Course
Profile Information
Technology in Business (BTX4C), Grade 12, College Preparation, Catholic
Unit 2: Teamwork
Time: 15 hours
Activity 2.1 | Activity 2.2 | Activity
2.3 | Activity 2.4 | Activity 2.5
Unit
Description
In
Unit 2, students become familiar with why teams are used so predominantly in
business and discover what skills and characteristics facilitate efficient
teamwork. They learn the importance of recognizing and resolving conflict in a
work environment, work as a team to create shorter and longer business reports
based on case study scenarios, and present their reports in an efficient and
businesslike manner.
In
Activity 1, students listen to an article containing many details and answer
ten questions based on the story. They record the number of correct answers
they received. Students are grouped and, as a team, answer the same ten
questions based on the article. The number of correct answers is recorded. Students
compare the number of correct responses from each situation and discuss reasons
for their results. The benefits of project teams in business situations are
discussed, as are roadblocks to group success. Students participate in another
team activity, The Obelisk of Zin (Appendix 2.1.1), which promotes
communication and cooperation. Students brainstorm why one team was more
successful or quicker than another team. The teacher assists by giving
observations gathered during the Obelisk activity. Using a word processor,
students generate a table of characteristics of effective and ineffective
teams. With teacher assistance, the class develops a checklist containing
criteria for effective group work that will be used to assess their group
activities in the remainder of the unit.
In
Activity 2, students differentiate between the terms problem, dispute, and
conflict. Conflict resolution principles are discussed, as are positive
functions of conflict, negative effects of conflict, and common negative
responses to conflict. Students participate in an activity designed to promote
conflict analysis and resolution. Students are “debriefed” following the
activity. Group work is evaluated using the checklist developed in Activity 1.
Students describe the importance of resolving employee conflict to enhance
business productivity and identify ways to promote effective project teamwork.
In
Activity 3, students consider the following scenario: “You are a real estate
agent. Your clients have $50 000 to put down on a house. They have two school
aged children and want a three-bedroom house near a school. They can only
afford a mortgage payment of $1200 a month. Shopping on-line, find the nicest
house you can in your area and the best mortgage rate currently available.
After you have found the best deals, write your client a letter and incorporate
a spreadsheet showing the information. Use a picture of the house.”
In
Activity 4, students, in groups of three to four, research and plan a two-week
dream tour package designed to be offered to their tour company’s repeat
clientele. Students, in their groups, use appropriate IT tools, e.g.,
spreadsheets, e-mail, shared directories, etc., to plan their proposals, set
timelines and divide responsibilities in order to create their proposed tour
packages. Students track their time using time sheets, so that management can
compare the actual cost of the development of this project with the projected
cost. Each group works effectively using the teamwork concepts taught earlier
in this unit. Consensus must be reached in each group regarding the group’s
final proposal. Decisions must be consistent with Catholic social principles,
specifically, “the dignity of the Human Person” and commitment to the common
good.
In
Activity 5, students choose the appropriate software tools to create a
multi-media presentation to highlight their final budget proposals and then
present this to the class. The class is encouraged to critically, but
sensitively, evaluate the work of their classmates by pointing out strengths
and weaknesses of each proposal.
|
Activity |
Learning Expectations |
Assessment Categories |
Focus |
|
2.1 2.5 hours |
PM1.01,
PM1.02, PM1.04, ER1.04 |
Application |
Introductory
Group Activities |
|
2.2 1.25 hours |
PMV.01, PM1.03 |
Application |
Conflict Resolution |
|
2.3 1.25 hours |
ERV.01,
SBV.01, ER1.01, SB1.01 |
Application |
Individual
Business Simulation |
|
2.4 5 hours |
PMV.02,
ERV.01, ER1.02, ER1.03, PM2.01, PM2.02 |
Thinking/Inquiry |
Group
Costing Analysis |
|
2.5 5 hours |
ERV.01,
SBV.01, PMV.02, ER1.02, ER1.03, PM2.02, SB1.01, SB1.02, SB1.03 |
Application |
Multimedia
Presentation |
Time: 2.5 hours
Groups
and individual students listen to an article containing many details and answer
ten questions based on the article. They record the number of correct answers
they received. Students are then grouped and, as a team, answer the same ten
questions based on the article. The number of correct group answers is
recorded. Students compare the number of correct responses from each situation
and discuss reasons for their results. The benefits of project teams in business
situations are discussed, as are roadblocks to group success. Students
participate in another team activity, The Obelisk of Zin, which promotes
communication and cooperation. Students brainstorm why one team was more
successful or quicker than another team. The teacher assists by giving
observations gathered during the Obelisk activity. Using a word processor,
students generate a table of characteristics of effective and ineffective
teams. With teacher assistance, the class develops a checklist containing
criteria for effective group work that is used to assess their group activities
in the remainder of the unit.
Ontario
Catholic School Graduate Expectations: CGE3c, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5e.
Strand(s): Electronic Project
Management and Teamwork, Electronic Research and Communication
Overall
Expectations
PMV.01 -
manage a multitask team project in an electronic environment.
Specific
Expectations
PM1.01 - explain the concept of a project team
as it applies to business;
PM1.02 - compare effective and ineffective
teams and explain how they differ;
PM1.04 -
demonstrate the appropriate use of an electronic tool for evaluating team
process and productivity;
ER1.04 -
demonstrate an understanding of the importance of classifying research results
based upon relevance to the specific problem.
·
Acquire
a business IT article with a large number of details for reading to the class
and prepare 10 questions to ask the class.
·
Photocopy
and cut up Obelisk of Zin clue sheets so that each clue exists on its own small
piece of paper and each group of students has a complete set of clues.
