Course Profile   Geography of Canada, Grade 9 applied, Public

 

Unit # 2: Human Systems

 

Activity 1 | Activity 2 | Activity 3 | Activity 4 | Activity 5 | Activity 6 | Activity 7 | Activity 8

 

Time:         25 hours

Unit Developer(s):

 

Development Date:            April 7, 1999

 

Unit Description

 

Students apply the knowledge and skills in a culminating activity in which they develop and complete a Locality Study and Business Plan for a secondary, tertiary or quaternary industry that incorporates demographics, future considerations, and locational factors.

 

In this investigation of human systems students are given the opportunity to develop skills in geographic inquiry through the creation, analysis and interpretation of a variety of geographic representations including graphs, maps, data charts and organizers. The relationship between human systems and ecozones are also explored.

 

Strand(s) and Expectations

 

Strand(s):                          Space & Systems, Human-Environment Interactions, Global Connections, Understanding & Managing Change, Method of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.01B, SSV.02B, SSV.03B, SSV.04B; HEV.01P; GCV.01P, GCV.02B; UMV.01B, UMV.02B, UMV.03B, MIV.01B

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.01B, SS1.03B, SS1.04B, SS1.05P, SS1.07P, SS2.01P, SS2.02P, SS2.03P, SS2.04P, SS3.02B, UM1.01B, UM1.02B, UM1.03P, UM3.03P, UM3.04P, M11.02B, M12.01P, M12.02B, M12.03P, M12.04B, M12.05B, M12.06B, M12.09B, M12.08P, M12.10P, M12.11P, M12.12B, M12.13B, M12.14B, M13.01B, M13.04P

 

 

Activity Titles (Time + Sequence)

 

Activity 1

Mapping & Graphing Canada's Population Distribution

250 min

Activity 2

Mapping and Graphing Canada's Population Density

250 min

Activity 3

Investigating Canada's Changing Demographics

250 min

Activity 4

Investigating Immigration: Past & Present

75 min

Activity 5

Who Immigrates to Canada?

75 min

Activity 6

Migration Within Canada

150 min

Activity 7

Understanding the Movement of People, Goods and Ideas

225 min

Activity 8

Locality Study and Business Plan

225 min

 

Unit Planning Notes

Prior Knowledge Required

Teaching/Learning Strategies            

Assessment/Evaluation

Resources

 

 

Activity #1:       Mapping and Graphing Canada’s Population Distribution

 

Suggested Time:            270 minutes

 

Description

 

Students map, graph, and examine the variations in provincial/territorial populations across Canada. They study Canada’s ecumene and the rationale behind the distribution of our country’s people. Students receive direct instruction focused on the concepts of population distribution, graphing and mapping. Students use the data they discover to analyse the factors which affect the distribution of Canadians.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundations: Space & Systems, Understanding & Managing Change, Methods of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.02B, SSV.04B; UMV.01B; MIV.02B, MIV.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS1.07P, SS2.03P; UM1.03P; MI1.02B, MI2,01P, MI2.09B, MI2.11B

 

Planning Notes

 

This activity can be competed using computer technology:

     Construct the graph using a spreadsheet program such as MicroSoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry licensed).

     Construct chloropleth maps using a GIS, such as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris Works (both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher should provide students with a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of Canada. Teacher may wish to do an isodemographic map instead.

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

From the Grade 7 and 8 curriculum, it is expected that students will be familiar with basic cartographic, graphing and mathematical skills and will understand the concepts of rural and urban population distribution and density, urbanization, CMAs, and primary/secondary/tertiary industries.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies:

 

1.   Ask "Where would you like to live in Canada?" and "Why?", and explore the factors that affect those choices: human systems and natural systems. Focussing on where people are the teacher show students a dot map of Canada’s population distribution (e.g. the inside cover of the Canadian Intermediate Oxford Atlas or on p.10-11 of the Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource, 2nd ed.), introduce the concepts of population distribution, population density, ecumene, core and periphery, heartland and hinterland, Quebec-Windsor axis, etc., and have students brainstorm patterns and rationale for the demographic variations across the country.

 

2.   Students use a dot map showing Canada’s population distribution, an atlas containing several thematic maps of Canada, and a base map of Canada to construct a table showing provincial territory and population, a pie graph and a chloropleth map to illustrate Canada's population distribution.

3.   Students describe the location of the provinces/territories with the highest and lowest populations and study the dot map of Canada’s population distribution to complete the following table to explain why so many Canadians live where they do:

 

Many Canadians live:

because...

Examples are:

within 200 km. of the Canadian-U.S. border

*    the climate is       warmer,...

* Winnipeg, ...

along the ocean coastlines

 

 

along major rivers

 

 

along the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway

 

 

near major resource bases

 

 

etc.

 

 

 

4.   The teacher introduces the culminating activity for the unit, a Locality Study and Business Plan, to set the stage for the activities in the rest of the unit which develop the skills and concepts needed.

 

Assessment/Evaluation Techniques

 

The product of this assignment can be assessed according to the:

     accuracy, neatness, and elements of the graph and map;

     the validity, completeness, detail, and depth of the analysis.

 

Planning Notes

 

Prior to students completing the above activity teachers should:

     make copies of the base map of Canada for all students.

     book facilities if students be completing the circle graph or chloropleth map using computers.

 

Resources

 

     Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource (2nd Edition)

     Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th Edition)

     E-Stats

     ArcCanada (GIS database for use with ArcView)

     Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel (Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet Software)

 

Accommodations:

 

Appendices:

 

 

Activity #2:       Canada’s Population Density CGA.1P

 

Suggested Time:            265 minutes

 

Description

 

This activity is designed to establish an understanding of Canada’s population distribution and of the concept of population density. Linkages to the previous unit are provided by the establishment of statistics for Canadian population density by ecozone. Students are re-introduced to skills of chloropleth mapping and graphing.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundations: Space and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Methods of Geographic Inquiry.

