrases; and noun,
adjective, and adverb clauses;
Grammar
and Usage: make pronouns agree with their antecedents, and subjects with their
predicates, even when widely separated in a sentence or paragraph;
Grammar
and Usage: use active and passive verb voice to suit purpose and audience;
Grammar
and Usage: use correct parallel structure;
Grammar
and Usage: identify and correct sentence errors in their own and others’
writing;
Grammar
and Usage: identify deliberate uses of ungrammatical structures in
advertisements, poetry, and oral language;
Spelling:
demonstrate understanding of a variety of spelling patterns, rules, and
strategies by analysing and correcting spelling errors;
Spelling:
use homophones and commonly confused words correctly;
Spelling:
spell correctly specific business, technical, and literary terms used in course
materials;
Spelling:
use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and
improve spelling;
Punctuation:
use punctuation correctly and for rhetorical effect, including the question
mark, exclamation mark, comma, semicolon, and colon, as well as quotation
marks, parentheses, brackets, and ellipses.
This
activity builds upon students’ knowledge of dramatic elements from previous
activities and upon earlier lessons on visual imagery. The familiarity with The
Boy in the Treehouse also allows students to consider the potential for
diversity of voice and perspective within a single Aboriginal author’s work, in
preparation for the culminating activity for the course.
Teachers
should:
·
pre-read
Girl Who Loved Her Horses; the play alludes to a number of potentially difficult
personal, familial, communal, and cultural issues which should be approached
with sensitivity and awareness;
·
consider
reading the original short prose version of “The Girl Who Loved Her Horses”,
(see Resources), and consider possible links and comparisons to the play
version used here;
·
consult
with various school and community resource persons to gain some perspective on
the significance of visual art in Aboriginal cultures; possibilities exist for
the development of a cross-curricular project with the Arts department;
·
review
the elements of personal correspondence (letter and e-mail conventions).
1. Set the stage for the study of Girl Who
Loved Her Horses by reviewing the significant moral in The Boy in the
Treehouse. Emphasize the positive message and positive family portrait
presented in that play. As an introductory writing activity, students compose a
personal letter or an e-mail posting to a parent, grandparent, or community
elder, reflecting upon or acknowledging the importance of traditions and
heritage. Students retain the letters for the portfolio being created
throughout the activity.
2. Read scene one to students. As with The
Boy in the Treehouse, the opening scene consists of thorough stage
directions, a description of the set design, and a visual introduction of a
main character who speaks only one line (i.e., “Ho-lee!”). For the next class,
students assess the dramatic effectiveness of this scene: Does the opening
capture the audience’s interest? What information is communicated? What
questions are raised? (For teachers considering comparisons to Taylor’s
short-story version, the differences in the openings are quite dramatic and
accessible to the student readers.)
3. Begin class with a brief review of the opening
scene, then proceed to reading scene two aloud. Without any class discussion,
assign each student the task of creating five questions about scene two: two
questions about content, two questions about character, and one
question about either structure (chronology, imagery), or theme.
4. Students exchange questions with a partner,
and answer their partner’s questions. The teacher collects the work from each
pair, to use as review at the beginning of next class.
5. Conduct an oral, whole-class review of scene
two, using student-generated work on plot, character, structure, and theme.
6. Read scenes three and four aloud. Have
students discuss their reactions to the non-linear chronology, the images of a
much younger RALPH and WILLIAM, the introduction of a young DANIELLE, and the
now recurrent image of the HORSE. Ask students to contribute all of the
specific information revealed through the non-verbal scene four. List the
information in point form on the board, and assign the task of writing a prose
synopsis of the play up to and including scene four, limiting themselves
exclusively to content about which they are very confident. Assign individual
reading of scene five and consider pre-assigning roles for student readers.
7. Assign parts for oral reading of scene five.
Try to have students’ reading evoke the dynamics of Ralph, William, and
SHELLEY, compared to the almost invisible presence of Danielle.
8. Following the reading, students draw their
first sketches in response to the following: If you had the chance to draw
on the Everything Wall, what would you draw? And remember, somebody’s mother is
going to be judging your contribution!! These visual expressions are
included in students’ activity work portfolios.
9. For next class, have students read scene six.
10. Review scene five briefly, then have scenes
six and seven read aloud. Ask students to describe the dynamic of the encounter
between William and Danielle. In the same student pair groupings as earlier,
assign the task of creating a theory to explain the tension in the
William/Danielle relationship, based only upon direct evidence or clues from
the text of the play.
11. After discussion of these ideas, briefly
suggest the idea that sometimes we recognize the need for something, like sovereignty,
only when we lack it. Discuss the many potential barriers to Danielle’s
self-esteem and sense of self.
12. Students pre-read scene eight for next day.
13. Students demonstrate their comprehension and
interpretation skills by completing a quiz about scene eight. The questions
should be a mix of content, interpretive, and speculative/imaginative answer.
14. Review the scene after students have completed
the quiz and submitted their answers. Emphasize the importance of the image of
Danielle’s home environment as an obstacle to her personal sovereignty, and of
the image of the horse as an expression of her fierce inner spirit struggling
to escape.
15. For homework, have students write a reflective
journal entry following the model of Danielle’s memory of the pony ride at the
fair (Can you imagine or describe a childhood experience which has stayed
with you, and which carries within it a lesson about life?).
