Course Profile Science (SNC4E), Grade 12, Workplace Preparation, Catholic
Unit 5: Alternative Environments
Time: 20 hours
Activity
1 | Activity 2 | Activity
3.1
Unit Description
Students demonstrate
a knowledge of the inputs, outputs, and interactions involved in maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment. Through the lens of stewardship and
Catholic social teaching students analyse major variables that affect the
various inputs, outputs, and interactions involved in maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment. Students demonstrate an understanding
of what would be required to equip and operate an alternative environment
capable of supporting human life, and compare its sustainability to that of our
normal planetary environment.
|
Activity |
Learning Expectations |
Assessment Categories |
Task |
|
1.1 |
AE1.01, AE1.02,
AE2.01, AE2.02, AE3.03 |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
Brainstorming
Activity |
|
1.2 |
AEV.01, AE2.02 |
Communication
Inquiry |
Laboratory
Activity |
|
2.1 |
AEV.01, AEV.02,
AE1.02, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE2.02, AE2.03, AE3.01 |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
Flow chart, Quiz |
|
2.2 |
AEV.01, AEV.02,
AE1.01, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE2.02, AE3.02, AE3.04 |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
Poster |
|
2.3 |
AE3.04 |
Knowledge/
Understanding Communication |
Report |
|
2.4 |
AE1.05, AE3.02 |
Communication |
Presentation |
|
2.5 |
AE3.03 |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
Formal Report,
Quiz |
|
3.1 |
AEV.01, AEV.02,
AEV.03, AE1.02, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE1.05, AE2.03, AE3.01, AE3.04 |
Knowledge/
Understanding |
Flow chart, Display |
Time: 5 hours (1-2 weeks for micro-ecosystem)
Students determine
factors that are essential for human life on Earth. Students reflect on
Catholic values and determine what is truly important for a life-sustaining
environment. Students construct a functional micro-environment that models a
naturally occurring ecosystem and determine the effects of altering abiotic
factors on the controlled environment.
Ontario Catholic
School Graduate Expectations
CGE 1d - develops
attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to promote
social responsibility, human solidarity, and the common good;
CGE 2c - presents
information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;
CGE 3d - makes
decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;
CGE 3f - examines,
evaluates, and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical,
political, ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a
just and compassionate society;
CGE 4g - examines
and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing
life’s choices and opportunities;
CGE 7e - witnesses
Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a
just, peaceful and compassionate society.
Strand(s): Alternative Environments
Overall
Expectations
AEV.01 - demonstrate
a knowledge of the inputs, outputs, and interactions involved in maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment.
Specific
Expectations
AE1.01 - identify
the systems required to sustain human life in an environment (e.g., biotic and
abiotic factors in our ecosystem);
AE1.02 - describe
the inputs of food, energy, air, and water needed to maintain an alternative
life-sustaining environment;
AE2.01 - determine,
through experimentation, the different factors affecting a controlled
microenvironment (e.g., the factors affecting a yeast suspension, a fruit-fly
culture, an aquarium, or a terrarium);
AE2.02 - formulate
scientific questions about the nature of alternative life-sustaining
environments (e.g., What becomes of the waste produced in an alternative
environment?);
AE3.03 - relate what
they have learned about sustaining life in alternative environments to the
processes through which our own natural environment sustains life (e.g., relate
the mechanical processes of an air purification system to the natural process
of air purification by trees).
Scientific
Investigation Skills
SIS.01 - demonstrate
an understanding of the safety practices consistent with Workplace Hazardous
Materials Information System (WHMIS) legislation by selecting and applying
appropriate techniques for handling, storing, and disposing of laboratory
materials;
SIS.02 - select
appropriate instruments and use them effectively and accurately in collecting
observations and data;
SIS.03 - demonstrate
the skills required to plan and carry out investigations, using laboratory
equipment safely, effectively, and accurately;
SIS.04 - select and
use appropriate numeric, symbolic, graphical, and linguistic modes of
representation to communicate scientific ideas, plans, and experimental
results;
SIS.06 - compile, organize, and interpret data, using appropriate
formats and treatments, including tables, flow charts, graphs, and diagrams;
SIS.07 - communicate
the procedures and results of laboratory investigations and research for
specific purposes using data tables and laboratory reports;
SIS.08 - select and
use appropriate SI units.
·
Grade 10 Science
(Applied or Academic) – Biology strand
·
Grade 9 Science
(Applied or Academic) – Earth and Space Science strand
·
Chart paper and
markers should be made available to allow students to brainstorm in small
groups for Activity 1.1.