·
The
teacher should go over the clues and understand the problem.
·
Knowledge
of how to use a word processor to create tables.
The teacher:
·
reads
a short article containing many details and asks students ten short-answer
questions based on the article;
·
groups
students into teams and has them answer the same ten questions based on the
article. The article is not reread. The group responses are checked and the
number of correct group answers is recorded. The students’ individual answers
are handed back and each student marks and records the number of correct
answers he/she received;
·
leads
a discussion based on the comparison of the number of correct responses from
each situation and discusses reasons for the differing results;
·
leads
a discussion on the benefits of project teams in business situations and the
roadblocks to group work success;
·
distributes
and explains the purpose of the second team activity called The Obelisk of Zin
(Appendix 2.1.1) which promotes communication and cooperation. Students are
encouraged to use the knowledge learned in the discussions regarding group work
to improve the efficiency of their group;
·
observes
the groups and records any apparent positive and/or negative teamwork traits;
·
leads
a student brainstorming session as to why some teams were more successful or
quicker than others. The teacher assists by giving examples through the teacher
observations gathered during the Obelisk activity;
·
instructs
students to use a word processor to generate a table of characteristics of
effective and ineffective teams. With teacher assistance, the class develops a
checklist containing criteria for effective group work that is used to assess
their group activities in the remainder of the unit.
Students:
·
listen
to the teacher read the article, answer the ten multiple choice questions and
submit the answers to the teacher;
·
work
in groups of four to answer the same ten questions. The group answers are
checked and recorded;
·
record
and tabulate their original individual answers;
·
participate
in a discussion regarding the value of group or team work and how to reduce the
roadblocks to communication and creativity;
·
participate
in the second team activity (Obelisk of Zin) trying to reduce those barriers to
creative group work;
·
create
a table of characteristics of an effective team;
·
assist
the teacher in creating a suitable checklist containing criteria for evaluating
their group work activity in the remainder of the unit.
·
Diagnostic
assessment of students’ ability to create tables through word processor should
be done prior to this activity using a checklist developed by the teacher and
students.
The
following are ways in which the activities can meet each student’s individual
needs:
·
provide
individual or small group support to students who lack the required background
skills.
Time: 1.25 hours
In
Activity 2, students differentiate between the terms problem, dispute, and
conflict. Students observe a conflict scenario role-play and are “debriefed”
following the activity. Conflict resolution principles are discussed, as are
positive functions of conflict, negative effects of conflict, and common
negative responses to conflict. Student groups participate in an activity
designed to promote conflict analysis and resolution. Group work is evaluated
using the checklist developed in Activity 1. Student groups report their
experiences to the class and participate in compiling a list of rules to
resolve conflict and promote effective teamwork.
Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations: CGE2a, CGE2c, CGE3b, CGE3c, CGE3d, CGE4a, CGE5e.
Strand(s): Electronic Project
Management and Teamwork
Overall
Expectations
PMV.01 -
manage a multitask team project in an electronic environment.
Specific
Expectations
PM1.03 -
describe how businesses resolve employee conflict to enhance productivity.
The teacher:
·
photocopies
Appendix 2.2.1 and cuts it up into portions with individual roles;
·
pre-selects
(the period before Activity 2 begins) six students to participate in the
introductory role-playing scenario;
·
gives
the six selected students a photocopy of their part of Appendix 2.2.1 with only
their role defined;
·
tells
students to stick to their defined roles and not discuss the scenario with each
other prior to the next class (maintenance of conflict is encouraged);
·
photocopies
the evaluation sheets to be used during the activity (from Activity 1);
·
prepare
whatever other handouts he/she selects upon from Appendices 2.2.2 and 2.2.3;
·
photocopy
Appendix 2.2.4 and cut up into portions with individual roles;
·
prepares
instructions for the activity.
The teacher:
·
leads
a group discussion to elicit synonyms for “conflict”;
·
helps
students differentiate the terms problem, dispute, and conflict;
·
reviews
school policies about Internet use and policies related to suspensions before
the role play
·
asks
pre-selected students to participate in a conflict role-play found in Appendix
2.2.1;
·
debriefs
students following the activity by discussing that there is often no perfect
solution and that participants in a conflict must be willing to consider a
variety of solutions;
·
has
students determine the roadblocks to resolving the conflict as shown in the
role-playing scenario (suggestions found in Appendix 2.2.2);
·
encourages
students to suggest solutions to the conflict (reactions of all parties
involved must be considered, discussion of win/lose, lose/lose and win/win
situations found in Appendix 2.2.3);
·
discusses
conflict resolution principles, positive functions of conflict, negative
effects of conflict, and common negative responses to conflict (see Resources –
Tillett, Gregory. Resolving Conflict: A Practical Approach);
·
divides
students into groups of four or five;
·
presents
students with business conflict resolution case study found in Appendix 2.2.4;
·
directs
students to divide up the roles in the group and then participate in the
role-play with a view to resolving the conflict;
·
encourages
students to represent his/her assigned character during the role play;
·
evaluates
group work using the checklist developed in Activity 1
·
directs
students to list five rules for resolving conflict that promotes teamwork and
in turn helps to enhance business;
·
leads
a class discussion where each group reports on their experiences with conflict
and conflict resolution;
·
encourages
students to identify how their Catholic faith can assist them in conflict
situations;
·
synthesizes
a list of top ways to address conflict resolution by eliciting each groups
response (see Resources for suggestions).