16. Read scenes nine and ten. Ask the class to
consider the following questions: How does the dilemma Danielle is in relate
to the issue of sovereignty? How have her relationships with Ralph, William,
and Shelley changed over time? Before reading the final scene, consider the
entire play to this point and make a prediction about how the play might resolve
the issue of the obstacles to Danielle’s desire for sovereignty and full
personhood.
17. Read
the final scene. Have students compose a personal letter, which addresses the
most significant obstacles to achieving their own potential for complete sovereignty.
These obstacles may be specific individuals, institutions, cultural attitudes,
or even personal characteristics or aspects of students’ own personalities. The
letter is included in students’ activity work portfolios.
18. Assign a second drawing to convey either each
student’s most vivid impression of Girl Who Loved Her Horses or their
strongest application of the play’s ideas to their own experience. This
“Everything Wall” drawing must be accompanied by a one-paragraph explanation of
its content, motivation, and significance. This is the final element included
in students’ activity work portfolios.
19. The teacher collects each student’s work
portfolio for assessment and evaluation. Consider assigning students the task
of selecting one “Best Piece” of work from the portfolio to be polished and
given particular evaluative attention.
·
formative
assessment of personal letter for Communication and Application, by self and
peers using a checklist and rubric
·
formative
assessment of student-generated questions for Knowledge/Understanding and
Application, by self and peers using a marking scheme.
·
summative
assessment of content quiz for Knowledge, by teacher using a marking scheme
·
summative
assessment of portfolios for Knowledge, Communication, Inquiry, and
Application, by self and teacher using a rubric
Since
this activity involves reading aloud in role, some students may benefit from
extra preparation time. Students may also find working with computers
advantageous for the letter-writing components; a variety of artistic media
might be considered for the illustration component of the final portfolio.
Taylor,
Drew Hayden. The Boy in the Treehouse/Girl Who Loved Her Horses.
Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2000. ISBN 0889224412
Taylor,
Drew Hayden. “The Girl Who Loved Her Horses.” Jaine, Linda and Drew Hayden
Taylor, eds. Voices: Being Native in Canada. Saskatoon: University of
Saskatchewan, 1995.
Time: 180 minutes
This
activity looks at poems that assert the importance of language to Aboriginal
sovereignty and, in particular, the necessity of defining one’s own terms.
Students respond to “Indian Woman” and “Threads of Old Memory,” by Jeannette C.
Armstrong, and “The Devil’s Language”, by Marilyn Dumont, as vehicles to expand
their knowledge of the language used by Aboriginal writers to express
sovereignty and to apply this awareness of language in their own writing.
Strand(s): Sovereignty, Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.01 -
describe the issues of identity and culture as they relate to sovereignty, as
expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.02 -
describe how sovereignty is expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.03 - demonstrate an understanding of the
language used in Aboriginal works in connection with sovereignty issues;
SOV.04 -
apply their knowledge of vocabulary and language conventions to read, write,
and speak effectively while identifying, developing, or describing Aboriginal
sovereignty;
WRV.02 -
select and use appropriate writing forms for various purposes and audiences,
focusing on reports, correspondence, and persuasive essays;
WRV.03 -
use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and
effective written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, focusing on
accuracy of information, clear expression, and consistent use of voice.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.02 -
assess the impact of Aboriginal sovereignty on Canadian society, as portrayed
in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Connie Fife, Taiaiake Alfred);
SO1.03 -
identify the role and importance of sovereignty in contemporary Aboriginal
communities, as portrayed by Aboriginal writers (e.g., Brian Maracle, Lenore
Keeshig-Tobias, Tomson Highway, Beth Cuthand);
SO1.04 -
describe the responses of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Maria Campbell, Drew Hayden
Taylor, Lee Maracle) to barriers to Aboriginal sovereignty erected by Canadian
society;
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
SO2.02 -
develop an understanding of the language used to affirm Aboriginal sovereignty
(e.g., in statements such as Aboriginal people will never again be the objects
of public policies of assimilation and extinguishment);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge and research to develop content
for writing (e.g., interview an employee for an essay about teamwork and
cooperation in business; apply knowledge of characterization techniques to
write a short essay about the major character in a novel by an Aboriginal
writer);
WR3.04 -
use organizational patterns such as cause and effect, classification, and
definition to present information and ideas in reports and short essays;
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts to ensure consistent use of an appropriate voice and tone (e.g.,
highlight pronouns to check for consistent use of person in a report or memo;
use feedback from a peer conference to assess the appropriateness of voice used
in a set of instructions or tone in a character’s direct speech).
Students’
prior knowledge of figurative language and skills in analysis of poetic forms
and tropes will be used in this activity. Students also continue to develop
their understanding of words’ connotative values, and the rhetorical,
political, and emotional effects of language.
Teachers should:
·
pre-read
poems to recognize the sensitive nature of the terms used and, in particular,
to see how each poem asserts a powerful message of sovereignty through
reclamation of the language of self-definition;
·
review
concepts and literary definitions of types of irony; prepare a lesson on irony;
·
read
Jeannette C. Armstrong’s paper “The Disempowerment of First North American
Native Peoples and Empowerment Through Their Writing”, in An Anthology of
Canadian Native Literature in English. This forceful declaration can inform
the discussion of the poems, as well as provide examples of the powerful
language of sovereignty in a distinct genre.
1. Use the terms empowerment and disempowerment
as introductory concepts for this activity. Have students express their
understanding of these terms through reference to the two plays just studied or
to other texts studied previously in the course.
