Course Profile English: Contemporary Aboriginal Voices,
Grade 11,
Workplace Preparation, Public
Unit
2: Relationships
Time: 25 hours
Activity 1 | Activity 2
| Activity 3 | Activity 4
| Activity 5 | Activity 6
| Activity 7 | Activity 8
In this
unit, students demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships as
portrayed in fiction, drama, and poetry created by Aboriginal authors. In
addition, they identify literary and media works used to promote and affirm
these relationships. Students assess these works through oral presentations and
written products with specific reference to the changing nature of Aboriginal
relationships in contemporary society. Finally, students compare their own
experiences with those portrayed in literary and media works.
Strand(s): Relationships,
Writing
Expectations: All expectations
(Overall and Specific) for Relationships and Writing, as shown in the Course
Overview, are covered in this unit. They are specified at the beginning of each
activity.
|
Activity
1 |
Personal
Responses to Poetry |
240
minutes |
|
Activity
2 |
Timed
Writing: Form and Purpose |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
3 |
Humorous
Stories |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
4 |
How do
You Tell a Story? |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
5 |
Who is
Telling the Story? |
240
minutes |
|
Activity
6 |
What
Does the Story Look Like? |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
7 |
Why
Tell Stories? |
180
minutes |
|
Activity
8 |
My
Story |
120
minutes |
Unit 2
expands the concept of identity constructed in Unit 1. Students draw upon their
knowledge of the characteristics that impact identity and begin to identify the
many evolving relationships that affirm identity. Students draw upon the skills
developed in The Ontario Curriculum,
Grades 9 and 10, English.
·
Teachers
locate and bookmark web versions of Aboriginal newspapers that publish
editorial cartoons on-line. Most artists can be reached via e-mail through the
publication.
·
A
collection of poetry is assembled for the introductory activities; lectures
notes on the use of literary devices are prepared.
·
Teacher
discretion based on individual classroom composition will have to be employed
when selecting poetry and cartoons for use in the classroom. Discretion is also
recommended before directing students to any of the websites listed.
·
The
Writing strand’s goals are best met within the context of learning activities outlined
in the Course Profile. Suggested topics are incorporated throughout the
activities that meet the Writing expectations, but needs and circumstances will
differ with each individual class.
·
A
review of the Report of the Royal
Commission on Aboriginal Peoples website provides the historical background
and overview for the Sovereignty Unit, which builds on the first two units.
·
Some
assignments may have to be completed outside of classroom hours.
Ahenakew,
Freda, Brenda Gardipy, and Barbara Lafond. The
Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the First Nations. Toronto: McGraw-Hill
Ryerson Ltd., 1995. ISBN 0-07-551448-6
Hodges,
J., et al. Harbrace College Handbook for
Canadian Writers, 5th ed.
Toronto: Harcourt Brace Canada, 1999. ISBN 0774736437
Duncan Campbell Scott: The Poet and
the Indians.
National Film Board of Canada, 1995. 56 min.
First Nations: The Circle Unbroken. National Film Board of Canada,
1998 (Series).
Robertson,
Robbie. Contact from the Underworld of
Redboy. EMI, 1998.
Aboriginal
Newspapers and Other Media Outlets
Aboriginal
Peoples Television Network – www.apin.ca
Aboriginal
Voices Magazine – www.aboriginalvoices.com
Canadian
Aboriginal News and Information – www.CanadianAboriginal.com
CBC
Infoculture Radio Canada – www.infoculture.cbc.cs
Emergences
form the Shadow: First Peoples’ Photographic Perspectives (Canadian Museum of
Civilization Corporation) –
www.civilization.ca/members/fph/jaillir/jailline.html
First
Nations Art: Contemporary Native Artists in Canada –
//collections.ic.gc.ca/artists
First
Nations Messenger – www.afn.ca/The %20Messenger/messenger.htm
The
First Perspectives – www.firstperspective.ca/news.html
George
Littlechild – www.artists4kids.com/product9.html
Harbourfront
Reading Series – www.icomm.org/ifoa/events/
Indian
Mascots and Logos – pages.prodigy.net
Justice
As Healing – www.uask.ca/nativelaw/jah.hmtl
The
Mascot Issue – www.pitt.edu
Native
Americas: Akwe:kon’s Journal of Indigenous Issues –
www.nativeamericas.alp.cornell.edu
Ontario
Native Affairs Secretariat (Justice Issues) – www.nativeaffairs.jus.gov.on.ca/
Royal
Commission on Aboriginal Peoples On-line – www.inac.gc.ca/ch/recap/index_e.html
TIMEcanada
Magazine – www.canoe.ca/TimeCanada/home.html
Windspeaker
– www.ammsa.com/windspeaker
Writers
in Electronic Residence – www.wier.ca/-WIER
Time: 240 minutes
Students
work in small groups and individually to respond to poetry, identifying
relationships portrayed by Aboriginal writers. The teacher leads an analysis of
a poem to gain an understanding of these changing relationships and how they
affirm Aboriginal identity. Students examine a poem for homework and complete a
personal response journal entry.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
demonstrate an understanding of the relationships depicted in fiction, drama,
poetry, and non-fiction by Aboriginal writers (with an emphasis on novels and
poetry);
REV.02 -
demonstrate an understanding of the ways Aboriginal writers use relationships
to promote a vision of Aboriginal communities;
WRV.02 -
select and use appropriate writing forms for various purposes and audiences,
focusing on reports, correspondence, and persuasive essays.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
demonstrate an understanding of relationships (e.g., within the family or
community; within the plant, animal, or spirit world) portrayed in the works of
Aboriginal writers;
RE1.02 -
analyse changes that take place in Aboriginal relationships through interaction
with Canadian society, as portrayed in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g.,
Ruby Slipperjack, Beatrice Culleton-Moisoner, Daniel David Moses);
RE1.03 -
compare their own ideas and perspectives with those expressed or implied in a
text by an Aboriginal writer (e.g., by analysing the thoughts and responses of
a fictional character in a crisis and comparing these with their own probable
reactions; by debating two different interpretations of a literary work, using
specific references to the text to support their arguments);
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying information
needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather
information and ideas (e.g., consult a CD-ROM to find information for a report
about the author of a novel; identify the accessibility of relevant sources for
a class presentation on a social issue);
WR1.03 -
analyse and assess the information and ideas gathered from a variety of print
and electronic sources to determine if they are accurate, current, sufficient,
relevant, and suitable to the form and purpose for writing;
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns to structure written work
(e.g., use a question-and-answer format to organize an information pamphlet
about a product or service; use chronological order and flashbacks to organize
information about a character in a script; use classification to organize a
class anthology of student writing).