·
The teacher prepares
the materials needed to create a controlled micro-environment (Activity 1.2).
Materials may include:
· 10-gallon aquarium (1 per 4-5 students)
· Glass piece cut to fit the top of the tank
· Duct tape for sealing the lids on the tanks
· Gravel, sand, and rocks
· Soil
· Seeds - collect local or purchase seeds (seeds of small plants work best.)
· Other organisms required, (in terms of matter and energy requirements, trophic levels and population interactions) to sustain each micro-ecosystem. The teacher can choose to develop any type of ecosystem within the limitations of a 10-gallon tank.
·
Note: the laboratory activity takes 1-2 weeks to
achieve good results
·
Safety
consideration: Some seeds might contain fungicides. Be aware of this during the
experiment
Activity 1.1:
Getting Ready
Students brainstorm
materials required for survival on Earth. Students reflect on Catholic values,
and consider what factors are truly important for sustaining human life.
(Reflection: Luke 6:27-36 or
Luke 12:34)
The
teacher:
·
leads the class
in a discussion to determine what types of materials and criteria (biotic and
abiotic factors) are essential for human life on Earth;
·
asks questions
that will guide the students in determining life’s necessities. Such questions
may include:
· What are some factors that we could not possibly live without, i.e., oxygen supply, food supply, water supply, climate control, medical aid, waste disposal, etc.?;
· What are some of the manufactured things that we have now, that our ancestors never had? Are they essential for life?
· What are the minimum requirements to sustain life on Earth?
· If you had to choose only four things you could own/buy…what would they be?
· Our society has become more dependent on technology. Name some advancements in technology that have made our lives much easier. Are these inventions crucial for life on Earth (e.g., transportation)?
· divides students into small groups and provides the groups with the chart paper required to brainstorm criteria;
· monitors group discussions, and ensures that groups are remaining on task;
· identifies and corrects misconceptions that the students may have.
Students:
· participate in a class discussion based on materials required to sustain human life on Earth.
· working in small groups, participate in the brainstorming activity.
· present ideas to other groups and discuss opinions.
· write a reflective journal focusing on what is truly important in life. Students should recognize how insignificant many things are (e.g., fancy cars, large houses, etc.)
Activity 1.2:
Experiment: Micro-ecosystems, i.e., Yeast Growth
Students construct a
functional micro-ecosystem that will model a naturally occurring ecosystem and
witness the interaction between the biotic and abotic factors within it.
Students alter abiotic factors to determine the effects these factors have on
the controlled environment.
The
teacher:
·
recaps briefly,
through question and answer period, the factors required for sustaining life on
Earth.
·
brainstorms
factors that may affect life in a closed environment, e.g., temperature,
available water, oxygen levels, energy source, etc.
·
constructs a
closed ecosystem that may be used as a control.
·
divides the class
into groups of four or five students, with each group assigned to test one of
the variables being examined.
Students:
·
brainstorm
factors required for sustaining life in a closed environment;
·
carefully plan,
as a class, the ecosystem with regards to: matter and energy requirements,
trophic levels and size of populations;
·
identify
variables that may affect a closed micro-environment;
·
carefully
construct closed environments that are as similar to each of the other groups
as possible (limiting experimental error);
·
test the variable
they are assigned, and examine the affects that the variable has on the closed
system;
·
record
observations they witness in the ecosystems and try to explain most of the
changes that they observe;
·
share findings
and pool data with other students;
·
draw tentative
conclusions concerning factors that affect a controlled micro-environment;
·
create a formal
lab write up determining the factors that affect a controlled
micro-environment.
·
Discussion/brainstorming
activity can be assessed for Communication using a rubric.
·
A diagnostic assessment
of student’s Knowledge/Understanding during discussion activity can be done
informally through a class discussion.
·
Communication can
be assessed using a science log – a record of research that the student has
compiled (AE2.01).
·
The lab can be
assessed for Knowledge/Understanding, Inquiry, Communication, and Making
Connections using a rubric (AE2.01).
·
Reflection
journals can be produced using a computer or a tape recorder.
·
Alternate
assessment methods could be used.
Print
Grace,
Eric, et al. SciencePower 10. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. 2000. ISBN 0-07-560364-0
Plumb,
Donald, et al. Science 9. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson Learning, 1999.
Clancy,
Christina, et al. SciencePower
9. Toronto: McGraw-Hill
Ryerson Limited, 1999.