2. Discuss with the class the idea of language
as either neutral or value-laden, and meanings as either denotative
or connotative. Have students brainstorm pairs of words which reflect
this difference (e.g., thin vs. scrawny, self-confident vs. arrogant, or
conceited, different vs. unique or weird).
3. Have students discuss the possible
implications of these connotative values to the topic of dis/empowerment.
Supplement students’ ideas with ideas, issues, and examples drawn from
Jeannette C. Armstrong’s essay “The Disempowerment of First North American
Native Peoples and Empowerment Through Their Writing”. Consider the following
activity. Reduce a selected portion of the essay to its most neutral terms
(e.g., paragraph 5 becomes “ In North America, this process was to introduce
the indigenous peoples to European customs. In the 498 years of contact in The
Americas, this has resulted in a significant loss of life and cultural
traditions, which continues today.”). Put it on the board and then copy the
paragraph written by Armstrong beside it. Have students identify Armstrong’s
vivid and provocative use of emphatic, value-laden, expressive terms to
communicate her message more powerfully. Ask the class: Considering the
effects of Armstrong’s word choices, do the two versions have the same meaning,
or is the message significantly changed through her writing?
4. Introduce Armstrong’s poem “Threads of Old
Memory”. Have students read silently, reflecting upon the following topics in a
journal entry: Which lines does the poet use to describe the nature or
spirit of her own language? Do you agree that a language can contain the
personality of a culture? Select four students or find four student
volunteers to prepare an oral reading of the poem for next class, with each
student taking ownership of one section.
5. Draw attention to the poet’s use of
repetition, particularly through the phrase “When I speak” and the
constructions “I am”, “I become”, “I choose”, “I sing”, “I search”. Assign the
task of constructing a poem of 10-12 lines, which uses Armstrong’s patterns as
a very loose model.
6. Begin class with an oral reading of “Threads
of Old Memory”, either by students or by the teacher.
7. Offer students the opportunity to read their
own poetic compositions. Collect poems for assessment.
8. Review the concepts of denotation and
connotation.
9. Introduce Armstrong’s poem “Indian Woman” by
emphasizing that the emotional values of words can be either
constructive/positive or negative/destructive. Prepare students for the fact
that this is the theme of the activity and the point of this poem. Ask students
to listen to “Indian Woman” for a connection between language and empowerment.
10. Read the poem aloud.
11. Students reflect individually upon the poem in
journal entries. Consider providing the following topics: destructive words;
powerful words; healing words. Or use the question: How does the poet
reverse the negative, destructive stereotype with which her poem begins?
12. Remind
students that they are examining the large issue of sovereignty in this unit,
in a variety of genres. They have studied plays, are reading poetry, and will
read informational, non-fiction texts as well. Stress that the particular focus
is how language can be instrumental, either acting as a barrier or as a bridge
to sovereignty. Each student practises the use of empowering language by
adapting “Indian Woman” to another literary genre - in this case, to a dramatic
scene.
The poem provides all (or a vast majority) of the dialogue of the
student’s dramatic adaptation. The student’s task is to imagine and compose a
scenario in which Armstrong’s language is brought to life, and given a spoken,
physical power. The assignment allows the student to consider elements of
dramatic construction studied in the prior activities, such as characterization,
special effects, stage directions, conflicts, and imagery.
13. Review expectations of the “Indian Woman”
dramatic adaptation. With students, create a rubric through which their efforts
are evaluated. Criteria might include range and complexity of character
development, use of multimedia or special effects, appropriate, distinctive or
creative use of original text. Negotiate an appropriate timeline for completion
of this assignment.
14. Introduce Marilyn Dumont, suggesting that her
Métis heritage provides her with a unique vantage point for addressing the
difficulties and possibilities of language as a barrier and a bridge to
sovereignty, the stuff of both communication and confusion.
15. Put the phrase the language of the devil on
the board. Solicit student reaction to the possible meanings of the phrase.
Address the issue of cultural perspective: Which traditions typically use
the idea of “the devil?” What connotations does the word “devil” have?
16. Assign silent reading of Dumont’s poem, “The
Devil’s Language”.
17. In their journals, students record the words
and phrases from Dumont’s poem which seem to have particularly strong
connotative values. Alternatively, have them record favourite lines, or most
intriguing images and references.
18. Read the poem aloud to the class, identifying
Eliot, the Great White Way pun, Dick and Jane, the King’s English, the idea of
Received Pronunciation.
19. In a class discussion, students clarify their
impressions of Dumont’s message in stanza one. Gather the images of English;
elicit associations of repression, rigidity, imposition, limitation, and
presumed authority.
20. Turn the attention to stanza two. Have
students identify the key ideas. Try to incorporate empowerment and
disempowerment into the discussion. Examine stanza two in terms of transitions,
turning points, or ironic reversal or inversion. Stress the complexity of
Dumont’s use of the phrase “devil’s language”, which in this context is both
the language by the oppressors and, ironically, about the
oppressors’ own language. When the word is turned back upon those using it, the
shift from disempowered to empowered occurs and the positive associations of
the Aboriginal voice, (in this context, Cree language), exert themselves.
21. Examine stanza three. Have the class consider
how Dumont has managed to completely redefine the term of oppression - the
devil’s language - into an image of a gentle, nurturing song.