Students
apply their knowledge of influences and characteristics of Aboriginal identity
established in Unit 1. They should also be familiar with teacher expectations
for notebook organization.
·
Note
that teacher discretion is advised for the website references. Students may
encounter offensive language in some of the song lyrics.
·
Students
need to examine a number of poems with the title and author not revealed.
Lyrics by Aboriginal songwriters work well.
1. Have groups categorize the poems according to
themes (e.g., grandparents, children, characters, land, animals, plants). A
spokesperson for each group reports on the themes chosen, and why these top
three poems were included. The titles and authors can be revealed when students
do their personal responses in their journals. Some background on the author
could be provided at this time as well.
2. Read
“A Visit in Mid-Summer “ by Daniel David Moses. Take note of the language conventions
in the poem. Does each new line begin with a capital letter? Why did the poet
use line breaks in this way? Try to rewrite the poem with conventional sentence
and paragraph structure. Does this change how the poem makes you feel? Have
students copy the definition of metaphor in their notebooks. What emotion is
the colour blue typically associated with? Is this a sad poem?
3. Students read “ Rocks” by Jeanette Armstrong.
Then, read it together and review any words students do not understand. Divide
the poem into sections. For homework, have students illustrate specific
sections. Talk about the images in the poem and how they change. Review
homework at the beginning of the next class.
4. Students choose one of the poems from the
first activity that has not been discussed in class. Write about it in their
personal response journals. Summarize the poem in one paragraph. How do you
think the poet felt? What evidence can you provide? What is the title? What is
the poem about? What is the image in the poem? Is there more than one image?
Compare them. Choose one of the poems you most identify with. Explain why. How
does the speaker feel? What are the main ideas of the poem? Why do you think
so?
|
Purpose (why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
diagnostic
assessment of small groups |
in-class
discussions |
Knowledge Communication Application |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
formative
assessment of note taking and class discussion on language connections and
poetry analysis |
direct
observations |
Knowledge |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of homework and journals |
direct
observation |
Knowledge Communication Application |
teacher |
checklist marking
scheme |
·
To
get students into the routine of writing personal responses, have them copy
questions from the board and answer them in their journals.
·
Students
who require enrichment can continue independent analysis (e.g., use of
metaphor) of poetry, collection of lyrics, biographies of Aboriginal poets, and
compare the two poems examined in this unit.
Print
Armstrong,
J. “Rocks.” In Ahenakew, F. and B. Gardipy, and B. LaFond, eds. The Senior Issues Collections: Voices of the
First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1995. ISBN 00755160-X
Moses, D.
“A Visit in Mid-Summer.” In The Senior
Issues Collections: Voices of the First Nations.
Websites
Native
American Music Web Board – www.rainbowwalker.com/
Robbie
Robertson Songs–hollywoodandvine.com/robbierobertson/songs/
Time: 180 minutes
Students
write within prescribed time limits and follow teacher instructions. Students
participate in a critical analysis of relationships in the work of an
Aboriginal writer. Students write a paragraph following a teacher model and
re-examine a piece of their own writing from Unit 1.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.02 -
identify literary works that promote and affirm relationships among Aboriginal
peoples;
REV.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships depicted in fiction,
drama, and poetry;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, collaboratively and independently, focusing on
accuracy of information and clear expression.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
identify various relationships in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., the
relationship of the main character with others, with land, with animals, and
with plants);
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
RE1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of how relationships affirm Aboriginal identity in
the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Beatrice Culleton-Moisoner);
WR1.01 - investigate
potential topics by formulating questions, identifying informational needs and
purposes for writing, and developing research plans to gather data from print
and electronic sources (e.g., search library resources to select, broaden, or
narrow a topic; consult an on-line catalogue to get product information or send
an e-mail message to request information; create a timeline to complete a
project effectively and meet a deadline);
WR2.02 -
use literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes
and audiences;
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns in written communications
(e.g., organize a prose narrative chronologically, using new paragraphs to
indicate significant changes in time, setting, or speaker; use categorization
and examples to organize an oral presentation on employability skills);
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details;
deleting irrelevant information; and reordering to clarify, order, or connect
ideas (e.g., add stage directions in a script to clarify characterization and
manner of delivery; revise a set of instructions by presenting key steps in
correct sequence);
WR4.02 -
revise drafts of written work to improve freshness, accuracy, and clarity of
expression (e.g., use feedback from a peer conference to rewrite a trite or
clichéd ending to a story; use a dictionary and thesaurus to substitute
appropriate for incorrectly used words; examine writing for the use of
inclusive and anti-discriminatory language);
WR5.03 -
compare their current writing skills with those required in a variety of
workplace situations and occupations and identify goals for improvement.
Students
continue to use checklists for revising drafts introduced in Unit 1. They apply
note-taking skills and practise critical literacy.
·
Students
may need an opportunity to practise continuous writing individually at their
desks.
·
Prepare
a visual organizer outlining how to write a narrative paragraph and post it in
the room.
·
Prepare
a rubric for the paragraph.
1. Groups of four or five students sit in a
circle. One writer is chosen to start. The first student writes continuously for
two minutes; the pen must never leave the paper. After two minutes, the next
student writes in the same fashion. Groups may need a prompt to get them
started. Students focus on a theme and include an introduction and a
conclusion. Continue until each student has contributed to the story. Ask for
volunteers to read their stories. Have students complete a self-assessment in
their notebooks (e.g., How did you like writing like this? What was effective
about it?).
2. Read “The Crow Hop” by Gary Gottfriedson. Clarify
what happens and the order of events. (When did the dance start? Who are the
characters in the poem? Are they old or young? Define cynical. Who starts to
dance first? Where does the dance take place? Where did the song come from? How
long does the dance last? Summarize what happens in one sentence. What do you
think the mystery is?)
3. Introduce paragraph writing. Encourage
students to come up with a graphic organizer based on the class discussion. The
topic sentence should be interesting and motivate the reader to continue (e.g.,
“The Crow Hop” is a poem about a young man who dances or “The Crow Hop” is a
poem about a young man who changes). Think about the kind of questions your
audience will be asking after the first sentence. The second sentence should
describe the most important aspect of the topic (e.g., “He was cynical but
becomes filled with hope”). Students use their class notes to write two or
three more sentences about the poem. As a large group, write the closing
sentence that ties everything together.