ISBN 0-07-560361-6
Ritter, Bob, et al. Science
10. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson Learning, 2000. ISBN 0-17-607501-1
Websites
–
http://www.accessexcellence.com/AE/AEC/AEF/1996/doerder_micro.html
Time: 10 hours
Students analyse
various existing alternative life-sustaining environments in terms of the
factors required for sustainability studied in Activity 1. Students research
and assess Canada’s contribution to the International Space Station, then perform
a cost/benefit analysis of constructing and maintaining the International Space
Station. Students investigate careers in Earth and space science by researching
a Canadian astronaut.
Ontario Catholic
School Graduate Expectations
CGE 1d - develops
attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to promote
social responsibility, human solidarity, and the common good;
CGE 2c - presents
information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;
CGE 3d - makes
decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;
CGE 3f - examines,
evaluates, and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical,
political, ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a just
and compassionate society;
CGE 4g - examines
and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing
life’s choices and opportunities;
CGE 7e - witnesses
Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a
just, peaceful and compassionate society.
Strand(s): Alternative Environments
Overall
Expectations
AEV.01 - demonstrate
a knowledge of the inputs, outputs, and interactions involved in maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment;
AEV.02 - analyse
major variables that affect the various inputs, outputs, and interactions
involved in maintaining an alternative life-sustaining environment.
Specific
Expectations
AE1.01 - identify
the systems required to sustain human life in an environment (e.g., biotic and
abiotic factors in our ecosystem);
AE1.02 - describe
the inputs of food, energy, air, and water needed to maintain an alternative
life-sustaining environment;
AE1.03 - identify
the components of an alternative life-sustaining environment (e.g., source[s]
of energy, atmosphere, means for recycling or disposing of waste), and describe
how they must interact to be successful;
AE1.04 - describe
the outputs of an alternative life-sustaining environment, and the systems
required to handle them (e.g., air filtration systems);
AE1.05 - describe
the difficulties facing humans living in a weightless self-supporting
environment (e.g., the difficulties of reducing human waste);
AE2.02 - formulate
scientific questions about the nature of alternative life-sustaining
environments (e.g., What becomes of the waste produced in an alternative
environment?);
AE2.03 - use flow
charts to diagram the inputs, outputs, and interactions of the various
life-sustaining components of an alternative environment (e.g., energy flow,
waste disposal, atmosphere);
AE3.01 - analyse,
using knowledge of the requirements for sustainability, existing alternative
life-sustaining environments (e.g., International Space Station, Earth-based
self-sustaining biodome experiments, nuclear submarines, off-shore oil rigs),
and make suggestions for their improvement or development;
AE3.02 - assess a
Canadian contribution to the development of alternative life-sustaining
environments (e.g., gather, integrate, and analyse information about the
Montreal Biodome);
AE3.03 - relate what
they have learned about sustaining life in alternative environments to the
processes through which our own natural environment sustains life (e.g., relate
the mechanical processes of an air purification system to the natural process
of air purification by trees);
AE3.04 - analyse the
costs and benefits to society, the economy, and the environment of constructing
and operating an alternative environment capable of supporting human life
(e.g., write a brief essay on the potential economic benefits of maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment such as the International Space
Station).
Scientific
Investigation Skills
SIS.05 - locate,
select, analyse, and integrate information on topics under study, working
independently and as part of a team, and using appropriate library and
electronic research tools, including Internet websites;
SIS.07 - communicate
the procedures and results of laboratory investigations and research for
specific purposes using data tables and laboratory reports;
SIS.09 - identify
and collect information on science- and technology-based careers related to the
subject area under study.
·
Grade 9 Science
(Academic or Applied) - Earth and Space Science strand
·
Grade 10 Science
(Academic or Applied) - Biology strand
·
Reserve
library/resource centre/computer lab time for the class.
·
Gather various
multi-media resources on the International Space Station and other alternative
environments (Montreal Biodome, Biosphere 2, etc.).
·
Prepare to
discuss recent movies that deal with space travel and alternate environments to
generate interest and introduce the topics.
·
Visit the NASA
SpaceFlight website to determine when the International Space Station can be
seen from your city.
·
The topics in
this activity are very timely. There may be missions into space planned which
relate to the topics being studied. Begin saving articles and other information
related to the topics studied.
·
Prepare templates
for students to use when analysing alternative environments and writing
research papers.