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.02B, SSV.04B, UMV.01B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS1.05P, SS1.07P, SS2.02P, SS2.03P, UM1.03P, UM2.01B, UM3.04P, MI1.02B, MI2.01P, MI2.02B. MI2.03P, MI2.09B, MI2.08P, MI2.11P, MI2.12B, MI2.13B,

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

Students are expected to have completed the distribution exercise which precedes this activity. In addition, students are expected to have successfully completed the expectations from grades seven and eight which deal specifically with an understanding of geographic inquiry, map and graphing skills, the effect of physical patterns on human activity, the role of natural resources in population distribution, and patterns in human geography.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

The teacher will:

 

a.   Review the concept of “population density” and have students brainstorm :

i.    areas of Canada with high and low population densities and the explanations behind each of these patterns;

ii.    how Canada’s overall population density compares with that of other countries;

iii.   advantages and disadvantages of having a high or low population density in your country.

 

b.   Review with students the construction of a bar graph and a choropleth map.

 

c.   provide students with a base map of the ecozones. (See Appendix J)

 

Students complete the following task:

 

1.   a.   Differentiate between the concepts of “population distribution” and “population density”.

 

b.   What does a low (high) number for population density mean? Where in Canada would you expect there to be a low (high) population density? Why do you think the population density is so low (high) in this area?

 

c.   Refer to the following chart and:

 

Province/

Territory

Population

(people)

Area

(km2)

Population Density

(people km-2)

% of Canada’s Total Pop.

NF

551792

371634.6

1.48

1.91

PEI

134557

5660.4

23.77

0.47

NS

909282

52840.8

17.21

3.15

NB

738133

71569.2

10.31

2.56

Que

7138795

1357811.7

5.26

24.75

ON

10753573

916733.7

11.73

37.28

Man

1113898

547703.8

2.03

3.86

Sask

990237

570113.5

1.74

3.43

Alta

2696826

638232.7

4.23

9.35

BC

3724500

892677

4.17

12.91

Yukon

30766

531843.6

0.06

0.11

NWT

64402

3246389.5

0.02

0.22

Canada

28846761

9203210.5

3.13

100

(1996).

            i.    Construct a bar graph to show how population density varies across Canada.

ii.    Analyse the graph and account for observations you make. (e.g. What province or territory is most densely populated? Even though Ontario and Quebec have large populations, their population densities are not as large as some others, why? Why are the population densities for the Yukon and NWT so low? etc.)

 

d.   Does Canada’s overall population density give a clear picture of how Canada’s population is distributed? Why/why not?

 

2.   a.   Refer to the following chart:

 

Ecozone

Population

(People)

Area

(km2)

Population Density

(People/km2)

% of Canada’s Total Pop.

1

1047

239216

0.00438

0.00428

2

16328

1433362

0.0114

0.0667

3

10314

775734

0.0133

0.0422

4

21429

563241

0.038

0.0876

5

33589

1268623

0.0265

0.137

7

2510203

196449

12.8

10.3

8

14016101

113431

123.6

57.3

9

707695

656970

1.08

2.89

10

3851089

440537

8.74

15.7

11

309

245865

0.126

0.00126

12

30839

432128

0.0714

0.126

13

2504393

195554

12.8

10.2

14

751761

461198

1.67

3.07

15

9938

350318

0.0284

0.0406

 

i.    Construct a choropleth map to show how population density varies across Canada.

ii.    Analyse the map and account for observations you make.

 

b.   Do the population densities of the provinces/territories or the population densities of the ecozones give you a clearer picture of where most people live in Canada?

 

3.   Suppose that 1000 people from all over Canada were coming to your school to see a concert in the auditorium. Assuming that these people are a perfect representation of Canada’s demographic make-up calculate the number that are from:

 

a.   each province;

 

b.   Atlantic Canada (NF, NB, NS, PEI), Central Canada (ON, Que), the Prairies (Man, Sask, Alta), Western Canada (BC), Northern Canada (Yukon, NWT); and,

 

c.   each ecozone.

 

Assessment/Evaluation Techniques

 

A rubric is provided for the activities listed in the exercise (see Appendix E). Others may be used. In addition to the rubrics for these activities, self and peer evaluation is suggested.

 

Planning Notes

 

Teachers should be sure to understand all of the terminology and procedures involved in the activity before starting. All charts and data sheets should be prepared before hand. Copies of the distribution assignment answers should also be present.

 

Resources

 

1.   Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource (2nd Edition)

2.   Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th Edition)

3.   E-Stats

4.   ArcCanada (GIS database for use with ArcView)

5.   Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel (Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet Software)

 

Accommodations

 

This activity can be competed using computer technology:

     Construct the graph using a spreadsheet program such as MicroSoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry licensed).

     Construct choropleth maps using a GIS, such as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris Works (both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher should provide students a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of Canada. Have students research statistics to go in chart.

 

Appendices

 

Rubric for Assessment (Appendix B)

 

 

Activity #3:       Canada’s Changing Demographics

 

Suggested Time:         250 Minutes

 

Description

 

Students will understand the terminology and concepts behind the study of Canada’s changing population. The focus will be on the application of population change data to questions centering on Canada and its place in the world with regards to population change. Students will refine skills of graphing, charting, mapping and data analysis.

 

Strands and Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundations: Space and Systems
Understanding & Managing Change
Methods of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.02B, SSV.04B, UMV.01B, UMV.02B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS2.03P, UM1.02B,UM1.03P, MI1.02B, MI2.01P, MI2.04B, MI2.09B, MI2.08P, MI2.11P, MI2.12B, MI2.13B

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

The student must understand the concepts from the grade 7 and 8 curriculum:

     creating maps and graphs to organize information,

     identifying patterns of settlement,

     factors affecting population distribution,

     the terms describing population characteristics,

     the correlation between population characteristics, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of data,

     the identification of push and pull factors in population change.