4. Arrange student-teacher conferences to select
a paragraph written in Unit 1. Exchange with a peer and provide suggestions for
improvement, using notes on writing. Paragraphs are submitted for marking.
|
Purpose(why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
formative
assessment of directed writing activity |
a
sequential narrative writing |
Communication |
peer
and self |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of poetry analysis notes |
analysis
of a poem |
Knowledge |
teacher |
marking
scheme |
|
formative
assessment of visual organizer from narrative paragraphs |
model
narrative paragraphs |
Knowledge Communication |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of paragraph revisions |
completed
revisions by peer process |
Communication Application |
teacher |
rubric |
·
Students
can be given bonus questions (e.g., identify and describe at least one poetic
language convention in “The Crow Hop.” Describe how the author shows passage of
time in the poem).
·
Provide
an alternate task for exceptional students experiencing difficulty in class
(e.g., develop your group writing effort into a short story or a poem).
·
To
reinforce paragraph structure, analyse the final paragraph of “Marketing the
Imaginary Indian.”
Gottriedson,
G. “The Crow Hop.” In Ahenakew, P. and B. Gardipy, and B. LaFond, eds. The Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the
First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd., 1995. ISBN0-07-551690-X
Francis,
D. “Marketing the Imaginary Indian.” In The
Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the First Nations.
Time: 180 minutes
Students
examine how Aboriginal writers use humour to comment on the changing nature of
relationships among Aboriginal people. Students analyse comic strips, cartoons,
and prose. They brainstorm, categorize, and respond critically to features of
artwork.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.02 -
identify literary works that promote and affirm relationships among Aboriginal
peoples;
REV.04 -
demonstrate an understanding of relationships presented in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.02 -
identify the informational and literary forms suited to various purposes and
audiences and use the forms appropriately in their own writing;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, collaboratively and independently, focusing on
accuracy of information and clear expression.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
identify various relationships in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., the
relationship of the main character with others, with land, with animals, and
with plants);
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
RE2.01 -
identify words and expressions that develop, maintain, and affirm Aboriginal
relationships (e.g., words used by Aboriginal guest speakers, phrases used by
storytellers);
RE2.02 -
describe an Aboriginal writer’s use of language that has been influenced by
Canadian society (e.g., phrases related to religious affiliations, slang
expressions that reflect urban influences);
RE2.03 -
identify ways in which language can be used to promote, affirm, and renew
relationships among Aboriginal peoples (e.g., through musical lyrics, poetry,
and speeches);
WR1.01 - investigate potential topics by
formulating questions, identifying informational needs and purposes for
writing, and developing research plans to gather data from print and electronic
sources (e.g., search library resources to select, broaden, or narrow a topic;
consult an on-line catalogue to get product information or send an e-mail
message to request information; create a timeline to complete a project
effectively and meet a deadline);
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information to suit specific forms and purposes for
writing (e.g., highlight the most relevant details in a brainstormed list and
group them for a report; place events in an appropriate sequence for a report
on a process);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge, personal experience, and
research to develop content for personal and workplace-related writing (e.g.,
use knowledge about a product or service to plan a letter of complaint; compare
information from different sources about summer jobs to plan a résumé);
WR2.01 -
select and use an appropriate form to produce written work for a specific
audience and a specific purpose (e.g., create instructions on how to program a
VCR for customers with a limited knowledge of electronics; write a short
narrative report for a supervisor outlining the sequence of events in a
workplace incident; write a letter of complaint about a defective product,
identifying the problem and proposing a solution; write a letter to the editor
concerning an Aboriginal issue);
WR2.02 -
use literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes
and audiences;
WR2.03 -
select the appropriate person and level of language for the form, purpose, and
audience to communicate information and ideas about themes and issues (e.g.,
use appropriate specialized language to explain two perspectives on an issue in
the workplace; use the gender-neutral third person to compare information and
ideas from two texts; use the first person to state an opinion);
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns in written communications
(e.g., organize a prose narrative chronologically, using new paragraphs to
indicate significant changes in time, setting, or speaker; use categorization
and examples to organize an oral presentation on employability skills);
WR3.03 -
use organizational patterns such as cause and effect or problem-solution to
present information and ideas in short reports (e.g., use a cause-and-effect pattern
and labelled diagrams in a report explaining how to use a computer
application);
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details;
deleting irrelevant information; and reordering to clarify, order, or connect
ideas (e.g., add stage directions in a script to clarify characterization and
manner of delivery; revise a set of instructions by presenting key steps in
correct sequence);
WR4.02 -
revise drafts of written work to improve freshness, accuracy, and clarity of
expression (e.g., use feedback from a peer conference to rewrite a trite or
clichéd ending to a story; use a dictionary and thesaurus to substitute
appropriate for incorrectly used words; examine writing for the use of
inclusive and anti-discriminatory language);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts of written work to integrate researched information, ideas, and
quotations in an ethical manner (e.g., provide a context for quoted materials;
use transition words and phrases to link information from different sources);
WR5.02 -
produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology, to
share writing with intended audiences (e.g., select the most effective
typefaces, type styles, and type sizes for an announcement; format a résumé and
letter of application for a summer job; adapt an electronic template to create
a greeting card or letterhead);
WR5.03 -
compare their current writing skills with those required in a variety of
workplace situations and occupations and identify goals for improvement.
Students
apply critical-thinking skills introduced in previous units and make additions
to the classroom chart for purpose, audience, and language conventions.
Teachers
review the websites and cartoons in current issues of Aboriginal newspapers.
Use discretion when choosing a cartoon for suitability of topic. Certain
examples lend themselves to a discussion of satire and stereotyping. Others may
require some “insider” knowledge to appreciate the humour.
1. Students rank the comics in order on a scale
from one to ten and explain why one cartoon is their favourite (e.g., What is
the title? What do you think of the title? What is funny about the cartoon?
What are the characters doing? Is there any dialogue? What do you think of the
dialogue? Describe the artwork. Who is the intended audience? What makes you
think so? How is this cartoon like or unlike other cartoons?). Do this activity
again at the end of the unit to see how perceptions have changed.
2. Explain that some comics deal with serious
issues in a humorous way. Examine some political cartoons from today’s national
newspaper. Compare them to an example from a First Nations newspaper. Discuss
how the artist creates humour. Read Drew Hayden Taylor’s “Powwows Evolving from
the Traditional to High-Tech” and complete a content test. Take up the test at
the beginning of the next class. Students complete a personal response journal
for homework (e.g., comment on the title, copy words and phrases you do not
understand; copy the sentence that you remember the best).