Activity 2.1:
Alternative Environment Analysis
Students use the
concept of sustainability to analyse existing life-sustaining alternative
environments. Students study inputs, outputs, and interactions between
components and summarize their information in a flow chart.
The
teacher:
·
reviews factors
required for life on Earth studied in Activity 1.1;
·
leads a class
discussion on the factors that must be considered when designing an alternative
environment, e.g., inputs, outputs, protection from the environment, etc.,
using a space suit as an example;
·
discusses and
lists the students’ responses on the board;
·
introduces
existing alternative environments. If possible, show photographs, websites,
newspaper/magazine articles, etc.;
·
briefly reviews
formation of scientific questions and assists students in generating suitable
scientific questions for study. Since the students will be participating in a
jigsaw activity, they should all have the same questions to research. The four
factors for sustainability should be considered, i.e., air, water, energy and
food. Research questions should include (but not be limited to):
· How is oxygen supplied to the environment?
· How is carbon dioxide removed from the environment?
· How is water (hot and cold) produced?
· What energy source powers the environment?
· What is the food source?
· How are wastes disposed of?
·
assigns each
student to an “expert group” and a “home group”. Assign each expert group one
alternative life-sustaining environment (International Space Station,
Biosphere, Montreal Biodome). Students could also take part in virtual tours of
the alternative environments listed, if Internet access is available. The home
groups each have at least one representative from each expert group. The expert
groups compile information to answer the scientific questions raised. The
information is then presented in flow chart form on chart paper showing inputs,
outputs and interactions between the components. If computer access is
available, students could use a software program to generate flow charts. Each
student creates their own summary sheet and present this information to their
home group. Students in each home group then assess each alternative
environment, list suggestions for their improvement and present their
suggestions to the class;
·
monitors group
discussions.
Students:
·
participate in a
class discussion on factors required for life on Earth;
·
discuss how an
alternative environment such as a space suit sustains life;
·
formulate
scientific questions about the nature of alternative environments;
·
in their expert
groups, analyse existing alternative environments and present findings in a
flow chart;
·
present this
information to their home groups;
·
in their home
groups, make suggestions for improving existing alternative environments and
present information.
Activity 2.2:
Canada’s Contribution to the International Space Station
Students research Canada’s contribution to the International Space
Station. Students create a timeline of the development of the International
Space Station and a poster to display their research.
The
teacher:
·
introduces the
International Space Station in a class discussion. Shows video of a recent
mission, if possible (see Planning Notes);
·
provides students
with background information from the Internet, newspaper/magazine articles,
media broadcasts, or videos;
·
assigns students
to groups of four to research Canada’s contributions to the International Space
Station. If Internet access is available, students can take a virtual tour of
the International Space Station. Each student creates a summary sheet of the
research. When the students have completed their research they present their
findings in a poster to be displayed in the classroom. Research should include
(but not be limited to):
· a diagram showing the components;
· a description of its function/purpose;
· a timeline of its development (including projected future developments);
· a description of research carried out;
· the relevance of the research to life on Earth.
·
monitors group
work and discussions;
·
guides students
in a Gallery Walk to peer assess other posters;
·
leads students in
a discussion on research conducted in space and how it can be used to improve
life on Earth. Specifically, discuss research that deals with human growth and
life keeping in mind Gospel teaching. Provide students with time to write a
reflection in their Science Journals. (Reflection Mark 9:33-37).
Students:
·
participate in a
class discussion on the International Space Station;
·
analyse
information from various media to assess Canada’s contribution to the
International Space Station;
·
in groups of
four, research Canada’s contribution to the International Space Station;
·
each create a
one-page summary sheet of their research;
·
in groups of
four, present their research in a poster;
·
participate in a
Gallery Walk to observe and peer assess other posters;
·
write a
reflection in their Science Journals on how research conducted in space can be
used to improve life on Earth, keeping in mind Gospel teaching.
Activity 2.3:
Cost/Benefit Analysis
Students analyse the costs and benefits to society, economy and the
environment of constructing and operating a life-sustaining alternative
environment, then write a report.