22. Assign the following questions in order to
allow a fuller expression of student responses to the poem: a) In stanza 1,
how does Dumont use the language of English to present a negative impression of
Native languages and Aboriginal writing? b) Explain the effect of Dumont’s
deliberate constructions talking back(wards), talking back, back(words). What
is the effect of these subtly different phrases, in thematic terms? c) What is
the effect of the memory of the mother’s sounds in stanzas 2 and 3? Is the
final admission, that she “can’t make the sound”, an admission of defeat? Can
you put the movement of the poem into your own words (through an engaged
paraphrase)?
23. Students complete these questions for
discussion purposes or assessment next class.
·
diagnostic
and formative assessment of language analysis for Knowledge, by teacher using
anecdotal comments and a rubric
·
diagnostic
and formative assessment of poetry compositions, oral readings, and adaptations
for Knowledge, Communication, and Application, by teacher and peers using
anecdotal comments and a rubric
Some
tasks require reading aloud, which may require greater preparation time for
some students. Adapting the poetry-writing task, through the creation of a
template that provides the key elements of the desired poetic structure, may
aid students with organizational challenges. Careful consultation with each
student regarding timelines for the major tasks is an important aspect of
facilitating opportunities for success.
Armstrong,
Jeannette C. “The Disempowerment of First North American Native Peoples and
Empowerment Through Their Writing”, “Indian Woman”, and “Threads of Old
Memory”. Moses, Daniel David and Terry Goldie, eds. An Anthology of Canadian
Native Literature in English, 2nd ed. Don Mills: Oxford University Press,
1998. ISBN 0195412826
Dumont,
Marilyn. “The Devil’s Language”. In Moses, Daniel David and Terry Goldie, eds. An
Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in English, 2nd ed. Don Mills:
Oxford University Press, 1998.
ISBN 0195412826
Time: 300 minutes
This
activity focuses on two dramatic poems, Pauline Johnson’s “The Cattle Thief”
and Maria Campbell’s “Joseph’s Justice”, which demonstrate personal assertions
of sovereignty in the face of obstacles. Student responses to these poems prepare
them for the final activity of the unit, which integrates the diverse ideas and
expressions of sovereignty previously studied.
Strand(s): Sovereignty, Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.01 -
describe the issues of identity and culture as they relate to sovereignty, as
expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.02 -
describe how sovereignty is expressed in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of the language used in Aboriginal works in
connection with sovereignty issues;
WRV.02 -
select and use appropriate writing forms for various purposes and audiences,
focusing on reports, correspondence, and persuasive essays;
WRV.03 -
use a variety of organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and
effective written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, focusing on
accuracy of information, clear expression, and consistent use of voice;
WRV.05 - edit and proofread to
produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as presented for this
course, with the support of print and electronic resources when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.04 -
describe the responses of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Maria Campbell, Drew Hayden
Taylor, Lee Maracle) to barriers to Aboriginal sovereignty erected by Canadian
society;
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
SO2.02 -
develop an understanding of the language used to affirm Aboriginal sovereignty
(e.g., in statements such as Aboriginal people will never again be the objects
of public policies of assimilation and extinguishment);
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying information
needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather
information and ideas (e.g., consult a CD-ROM to find information for a report
about the author of a novel; identify the accessibility of relevant sources for
a class presentation on a social issue);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge and research to develop content
for writing (e.g., interview an employee for an essay about teamwork and cooperation
in business; apply knowledge of characterization techniques to write a short
essay about the major character in a novel by an Aboriginal writer);
WR2.01 -
select and use appropriate informational or literary forms to produce written
work for specific audiences and purposes, with an emphasis on reports,
correspondence, and persuasive essays (e.g., summarize a magazine article on a
topic of personal interest for a report to the class; write a letter requesting
information about a college program; write a short essay presenting a solution
to a community problem);
WR3.03 -
apply knowledge of essay structure to organize short essays, using (a) an
introduction that engages the reader’s interest, introduces the thesis or
controlling idea, and previews the organization or content of the essay; (b) a
body that develops ideas logically and coherently and incorporates well-chosen,
relevant evidence to support each idea; and (c) a conclusion that follows
logically from the thesis and ideas developed in the body, summarizes the key
points and organization in the body, and makes a thoughtful generalization
related to the controlling idea;
WR3.04 -
use organizational patterns such as cause and effect, classification, and
definition to present information and ideas in reports and short essays;
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation listed below.
Grammar
and Usage: use parts of speech correctly, including participles and gerunds;
Grammar
and Usage: construct a variety of correct sentences, including compound-complex
sentences, using conjunctions; prepositional and gerund phrases; and noun,
adjective, and adverb clauses;
Grammar
and Usage: make pronouns agree with their antecedents, and subjects with their
predicates, even when widely separated in a sentence or paragraph;
Grammar
and Usage: use active and passive verb voice to suit purpose and audience;
Grammar
and Usage: use correct parallel structure;
Grammar
and Usage: identify and correct sentence errors in their own and others’
writing;
Grammar and Usage: identify
deliberate uses of ungrammatical structures in advertisements, poetry, and oral
language;
Spelling:
demonstrate understanding of a variety of spelling patterns, rules, and
strategies by analysing and correcting spelling errors;
Spelling:
use homophones and commonly confused words correctly;
Spelling:
spell correctly specific business, technical, and literary terms used in course
materials;
Spelling:
use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and
improve spelling;
Punctuation:
use punctuation correctly and for rhetorical effect, including the question
mark, exclamation mark, comma, semicolon, and colon, as well as quotation
marks, parentheses, brackets, and ellipses.