The students must be able to communicate the results of specific inquiries.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

a.   Students:

i)    brainstorm the factors that account for and influence population change;

 

ii)   postulate on the regions of Canada experiencing the largest and slowest population growth rates, the rationale behind these trends, and the problems that may result.

 

iii)   consider how population growth in Canada compares to that in other parts of the world and the explanations for such variations.

 

b.   Teach the concepts of Population Growth Rate, Percentage Population Change, Birth rate, Death rate, Rate of Natural Increase, Life Expectancy, and Population Pyramid (Age-Sex Structure).

 

c.   Review how to produce a multiple-line graph and chloropleth map.

 

d.   Provide students with a base map of Canada’s Provinces and Territories.

The student will complete the following activity:

 

1.   a.   Produce a multiple line graph with two vertical axis to illustrate the data below:

 

Canada

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

Population

( millions)

14.0

16.1

18.2

20.0

21.6

23.0

24.3

25.3

27.3

28.9

Growth Rate (%)

 

14.8

 

13.4

9.7

7.8

6.6

5.9

4.0

7.9

5.7

 

b.   i.    Describe what has happened to Canada’s population since 1951.

ii.    Describe what has happened to Canada’s growth rate since 1951.

iii.   Why do you presume the growth rate was so high from 1951-61?

iv.   Why do you think the growth rate has fallen since this time?

v.   What may eventually happen to Canada’s population if the growth rates continues its decline? Why might this be a problem?

vi.   How might Canada stop this from happening?

 

2.   a.   In groups of four, construct population pyramids to represent Canada’s age-sex structure for the following years: 1971, 1986, 2001, 2016: (projections for 2001 and 2016 are based on medium growth rates)

 

Year

0-4m

0-4f

5-9m

5-9f

10-14m

10-14f

15-19m

15-19f

20-24m

20-24f

1971

4.27%

4.08%

5.27%

5.04%

5.41%

5.18%

5.01%

4.85%

4.54%

4.50%

1986

3.61%

3.43%

3.59%

3.40%

3.55%

3.39%

3.91%

3.70%

4.83%

4.61%

2001

3.10%

2.94%

3.35%

3.18%

3.42%

3.25%

3.41%

3.26%

3.39%

3.25%

2016

2.84%

2.69%

2.87%

2.71%

2.92%

2.76%

3.04%

2.87%

3.28%

3.12%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

25-29m

25-29f

30-34m

30-34f

35-39m

35-39f

40-44m

40-44f

45-49m

45-49f

1971

3.83%

3.66%

3.13%

2.99%

3.02%

2.84%

2.99%

2.86%

2.84%

2.86%

1986

4.83%

4.70%

4.38%

4.38%

3.99%

3.92%

3.24%

3.14%

2.58%

2.53%

2001

3.46%

3.37%

3.74%

3.68%

4.32%

4.23%

4.28%

4.24%

3.75%

3.78%

2016

3.40%

3.28%

3.47%

3.37%

3.45%

3.36%

3.41%

3.35%

3.47%

3.45%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

50-54m

50-54f

55-59m

55-59f

60-64m

60-64f

65-69m

65-69f

70-74m

70-74f

1971

2.40%

2.45%

2.18%

2.21%

1.76%

1.82%

1.36%

1.49%

0.95%

1.16%

1986

2.39%

2.37%

2.32%

2.38%

2.05%

2.30%

1.61%

1.93%

1.25%

1.61%

2001

3.36%

3.36%

2.57%

2.61%

2.00%

2.08%

1.74%

1.88%

1.48%

1.75%

2016

3.77%

3.75%

3.59%

3.65%

3.03%

3.19%

2.56%

2.75%

1.79%

2.04%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

75-79m

75-79f

80-84m

80-84f

85-89m

85-89f

90+m

90+f

 

 

1971

0.64%

0.85%

0.39%

0.54%

0.19%

0.27%

0.06%

0.11%

 

 

1986

0.81%

1.17%

0.45%

0.75%

0.19%

0.40%

0.08%

0.21%

 

 

2001

1.09%

1.52%

0.63%

1.07%

0.31%

0.66%

0.12%

0.40%

 

 

2016

1.18%

1.48%

0.78%

1.14%

0.44%

0.81%

0.22%

0.67%

 

 

 

b.   Analyse the graphs and answer the following questions:

i.    Explain the “bulge” in the younger age cohorts of the 1971 pyramid (i.e. who are they, when were they born, why are there so many of them, etc.)

ii.    What has happened to birth rates since this time? (i.e. Have the “baby-boomers” had as many children as their parents did?) How can you tell by looking at the pyramids? Why do think they have changed?

iii.   What has happened to life expectancies since this time? How can you tell by looking at the pyramids? Why do think they have changed?

iv.   The “baby boomers” are now in the middle age (working-class) cohorts. How might this be good and how might it be bad at the present time?

v.   By 2016 many of the “baby boomers” have retired. How might this be good and how might it be bad at that time?

vi.   Once the baby-boomers begin to pass on, what may happen to Canada’s population? What are the two ways that this may be avoided? Which is Canada focusing on now? Why?

 

The following data tables be helpful in answering the above questions:

 

Average Family Size

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

3.7

3.5

3.3

3.1

3.1

3.0

 

Canadian Families by Number of Children at Home

YEAR

0

1

2

3

4

5

1976

30

23.5

23.5

12.5

6

4

1991

35

26.5

26

9.5

2

.5

(Notice: How have the number of children had by Canadian families changed? How might this impact Canada’s population size and structure in the future?)

 

Family Structure

 

1976

1991

Husband-Wife Families

90.2

87.0

Female Lone-Parent Families

8.1

10.7

Male Lone-Parent Families

1.7

2.3

(Notice: What’s happening to the traditional family structure of the past? Will this impact on the number of children families choose to have? How and why?)