The
teacher:
·
reviews the
alternative environments studied in Activity 2.1;
·
leads a class
discussion on alternative environments, specifically how the technologies and
research can be used to improve the lives of people on Earth;
·
assigns students,
in groups of two, to review the information and create a qualitative summary
chart of costs and benefits of an alternative environment, e.g., International
Space Station, Biosphere, Montreal Biodome. The teacher outlines a template
which the students use when gathering information (Appendix 2.3A – Template for
Cost/Benefit Analysis);
·
reviews report
writing and paragraph structure with the students. Each student uses their
summary chart to write a three-paragraph report, with an introduction and
conclusion. Each student is provided with a template for writing paragraphs and
allowed time to prepare a rough draft (Appendix 2.3B – Template for Report
Outline). The students are then paired to peer assess their work, using a
teacher designed checklist. The students then edit their work and submit a final
report to the teacher (Appendix 2.3C – Peer Assessment Checklist);
·
leads the class
in discussing whether money should be spent on research in space, or be used to
directly improve the lives of people on Earth, referring to Gospel teaching.
The teacher then provides an opportunity for students to write a refection in
their Science Journals. (Reflection John 13:1-13).
Students:
·
participate in a
class discussion of alternative environments and their impact on people on
Earth;
·
participate in a
class discussion of the International Space Station;
·
use reference
material to create a qualitative summary sheet of costs and benefits of the
International Space Station then write a three-paragraph report, with an
introduction and conclusion, summarizing their research;
·
participate in a
class discussion on Gospel teaching and research conducted in space
·
write in their
Science Journal, reflecting on whether money should be spent on research in
space, or be used to directly improve lives of people suffering on Earth.
Activity 2.4: Press
Conference
Students collect and
analyse information on careers in Earth and Space Science by preparing an
information package to be used at a press conference for an astronaut and crew
returning from a mission.
The
teacher:
·
leads a class discussion
on recent space missions involving Canadian astronauts;
·
leads students in
a think/pair/share activity to determine characteristics of an astronaut;
·
provides students
with resources or library/resource centre/computer time to research a recent
Canadian mission. The teacher arranges students in groups of three or four
students. Each student in a group plays the role of a different member of the
crew. Students can play the role of a Canadian astronaut (Chris Hadfield, Julie
Payette, Robert Thirsk, Dave Williams, Bjarni Tryggvason, Roberta Bondar, or
Marc Garneau), technician, or trades person. The students research their
character’s contribution to the success of the mission. Students use their
research to prepare a script for a press conference that will be presented to
the class. When students are not presenting, they play the role of reporters
for various media and ask questions of the presenters. If equipment is
available, students can videotape the press conference. The students’ research
should include (but not be limited to):
· personal data, e.g., date of birth, place of residence, family, hobbies/interests;
· education and training;
· description of most recent mission, e.g. research carried out, length of mission;
· their role in this mission;
· the mission patch.
· provides time for preparing the script and rehearsing the press conference.
Students:
·
participate in a
class discussion on recent missions to space and brainstorm characteristics of
an astronaut;
·
research a
Canadian astronaut, technician or trades person, then prepare an informational
package to be used at a press conference describing a recent mission;
·
will present
their information to the class in the style of a press conference and answer
questions;
·
participate in
other groups’ press conferences by asking questions. (Appendix 2.4 –
Presentation Assessment Rubric)
Activity 2.5:
Spaceship Earth
Students relate
components of a closed system to our environment. Students will view the Earth
as a closed system where supplies are limited. Students may use this exercise
to bring forth Catholic values and reflect on how their values and aspirations
can affect other members of their community. Students reflect on the way many
people currently take the Earth’s resources for granted and how important it is
to treat the Earth with respect.
The
teacher:
·
distributes
role-playing journal reflective cards to the small groups. Each card has a
different scenario written on it, e.g., (1) The father has to leave. How will
this affect the community? What role does the father play in this community?
(2) Someone in the community is continually dumping their garbage in a nearby
park. How does this affect the community?)
·
assigns student’s
the task of creating a short skit to act out their scenario;
·
leads a
discussion regarding ways one’s roles and values affect the communities they
are a part of;
·
engages the class
in a discussion relating what has been learned about sustaining life in
alternative environments to Earth, i.e., relating the mechanical processes of
an air purification system to the natural process of air purification by trees;
·
introduces the
concept of Earth as a closed system known as “Spaceship Earth.” Earth is more
closed than even a spaceship because there is no “refuelling station” to take
on supplies. The teacher encourages the students to think about the following
facts about our planet:
· There is no outside source for life-sustaining raw materials.
· There is no interplanetary garbage dump.
·
leads a
discussion about rules that may be followed on spaceships to avoid fouling the
air and overusing vital water and food supplies;
·
leads the class
in a reflective discussion about how the Earth should be respected and viewed
of as a gift from God;
·
stimulates
discussion regarding the way human civilization has taken the Earth for
granted, and what we, as Catholics, can do to prevent its deterioration.