This
activity utilizes students’ knowledge of the details and significant place of
the “Riel Rebellion” in both Aboriginal and Canadian histories. Also, the
activity continues to build upon students’ skills in oral reading and
performance. Students continue to develop their understanding of various
definitions of sovereignty and the significant role played by language in
articulating concerns about sovereignty.
Teachers
should:
·
pre-read
Pauline Johnson’s “The Cattle Thief” and Maria Campbell’s “Joseph’s Justice”;
·
read
and consider the biographical information on both authors, provided in “Notes
on Authors” in An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in English. In
particular, consider the significance of Campbell’s comments about the proper
relationship to the Land as Mother and about the nature of story ownership;
consider Johnson’s political and moral sensibilities, as relevant to both unit
themes and to her role in creating a place for Aboriginal literature in the
mainstream Canadian literary landscape;
·
prepare
a review lesson of concepts and expressions of sovereignty from previous
activities; for further background, investigate the interview with Maria
Campbell in Contemporary Challenges: Conversations with Canadian Native
Authors and the introductory essay to Maria Campbell Translated: Stories
of the Road Allowance People (see Resources);
·
consider
specific criteria of effective dramatic readings;
·
investigate
local school and community resources, as well as Internet resources, to find
examples of effective dramatic poetry readings;
·
seek
the assistance of the History and Native Studies Departments if background
information on the Riel Rebellion is required; consult Resources for print and
on-line background information.
1. The teacher introduces this activity through
a review of the three prior activities, stressing the ideas of personal,
communal, and spiritual sovereignty. Indicate that communicating through
writing, speaking, and representing are all means of asserting various aspects
of sovereignty. The teacher introduction will also set in place the basic
historical contexts for both “The Cattle Thief” and “Joseph’s Justice”, through
references to the near-extinction of the buffalo and the Riel Rebellion. The
teacher may also choose to adopt a diagnostic questioning approach, to elicit
from students a demonstration of the extent of their prior knowledge of these
historical occurrences.
2. Students form groups of three. Proceed to
read “The Cattle Thief”, either silently or aloud. Each group is assigned a set
of specific questions as a guide for group discussion and collaborative
note-making. The questions should require students to demonstrate their
comprehension and interpretation skills, through content questions and through
analytical and personal response opportunities to the poem’s themes,
characters, and key lines.
3. The
collaborative poem analysis can provide a basis for a whole-class discussion
and exchange of opinions, as the teacher calls upon all groups (or designated
spokespersons) to contribute. Before the end of the class, the teacher collects
each group’s collaborative efforts, either to assess the effectiveness of the
group work or to prepare a review of the efforts as a method of introducing the
next day’s lesson.
4. Conduct an oral, whole-class review of “The
Cattle Thief” using material from students’ notes. Upon returning each group’s
notes package, recommend that students add to them any new ideas which have
surfaced as a result of reflection, discussion, or review.
5. Review with the class the relevant criteria
for a dramatic reading of a poetic narrative. Possible criteria include modulation
of voice (to indicate character and situation), variation in volume
(to indicate mood of character), and body language (to emphasize nuances
of meaning and intention). The teacher may find this an appropriate opportunity
to work with the class in the construction of either a rubric or a checklist,
to facilitate the peer assessment of the forthcoming performances. These
rubrics or checklists can be either generic or created specifically for this
task dealing with “The Cattle Thief”. In addition, if the teacher has access to
any media resources, a recorded or videotaped version of any effective dramatic
poetry reading might serve as an additional tool in the creation of assessment
expectations. Assemble the groups of three for assignment of the parts of
narrator, Eagle Chief, and Cree daughter, for a dramatic reading of Johnson’s
poem. Students take an appropriate amount of time to consider and rehearse a
reading of the poem, to be presented to and evaluated by their peers.
6. Review with the class the criteria for a
dramatic reading of a poetic narrative, using the rubric or checklist created
in the previous class. Emphasize that the message ought to be enhanced by the
dramatic delivery and that tremendous subtlety and variety is still possible.
Each group rehearses and presents their dramatic readings of “The Cattle Thief”
to the class. After completion of the reading, the teacher conducts a general
discussion of the positive aspects of the readings. Stress the effective
portrayal of character where appropriate. Turn the discussion towards the Cree
daughter’s assertion of her own identity and her assertion of various aspects
of sovereignty.
7. Allow students to complete peer assessments
of their classmates’ presentations. Finally, assign a one-page journal response
on the topics of the poem or the presentations.
8. Begin class with a review of the participants
and key features of the Riel Rebellion. The teacher, with the assistance of
student volunteers, reads Maria Campbell’s “Joseph’s Justice.” Pose a series of
questions to the class to elicit responses about the nature of Joseph’s
character as presented by Campbell (he is Métis, an ordinary man, neither
presented as heroic, nor noble, in comparison to the looming reputation of
Riel; he is, however, perceptive, and recognizes the spiritual aspects of the
Riel family and the practical nature of Dumont; Joseph asserts himself and his
claims in his own language; it is through this determined assertion that Joseph
successfully meets the challenges of injustice, and the barriers to his
rightful sovereignty).
9. Students return to their groups of three.
Instruct each group to select any 20 lines of “Joseph’s Justice” for
recitation. The groups should choose lines on the basis of poetic and dramatic
expressions of the obstacles to sovereignty and the various responses to those
obstacles. The groups are responsible for an oral reading and for both an oral
and a written explanation of their selection.