 

Percentage of Married Males/Females for Selected Age Groups

YEAR

 

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

 

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

1976

32

54

71

81

85

87

89

88

90

87

1991

17

33

51

65

70

75

78

78

81

78

(Notice: Are people waiting longer to get married these days? Why? and, Are a greater or lesser percentage of us getting married as compared to before? Is there a relationship between these two trends and the number of children people are having today?)

 

Life Expectancy at Birth

1920-22

1930-32

1940-42

1950-52

1960-62

1970-72

1980-82

1990-92

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

59

61

60

62

63

66

66

71

68

74

69

76

72

79

75

81

(Notice: What has happened to Canada’s life expectancy? How this impact on our population structure in the future? What it mean for Canadians?)

 

3.   a.   Refer to the following chart:

 

Province / Territory

1996

1991

Absolute Change

Percentage Change

Canada

28 846 761

27 296 859

1 549 902

5.7%

Nfld

551 792

568 474

16 682

-2.9%

PEI

134 557

129 765

4792

3.7%

NS

909 282

899 942

9340

1.0%

NB

738 133

723 900

14 233

2.0%

Que

7 138 795

6 895 963

242 832

3.5%

ON

10 753 573

10 084 885

668 688

6.6%

Man

1 113 898

1 091 942

21 956

2.0%

Sask

990 237

988 928

1309

0.1%

Alta

2 696 826

2 545 553

151 273

5.9%

BC

3 724 500

3 282 061

442 439

13.5%

Yukon

30 766

27 797

2969

10.7%

NWT

64 402

57 649

6753

11.7%

(1996).

b.   Produce a chloropleth map showing the percentage population change for the provinces and territories.

 

c.   Do the following:

 

i.    Name the provinces/territories that have experienced percentage population change above and below the national average. Provide explanations for these variations.

 

Assessment/Evaluation Techniques

 

1.   Summative assessments may be made of the various products the students produce

2.   The inclusion of examples of student work in a portfolio for evaluation at the end of the unit is a suggested evaluation technique. In this unit, such inclusions would contain a map, a graph, a chart, a population pyramid and a sample of student analysis of the various visual tools they have produced to display geographic data.

3.   A rubric for the assessment of such portfolios is included in Appendix E.

 

Planning Notes

 

The teacher should be prepared in advance of this activity to teach the concepts of Population Growth Rate, Percentage Population Change, Birth Rate, Death Rate, Rate of Natural Increase, Life Expectancy, Population Pyramid (Age-Sex Structure), and Dependency Ratio.

 

Resources

 

     Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource (2nd Edition)

     Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th Edition)

     E-Stats

     ArcCanada (GIS database for use with ArcView)

     Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel (Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet Software)

 

Accommodations

 

This activity can be competed using computer technology:

     Construct the graph using a spreadsheet program such as Microsoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry licensed).

     Construct chloropleth maps using a GIS, such as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris Works (both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher should provide students a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of Canada.

 

Appendices

 

Evaluation Rubric for portfolios containing a map, a graph, a chart, a population pyramid and a sample of student analysis of the various visual tools they have produced to display geographic data. (Appendix E)

 

 

Activity #4:       Immigration Past and Present

 

Suggested Time:

 

Description

 

Students understand why and how people immigrate to Canada. They understand the reasons why people move from one place to another. The concept is expanded to a view on why people move to new countries. Students analyse a graph showing immigration between 1851-1996. Students then look at how people immigrate to Canada (classifications, point system, quotas). Finally, students write a letter to their MP stating an informed opinion about immigration.

 

Strands and Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundation: Space & Systems
Methods of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.02B, UMV.01B, UMV.03B, MIV.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS2.03P, SS3.04P, UMV.02B, MI2.08P, MI1.06B, MI2.05B

 

Planning Notes

 

Get the address for MP ahead of time.

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

From the Grade 7 & 8 curriculum document:

     Identify factors that affect migration and mobility.

     Demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which cultures are affected by migration.

     Describe patterns and trends in immigration and their effects on Canada.

     Use a variety of geographic representations, tools and technologies to gather, process, and communicate geographic information.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

1.   Teacher polls students to see how many times they have moved (house/apartment/dwelling). Summarize the results. Ask students for reasons a person might move. List positive and negative factors that determine movement.

 

2.   From the local example, determine why people immigrate (the push and pull factors). Compare these factors to the positive and negative things that make people move locally.

 

3.   Show video on Canadian immigration (ex.: Canadian Immigration by Classroom Video, 23 minutes) Discuss the video.

 

4.   Teacher uses immigration data to have students determine trends in immigration from a current text/atlas reference. What years have the highest immigration? What years have the lowest immigration?

 

5.   As a class, discuss reasons for highs and lows (poor economic times, good economic times, depression, expansion of the West, WWI, post war boom, WWII, Government concern over falling birth rates, etc.) Students should add these reasons to their notes.

 

6.   Why do people immigrate to Canada? Go over the classification system with students - Refugee, Independent, Family. Have students complete a chart which includes a description as well as assessment. (See appropriate text) Go over the points system with students, looking at the different factors and how they are assessed (see resources for web pages with up to date points system). Finally discuss the idea of a government quota.

 

7.   Discuss the benefits of having immigrants come to Canada. (Different foods, different languages, contacts with other countries, etc.)

 

8.   Review the impacts of declining growth rates on Canada's population and establish the importance of immigration. Students write a letter to the government stating whether or not they think the Government should increase, decrease or leave the same the number of people they allow to immigrate to Canada. (They must refer back to the work on demographics to do this).

 

Assessment

 

Tool

Purpose

Who

Activity

rubric

formative

teacher

letter to immigration ministry

 

Resources

 

     Contact Canada

     Canada Land of Diversity

     Websites:    http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm

                        http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm

                        http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm

                        http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm

 

Activity #5:       Who Immigrates to Canada and where do they go?