Students:
·
are assigned to
groups of three or four students and are given group role-playing journal
reflection cards;
·
act out scenario
given to them on their journal reflection card;
·
participate in a
discussion on how their roles and values affect the rest of their community;
·
participate in
the discussion on “spaceship Earth”;
·
write a rules
manual that should include (but is not limited to):
· A set of rules for human passengers on spaceship Earth;
· An evaluation of how closely these rules are presently being followed;
· Suggestions about how some human behaviours should be altered;
· A prediction about how these human practices and behaviours may affect the diversity of living things.
·
take part in a
reflective discussion regarding ways humans take Earth’s resources for granted;
·
discuss ways they
can help prevent the Earth’s deterioration.
·
Flow chart can be
assessed for Knowledge/Understanding and Communication using a checklist
(AE1.02, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE2.03, AE3.01).
·
Analysis of
alternative environments can be assessed for Knowledge/Understanding using a
quiz (AE1.02, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE3.01).
·
Students’
scientific questions can be assessed for Inquiry using a suitable rubric or
rating scale (AE2.02).
·
Poster can be
assessed for Making Connections and Communication using a suitable rubric or
rating scale by both the teacher and peers (AE1.01, AE1.03, AE1.04, AE3.02).
·
Report can be
assessed for Knowledge/Understanding and Communication using a suitable rubric
or rating scale (AE3.04).
·
Press conference
can be peer assessed for Communication using a suitable rating scale
(AE1.05, AE3.02).
·
Spaceship Earth
is assessed for Knowledge/Understanding, Communication, and Making Connections
based on the criteria given by the teacher with regards to the formal paper
(AE3.03).
·
A quiz may also
be given to assess for Knowledge/Understanding relating sustaining life on a
closed alternative environment to the process through which our own natural
environment sustains life (AE3.03).
·
For students with
physical or learning impairments, classroom activities can be adapted, where
possible, to permit participation in activities. Peer assistance should be
encouraged. Access to a computer or tape recorder should be provided, where
possible.
·
If a student has
an individual education plan (IEP), this activity must be adapted to meet the
needs as outlined in the IEP.
·
For enrichment
activities:
· Choose one of the ways that our natural environment sustains life, e.g., air purification by trees. Research this process in detail and present findings to the class in a formal presentation.
· Research rules that are followed by Canadian astronauts on spaceships to avoid fouling air and overusing vital water and food supplies. Present research to the class.
·
ESL/ESD students
should have opportunities to demonstrate their learning by alternate means,
e.g., spoken English, direct demonstration, and/or pictorial representation.
Print
Grace,
Eric, et al. SciencePower 10. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. 2000. ISBN 0-07-560364-0
Plumb,
Donald, et al. Science
9. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson
Learning, 1999.
Cattiaux, P.
“Astronaut Julie Payette is Out of This World.” REALM. (Winter 2001/2002):
26-29
[also available at http://realm.net]
Clancy,
Christina, et al. SciencePower
9. Toronto: McGraw-Hill
Ryerson Limited, 1999.
ISBN 0-07-560361-6
Ritter, Bob, et al. Science
10. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson Learning, 2000. ISBN 0-17-607501-1
Websites
Biosphere 2 Center –
www.bio2.edu
Canada’s
SchoolNet and the Canadian Space Agency’s SPACE
– http://www.schoolnet.ca/space/main_E.htm
The Canadian
Space Agency – http://www.space.gc.ca
Challenger
Center Online – http://www.challenger.org
Discovery
Channel Canada – http://www.exn.ca
Montreal
Biodome – http://www.ville.montreal.qc.ca/biodome/e1–intro/ef1_cam.htm#camera
NASA Human
SpaceFlight – http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/index.html
Spacelink –
http://spacelink.nasa.gov/index.html
Software
Inspiration®6 ©1988-1999 Inspiration® Software Inc.
Time: 5 hours
Students design a
closed ecosystem capable of supporting human life. Students write a reflective
journal emphasizing what is truly important in life.
Ontario Catholic
School Graduate Expectations
CGE 1d - develops
attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to promote
social responsibility, human solidarity, and the common good;
CGE 2c - presents
information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;
CGE 3d - makes
decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;
CGE 3f - examines,
evaluates, and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical,
political, ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a
just and compassionate society;
CGE 4g - examines
and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing
life’s choices and opportunities;
CGE 7e - witnesses
Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a
just, peaceful and compassionate society.