Students:
·
participate
in a class discussion to define problem, dispute, and conflict;
·
watch
a conflict situation role-play;
·
discuss
roadblocks to resolving conflicts;
·
participate
in a group activity to identify roadblocks in resolving conflict;
·
brainstorm
solutions to resolving conflicts;
·
discuss
conflict resolution principles, negative effects, and negative responses to
conflict;
·
assume
one of the roles in the business conflict scenario;
·
role-play
the conflict scenario and try to reach a win-win resolution to the conflict;
·
in
groups, formulate five rules for conflict resolution;
·
share
their role-playing experiences and their list of five rules with the class.
The teacher and students
gather assessment information based on the specific expectations, including:
·
formative
assessment of student participation in class discussions based on observation;
·
formative
assessment of student participation in debriefing based on role-playing
scenario;
·
formative
assessment of group work skills in the business conflict role-playing scenario
(based on rubric developed in Activity 1.
The following are ways in which the activities
can meet each student’s individual needs:
·
provide
a glossary of conflict resolution terminology with definitions.
http://www.crnhq.org/
(The Conflict Resolution Network – Skills, Game, 12 Skill Summary, Fighting
Fair Guide)
http://www.crinfo.org/
(Search and directory features – extensive lists of links to other CR sites)
http://www.teachervision.com/lesson-plans/lesson-3038.html
(lesson plans available)
http://www.conflictresolver.com/
(set of links to other sites, articles and essays)
http://www.ncip.org/Key_Articles.html
(links to articles on conflict resolution)
Lieber,
C. M., L. Lantieri, and T. Roderick. Conflict Resolution in the High School:
36 Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Educators for Social Responsibility, 1998. ISBN
0-942349-07-5
Lieberman,
David J. Make Peace With Anyone: Breakthrough Strategies to Quickly End Any
Conflict, Feud, or Estrangement. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002. ISBN
0312281544
Guidance
Teachers at school
Peer Mediation Teachers or Coordinators
Tillett, Gregory. Resolving Conflict: A Practical Approach, 2nd ed. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press, 1999. ISBN 0 105511514
Time: 1.25 hours
In
Activity 3, students working in pairs undertake the following assignment: “You
are a real estate agent. Your clients have $50 000 to put down on a house. They
have two school aged children, want a three-bedroom house near a school, but
can only afford a mortgage payment of $1200 a month. Shopping on-line, find the
nicest house you can in your area and the best mortgage rate currently
available. After you have found the best deals, write a letter replying to your
client that incorporates a spreadsheet and includes a picture of the house.”
Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations: CGE4b, CGE4f.
Strand(s): Electronic Research and
Communication, Software Applications and Business Documents
Overall
Expectations
ERV.01 -
solve business problems by using electronic tools;
SBV.01 -
create integrated customized documents using appropriate software.
Specific
Expectations
ER1.01 -
use electronic tools to collect information required to solve a specific
business problem (e.g., investment decisions, mortgage rate choices, real
estate purchases);
SB1.01 -
determine how to produce suitable business documents for particular purposes
(e.g., a multimedia document requiring text, flowcharts, images, sound, and
tables).
·
Make
an overhead of the activity.
·
If
Internet access is not available, use a local newspaper.
·
Use of
the windowed workstation environment and an Internet web browser.
·
Basic
skills in word processing, spreadsheets, and software integration.
The teacher:
·
introduces
the activity;
·
reviews
the payment (pmt) function;
·
reviews
and establishes expectations for proper letter writing protocol (letterhead,
dateline, salutation, body, complimentary closing, signature line.);
·
reviews
and establishes expectations for the use of formulas in spreadsheet software;
·
reviews
integration of spreadsheets into word processing documents;
·
discusses
requirements of the assignment (appropriate pricing and location of real
estate, etc.);
·
assists
students as required.
Students:
·
use
the spreadsheet payment function to determine an appropriate cost for the
house;
·
use
the Internet to search for a suitable home;
·
save a
picture of the house from the Internet;
·
create
a professional looking letter with proper formatting, integrated spreadsheet,
and a graphic;
·
submit
letter to the teacher for individual evaluation.
The teacher and students
gather assessment information based on the specific expectations, including:
· diagnostic assessment of word processing and Internet skills;
·
summative
evaluation of the spread sheet and the letter using the rubric in Appendix
2.3.1.
The following are ways
in which the activities can meet each student’s individual needs:
·
provide
computer access outside of class time;
·
provide
flexible timelines and allow for support as needed;
·
modify
and expand ideas and existing guidelines with permission for students requiring
enrichment.
http://www.MLS.ca
(search for houses for sale)
Time: 5 hours
In
Activity 4, student groups of three or four research and plan a two-week dream
tour package designed to be offered to their tour company’s repeat clientele.
Students, in their groups, use appropriate IT tools, e.g., spreadsheets,
e-mail, shared directories, etc., to plan their proposals, set timelines and divide,
responsibilities in order to create their proposed tour packages. Students
track their time using time sheets so that management can compare the actual
cost of the development of this project with the projected cost. Each group
works effectively using the teamwork concepts taught earlier in this unit.
Consensus must be reached in each group regarding the group’s final proposal.
Decisions must be consistent with Catholic social principles, specifically,
“the dignity of the human person” and commitment to the common good.
Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations: CGE1d, CGE3b, CGE3c, CGE3d, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4d, CGE4f, CGE4g, CGE5a, CGE5e.
Strand(s): Electronic Project
Management and Teamwork, Electronic Research and Communication
Overall
Expectations
PMV.02 -
demonstrate the use of electronic tools to manage a multimedia team project;
ERV.01 -
solve business problems by using electronic tools.
ERV.02 - assess data electronically to solve a specific business problem;
ERV.03 - communicate research results electronically.