3. Students work in groups of two or three to
develop a cartoon. Using anything read in the course to date for ideas,
brainstorm different topics and situations. Decide on your intended audience
(e.g., peers). What will your main character look like? What will your main
character sound like? Brainstorm some topics and situations for your character.
At the beginning of next day, compare your work with another group’s. How were
they the same? How were they different? Create cartoons independently for
assessment.
|
Purpose (why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
diagnostic
assessment of personal responses to cartoons |
ranking
and oral responses |
Knowledge Communication |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
formative
assessment of discussions and note taking |
content
test |
Knowledge Communication |
teacher |
marking
scheme |
|
summative
assessment of stereotyping, humour, satire |
cartoon |
Inquiry Communication Application |
peer teacher |
rubric |
·
If
students are having difficulty creating a cartoon, have them turn one of the
published cartoons into a poem by describing the image as concretely as
possible. Try to incorporate each of the five senses.
·
Content
tests can be administered orally in large groups, small groups, or individually
for more challenging texts by reading a passage then asking the questions that
pertain to that passage.
Hayden
Taylor, D. “Powwows Evolving from the Traditional to High-Tech.” In Ahenakew,
F., B. Gardipy, and B. LaFond, eds. The
Senior Issues Collections: Voices of the First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited, 1995, ISBN 0-07-551690-X
Windspeaker –www.ammsa.com/windspeaker
The First Perspective –
www.firstperspective.ca/news.html
First
Nations Messenger –www.arn.ca/The %20Messenger/messenger.htm
Time: 180 minutes
To
demonstrate an understanding of how the traditional art of storytelling has
changed in relation to contemporary society, students practise adapting
traditional oral forms.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.02 -
identify literary works that promote and affirm relationships among Aboriginal
peoples;
WRV.02 -
identify the informational and literary forms suited to various purposes and
audiences and use the forms appropriately in their own writing;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
identify various relationships in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., the
relationship of the main character with others, with land, with animals, and
with plants);
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
WR2.01 -
select and use an appropriate form to produce written work for a specific
audience and a specific purpose (e.g., create instructions on how to program a
VCR for customers with a limited knowledge of electronics; write a short
narrative report for a supervisor outlining the sequence of events in a
workplace incident; write a letter of complaint about a defective product,
identifying the problem and proposing a solution; write a letter to the editor
concerning an Aboriginal issue);
WR2.02 -
use literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes
and audiences;
WR2.03 -
select the appropriate person and level of language for the form, purpose, and
audience to communicate information and ideas about themes and issues (e.g.,
use appropriate specialized language to explain two perspectives on an issue in
the workplace; use the gender-neutral third person to compare information and
ideas from two texts; use the first person to state an opinion).
Students
move from personal responses to critical responses of works by Aboriginal
writers studied in Unit 1. Students apply their understanding of traditional
forms of oral communication introduced in
Unit 1.
·
Students
may need to review the traditional forms of oral communication from Unit 1. The
teacher should do some research on Aboriginal authors, in residence at your
local post-secondary institution or on-line. Also, locate a book on
storytelling for student reference in the classroom.
·
Teachers
prepare point-form notes for “Untitled” and rehearse oral retelling for direct
instruction.
1. Students brainstorm different ways they hear
stories and list them on a chart (e.g., television, radio, newspaper, magazine,
family, friends, books). Discuss what makes a good story (e.g., attention
grabbing, subject, voice, tone, gesture, pauses, eye contact, and addressing
the audience) and develop a rubric for oral storytelling.
2. If possible, have an Aboriginal elder visit
the class to share a story with students.
3. Students read “Untitled” by J. Berthelette
and complete personal responses in their journals (e.g., What do you think of
the title? Do you like it? Explain. Can you come up with a better one? Why is
yours better?).
4. The teacher models how to retell a story
using point-form notes from “Untitled.” Be sure to address the audience and
tell them why you are telling the story and where it came from (e.g., The story
is a modern example of a morality tale, it is an enjoyable story). Review how
to make point-form notes.
5. Provide a definition of personification for
students to copy into their notebooks (e.g., attribution of human
characteristics to non-human objects, animals, and ideas as a way of being in
the world). Discuss how it is incorporated into your oral retelling of the
story (e.g., music, voice, pause, gesture).
6. Students work individually to summarize
excerpts from stories studied in Units 1 and 2 in point form. Working in pairs,
students retell the stories to one another, incorporating elements of effective
storytelling and performing an assessment using the developed rubric.
|
Purpose (why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
assessment
of oral storytelling |
develop
together a rubric |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of independent reading and research |
Test on
independent reading |
Knowledge/
Understanding Communication |
teacher |
marking
scheme |
|
formative
assessment of notebooks |
checklist |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
teacher/
self |
anecdotal
comments, checklist |
|
diagnostic
assessment of independent reading |
point-form
summary |
Knowledge/
Understanding Communication Application |
peer |
rubric |
·
If
students are having difficulty, have them summarize how the boy got his name in
“Untitled.”
·
For
enrichment, discuss the classification of fiction and non-fiction and review
the chart from Unit 1. Compare “Untitled” to stories read in Unit 1 (e.g., “The
Burial Mound”, “Quill Earrings”). Compare them based on language, message,
interest level, and intended audience. Discuss how the classification system
does or does not apply accurately to Aboriginal authors.
Berthelette,
J. “Untitled.” In Ahenakew, F., B. Gardipy, and B. LaFond, eds. The Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the
First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1995. ISBN 0-07-551690-X
Joe,
R. “The Legend of Glooscap’s Door.” In The
Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the First Nations.
Pamak,
R. “Tiskisiak.” In The Senior Issues
Collection: Voices of the First Nations.
Sark,
J. J. “The Birth of Minegoo.” In The
Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the First Nations.
Snake,
S., et al. “Nanabush and the Rude Eagle.” In The Senior Issues Collection: Voices of the First Nations.
Time: 240 minutes
Students
demonstrate their understanding of how relationships with the past affirm
identity in the works of Aboriginal writers by adapting traditional oral forms.