10. To conclude, the teacher conducts a summative
class discussion of the two poems, which emphasizes similarities and
differences. Students write a journal response indicating their current
understanding of the unit’s overall theme of sovereignty. More specific topics
could include a personal response to either poem on the basis of its
presentation of the obstacles to sovereignty, or an assessment of the viability
of the responses to the challenges to sovereignty presented in either poem.
·
formative
assessment of journal response for Knowledge/Understanding and Inquiry, by self
using a checklist
·
formative
assessment of group discussion for Knowledge/Understanding and Communication,
by self and peers using anecdotal comments
Since
this activity involves reading aloud in role, some students may benefit from
having specific reading responsibilities assigned in advance, to allow for pre-reading,
practice, and coaching from peers. Students might also be reminded to draw upon
their recent performance experience in prior activities in the course.
Campbell,
Maria. Maria Campbell Translated: Stories of the Road Allowance People. Penticton:
Theytus, 1995.
Lutz,
Hartmut. Contemporary Challenges: Conversations with Canadian Native Authors.
Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1991. ISBN 092007975X
Moses,
Daniel David and Terry Goldie. An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in
English, 2nd ed. Toronto: OUP, 1998. ISBN 0-19-541282-6
Background
on Riel and the Rebellion
Bowsfield,
Hartwell. Louis Riel: the rebel and the hero. Toronto: Oxford, 1971.
ISBN 0195401824
Brown,
R.C. and M.E. Prang. Confederation to 1949. Scarborough: Prentice Hall,
1966. LCCN 6523527
Hacker,
Carlotta. The Book of Canadians. ISBN 0888302436
Howard,
Joseph. Strange Empire: Louis Riel and the Métis People. Toronto: James
Lewis and Samuel, 1952. ISBN 0888620594
Morton,
Desmond. Rebellions in Canada. Toronto: Grolier, 1979. ISBN 0717218007
Websites
www.library.usask.ca/northwest/background/riel.htm
www.escape.ca/~shsb/Riel/erebellion.htm
www.fallenmatyrs.com/canada.htm
www.canadahistory.about.com
Time: 300 minutes
This
activity focuses on the content and style of two prose works, both relating to
the concept of sovereignty. Study of the two prose works is used to develop an
understanding of the features of persuasive essay form, to be used in students’
construction of a short essay as the culminating activity for Unit 3.
Strand(s): Sovereignty, Writing
Overall
Expectations
SOV.02 - describe how sovereignty is expressed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
SOV.04 - apply their knowledge of vocabulary and
language conventions to read, write, and speak effectively while identifying,
developing, or describing Aboriginal sovereignty;
WRV.03 - use a variety of
organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent and effective
written work;
WRV.04 - revise their written work,
independently and collaboratively, focusing on accuracy of information, clear
expression, and consistent use of voice;
WRV.05 - edit and proofread to produce final
drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation
conventions of standard Canadian English, as presented for this course, with
the support of print and electronic resources when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
SO1.01 -
identify different definitions of sovereignty (e.g., personal sovereignty,
spiritual sovereignty, collective sovereignty, political sovereignty), as
expressed in the works of Aboriginal writers;
SO1.02 -
assess the impact of Aboriginal sovereignty on Canadian society, as portrayed
in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Connie Fife, Taiaiake Alfred);
SO1.04 -
describe the responses of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Maria Campbell, Drew Hayden
Taylor, Lee Maracle) to barriers to Aboriginal sovereignty erected by Canadian
society;
SO2.01 -
express themselves clearly in a variety of spoken and written communications on
the topic of Aboriginal sovereignty, using appropriate vocabulary and
figurative language;
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying information
needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather
information and ideas (e.g., consult a CD-ROM to find information for a report
about the author of a novel; identify the accessibility of relevant sources for
a class presentation on a social issue);
WR2.01 -
select and use appropriate informational or literary forms to produce written
work for specific audiences and purposes, with an emphasis on reports,
correspondence, and persuasive essays (e.g., summarize a magazine article on a
topic of personal interest for a report to the class; write a letter requesting
information about a college program; write a short essay presenting a solution
to a community problem);
WR3.03 -
apply knowledge of essay structure to organize short essays, using (a) an
introduction that engages the reader’s interest, introduces the thesis or
controlling idea, and previews the organization or content of the essay; (b) a
body that develops ideas logically and coherently and incorporates well-chosen,
relevant evidence to support each idea; and (c) a conclusion that follows
logically from the thesis and ideas developed in the body, summarizes the key
points and organization in the body, and makes a thoughtful generalization
related to the controlling idea;
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details,
deleting irrelevant information, and reordering ideas (e.g., revise a report to
list a series of recommendations in order of priority; delete irrelevant
arguments to enhance the impact of a persuasive essay; add details to reveal
more about a character’s motivations);
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation listed below.
Grammar
and Usage: use parts of speech correctly, including participles and gerunds;
Grammar
and Usage: construct a variety of correct sentences, including compound-complex
sentences, using conjunctions; prepositional and gerund phrases; and noun,
adjective, and adverb clauses;
Grammar
and Usage: make pronouns agree with their antecedents, and subjects with their
predicates, even when widely separated in a sentence or paragraph;
Grammar
and Usage: use active and passive verb voice to suit purpose and audience;
Grammar
and Usage: use correct parallel structure;
Grammar
and Usage: identify and correct sentence errors in their own and others’
writing;
Grammar
and Usage: identify deliberate uses of ungrammatical structures in
advertisements, poetry, and oral language;
Spelling: demonstrate understanding of a
variety of spelling patterns, rules, and strategies by analysing and correcting
spelling errors;
Spelling:
use homophones and commonly confused words correctly;
Spelling:
spell correctly specific business, technical, and literary terms used in course
materials;
Spelling:
use a variety of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and
improve spelling;
Punctuation:
use punctuation correctly and for rhetorical effect, including the question
mark, exclamation mark, comma, semicolon, and colon, as well as quotation
marks, parentheses, brackets, and ellipses.