Specific
Expectations
ER1.01 - use electronic tools to collect information required to solve a specific business problem (e.g., investment decisions, mortgage rate choices, real estate purchases);
ER1.02 -
assess collected information in terms of its validity, bias, copyright
protection, appropriateness, accuracy, and confidentiality;
ER1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of copyright and licensing rules and regulations;
ER3.02 - select appropriate electronic tools (e.g., multimedia, e-mail, web-based communication) to communicate information to a specific audience;
PM1.01 - explain the concept of a project team as it applies to business;
PM2.01 -
identify and describe the electronic tools used by business to facilitate
project team activities (e.g., e-mail, intranet, newsgroups, software features
that enhance joint productivity, fax, video conference);
PM2.02 -
summarize the appropriate use of electronic tools used by business to manage a
multimedia team project.
·
Hand
out or electronically distribute Appendix 2.4.1, Appendix 2.4.2, and Appendix
2.4.3 to each student.
·
Inform
students that in their next activity, student groups are required to: 1) create
a multi-page report using an integrated software package that comprehensively
describes the itinerary and gives the cost breakdown, and 2) create a
multimedia presentation or webpage that includes sound, graphics, and video
components. Students store and organize any appropriate resources that are
valuable to facilitate these objectives.
·
Use of
the windowed workstation environment and an Internet web browser.
·
Knowledge
of spreadsheets and spreadsheet formulas and word processing skills.
The teacher:
·
has
students form small groups of three or four people;
·
distributes
and explains students’ assignment and rubric (Appendix 2.4.1 and Appendix
2.4.2) and reminds students to use effective teamwork concepts taught earlier
in this unit;
·
stresses
the importance of consensus being reached in each group’s final proposal;
·
reviews
the methods of verifying data, confidentiality and copyright issues associated
with researching using the Internet and informs students that they are required
to maintain a research log (see Appendix 2.4.5);
·
discusses
how IT tools, e.g., spreadsheets, e-mail, shared directories, etc., help
project teams meet their deadlines and objectives;
·
instructs
students on the use and importance of time sheets in a business environment and
discusses what variances between actual and projected time allocations mean to
a company;
·
directs
students to set timelines and divide responsibilities in order to create their
proposed tour packages;
·
discusses
the types of events that would be appropriate and consistent with Catholic
social principles;
·
circulates
among the groups providing direction to ensure that students have considered
all relevant expenses and are using formulas as much as possible;
·
ensures
students continue to track time spent on activities using time sheets (see
Appendix 2.4.4);
·
guides
students through the group peer assessment process (see Appendix 2.4.3);
·
directs
students to hand in spreadsheet information for evaluation.
Students:
·
work
as a team to complete project;
·
set
timelines and divide responsibilities within the group;
·
share
ideas, use group consensus for making decisions, and work to meet timelines
set;
·
use
Internet for research purposes to investigate various destinations, events,
transportation, etc.;
·
track
time spent on tasks using a shared electronic time sheet (see Appendix 2.4.4
for set up);
·
maintain
a shared electronic log of resource sites to facilitate citation under
copyright laws
(see Appendix 2.4.5);
·
consolidate
all research results and decide on a common pricing package;
·
hand
in spreadsheet costing analysis for evaluation.
The teacher and students
gather assessment information based on the specific expectations, including:
· diagnostic assessment of student knowledge of spreadsheets;
·
summative
evaluation of group members using rubric (Appendix 2.4.2); (an individual
evaluation);
·
peer-assessment
of contribution of group members to the project (Appendix 2.4.3) Discuss the
criteria with the students as you distribute this appendix;
·
summative
evaluation of costing analysis (Appendix 2.4.6).
The following are ways
in which the activities can meet each student’s individual needs:
·
pair
students to provide peer support for students with limited software and
research skill development;
·
provide
computer access outside of class time;
·
help
students with mathematical difficulties with spreadsheet formulas;
·
extend
the destinations to U.S. or international tours where students requiring
enrichment would need to consider exchange rates and other considerations,
e.g., passports.
http://www.westjet.ca
(Travel providers)
http://www.aircanada.ca
(Travel providers)
http://www.viarail.com
(Travel providers)
http://www.greyhound.ca
(Travel providers)
http://www.all-hotels.com/canada/home.htm
(Accommodation providers)
http://www.ticketmaster.ca
(Event providers)
Time: 5 hours
In
Activity 5, students choose the appropriate integrated software tools to
present the tour proposals created during Activity 4 to the class. Required
elements for the proposals are: 1) a multi-page report detailing the daily
itinerary to be followed during the tour as well as a detailed cost breakdown,
and 2) a multi-media slide presentation or webpage promoting their tour and
destinations. Reports are to be professionally formatted, printed, and bound.
Each group’s slide presentation or webpage is to be “unveiled” at a mock travel
exposition with other students in the class representing the agency’s preferred
clients. The class is encouraged to critically, but sensitively give feedback
on the work of classmates by pointing out strengths and weaknesses of each
proposal.
Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations: CGE2c, CGE5g.
Strand(s): Electronic Research and
Communication, Software Applications and Business Documents,
Electronic Project
Management and Teamwork
Overall Expectations
ERV.01 -
solve business problems by using electronic tools;
SBV.01 -
create integrated customized documents using appropriate software;
PMV.02 -
demonstrate the use of electronic tools to manage a multimedia team project.
Specific
Expectations
ER1.02 -
assess collected information in terms of its validity, bias, copyright
protection, appropriateness, accuracy, and confidentiality;
ER1.03 -
demonstrate an understanding of copyright and licensing rules and regulations;
PM2.02 -
summarize the appropriate use of electronic tools used by business to manage a
multimedia team project;
SB1.01 -
determine how to produce suitable business documents for particular purposes
(e.g., a multimedia document requiring text, flowcharts, images, sound, and
tables);
SB1.02 -
determine the most appropriate software application for creating customized
business documents;
SB1.03 -
create customized business documents (e.g., formatted and integrated documents,
original graphics, multimedia documents).