Students apply their critical- and creative-thinking skills in the development
of a children’s picture book.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.02 -
identify literary works that promote and affirm relationships among Aboriginal
peoples;
REV.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships depicted in fiction,
drama, and poetry;
WRV.01 -
use a variety of print and electronic sources to gather information and develop
ideas for personal, school, and workplace-related writing;
WRV.02 -
identify the informational and literary forms suited to various purposes and
audiences and use the forms appropriately in their own writing;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, collaboratively and independently, focusing on
accuracy of information and clear expression.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
RE1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of how relationships affirm Aboriginal identity in
the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Beatrice Culleton-Moisoner);
RE2.01 -
identify words and expressions that develop, maintain, and affirm Aboriginal
relationships (e.g., words used by Aboriginal guest speakers, phrases used by
storytellers);
RE2.02 -
describe an Aboriginal writer’s use of language that has been influenced by
Canadian society (e.g., phrases related to religious affiliations, slang
expressions that reflect urban influences);
RE2.03 -
identify ways in which language can be used to promote, affirm, and renew
relationships among Aboriginal peoples (e.g., through musical lyrics, poetry,
and speeches);
WR1.01 - investigate potential
topics by formulating questions, identifying informational needs and purposes
for writing, and developing research plans to gather data from print and
electronic sources (e.g., search library resources to select, broaden, or
narrow a topic; consult an on-line catalogue to get product information or send
an e-mail message to request information; create a timeline to complete a
project effectively and meet a deadline);
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge, personal experience, and
research to develop content for personal and workplace-related writing (e.g.,
use knowledge about a product or service to plan a letter of complaint; compare
information from different sources about summer jobs to plan a résumé);
WR2.01 -
select and use an appropriate form to produce written work for a specific
audience and a specific purpose (e.g., create instructions on how to program a
VCR for customers with a limited knowledge of electronics; write a short
narrative report for a supervisor outlining the sequence of events in a workplace
incident; write a letter of complaint about a defective product, identifying
the problem and proposing a solution; write a letter to the editor concerning
an Aboriginal issue);
WR2.02 -
use literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes
and audiences;
WR2.03 -
select the appropriate person and level of language for the form, purpose, and
audience to communicate information and ideas about themes and issues (e.g.,
use appropriate specialized language to explain two perspectives on an issue in
the workplace; use the gender-neutral third person to compare information and
ideas from two texts; use the first person to state an opinion);
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details;
deleting irrelevant information; and reordering to clarify, order, or connect
ideas (e.g., add stage directions in a script to clarify characterization and
manner of delivery; revise a set of instructions by presenting key steps in
correct sequence);
WR4.02 - revise
drafts of written work to improve freshness, accuracy, and clarity of
expression (e.g., use feedback from a peer conference to rewrite a trite or
clichéd ending to a story; use a dictionary and thesaurus to substitute
appropriate for incorrectly used words; examine writing for the use of
inclusive and anti-discriminatory language);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts of written work to integrate researched information, ideas, and
quotations in an ethical manner (e.g., provide a context for quoted materials; use
transition words and phrases to link information from different sources);
WR5.01 -
cite researched information, ideas, and quotations in a consistent and ethical
manner according to acceptable research methodology;
WR5.02 -
produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology, to
share writing with intended audiences (e.g., select the most effective
typefaces, type styles, and type sizes for an announcement; format a résumé and
letter of application for a summer job; adapt an electronic template to create
a greeting card or letterhead);
WR5.03 -
compare their current writing skills with those required in a variety of
workplace situations and occupations and identify goals for improvement;
WR5.04 -
edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting
errors according to the requirements of grammar, usage, spelling, and
punctuation.
Students
continue to use critical-thinking skills and apply inquiry skills in the
communication of ideas.
·
Teachers
gather samples of children’s literature by Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
authors, as well as the NFB video series, The
Circle Unbroken.
·
Teachers
also have to prepare lecture notes on citing resources appropriately, content
tests, and a transcript of “Lord of the Sky.”
·
Teachers
should preview video to be prepared to stop or fast forward through the video
to point out misconceptions and facilitate identification of myths and icons
that appear in the film. A teacher’s guide accompanies the video. Also, try to
obtain a copy of Richard VanCamp’s A Man
Called Raven to compare to the video.
1. Brainstorm characteristics of a children’s
picture book (e.g., illustrations, types of sentences, language conventions,
characters, plot, title, name of author, illustrator). Bring in some Aboriginal
and non-Aboriginal authors and illustrations for students to compare and
classify (e.g., legend, modern story). Students form groups to write and
illustrate a children’s book.
2. Provide a choice of stories from primary
texts for students to adapt. Provide lecture notes on how to cite resources
appropriately, including resource persons (e.g., title, as told to student by
resource person; or title by permission of resource person). Administer content
test questions to ensure independent reading and comprehension, clarify the
order of events, and answer any questions students have. Students review their
story and make a list of scenes to be illustrated (e.g., dialogue). Groups may
benefit from doing a point-form summary before planning the scenes. Groups
submit a first draft.
3. Prepare a transcript of the text from “Lord
of the Sky.” Students listen to the video without the picture and then
illustrate the script. As a class, discuss the fact that the directors were
non-Aboriginal. Play the video with the picture and view with a critical eye
(e.g., Where does this legend come from? Were they hunters/gatherers or
nomadic?). List students’ suggested solutions to misconceptions in the film.
4. Return drafts of children’s books to groups
for revision. Have groups review their illustrations, keeping classroom
discussion about the video in mind, and submit a second draft. Reinforce the
importance of writing what you know, researching a topic, and the value of
human resources. If there is any concern about appropriation of voice, have
students seek input from an Aboriginal resource (e.g., student, teacher,
community member).
|
Purpose (why) |
Connections to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
formative
assessment of language conventions |
Knowledge Communication |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
diagnostic
assessment of independent reading |
Knowledge |
teacher |
marking
scheme |
|
formative
assessment of revisions |
Knowledge Inquiry Communication Application |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
·
Have
students prepare a debate, agreeing or disagreeing with M. Demientieff’s
statement, “Children have no prejudices” from the article “Our Stories: The
Roots that Bind Us.”
·
Rather
than reintroducing texts studied in Unit 1 the class could work in small groups
to compose a children’s book for publication, using “Untitled.” One group could
be responsible for illustrations, one for text, and another for publishing
details.
·
Excerpts
of dialogue from “Untitled” could be practised and acted out by groups in place
of publishing. Students could provide a dramatic re-enactment of the boy’s
speech in the story.
Print
Deminetieff,
M. “Our Stories: The Roots that Bind Us.” In Ahenakew, F., B. Gardipy, and B.
LaFond, eds. The Senior Issues
Collection; Voices of the First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1995.