This
activity builds upon students’ knowledge of the various meanings of sovereignty
as developed through the prior reading of works by Drew Hayden Taylor,
Jeannette C. Armstong, Marilyn Dumont, Pauline Johnson, and Maria Campbell. The
activity also builds upon students’ familiarity with the conventions of
standard English and any prior knowledge and skills relating to the
essay-writing process. If Harold Cardinal’s essay “A Canadian What the Hell
It’s All About” has been studied, this familiarity can enhance the
discussion of the essay in the new context of this activity.
Teachers
should:
·
pre-read
“A Canadian What the Hell It’s All About”, a persuasive essay by
Harold Cardinal. By defining “Canadian” from an Aboriginal (Cree) perspective,
Cardinal offers a vision, a solution to challenges faced by both Aboriginal
people and non-Aboriginal people of Canada;
·
consult
with History and Native Studies teachers to gain background to the “aura of
conflict” referred to by Cardinal in his essay, particularly but not
exclusively, the period from the late 1960s to late 1970s; consider reading
Trudeau’s “White Paper” (1969), which outlines the federal government’s intent
to make Aboriginal peoples into Canadians;
·
in
an analysis of Cardinal’s essay, note that he structures his argument in terms
of time: the past (“Over the past century”), the present (the prevalent
challenges of defining Canadian identity), and the future (“construction of a
bridge of understanding”);
·
contact
a Native Cultural Centre for a statement of a relevant, locally-appropriate
Aboriginal world view (e.g., for Hodinoso:ni (Iroquoian) world view statement,
contact the Woodland Cultural Centre, 184 Mohawk St., P.O. Box 1506, Brantford,
ON, N3T 5V6).
1. The teacher introduces Activity 5 with a
brief outline of the historical context of Harold Cardinal’s “A Canadian
What the Hell It’s All About”, from his book The Rebirth of Canadian
Indians. The confrontational aspect of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
relationships of the past and present is acknowledged in the essay, and
Cardinal presents one possible solution to this historical and ongoing tension,
fractiousness, and debate. The teacher introduces Cardinal’s essay as a model
of persuasive, written discourse about current challenges. The teacher makes it
clear that one of the purposes for studying this prose is to assist students in
writing their own personal persuasive essay as the unit culminating activity.
Throughout this activity, the teacher keeps students focused on how Cardinal
uses rhetorical devices to convince his reader of the soundness of his thesis,
the strength of his conclusions, the necessity of “the construction of a bridge
of understanding between two worlds”. Before reading the first four paragraphs
of the essay, the class reads the Harold Cardinal reference in the “Notes on
Authors” section of An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in English.
2. The
teacher reads the first four paragraphs of the Cardinal essay, in order to
effectively introduce the essay’s subject matter and to highlight the author’s
use of rhetorical devices. The teacher conducts a Socratic lesson using the
board to assist students in note taking. Questions should elicit responses
regarding the essay’s mood (polemical seriousness), its subject matter (the
issue of Aboriginal /non- Aboriginal relations in Canada, its structural
coherence (chronologically structured), its tools of emphasis (repetition of
conflict words, such as “struggle”, “fighting”, “misunderstanding”,
“disastrous”, and “conflict”), and its thematic unity (clearly pinpointing the
idea of problematic relationships in an Aboriginal-Canadian context). The
teacher gives an oral summary from a board outline, to facilitate better
note-taking by students. Assign a reading of the remainder of the essay for
next class, with the direction to compose a statement of Cardinal’s thesis (his
specific argument regarding his chosen subject), in the students’ own words.
3. Begin the class with a brief review of the
first part of Cardinal’s essay. Have students make oral contributions, drawing
upon notes from the previous class, to demonstrate their understanding of that
introductory material. Have students offer their versions of Cardinal’s thesis,
based upon their own individual readings for homework. Review with the class
the various literary/rhetorical devices of persuasion, such as analogy,
paradox, contrast, rhetorical questions, definitions, etc. Pair students and
direct each pair to select two rhetorical devices used by Cardinal, from the
final paragraph on
p. 211, through the end of p. 213. Each pair considers how the devices enhance
Cardinal’s persuasive argument. The pair should record all of their findings
and commentary, in point form. Have student volunteers put the results of their
examinations of the text onto the board. Using these student contributions, the
teacher leads a discussion of the following issues from the essay: the
challenges presented by terminology in the debate over the idea of Canadianism;
responses to the question “Why do you not want to be Canadian?”; definitions of
the meaning of the word “Canada” from a Native perspective (i.e., Ka-Kanata);
definitions of the nature of Canada (Nee - yow). The teacher assists
students in expanding their note-making, by directing them to organize
responses to the text under such headings as personal sovereignty, collective
sovereignty, political sovereignty, and spiritual sovereignty. For next class,
assign reading from pp. 214-217. Students answer the following questions: In
the context of Aboriginal /Canadian relations in 1977, what is “our communal
problem” as it relates to the ideas of communication and understanding? What
does Cardinal mean by the “mirage gap”? What are some of the “mutually
identified goals” mentioned by Cardinal on
pp. 214 -217?