Students have:
·
keyboarding
skills, experience with the use of a mouse;
·
knowledge
of word processing, spreadsheet, graphics, slide presentation, and webpage
programs;
·
oral
presentation skills.
·
Draw
for order of presentations and ensure availability of appropriate equipment for
presentations.
·
Photocopy
Appendix 2.5.1.
·
Photocopy
Appendix 2.5.2 and Appendix 2.5.3 for student use.
The teacher:
·
directs
student groups to create a multi-page report using an integrated software
package that comprehensively describes the itinerary and gives the cost
breakdown for the proposed tour;
·
directs
students to create and monitors each group’s creation of a multi-media slide
presentation or webpage that includes sound, graphics, and video components
that will be used at a mock travel exposition;
·
offers
suggestions for improvement of slide presentations or webpages and encourages
professional presentation of project work;
·
reminds
students to follow copyright laws discussed in Activity 4;
·
reviews
the rubric criteria with students;
·
facilitates
the printing and binding of group reports;
·
establishes
order of presentations;
·
makes
students aware of multi-media equipment resources available;
·
explains
the process for reserving multi-media resources to each group;
·
reviews
effective oral presentation skills found in Appendix 2.5.2;
·
plans
the travel exposition event, e.g., invitation of other students or staff to
view presentations;
·
ensures
presentation process moves along smoothly;
·
ensures
sensitivity of suggestions during presentation critique process;
·
evaluates
presentations;
·
explains
procedures for peer evaluation of group work within individual groups using
Appendix 2.5.3.
Students:
·
choose
appropriate integrated software and prepare the multi-page report;
·
professionally
print, bind, and hand in their reports (evaluated using Appendix 2.5.1);
·
reserve
multi-media resources for their presentation;
·
prepare,
rehearse, and present a multi-media slide presentation or webpage based on
their proposals and destinations;
·
participate
in peer-assessment and sensitive critiquing of other group’s proposals;
·
participate
in peer-assessment within own groups.
The teacher and students
gather assessment information based on the specific expectations, including:
·
peer-assessment
of group work within individual groups using Appendix 2.5.3;
·
summative
evaluation of multi-page proposals using Appendix 2.5.1;
·
summative
evaluation of oral multi-media presentation.
The following are ways
in which the activities can meet each student’s individual needs:
·
provide
peer support for students requiring additional assistance with multi-media
presentation software;
·
provide
students requiring enrichment opportunities the opportunity to create a flyer
or brochure promoting their tour;
·
allow
students requiring enrichment opportunities to use video editing, sound
recording, or advanced HTML editing tools, e.g., Flash, Dreamweaver,
etc.
Rubrics
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html
(multiple links to samples of rubrics)
http://intranet.cps.k12.il.us/Assessments/?Ideas_and_Rubrics/ideas_and_rubrics.html
(Rubric bank available)
Presentation
Skills
http://www.kumc.edu/SAH/OTEd/jradel/Preparing_talks/103.html
(tutorial on effective presentations)
http://www.presentersonline.com/
(resources and downloads available)
http://208.152.64.46/training/
(delivery techniques, message, visual aids discussed)
Endicott,
Jim and Scott W. Lee. The Presentation Survival Skills Guide.
Distinction Publishing, 2001.
ISBN 0970672705
Kroehnert,
Gary. Basic Presentation Skills. McGraw-Hill, 1999. ISBN 0074706063
Note
to teacher:
The
purpose of this activity is to observe how effectively students have
implemented the teamwork skills discussed and to give students a chance to
practise them. Student groups should be encouraged to delineate their
respective responsibilities in the group but this may be difficult until they
understand the activity. This activity attempts to put all students on a
theoretically even plane by using a topic that they have no familiarity with.
The foreign nature of the project often makes more evident those poor teamwork
characteristics. It is important to record these and any other teamwork
observations. All groups are directed to record their impressions of the
activity and their perception of the strengths and weaknesses that were
exhibited by their group.
Group
Instruction Sheet
In
the ancient city of Atlantis, a solid rectangular Obelisk, called a Zin, was
built in honour of the goddess, Tina. The structure took less than two weeks to
complete.
The
task of your team is to determine on which day of the week the Obelisk was
completed. You will be given clues containing information related to the task.
You may share this information orally in your groups, but you may not show or
give your cards to the other participants.
Note: Remember to use constructive
teamwork habits when working on the assignment to make the most effective use
of your team members.
Obelisk Clues
1. There
are five days in an Atlantian Week
2. Green
has special religious significance on Mermaidday
3. There
are eight gold scales in a gold fin.
4. What
is a cubitt?
5. Any
time when work is taking place there is a gang of nine people on site.
6. Day
Four in the Atlantian week is called Mermaidday
7. There
are eight ponks in a schlib.
8. Day
Three in the Atlantian week is called Sharkday.
9. Each
worker takes rest periods during the working day totalling sixteen ponks.
10. Only
one gang is working on the construction of the Zin.
11. Work
starts at daybreak on Aquaday.
12. The
length of the Zin is fifty feet.
13. No
Work takes place on Daydoldrum.
14. The
height of the Zin is one hundred feet.
15. Day
five in the Atlantian week is called Daydoldrum.
16. Workers
each lay 150 blocks per schlib.
17. What is
a Zin?
18. Does
work take place on Sunday?
19. There
are three and one half feet in a megalithic yard.
20. An Atlantian day is divided into schlibs and
ponks.
21. Each
block is one cubic foot.
22. The
width of the Zin is ten feet.
23. Each
gang includes two women.
24. The
Zin is built of stone blocks.