Strand(s): Alternative Environments
Overall
Expectations
AEV.01 - demonstrate
a knowledge of the inputs, outputs, and interactions involved in maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment;
AEV.02 - analyse
major variables that affect the various inputs, outputs, and interactions
involved in maintaining an alternative life-sustaining environment;
AEV.03 - demonstrate
an understanding of what would be required to equip and operate an alternative
environment capable of supporting human life, and compare its sustainability to
that of our normal planetary environment.
Specific
Expectations
AE1.02 - describe
the inputs of food, energy, air, and water needed to maintain an alternative
life-sustaining environment;
AE1.03 - identify
the components of an alternative life-sustaining environment (e.g., source[s]
of energy, atmosphere, means for recycling or disposing of waste), and describe
how they must interact to be successful;
AE1.04 - describe
the outputs of an alternative life-sustaining environment, and the systems
required to handle them (e.g., air filtration systems);
AE1.05 - describe
the difficulties facing humans living in a weightless self-supporting
environment (e.g., the difficulties of reducing human waste);
AE2.03 - use flow
charts to diagram the inputs, outputs, and interactions of the various
life-sustaining components of an alternative environment (e.g., energy flow,
waste disposal, atmosphere);
AE3.01 - analyse,
using knowledge of the requirements for sustainability, existing alternative
life-sustaining environments (e.g., International Space Station, Earth-based
self-sustaining biodome experiments, nuclear submarines, off-shore oil rigs),
and make suggestions for their improvement or development;
AE3.04 - analyse the
costs and benefits to society, the economy, and the environment of constructing
and operating an alternative environment capable of supporting human life
(e.g., write a brief essay on the potential economic benefits of maintaining an
alternative life-sustaining environment such as the International Space
Station).
Scientific
Investigation Skills
SIS.05 - locate,
select, analyse, and integrate information on topics under study, working
independently and as part of a team, and using appropriate library and
electronic research tools, including Internet websites;
SIS.07 - communicate
the procedures and results of laboratory investigations and research for
specific purposes using data tables and laboratory reports.
·
Grade 10 Science
- Biology strand
·
Grade 9 Science -
Earth and Space Science strand
·
Reserve the
library/resource centre/computer lab time for the class.
·
Collect materials
that are available in the school for building a display.
The
teacher:
·
briefly reviews
factors required to sustain life in an alternative life-sustaining environment;
·
records all major
factors on board. Such factors should include air, water, food, energy, waste
disposal, etc.;
·
assigns students
with the responsibility of designing and creating a display (drawing or
three-dimensional model) depicting a sustainable space research colony suitable
for permanent human habituation.
Students:
·
design and create
a display depicting a sustainable space research colony suitable for permanent
human habituation;
·
hand in a
completed display that includes:
· a demonstration of how the colony will be adapted to the environment (keeping in mind problems that the colony will face in a weightless self-supporting environment, e.g., waste disposal;
· a plan that will outline how colonists will achieve self-sufficiency in both short and long terms;
· evidence of how knowledge gained from existing space explorations and space technology will be used;
· a flow chart to diagram the inputs, outputs, and interactions of the various life-sustaining components of the student’s space colony.
·
present completed
displays to the class and justify their designs. Students must defend the
criteria they have chosen to include in their space colony;
·
write a
reflective journal entitled How can I take all that I have learned to the
future? Students reflect on Catholic values, and reflect on factors that are
truly important in their lives.
·
Space colony
activity can be assessed for Knowledge/Understanding, Communication, Inquiry,
and Application using a task specific rubric (AEV.01, AEV.02, AEV.03, AE1.02,
AE1.03, AE1.04, AE1.05).
·
The flow chart
can be assessed for Communication and Making Connections (AE2.03)
·
Reflective
journals can be produced using a computer or a tape recorder.
·
Graphic
organizers and diagrams could be used as alternate journal activities.
Print
Grace,
Eric, et al. SciencePower 10. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. 2000. ISBN 0-07-560364-0
Plumb,
Donald, et al. Science 9. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson Learning, 1999.
Clancy,
Christina, et al. SciencePower
9. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited, 1999.
ISBN 0-07-560361-6
Ritter, Bob, et al. Science
10. Scarborough: Nelson Thomson Learning, 2000. ISBN 0-17-607501-1
Costs and Benefits
to Society
|
Costs |
Benefits |
|
|
|
Costs and Benefits
to The Economy
|
Costs |
Benefits |
|
|
|
Costs and Benefits
to The Environment
|
Costs |
Benefits |
|
|
|
Introduction:
______________________________________________________________
Paragraph 1: Effects
on Society
Topic Sentence 1:
______________________________________________________________
Support:
1.