 

Suggested Time:            75 minutes

 

Description

 

Students complete a graph showing source countries for Immigrants to Canada. On a Canada map, students illustrate, using a chloropleth map, where immigrants go when they arrive in Canada. Students complete a graduated symbols map to illustrate metropolitan immigration by the top ten Metropolitan Areas. Students complete a decision making matrix for the best location to settle in Canada.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundation: Space and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Global Connections

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.01B, SSV.02B, SSV.04B, UMV.01B, GCV.02B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS2.02P, SS2.04P, SS3.02B

 

Planning Notes

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

Grade 7 & 8

     Identify factors that affect migration and mobility.

     Demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which cultures are affected by migration.

     Describe patterns and trends in immigration and their effects on Canada.

     Use a variety of geographic representations, tools and technologies to gather, process, and communicate geographic information.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

1.   Students discuss: Where would you want to go if you were a new immigrant to Canada? Where do immigrants go when they arrive in Canada? Do all immigrants go to the same place? Do many immigrants move into your community?

 

2.   Students gather information about sources of immigrants to Canada (see appropriate text/atlas resource) and complete the following:

a.   Students complete a chloropletieth map showing immigration by province

b.   Students complete a proportional circle map showing immigration tot he top 10 Metropolitan Centres.

 

Immigration by Province, 1995

 

NFLD

PEI

NS

NB

QUE

ONT

MAN

SASK

ALTA

BC

YK

NWT

585

167

3581

639

27182

115681

3603

1949

14329

44541

108

91

 

Immigration by top 10 Metropolitan Areas

 

Toronto

Montreal

Vancouver

Calgary

Edmonton

Ottawa

Winnipeg

Hamilton

Halifax

London

71964

38422

37134

8574

7530

6153

4292

3102

2471

2138

 

3.   Students complete a decision making matrix to determine the best place to move to in Canada. Use the template for decision making from unit one. Ideas for criteria to use include: unemployment rate, employment types, recreation, climate, culture, housing prices, etc. The teacher can gather the stats ahead of time from the internet - Statistics Canada, or let the students gather the relevant information themselves.

 

Assessment

 

Tool

Purpose

Who

Activity

Overhead of completed graph

formative

self

graph showing source countries for immigrants

Rubric

formative

peer/self

graded shading map

Rubric

formative

teacher

graduated symbols map

Rubric

formative

teacher

decision making matrix

 

 

Activity #6:       Migration within Canada

 

Suggested Time:            150 minutes

 

Description

 

Students create a flow line map showing migration into and out of Ontario. Students will also complete a chart showing net gains and losses due to migration. The teacher lead a discussion on regional economic disparity as it applies to migration, and students will finish with writing a formal paragraph on this.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strands:                             Space and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Methods of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      MVI.01B, MVI.02B, MVI.03P

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.03B, SS1.04B, SS1.05P, SS2.04P, UM1.03P, MI1.02B, MI2.02B, MI2.09B, MI2.10B, MI2.11B, MI2.14B, MI3.01B

 

Planning Notes

 

Have blank maps of Canada for each student and an overhead of blank map of Canada.

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

Grade 7 & 8

     Use a variety of geographic methods to gather, process and communicate geographic information.

     Demonstrate an understanding of geographic inquiry.

     Identify and explain patterns in geography.

     Identify factors that affect migration and mobility.

     Demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which cultures are affected by migration.

     Describe patterns and trends in immigration and their effects on Canada.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

1.   Teacher leads discussion: If you could live anywhere in Canada, where would it be? Lead into a discussion on movement/migration in Canada - people are free to move around within Canada, Economics often decide where people go, etc.

 

2.   Students create a flow line map showing migration into and out of Ontario from other provinces/regions. See Appendix A for instructions. The teacher may want to model how to do a flow line map on the overhead to get students started.

 

3.   Once students have completed their flow line map, the teacher leads the class in a discussion about regional economic disparity as it links to migration - depressed areas versus booming areas, the types of natural resources available to an area, the economic base (one-industry towns versus towns with a variety of industry), transportation network in place, etc. (any good grade 9 textbook have a section on regional disparity.)

 

4.   Teacher and students will generate a note on the board about the discussion, which students then copy into their notes.

 

Assessment

 

Tool

Purpose

Who

Activity

Rubric

formative

teacher

flow line map

 

Resources

 

1.   Text (Canada Land of Diversity, Contact Canada, etc.)

2.   Base Map of Canada, overhead of base map

3.   Statistics Canada

 

Accommodations

 

     Note on board could be produced using word processor

     Computer generated graphs and maps

     ESL students could share culture with class

 

 

Student Worksheet: Migration Into and Out of Ontario

 

A flowline map shows the movement of goods/people/etc. from one location to another. The width of the arrow indicates the amount of goods/people/etc. being moved. A wider arrow means that more is being moved. A narrower arrow means less is being moved. The width of the arrow along with what each represents is indicated in the legend.

 

1.   Create a flowline map to show migration out of Ontario to other provinces in Canada.

 

# people leaving Ont.

Destination Province/Region

Width of

arrow (mm)

7927

Saskatchewan and Manitoba

__________

13 292

Alberta

__________

24 280

British Columbia

__________

17 177

Quebec

__________

17 432

Atlantic Provinces

__________

 

a.   For your map, 1 mm = 1000 people.

b.   You first need to round the number of people leaving Ontario to the different destinations to the nearest thousand. For example, the arrow for Saskatchewan and Manitoba will be 8 mm wide because 7927 rounds up to 8000.

c.   You have 5 arrows starting from Ontario in total.

d.   Colour the arrows red.

 

2.   Add to your map the number of people arriving in Ontario from the other provinces.

 

# people moving to Ont.

Province/Region of Origin

Width of arrow (mm)

8882

Saskatchewan and Manitoba

__________

11 528

Alberta

__________

10 949

British Columbia

__________

27 596

Quebec

__________

19 706

Atlantic Provinces

__________

 

a.   1 mm = 1 000 people

b.   You have five arrows arriving in Ontario (one from each of the provinces/regions of origin).

c.   Colour the arrows green.