ISBN 0-07-551690-X
Joe,
R. “The Legend of Glooscap’s Door.” In The
Senior Issues Collections: Voices of the First Nations.
Pamak,
R. “Tikisiak.” In The Senior Issues
Collection; Voices of the First Nations.
Sark,
J.J. “The Birth of Minegoo.” In The
Senior Issues Collection; Voices of the First Nations.
Snake,
S., et al. “Nanabush and the Rude Eagle.” In The Senior Issues Collection; Voices of the First Nations.
VanCamp,
R. A Man Called Raven. San Francisco,
CA: Children’s Book Press, 1997. ISBN 0892391448
VanCamp,
R. What’s the Most Beautiful Thing You
Know About Horses? San Francisco, CA: Children’s Book Press, 1998. ISBN
0892391545
Websites
Aboriginal
Directors Video Collection 2000 – www.nfb.ca/aboriginaldirectors
Native
American Books – www.kstrom.net/isk/books/bookmenu.html
Video
“Lord of
the Sky,” from First Nations: The Circle
Unbroken Series. National Film Board of Canada, 1998. Order Number C9198066
Time: 180 minutes
Students
assess informational texts and compare different types of interviews that
reference the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships. Students research
Aboriginal media creators and adapt information into an outline for an
interview.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.04 -
demonstrate an understanding of relationships presented in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.01 -
use a variety of print and electronic sources to gather information and develop
ideas for personal, school, and workplace-related writing;
WRV.02 -
identify the informational and literary forms suited to various purposes and
audiences and use the forms appropriately in their own writing;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, collaboratively and independently, focusing on
accuracy of information and clear expression;
WRV.05 -
edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage,
spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as
prescribed for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources
when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
RE1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of how relationships affirm Aboriginal identity in
the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Beatrice Culleton-Moisoner);
RE2.02 -
describe an Aboriginal writer’s use of language that has been influenced by
Canadian society (e.g., phrases related to religious affiliations, slang
expressions that reflect urban influences);
RE2.03 -
identify ways in which language can be used to promote, affirm, and renew
relationships among Aboriginal peoples (e.g., through musical lyrics, poetry,
and speeches);
RE3.02 -
identify how Aboriginal media creators (e.g., Gil Cardinal, Buffy Sainte-Marie,
Alanis Obomsawin) use images to represent changes in Aboriginal relationships
(e.g., the role of women in Aboriginal society, Aboriginal peoples’
relationship to the earth);
RE3.03 -
assess, with reference to various media forms, how Aboriginal creators portray
the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships (e.g., the development of
relationships between isolated and urban communities);
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying
informational needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to
gather data from print and electronic sources (e.g., search library resources
to select, broaden, or narrow a topic; consult an on-line catalogue to get
product information or send an e-mail message to request information; create a
timeline to complete a project effectively and meet a deadline);
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information to suit specific forms and purposes for
writing (e.g., highlight the most relevant details in a brainstormed list and
group them for a report; place events in an appropriate sequence for a report
on a process);
WR1.03 -
analyse information gathered from a variety of print and electronic sources to
determine whether the information is sufficient, relevant, and suitable to the
form and purpose for writing;
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge, personal experience, and
research to develop content for personal and workplace-related writing (e.g.,
use knowledge about a product or service to plan a letter of complaint; compare
information from different sources about summer jobs to plan a résumé);
WR4.01 -
revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by adding details;
deleting irrelevant information; and reordering to clarify, order, or connect
ideas (e.g., add stage directions in a script to clarify characterization and
manner of delivery; revise a set of instructions by presenting key steps in
correct sequence);
WR4.02 -
revise drafts of written work to improve freshness, accuracy, and clarity of
expression (e.g., use feedback from a peer conference to rewrite a trite or
clichéd ending to a story; use a dictionary and thesaurus to substitute
appropriate for incorrectly used words; examine writing for the use of
inclusive and anti-discriminatory language);
WR4.03 -
revise drafts of written work to integrate researched information, ideas, and
quotations in an ethical manner (e.g., provide a context for quoted materials;
use transition words and phrases to link information from different sources);
WR5.01 -
cite researched information, ideas, and quotations in a consistent and ethical
manner according to acceptable research methodology;
WR5.02 -
produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology, to
share writing with intended audiences (e.g., select the most effective
typefaces, type styles, and type sizes for an announcement; format a résumé and
letter of application for a summer job; adapt an electronic template to create
a greeting card or letterhead);
WR5.03 - compare their current writing skills
with those required in a variety of workplace situations and occupations and
identify goals for improvement;
WR5.04 - edit and proofread their own and
others’ writing, identifying and correcting errors according to the
requirements of grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation.
Students
continue to develop the chart, outlining ways of communicating Aboriginal
identity, values, and world views, to include journalism (e.g., print and radio
interviews, newspaper accounts of an event).
·
Teachers
should do preliminary research on contemporary Aboriginal authors and artists
and prepare a worksheet on how to cite Internet resources for student
reference.
·
Teachers
should prepare a content test/point-form summary of each interview to lead
class discussions. Prepare a lesson and worksheet on identifying sentence
fragments for students to complete. Teachers should prepare a sample flowchart
for the questions from “Conversation with Ruby Slipperjack.”
1. Students brainstorm jobs in the arts that
involve writing. Have students do some Internet research on one contemporary
Aboriginal author or artist (e.g., Richard VanCamp, Greg Staats, Alanis
Obomsawin, George Littlechild, Jane Ash Poitras). Students select and print
three relevant Internet articles about their artist. Provide lecture notes on
citing Internet references for students to copy into their notes. Have students
perform a self-assessment (e.g., What was my best source of information? What
other kinds of sources could I have used? What are the pros and cons of each
type? How could I find out more?).
2. Students read “Interview with Blaine Favel”
by Freda Ahenakew and “Conversation with Ruby Slipperjack” by Harmut Lutz and
complete a personal response journal (e.g., What are your impressions of Ruby
Slipperjack/Blaine Favel after reading the interview? What was the most
interesting thing you learned from reading the interview?).
3. Lead a class discussion on the difference in
types of questions and answers in each interview. Which questions were planned?
Which questions were results of the previous one? Which interview did you
prefer reading? Compare the interviews (e.g., purpose, intended audience,
language conventions). After discussion on sentence fragments, students
complete a worksheet identifying them.