25. Day
one of the Atlantian week is called Aquaday.
26. The
Zin is made of green blocks.
27. One
member of each gang has religious duties and does not lay blocks.
28. Day
two in the Atlantian week is called Neptimus.
29. The
basic measurement of time in Atlantis is a day.
30. The
working day has nine schlibs.
31. A
cubitt is a cube, all sides of which measure one megalithic yard.
32. Which way up does the Zin stand?
The Obelisk Of Zin (Answers)
1. The
dimensions of the Zin indicate that it contained 50 000 cubic feet of stone
blocks (50 × 10 × 100)
2. The
blocks are one cubic foot each; therefore, 50 000 blocks are required.
3. Each
worker works seven schlibs in a day (two schlibs are devoted to rest).
4. Each
worker lays 150 blocks per schlib; therefore, each worker lays 1050 blocks per
day. (150 × 7)
5. There
are eight workers per day; therefore, 8400 blocks are laid per working day. (8
× 1050)
6. Therefore
work on the Obelisk would be completed on the sixth day. (50 000 divided by
8400 goes 5 times with 8000 remainder).
7. The
five days of the Atlantian Week are:
· Aquaday
· Neptimus
· Sharkday
· Mermaidday
· Daydoldrum (No work done)
8. Therefore
the Obelisk would be finished on...
Neptimus
Character
1 – School Board Superintendent
You are
the Catholic school board superintendent responsible for computers and
technology. The father of a student who is to be suspended has contacted you
because he disagrees with the decision to suspend his son/daughter and to
remove his/her network privileges for one month. You support the principal’s
decision because it is consistent with the school board’s Internet policy that
prohibits the use of the Internet for inappropriate activities and because the
school’s computer usage policy states that students are responsible for their
user identification (ID).
Character
2 – High School Principal
You are
the principal of a Catholic high school. The computer site administrator
approached you with an incident where a student has accessed inappropriate
sites and created shortcuts to inappropriate sites that he/she has subsequently
made available to other students. In the past, such offences have been seen as
a serious breach of protocol and have been dealt with severely to set an
example for others and to discourage future occurrences. You question the
student who tells you he/she “lent” their user ID to a friend. The student will
not divulge the name of the friend. You suspend the student from school for two
days. You revoke his/her Internet privileges because he/she is in contravention
of the school board’s Internet usage agreement, which was signed by the student
and his/her parents. You also suspend the student’s right to use the school
computer network for one month.
Character
3 – Computer Site Administrator
A teacher
approached you with a report that a student made a shortcut to an inappropriate
Internet site available to other students. Upon investigation of the origin of
the shortcut, you were able to determine the user ID of the student who created
the file, the time the shortcut was created and the time the shortcut was made
available to other students. You documented this information and sent the
evidence to the school’s principal so that appropriate disciplinary action
could be taken against the student. You were subsequently told to remove the
student’s Internet rights and to remove the student’s school computer access
(for one month), which you did.
Character
4 – Mother of Student
Your
child tells you he/she has been suspended for two days because a friend used
his/her school user ID to visit inappropriate sites and to create a shortcut to
one of these sites, which the friend then made available to other students.
Your child has been suspended for two days for not following the school board’s
Internet policy, his/her Internet rights have been terminated, and his/her
school computer usage has been suspended for one month. You are concerned that
the other student did not receive any consequences. You feel the other student
should have been punished, not your child. You feel your child has done nothing
wrong, other than being a good friend. In your opinion, this is fundamentally
unfair; your child should not be punished, but the other student should.
Character
5 – Father of Student
Your
child tells you he/she has been suspended for two days because a friend used
his/her school user ID to visit inappropriate sites and to create a shortcut to
one of these sites, which the friend then made available to other students.
Your child has been suspended for two days for not following the school board’s
Internet policy, his/her Internet rights have been terminated, and his/her
school computer usage has been suspended for one month. You are concerned that
this will affect the status of your child’s college application since it will
mean your son/daughter cannot complete work for the computer course in which
they are currently enrolled. You feel the suspension is unwarranted as the
school cannot “prove” your son/daughter did anything wrong, even though his/her
user ID may have. You also feel the revocation of Internet privileges and
school computer usage is excessive. This is your child’s first offence and you
feel that a warning would have been sufficient.
Character
6 – Student
You
shared your network password with a “friend” who could not access the school
computers. The friend said that since his/her home computer was broken, he/she
needed to do some Internet research for a class and needed to type up an essay
and print it at school. While logged on with your user ID, your friend created
some shortcuts to inappropriate Internet sites. These shortcuts were stored in
your user ID and one was made available to other students. A teacher discovered
the shortcut and turned the matter over to the computer site administrator who
found proof that the shortcut came from your file. The principal called you
down to his/her office and questioned you. You refused to “rat” on your friend,
but told the principal that it was not your fault that this happened. Upon
conclusion of questioning, he/she decided upon the following course of action:
you would be suspended for two days because your friend visited inappropriate
Internet sites which was a contravention of the school board’s Internet usage
agreement, which you and your parents signed. Your Internet privileges were
also revoked and you were removed from the school network for a period of one
month. You will be unable to complete work for the BTX4C computer course in
which you are enrolled, which might result in your not being accepted for the
college program you have applied for. You feel this is unfair. Even though you
knew it was wrong to “share” your User ID, you were just trying to be a good
friend. You do not feel it is necessary to “rat” on your friend and you feel
the punishment is excessive.