 

3.   Complete the following chart showing Provincial Migration, 1992.

 

Province/ Region

Gained

Subtract

Lost

Equals

Net Gain/ Loss

Ontario

78 031

80 108

=

 

Quebec

27 245

41 551

=

 

Atlantic Provinces

30 412

36 602

=

 

Saskatchewan & Manitoba

30 365

44 515

=

 

Alberta

57 747

60 142

=

 

British Columbia

78 831

40 343

=

 

 

 

Activity #7:       Understanding the Movement of People, Goods, and Ideas

 

Suggested Time:            225 min

Description

 

Students investigate modes of transportation and communication.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strand(s):                          Geographic Foundations: Space and Systems, Human-Environment Interactions, Global Connections, Methods of Geographic Inquiry, Understanding and Managing Change         

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.01B, SSV.02B, SSV.03B, SSV.04B, HEV.01P, GCV.01P, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P, UMV.01B,

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.04B, SS1.05P, SS1.08P, SS2.01P, HE1.03B, UM3.01P, MI1.02B, MI2.03P, MI2.04B, MI2.11P, MI2.12P, MI2.14B, MI3.02P

 

Planning Notes

 

     When brainstorming modes of transportation, accept all creative comments (electric car, spaceship, skipping) but for the accompanying exercises, focus on the five main modes of transportation.

     When brainstorming modes of communication, accept all creative comments (smoke signals, morse code, body language) but for the accompanying exercises, focus on more common modes of communication.

     Students should realize that even as passive radio or television listeners/viewers, they are receivers in a communication process.

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

     demonstrate an understanding of region and movement as well as the factors affecting transportation and communication

     produce a wide variety of graphs and charts to organize and present information

     locate information from primary sources

     identify regions of Canada with high and low population density

     communicate the results of inquiries using charts and maps

     demonstrate an awareness of an economic system and how goods are distributed

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

1.         “There was a time in this fair land when the railway did not run
When the wild majestic mountains stood alone against the sun
Long before the white man, long before the wheel,
When the green dark forest was too silent to be real”

From The Railroad Trilogy, Gordon Lightfoot

 

Use this quotation or play a version of the song to lead into a discussion of Canada as an extensive area of natural systems which we have overlaid with human systems. What are the systems that we have built? How do we use them? How do we rely on them in our daily life? What activities do we use them for? How have these activities changed with time?

 

2.         Brainstorm a list of different modes of transportation used today.

 

3.         Read together (or individually) suitable text section or article on Modes of Transportation.

 

4.         Individually or in partners, complete a worksheet on Comparing Modes of Transportation (rail, road, water, air, pipeline) with a column for advantages and a column for disadvantages.

 

5.         Develop an Organizer for “Which mode is best?” (Use the following as a starting point – using real situations, each student will decide on a mode of transportation and provide reasoning to support their decision along with information on principal transportation networks from an atlas to support the decision.)

 

Cargo

Mode of Transportation

Reasoning for your decision

 

Atlas Information to support decision

Meat from Regina to Winnipeg

 

 

 

1000 textbooks from Toronto to Ottawa

 

 

 

Oil from Alberta to Ontario

 

 

 

Live lobsters from PEI to Ottawa

 

 

 

25 000 t of potash from Saskatchewan to the Netherlands

 

 

 

Fresh Tomatoes from Leamington to Churchill Man.

 

 

 

6 cars from Oshawa to a dealer in Moncton NB.

 

 

 

 

6.         Brainstorm modes of communication and try to get as detailed as possible to demonstrate the variety of modes. Develop definitions for the terms direct and indirect communication (use an appropriate textbook). Develop an organizer that displays the modes of communication, whether each one is indirect or indirect, and the time required to receive the information.

 

7.         Ask the students to list their most frequently used modes of communication. What are some factors that would prevent you from using these modes? Have them complete an activity such as a worksheet comparing a variety of communications (e.g., Toronto business ordering materials from an English manufacturer; Kingston business ordering paper supplies from a Toronto supplier; family in Smalltown, Ontario announcing the birth of a child to their family in Ireland; student asking for information on a university program in Boston, USA; students in Ontario communicating with students in Alberta; sending birthday greetings to someone who lives in the same town or city etc. ) as to how they would have been carried out 100 years ago, today, and in the future. Have them describe how and why communications have changed.

 

8.         Show the need for good communication systems by playing “telephone” – people whispering a message to each other. Only the first person gets to see the message; the last person announces the message to the class. This game illustrates the effects of an inadequate communications medium.

 

9.         Discuss the use of directories to help us locate information so that people can communicate more easily and quickly. Use your local phone book and the Canadian Postal Code Directory (a copy is probably available in the school office) as examples. Give the students an assignment to carry out a comparison of how geographically-based codes are used for phone and postal systems using the headings: coding systems; geographic pattern of codes; size of code areas; reason for variation of size; information needed to use the directory (e.g., name, address etc.) codes for all Canadian capital cities. Include questions requiring use of the directories to locate specific information. As an extension discuss how the internet can be used to locate address information (e.g., 411 site). And how do you find out what someone’s e-mail address is?

 

10.        Introduce the idea of the increasing costs with distance traveled using e.g., a taxi’s fare. Have students examine rate structures of various transportation and communication modes either by giving them the data or having them collect the data by themselves as a homework assignment (using the Internet or making some phone calls). Have each student in a group create a scatter graph for one of the sets of data. Have them share their results with the rest of the group, describing the correlation the graph produces.

 

11.        Have students use the data to consider four destinations (local, provincial, national, and international) and decide which mode of transportation/communication would be most economic and efficient for the movement of people, goods, and ideas (see Appendix D). (Have students locate the destinations on a world map.)