4. Begin the class with a review of some of the
rhetorical devices and their intended effects in a persuasive essay. In
response to the three questions assigned in the previous class, ask students to
respond orally using their point-form notes as discussion points. From this
teacher-guided discussion, stress the importance of language usage in
clarifying definitions (linguistic sovereignty). Also consider the
misperceptions of “the other,” which are born of miscommunication (referred to
by Cardinal as the “mirage gap”). Finally, turn attention towards Cardinal’s
provision of a vision for the future, through a fusion of Aboriginal/Canadian
understandings. The teacher selects a student volunteer to make notes on the
board during this lesson. Following this discussion, students add to, amend,
and revise their own notes from the previous evening in response to the questions.
The teacher then reads Cardinal’s conclusion, which offers his vision in the
last four paragraphs (p. 217). Having established the argumentative content of
the essay, the attention should turn to the organizational aspects of the
essay’s construction. The teacher can posit this basic structure for a
persuasive essay: thesis, arguments against, and then for
the thesis, and conclusion (in this essay, the pattern is subjugated to
the chronological organization, but still underpins the essay as follows:
the nature of the historical Aboriginal/European-settler conflicts; the meaning
of the word Canada as opposed to Ka-Kanata; the current predicament based on
the “mirage gap;” and finally, the proposed “construction of a bridge of
understanding.” Students should be aware of the variations possible in essay
organization, and also be aware of the central principles of thesis,
antithesis, persuasion, developed support, and conclusion.
5. In
preparation for student work on the unit’s culminating assignment, read a
statement of sovereignty most appropriate to the local Aboriginal community.
This statement of sovereignty should address the basis for citizenship (be that
citizenship with a clan, community, nation, or Canadian nationality). For
example, the Hodinoso:ni world view specifies that nation’s historical
background, the linkage to Mother Earth, and concludes with the political and
spiritual duties of its people. This, then, is a statement of sovereignty in
all of its aspects. Students are assigned the task of composing a personal,
persuasive essay which effectively communicates their own vision statement of
sovereignty, based upon a response to the statement “I am/am not a Canadian.”
Having introduced the essay assignment and topic, the teacher reminds students
of the requisite stages in the writing process and negotiates appropriate
timelines for the completion of this activity.
6. Students pair up once they have completed
pre-writing stages and have an outline for their essays. They critique their
partner’s outline. This editorial process continues through the construction of
at least one rough draft, with the student peer editors concentrating on the
effective use of the conventions of standard English, the organizational
characteristics of the persuasive essay, and the effective application of
rhetorical language as learned throughout the unit.
7. Students submit a polished persuasive essay,
including preceding compositional stages, for evaluation.
·
summative
assessment of essay for Knowledge/Understanding, Thinking/Inquiry,
Communication, and Application, by teacher using anecdotal comments and a
marking scheme
This
activity involves some difficult reading matter and accommodations might be required,
either through selection of an alternative persuasive essay model or through
reading aloud in class by the teacher rather than through the assignment of
individual expectations; accommodations in time allotment, in the provision of
a scribe, or through ensuring laptop availability, should be considered
wherever required. In some cases, a persuasive personal statement of
sovereignty might be made orally or through a visual composition.
Alfred,
Taiaiake. Peace, Power, Righteousness: an Indigenous Manifesto. Don
Mills: OUP, 1999.
ISBN 0-19-541216-8
Six
Nations at Grand River Territory. “Hodinoso:ni World View” The Sacred Trust
of the Hodinoso:ni Confederacy. 1992. Woodland Cultural Centre, 184 Mohawk
St., P.O. Box 1506, Brantford, ON, N3T 5V6, library@woodland-centre.on.ca
Websites
http://www.goodminds.com
helpme@goodminds.com
Sample
Questions for Pauline Johnson’s “The Cattle Thief”
Reading
Comprehension
The
following questions allow you to demonstrate your ability to extract
information accurately from a written, poetic text. Your answers need not be in
complete sentence form.
1. Who is being chased by the “desperate riders”
in stanza one?
2. Who is doing the chasing?
3. What crime has allegedly been committed?
4. What insult is hurled by the men when they do
not find the man they’re seeking?
5. What immediate physical response does this
insult receive?
6. How do the men intend to treat the dead man’s
body?
7. Why do the men back away from the woman, according
to the poem?
8. Who is the woman?
9. How does she justify the dead man’s so-called
crimes?
10. What accusation does she make towards the
group of men?
Interpretation
These
questions allow you to demonstrate your ability to interpret the ideas
communicated through poetic devices and significant quotations. Your answers
should be written in proper sentences and paragraphs.
11. How does the poet create an impression of the
English settlers’ natures through her physical description of them?
12. How is the eventual appearance of Eagle Chief
ironic, considering the image of him created initially in the poem?
13. What is the significance of Eagle Chief’s
physical appearance to the theme of the entire poem?
14. Johnson emphasizes that both Eagle Chief and
the woman speak to the English settlers “in the language of the Cree.” What
does this information add to your understanding of the poem’s plot and its
theme?
15. Explain the meaning of the lines “how have you
paid us for our land?/By a book.” Clarify the allusion that the poet is making
and how she further develops her idea throughout the final movement.
Course
Overview | Unit 4 | Course Profiles Main
Menu