|
Antagonizing |
Blaming |
Boasting |
Coercing |
|
Commanding |
Criticizing |
Delaying |
Diagnosing |
|
Digressing |
Directing |
Distracting |
Diverting |
|
Exhorting |
Fixating |
Interpreting |
Interrogating |
|
Interrupting |
Judging |
Lecturing |
Moralizing |
|
Name-calling |
One-way
solutions |
Over-analyzing |
Preaching |
|
Probing |
Put-downs |
Ridiculing |
Shaming |
|
Stereotyping |
Suppressing |
Threatening |
Withdrawing |
1. Win-Lose Strategies
· Legitimate Power – “I am the boss” – can reward/punish
· Mental or Physical Power – threatening with dismissal
· Failure to Respond – give up participating due to prior negative experiences
· Majority Rule – Voting (can create a losing side)
· Minority Rule – silence = consent or “railroading” an issue
2. Lose-Lose Strategies
· Compromise – settling conflict by mutual concessions
· Side Payments – bribery to do disagreeable tasks
· Neutral Third Party Intervention – (like arbitration – some middle ground chosen)
· Rules – used to avoid confrontation
3. Win-Win Strategies (focus on ends or goals)
· Consensus – focus on defeating the problem, not each other, avoid voting, trading or averaging, seek facts, accept conflict as helpful
Task: In groups of four or five, students
are asked to role-play the following business conflict scenario. Students are
encouraged to see all sides of the problem. Students are encouraged to
represent his/her assigned character during the role-play. A list of five rules
for resolution of conflicts is generated.
Conflict
Situation: You are
participating in a meeting to decide on action against an employee who “gave
away” a large amount of fast-food restaurant receipts.
Character
1 – Franchise Owner
You own
the franchise and intend to operate it at a profit. You are extremely upset
that one of your employees “accidentally” gave away the nightly deposit (close
to $12 000). You expect the employee to repay the amount with interest by
working it off. You are also unconvinced that this was an “accidental”
occurrence and are considering taking legal action (a civil suit) or asking the
police to press charges against the employee.
Character
2 – Employee
You are
an employee of a fast-food restaurant who works the drive-thru window. While
working the late shift one evening, you were given the cash deposit (close to
$12 000) by the Manager to take to the bank. In order to ward off would-be
robbers, the night deposit is placed in one of the franchise’s paper bags
rather than in a regular deposit bag that is too easily identifiable. One of
the cooks handed you a drive-thru customer’s order while you were getting your
coat on to leave. Instead of giving the customer the food, you accidentally
gave him/her the bag containing the deposit. You discovered this too late; the
customer had already paid in cash, driven off and not returned to complain about
their missing food. You reported the loss of the deposit to the manager who
immediately called the police. The police were unable to locate the deposit
because the information you were able to provide was very vague. You were
informed that you needed to attend at meeting the next morning to decide your
fate.
Character
3 – Union or Employee Representative
An
employee who works at the drive-thru window of a fast-food restaurant calls you
to attend a meeting to support him/her. He/she accidentally gave away the
nightly deposit of approximately $12 000. You go to the meeting to assure the
employee is supported and not taken advantage of.
Character
4 – Manager of the Franchise
You gave
the nightly deposit bag to the drive-thru employee to take to the bank. In order
to ward off would-be robbers, the night deposit is placed in one of the
franchise’s paper bags rather than in a regular deposit bag that is too easily
identifiable. You returned to your office and shortly thereafter were informed
by the employee that he/she “accidentally” gave the deposit bag to a drive-thru
customer. You immediately called the police. The employee was very vague about
details and the police were not able to locate the drive-thru customer. You
have been asked to attend a meeting to decide on action to be taken.
Character
5 – Cook (Optional if 5th person is needed)
You gave
an order to the drive-thru attendant, a friend of yours, to hand to a customer.
The employee was putting on his/her coat at the time and you watched them place
the order bag on the counter beside several other bags. He/she put on his/her
coat, grabbed one of the bags and handed it to the drive-thru customer waiting
at the window. You heard the manager call the police and when they arrived you
discovered that the attendant had given away the deposit money. You have been
asked to attend at meeting to give pertinent information. You are worried about
yourself because you are on probation for a minor criminal conviction; you did
not share this information with your employer when you were hired and are
worried you might lose your job.
|
Category/Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
Knowledge/
Understanding SBV.01 |
-
demonstrates limited skills |
-
demonstrates moderate skills |
-
demonstrates considerable skills |
-
demonstrates high degree of skills |
|
Thinking/Inquiry SB1.01 |
-
established requirements met with limited effectiveness |
-
established requirements met with moderate effectiveness |
-
established requirements met with considerable effectiveness |
-
established requirements met with a high degree of effectiveness |
|
Communication SB1.01 |
-
demonstrates limited effectiveness in using business communication skills |
-
demonstrates moderate effectiveness in using business communication skills |
-
demonstrates considerable effectiveness in using business communication
skills |
-
demonstrates a high degree of effectiveness in using business communication
skills |
Note: A student whose achievement is
below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or
activity.
You
are an employee of a large tour company called Canadian Dream Tours and have
been asked to come up with a plan for a two-week tour package that will be
offered to preferred clients who have traveled with you before. Obviously, the
intent is to give your preferred clients something that they will be interested
in and look forward to. Your employer has determined that the proposed package
should have the following characteristics.
|
Length
of Trip: |
two
weeks |
|
Destination: |
Canada
(two different provinces must be visited) |
|
Date
of Trip: |
departure
date to occur within the next three months |
|
Target
Market: |
identified
and defined by each group |
|
Pricing: |
based
on single and/or double occupancy |
Daily
itinerary for the tour – times included
Breakdown
of all costs using separate linked spreadsheets for:
1. Transportation – choice of flights, car,
train, bus, local travel
2. Different events – concerts, sporting events,
theatre, etc., minimum of two events
3. Accommodations – Hotel, etc.
4. Tourist Attraction Admission Fees – based on
itinerary
Clients should be given an indication of
expected additional expenses not included in tour price, e.g., food not
included as part of events or accommodations, spending money for souvenirs,
tipping, etc.