 

12.        Have students compare the cost of having five people from two different cities in two different time zones (give each pair of students a different pair of cities) meet in person or have a conference call. Have them describe any problems created by the different time zones, and how they would solve them.

 

Assessment/Evaluation Techniques

 

Personal Communication:

Instructional questions

Performance Assessment (Rubrics Checklists, Rating Scales, Anecdotal Records)

Written Assignments

Paragraph

Demonstrations (Live, Tape)

Co-operative group work

 

Resources

 

     Canada: Land of Diversity textbooks

     Canada and the World Atlases

 

Accommodations

 

     Use of peer-helpers when developing organizer

     Provide individual assistance where needed

     Provide a set of reference notes

 

Appendices

 

Rate Structures for Specific Transportation and Communication Modes (Appendix D)

 

 

Activity #8:       Locality Study and Business Plan

 

Suggested Time:         225 min

 

Description

 

Students develop and complete Locality Study and Business Plan for a secondary, tertiary, or quaternary industry that:

a.   reflects Canada’s present demographic structure, i.e. large percentage of populace in middle and working age cohorts.

b.   contains projections for future expansion or change in function based on projected changes to Canada’s demographic structure, i.e. the aging of Canada’s population.

c.   is located in one of Canada’s ecozones and is based on the locational factors for industry, the ecozone data that they has been collected in Units 1 and 2, and Canada’s existing infrastructure.

 

Strands & Expectations

 

Strands:                             Geographic Foundations: Space & Systems, Understanding & Managing Change, Methods of Geographic Inquiry

 

Overall Expectations:      SSV.04B, UMV.01B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03B

 

Specific Expectations:      SS1.01B, SS1.03B, SS2.01D, UM1.02B, UM3.02D, UM3.04D, UM3.05P, MI2.02B, MI2.09B, MI2.10B, MI2.11D, MI2.12B, MI3.01B, MI3.04D

 

Planning Notes

 

Teachers should:

     invite a business teacher or community member to discuss the writing of business plans.

     download a business plan template from the web site of any banking institution or obtain one through visiting the local Business Self Help Office or Economic Development Office.

     prepare a list of locational factors of industry in the event that the brainstorming session does not reveal all of them.

     remind students that they must bring to class all of their notes and work from Units 1 and 2 as it be used in this activity.

     book appropriate facilities if computers are being used as a resource for this activity.

 

Prior Knowledge Required

 

Students should:

     have the prerequisite knowledge for this activity including the ability to differentiate between the various forms of industry.

     be able to differentiate between the various types of industry.

     understand Canada’s changing demographic structure.

     know the location and general physical and human characteristics of Canada’s ecozones.

     have an understanding of Canada’s transportation and communications infrastructure.

 

Teaching/Learning Strategies

 

The teacher will:

     review Canada’s changing demographic structure;

     discuss with students the impacts on consumerism that the aging of Canada’s population initiate (e.g. less demand for goods and services required by youth and the middle-aged, greater demand for goods and services required by the aged);

     review the differences between primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary industries;

     discuss expansion or changing functions of businesses and industry (using local examples wherever possible);

     have students brainstorm and discuss the locational factors of industry such as nearness to water, access to utilities, proximity of market, adequate labor force, availability of resources, proper infrastructure, appropriate climate, etc. (Teachers may wish to separate these into site and situation factors);

     instruct students to construct a basic business plan;

     divide the class into groups of 2 to 3 students and review the following instructions.

 

1.   Select an important local business or industry and, using the list constructed by the class, identify the significant locational factors that would explain why it is situated where it is.

 

2.   Describe the site and situation characteristics of their locality and, by examining this list, record and provide a rationale for three industries or businesses that would likely flourish in their area.

 

Culminating Activity

 

3.   Choose a secondary, tertiary, or quaternary industry that produces or provides consumer goods or services for the youth or middle-aged population of Canada and may either expand or change in the future to reflect Canada’s aging population. For example,

 

 

Secondary

Tertiary

Present

Sport Shoes

Catering Business

Future

Orthopaedic Shoes

Home Food Service

 

4.   Review the:

     locational factors for industry,

     the ecozone data collected during Units 1 and 2, and,

     the information on Canada’s existing infrastructure from Unit 2.

 

Using this information, record a list of the factors that would be most important in selecting the best ecozone for their business or industry.

 

5.   Construct a decision-making matrix that has the factors recorded above as the criteria and five chosen ecozones as the alternatives; e.g.,

 

Ecozone

Population Density

w

Freshwater Area

 

Forest Resources

 

Climate Statistics

 

Proximity of Major Highways

 

 

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Points:

 

p

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

w   - weight

r     - rank

p    - points

 

note: p = w x r

 

 

Alternatives:

 

Instead of using ecozones teachers may choose to use:

 

     CMAs, census divisions, or cities within the province or country (if so, Stats Can Web Site is an excellent source of data); or,

     commercial or industrial lots within the local community or region (if so, local planning or engineering departments should have data on available lots or buildings, zoning, utilities, roads, protected greenspace, slope, drainage, etc.)

 

6.   Construct a business plan that includes:

     a description of the business (i.e. description of the product or service, plant, basic industrial process, output, market, and target consumer group),

     its potential location (supported by the decision-making matrix constructed above),

     a comprehensive marketing plan, and,

     projections for future expansion or change in function to reflect Canada’s changing demographics.

Note: Business plans must be accompanied by at least one chloropleth map and one graph.

 

7.   Present their business plans to the class, complete with supportive visuals. The teacher may choose to do this as a simulation by selecting a group of students, colleagues, or members of the community to act as:

     representatives from a lending institution who have the responsibility of approving a loan for the new business venture; or,

     potential shareholders considering investing their money into the business.