____________________________________________________________________________
2.
____________________________________________________________________________
3.
____________________________________________________________________________
4.
____________________________________________________________________________
Linking sentence:
________________________________________________________________
Paragraph 2:
Effects on the Economy
Topic Sentence 2:
______________________________________________________________
Support:
1.
____________________________________________________________________________
2.
____________________________________________________________________________
3.
____________________________________________________________________________
4.
____________________________________________________________________________
Linking sentence:
________________________________________________________________
Paragraph 3:
Effects on the Environment
Topic Sentence 3:
______________________________________________________________
Support:
1.
____________________________________________________________________________
2.
____________________________________________________________________________
3.
____________________________________________________________________________
4.
____________________________________________________________________________
Concluding Sentence:
____________________________________________________________
Conclusion:
________________________________________________________________
Notes:
·
Topic Sentence:
point being developed
·
Linking Sentence:
takes the reader to the next point
Cost/Benefit
Analysis Peer Checklist
Name:
__________________________ Evaluator:
_________________________
|
Criteria |
Yes |
No |
|
Topic
sentence is clear and easily understood. |
|
|
|
Evidence
is relevant and supports the topic sentence. |
|
|
|
Evidence
is in the student’s own words. |
|
|
|
Linking
sentences introduce the following paragraph. |
|
|
|
Spelling
errors have been fixed. |
|
|
|
Grammar
and punctuation errors have been fixed. |
|
|
|
Report
follows a logical order. |
|
|
|
Reference material
is properly referenced. |
|
|
(Generic model –
modify to meet local criteria)
|
Category/ Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
Knowledge/
Understanding - understanding of
concepts, principles, laws, and theories |
- demonstrates
limited understanding of concepts, principles, laws, and theories |
- demonstrates
some understanding of concepts, principles, laws, and theories |
- demonstrates
considerable understanding of concepts, principles, laws, and theories |
- demonstrates
thorough understanding of concepts, principles, laws, and theories |
|
- knowledge of
facts and terms |
- demonstrates
limited knowledge of facts and terms |
- demonstrates
some knowledge of facts and terms |
- demonstrates
considerable knowledge of facts and terms |
- demonstrates
thorough knowledge of facts and terms |
|
- transfer of
concepts to new contexts |
- transfers simple
concepts to new contexts infrequently |
- transfers simple
concepts to new contexts sometimes |
- transfers simple
and some complex concepts to new contexts usually |
- transfers
complex concepts to new contexts routinely |
|
Inquiry - application of
the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry |
- applies few of
the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry |
- applies some of
the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry |
- applies most of
the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry |
- applies all or
almost all of the skills and strategies of scientific inquiry |
|
Communication - communication of
information and ideas |
- communicates information
and ideas with limited clarity and precision |
- communicates
information and ideas with moderate clarity and precision |
- communicates
information and ideas with considerable clarity and precision |
- communicates
information and ideas with a high degree of clarity and precision |
|
Category/ Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
Communication - use of
scientific terminology, symbols, conventions, and standard (SI) units |
- uses scientific
terminology, symbols, conventions, and SI units with limited accuracy and
effectiveness |
- uses scientific
terminology, symbols, conventions, and SI units with some accuracy and
effectiveness |
- uses scientific
terminology, symbols, conventions, and SI units with considerable accuracy
and effectiveness |
- uses scientific
terminology, symbols, conventions, and SI units with a high degree of
accuracy and effectiveness |
|
- communication
for different audiences and purposes |
- communicates
with a limited sense of audience and purpose |
- communicates
with some sense of audience and purpose |
- communicates
with a clear sense of audience and purpose |
- communicates
with a strong sense of audience and purpose |
|
- use of various
forms of communication (e.g., reports, essays) |
- demonstrates
limited command of the various forms |
- demonstrates
moderate command of the various forms |
- demonstrates
considerable command of the various forms |
- demonstrates
extensive command of the various forms |
|
Making
Connections - understanding of
connections among science, technology, society, and the environment |
- shows limited
understanding of connections in familiar contexts |
- shows some
understanding of connections in familiar contexts |
- shows
considerable understanding of connections in familiar and some unfamiliar
contexts |
- shows thorough
understanding of connections in familiar and unfamiliar contexts |
Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1
(50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment or activity.
Overview | Course Profiles Main
Menu