Students must:
·
fill
out electronic time sheets accurately and on a daily basis;
·
add to
Internet resource log sheets on a daily basis;
·
cooperate
in the division of responsibilities to equitably allocate the workload to each
group member;
·
plan
and set appropriate timelines for completion of tasks;
·
cooperatively
schedule formal meetings of the group;
·
attend
and participate in all scheduled group meetings;
·
meet
timelines set in the group meetings.
In the next activity, student groups are required to:
1. create a multi-page report using an
integrated software package that comprehensively describes the itinerary and
gives the cost breakdown, and
2. create a multimedia presentation or webpage
that includes sound, graphics, and video components. Students store and
organize any appropriate resources that are valuable to facilitate these
objectives.
|
Category/ Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
Knowledge/Understanding ERV.01 |
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
considerable degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
-
maintains reference log and time sheets PM2.02 PM2.01 |
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
considerable degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
Thinking/Inquiry -
comprehensively analyses costs ERV.02 |
- to a
limited degree |
- to a
moderate degree |
- to a
considerable degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
|
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
considerable degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
Communication PM1.01 ERV.03 ER3.02 |
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
considerable degree |
- to a
high degree |
Note: A student whose achievement is
below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or
activity.
Instructions
Write
the name of each of your team members in the top row (put your name in as #1).
Rate
each team member as a percent of total effort for each criterion. The
percentages must add up to 100 for each row.
Give
each team member a rating (level 1, 2, 3 or 4) based on his or her overall contributions
to the project.
Group
________
|
|
Member 1 |
Member 2 |
Member 3 |
Member 4 |
|
Contribution/Research |
|
|
|
|
|
Cooperation |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
Skills |
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership
Skills and Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
of Work |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall
Rating (0 to 100) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Member |
Time |
Description of Activity |
|
Oct.
14 |
Chris
R. |
30
min. |
Researched
airfare to destination #1 |
|
Oct.
14 |
Jamie
T. |
45
min. |
Researched
major events during time period at destination #1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Student Name |
URL |
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category/Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
Knowledge/Understanding |
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
moderate degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
Communication |
-
demonstrates limited organization |
-
demonstrates some organization |
-
demonstrates considerable organization |
-
demonstrates strong organization |
|
-
communicates ideas in a clear, concise, accurate, and businesslike manner |
- to a
limited degree |
- to
some degree |
- to a
moderate degree |
- to a
high degree |
|
Thinking/Inquiry |
-
limited and superficial information |
- some
breadth and depth in information |
-
considerable depth and breadth in information |
-
insightful and thorough breadth and depth in information |
|
-
selects information that is valid, unbiased, appropriate, and accurate |
-
selects information with limited appropriateness |
-
selects information with some appropriateness |
-
selects information with considerable appropriateness |
-
selects information with strong appropriateness |
|
Application |
-
demonstrates limited proficiency to create customized documents |
-
demonstrates some proficiency to create customized documents |
-
demonstrates considerable proficiency to create customized documents |
-
demonstrates a high degree of proficiency to create customized documents |
Note: A student whose achievement is
below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or
activity.
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
Ideas and Content: |
|
|
|
Organization:
|
|
|
|
Are my
ideas logically sequenced? |
|
|
|
Is
there a focus to the ideas? |
|
|
|
Are
ideas related to each other? (transitions) |
|
|
|
Depth
(Support & Elaboration): |
|
|
|
Do I
know my subject well? Is the information accurate? |
|
|
|
Have I
included good reasoning, clarification, and documentation? |
|
|
|
Adaptation
to Audience: |
|
|
|
Do I
choose appropriate words? |
|
|
|
Oral Skills: |
|
|
|
Oral
Expression: |
|
|
|
Do I
pronounce my words clearly? |
|
|
|
Do I
speak loud enough to be heard clearly at the back of the room? |
|
|
|
Do I
avoid speaking too slowly or too quickly? |
|
|
|
Is my
tone enthusiastic? |
|
|
|
Physical
Expression: |
|
|
|
Do I
make eye contact with the audience and speak directly to them? |
|
|
|
Do I stand
up straight and avoid fidgeting while presenting? |
|
|
|
Technical: |
|
|
|
Use
of Program Elements: |
|
|
|
Is the
multi-media used in creative or effective ways? |
|
|
|
Technical
Problems: |
|
|
|
Does
the presentation run without “glitches”? |
|
|
|
Choice
of Components: |
|
|
|
Do all
elements (animation, links, graphics, sound, etc.) contribute to the
presentation? |
|
|
|
Readability:
|
|
|
|
Is the
text clear and concise? |
|
|
|
Layout
(or screen design): |
|
|
|
Does
the layout enhance the message rather than distract from it? |
|
|
|
Integration of Components (Overall
Effect): |
|
|
|
Is the
presentation free of spelling/grammar errors? |
|
|
|
Is the
presentation interesting to others? |
|
|
|
Is the
overall quality of the presentation the best I can make it? |
|
|
Instructions:
Write
the name of each of your team members in the top row (put your name in as #1).
Rate
each team member as a percent of total effort for each criterion. The
percentages must add up to 100 for each row.
Give
each team member a rating (level 1-4) based on his or her overall contributions
to the project.
Group
________
|
|
Member 1 |
Member 2 |
Member 3 |
Member 4 |
Member 5 |
|
Contribution
to Group Effort |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooperation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
Skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational
Skills and Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
of Work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall
Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
Overview | Course Profiles Main
Menu