4. Using the three Internet articles, students
summarize and highlight main points in their notes. Students develop three
initial questions to ask the artist they selected to research. Ensure in a
conference that students utilize their research to prepare questions that draw
on the artist’s area of expertise. Direct students to anticipate the answer
their question will receive (e.g., yes or no) and be prepared to follow up on
any new information that could be provided. Students prepare a flow chart
diagram outlining the questions they have developed and submit it with the
three article summaries and a works cited page.
·
If
there are concerns about reading comprehension, administer content tests for
interviews. These could be done in cooperative learning groups, doing sections
of each interview and reporting to the class.
·
Students
could develop interview questions for one another. After rehearsing the
interview several times, they could record the result. Is the interview going
to be recorded live on the radio? Is the interview going to be edited for a
textbook? Have students try transcribing the interview and comment on the
editing process. Does the edited version reflect spontaneity, as in a
conversation?
Print
Ahenakew,
F. “Interview with Blaine Favel.” In Ahenakew, F., B. Gardipy, and B. LaFond,
eds. The Senior Issues Collection; Voices
of the First Nations. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1995.
ISBN 0-07-551690-X
Lutz, H.
“Conversation with Ruby Slipperjack.” In The
Senior Issues Collection; Voices of the First Nations.
Websites
First
Nations Art: An Introduction to Contemporary Native Artists in
Canada–//collections.ic.gc.ca/artists/
Aboriginal
Voices Magazine – www.aboriginal voices.com
Time: 180 minutes
Students
identify an aspect of the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships in
contemporary society as reported in the Aboriginal media. Through an analysis
of the facts, they demonstrate an understanding of the commonalities of
Aboriginal world views. Students use the third person to summarize accounts of
affirmation of Aboriginal identify in contemporary society.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.04 -
demonstrate an understanding of relationships presented in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.01 -
use a variety of print and electronic sources to gather information and develop
ideas for personal, school, and workplace-related writing;
WRV.03 -
use organizational structures and patterns to produce coherent written work;
WRV.04 -
revise their written work, collaboratively and independently, focusing on
accuracy of information and clear expression.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
identify various relationships in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., the
relationship of the main character with others, with land, with animals, and
with plants);
RE1.02 -
identify the changing nature of Aboriginal relationships in contemporary
society (e.g., the Aboriginal concept of “nation to nation”, the tendency of
Aboriginal people to become more vocal and demonstrative in seeking redress of
wrongs committed against them), as depicted in the works of Aboriginal writers;
RE1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of how relationships affirm Aboriginal identity in
the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., Beatrice Culleton-Moisoner);
RE2.03 -
identify ways in which language can be used to promote, affirm, and renew
relationships among Aboriginal peoples (e.g., through musical lyrics, poetry,
and speeches);
RE3.03 -
assess, with reference to various media forms, how Aboriginal creators portray
the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships (e.g., the development of
relationships between isolated and urban communities);
WR1.01 - investigate potential
topics by formulating questions, identifying informational needs and purposes
for writing, and developing research plans to gather data from print and
electronic sources (e.g., search library resources to select, broaden, or
narrow a topic; consult an on-line catalogue to get product information or send
an e-mail message to request information; create a timeline to complete a
project effectively and meet a deadline);
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information to suit specific forms and purposes for
writing (e.g., highlight the most relevant details in a brainstormed list and
group them for a report; place events in an appropriate sequence for a report
on a process);
WR1.03 -
analyse information gathered from a variety of print and electronic sources to
determine whether the information is sufficient, relevant, and suitable to the
form and purpose for writing;
WR1.04 -
use information and ideas from prior knowledge, personal experience, and
research to develop content for personal and workplace-related writing (e.g.,
use knowledge about a product or service to plan a letter of complaint; compare
information from different sources about summer jobs to plan a résumé);
WR2.03 -
select the appropriate person and level of language for the form, purpose, and
audience to communicate information and ideas about themes and issues (e.g.,
use appropriate specialized language to explain two perspectives on an issue in
the workplace; use the gender-neutral third person to compare information and
ideas from two texts; use the first person to state an opinion);
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns in written communications
(e.g., organize a prose narrative chronologically, using new paragraphs to
indicate significant changes in time, setting, or speaker; use categorization
and examples to organize an oral presentation on employability skills);
WR5.03 -
compare their current writing skills with those required in a variety of
workplace situations and occupations and identify goals for improvement.
Students
build on their knowledge and understanding of influences on Aboriginal identity
and the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships examined in the course to
date.
·
Teachers
prepare lecture notes to facilitate large-group and small-group discussions
about why these types of stories should be told, who should tell them, and who
should hear them. Notes incorporate use of first person to state an opinion
(e.g., personal response journal) and third person to compare information and
ideas (e.g., article summary) in context to reinforce student use of the appropriate
level of language for form, purpose, and audience. Reference could be made to
the chart developed in Unit 1.
·
Teachers
should pre-select some web articles for students who are having difficulty
(e.g., First Nations Messenger is a
national newspaper published to advance the aspirations of First Nations
peoples).
·
Create
rubric to grade summative writing in the third person
1. Students brainstorm the components of a
newspaper article (e.g., headline, byline, photograph, caption, test, tables,
graphs). Allow time for students to use Internet resources of Aboriginal
newspapers to scan headlines, examine photographs, read captions, and select
three articles.
2. Have students select one of their articles
and record important facts under the following headings in their notebooks:
When (date, time, season); What (an event); Who (person); Where (location); Why
(reason). For homework, students complete a personal response journal. What did
you know about the topic before you read the article? What did you learn? What
do you want to know more about?
3. Assign
pairs of students to ask questions about their partner’s article using the
following model:
|
First Student: |
Summarize your article in one sentence. |
|
Second Student: |
Ask as many questions as possible about the topic (will your question get a “yes” or “no” answer?). |
|
First Student: |
Only provide the answer to the questions and do not volunteer other information. |
|
Second Student: |
Write down any new ideas that result from questioning. |
|
First Student: |
Offer suggested questions that could have been asked. |
4. Students take turns summarizing their
articles in the third person and listing the three most important facts in the
article. For homework, students write an alternate headline for their article
and explain why their headline is better.
5. Students submit their summaries
|
Purpose (why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
formative
assessment of appropriate level of language |
class-generated
charts and notes |
Knowledge/
Understanding Communication |
peer teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of article selection criteria and note taking |
summary
and personal response |
Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments marking
scheme |
|
diagnostic
assessment of reciprocal questioning and article summary |
|
Communication Application |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments one-on-one
guidance |
|
Summative
assessment of summary paragraph |
Paragraph
in third person |
Communication.
Application |
teacher |
rubric |
·
Re-read
“Two Teens Banished to Remote Islands.” Have students create an illustration to
go with this article. What phrase brings strong images to mind? Write a caption
for your illustration. Explain why the caption is suitable.
·
Independent
study on a current topic (e.g., Mathew Coon Come or Grand Chief of the Assembly
of First Nations) for students who require enrichment.
Coon
Come’s Challenge: Canada’s Aboriginals Look to a New National Chief to be More
Militant–www. macleans.ca
Windspeaker
– www.ammsa.com/windspeaker
The
First Perspective–www.firstperspective.ca/news.html
First
Nations Messenger –www.afn.ca/The%Messenger/messenger.htm
Timecanada
Magazine–www.canoe.ca/TimeCanada/home.html
Time: 120 minutes
In this
culminating activity, students demonstrate an understanding of the evolving
relationship between Aboriginal identities and the media and an understanding
of how relationships, discussed in the course to date, affirm Aboriginal
identity through creation of a media product. Students create a poster that
illustrates the various relationships that are constantly forming Aboriginal
identity and they employ language to promote, affirm, and renew relationships
among Aboriginal peoples.
Strand(s): Relationships, Writing
Overall
Expectations
REV.01 -
identify and demonstrate an understanding of Aboriginal relationships portrayed
in works by Aboriginal writers;
REV.04 -
demonstrate an understanding of relationships presented in media works by
Aboriginal creators;
WRV.01 -
use a variety of print and electronic sources to gather information and develop
ideas for personal, school, and workplace-related writing;
WRV.02 -
identify the informational and literary forms suited to various purposes and
audiences and use the forms appropriately in their own writing;
WRV.05 -
edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage,
spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as
prescribed for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources
when appropriate.
Specific
Expectations
RE1.01 -
identify various relationships in the works of Aboriginal writers (e.g., the
relationship of the main character with others, with land, with animals, and
with plants);
RE2.01 -
identify words and expressions that develop, maintain, and affirm Aboriginal
relationships (e.g., words used by Aboriginal guest speakers, phrases used by
storytellers);
RE2.03 -
identify ways in which language can be used to promote, affirm, and renew
relationships among Aboriginal peoples (e.g., through musical lyrics, poetry,
and speeches);
RE3.01 -
identify film and video images that reflect commonalities in Aboriginal world
views (e.g., holism, oneness, nationhood);
RE3.02 -
identify how Aboriginal media creators (e.g., Gil Cardinal, Buffy Sainte-Marie,
Alanis Obomsawin) use images to represent changes in Aboriginal relationships
(e.g., the role of women in Aboriginal society, Aboriginal peoples’
relationship to the earth);
RE3.03 -
assess, with reference to various media forms, how Aboriginal creators portray
the evolving nature of Aboriginal relationships (e.g., the development of
relationships between isolated and urban communities);
WR1.01 -
investigate potential topics by formulating questions, identifying
informational needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to
gather data from print and electronic sources (e.g., search library resources
to select, broaden, or narrow a topic; consult an on-line catalogue to get
product information or send an e-mail message to request information; create a
timeline to complete a project effectively and meet a deadline);
WR1.02 -
classify and organize information to suit specific forms and purposes for
writing (e.g., highlight the most relevant details in a brainstormed list and
group them for a report; place events in an appropriate sequence for a report
on a process);
WR1.03 -
analyse information gathered from a variety of print and electronic sources to
determine whether the information is sufficient, relevant, and suitable to the
form and purpose for writing;
WR1.04 - use information and ideas
from prior knowledge, personal experience, and research to develop content for
personal and workplace-related writing (e.g., use knowledge about a product or
service to plan a letter of complaint; compare information from different
sources about summer jobs to plan a résumé);
WR2.02 -
use literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes
and audiences;
WR3.01 -
select and use appropriate organizational patterns in written communications
(e.g., organize a prose narrative chronologically, using new paragraphs to
indicate significant changes in time, setting, or speaker; use categorization
and examples to organize an oral presentation on employability skills);
WR5.02 -
produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology, to
share writing with intended audiences (e.g., select the most effective
typefaces, type styles, and type sizes for an announcement; format a résumé and
letter of application for a summer job; adapt an electronic template to create
a greeting card or letterhead).
Student
review the language, symbols, and visual images discussed in the course in a
new context.
Teachers
should pre-select resources about the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network for
reference.
1. Students make a list of famous Aboriginal
people. What characteristics are similar? (e.g., all dead, all fictional, all
learned in this course). Is there a stereotype the non-Aboriginal media seem to
use?
2. Prepare some resources for students to review
the Aboriginal People’s Television Network or have them search the Internet
(e.g., programming schedule, APTN mandate). Make a list of different types of
children’s shows. Are there any missing?
3. Students develop posters promoting a new show
to debut on the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network, with themselves as the
central character. Decide what format their show will take (e.g., car show,
sports show, half-hour sitcom, hour-long drama, movie of the week). Who is
going to be looking at the poster? Brainstorm some images of contemporary
Aboriginal society. What kind of images will appeal to the audience? Select a
visual image for your poster. What is the relationship among these images? Draw
a rough sketch of the layout reflecting this relationship. What will the tone
of your poster be? Create a slogan or a jingle for your show. How could you
improve the message you are trying to send? How does your show fit APTN’s
profile? Students submit a completed first draft for evaluation. After
revision, students submit a final product.
|
Purpose (why) |
Strategy (what) |
Connection to Achievement Chart |
Evaluator (who) |
Tool (how) |
|
diagnostic
assessment of change in perceptions |
brainstorming |
Communication |
teacher
|
anecdotal
comments |
|
formative
assessment of research and note taking |
media
examination |
Knowledge Inquiry |
peers |
checklist |
|
formative
assessment of application of concepts |
draft
of poster development |
Application |
teacher |
anecdotal
comments |
|
summative
assessment of application of concepts |
poster
development |
Application |
teacher |
rubric |
·
A
research exercise, with specific questions and how to locate the answer, could
be prepared in advance for students experiencing difficulties.
·
Students
who are working ahead could prepare a video review of an Aboriginal director’s
work (e.g., use of camera angle, fades, lighting, sound, and action to reflect
the relationship between people and their environment and between the past and
the future.)
CBC
Infoculture Radio Canada – www.infoculture.cbc.cs
Aboriginal
Peoples Television Network – www.apin.ca
Course
Overview | Unit 1 | Course Profiles Main
Menu