 

Assessment/Evaluation Techniques

 

1.   Teacher Assessment of Business Plan

2.   Teacher and Peer Assessment of Presentation

3.   Teacher Assessment of Group Performance

4.   Peer Assessment of Partner’s Contributions

 

Resources

 

1.   Contact Canada

2.   Canada: Land of Diversity

3.   Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource

4.   Canadian Oxford Intermediate Atlas

5.   Canadian Oxford School Atlas

6.   GIS (e.g. ArcView, Idrisi, MapInfo, SpansMap, MF Teach, etc.)

7.   GIS databases (e.g. ArcCanada, ArcVoyager, etc.)

8.   Stats Can Web Site

9.   Estats

 

Accommodations

 

     Students could use National Parks and Park Activities as the decision making basis for their business plan and Location study.

 

 

Appendix A

 

National Parks Visit:        Decision Making

 

Activity:    Choosing the best national park to visit in Canada, based on a selection of personal preferences variables.

 

Materials:

       Climate data from Environment Canada

       Decision-making matrix

       Ecozone Regions of Canada Map (student supplies)

       Data on days of sunshine for selected locations in Canada

 

       Information on tourist activities in the National Parks

       Transportation Map of Canada

       Physiographic, Climate, Vegetation, Soils Maps of Canada (student supplies)

       Research notes on the different ecozones in Canada         (student supplies)

 

Task:

1.   Choose 3 National Parks that may appeal to you as a place to visit. Print each name under alternatives on a chart similar to the one below:

 

 

Criteria and Weighting

Alternatives

Criteria 1

W

Criteria 2

 

Criteria 3

 

Criteria 4

 

Criteria 5

Alternative 1

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative 2

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative 3

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                      W - weighting                                                       r - rank                                                    p - points

 

2.   The information columns represent different types of personal preferences such as “hours of sunshine”, “type of wildlife” or “proximity to ski areas” for each location. These are things to be considered when making the decision about where you go. They be known as different criteria. Select 5 criteria that you wish to evaluate for your 3 national parks. Print the description of your chosen criteria in the spaces at the top of each column.

 

3.   Print in the data for the three national parks that you selected, for each type of criteria. This information should be written to the upper left of each diagonal line.

 

4.   Rank the national parks under each criterion by giving them a score with “3" for the best and “1" for the worst. Please note the highest numbers mean the best conditions for you. For example, if a higher number of days with frost makes a location less desirable for you, you would give this area a lower score, even though the criteria you are measuring associates a higher value (more days with frost) with the national park.

 

5.   Add the total scores and write a preliminary statement about the best national park for you to visit.

 

Weighted Criteria

 

1.   Different criteria have different values to people. Some people do not mind frost; for others, the amount of sunshine a place receives is far more important than the amount of cold, etc. To try and make the decision-making more accurate it is necessary to give each criteria a weighted value based on your personal preference. Start this process by determining which of your criteria is of least value. All scores in this column will be multiplied by 1X. Now decide which of the criterion is the next least valued. Decide how much more important it is than the previous criterion. If you decide it is twice as important, all its scores be multiplied by 2X. Repeat this process for each of the five criteria. Now add up the totals. Write a statement in which you explain which is the best National Park for you to visit in Canada.

 

Writing Your Report

 

You must now write a report in which you state the problem by way of introducing the report, and then write the decision making process you followed, with a paragraph each for either each criteria, or for each national park. Your conclusion consist of your decision statement about which National Park in Canada most appeals to you as a place to visit.

 

In summary, your report be structured as follows:

     Introduction: make a problem statement, state the national Park alternatives and the criterion you used

     Body: Decision making process - why did I rank as I did? 1 paragraph per criteria, or per National Park.

     Conclusion: Decision statement.

 

 

Appendix B

 

 

Downloading jpegs from the Internet and Converting to bmp files to Import

into Microsoft Publisher (Lview Pro)

 

 

1.   Right-click on any picture or icon on a       web page

2.   Select Save as...

3.   Insert disk into drive

4.   Change drive to a:

5.   Type an appropriate name in the File name field

6.   Click O.K.

(Since most graphics on the internet are jpeg or gif files, you must convert them into bmp or pcx format so they may be imported into Microsoft Publisher)

1.   Start LView Pro

2.   Click on the File menu

3.   Insert your disk into the drive

4.   Change the drive to a:

5.   Change the File type to jpeg

6.     Double-click on the file you want

7.     After the picture appears, click on the         File menu again

8.     Select Save as...

9.     Change the File type to bmp

10.    Click O.K.

(Repeat the above steps for each of your jpeg files)

 

 

Travel Brochure Assignment (scanner) (PaperPort)

 

 

1.     Click Start

2.     Go to Programs, then PaperPort, then         click the PaperPort option

3.     Place picture on the Scanning Bed and         Close Lid

4.     Click Scan Button on Task Bar

5.     Accept default and Click Scan Button

6.     Click Options Button

7.     Click on the ruler

8.     Click on Specify Custom Size Option

9.     Change the number in the Width field so         that the file fit on your disk

10.    Click O.K. button

11.    Click Accept Button

12.    Click File in the Pull-down Menus

13.    Click Export Option

14.    Ensure “Export Files of Type” is set    to Bit Map (*.BMP)

15.    Change “Drives” is to a:

16.    Click in the “File Name” Field, delete         “*.bmp”, and type in the a name of your         picture

17.    Click O.K. Button

18.    Close this Window

(REPEAT STEPS 3-18 FOR ALL PICTURES)

19.    Click File in the pull-down menus

20.    Click Exit Option

21.    Close PaperPort Window

 

 

Travel Brochure Assignment (importing graphics and entering text) (Microsoft Publisher)

 

 

1.   Start Microsoft Publisher

2.   Select Use a Page Assistant Wizard and       choose three-panel brochure

3.   Follow instructions on screen, then click       O.K. and close the Cue Cards

4.   Click on any text box and delete contents

5.   Begin entering your text (Font size, type,       colour, and style can be changed in Format       -Character)

(REPEAT STEPS 3-5 for all text boxes)

 

6.     Click on any graphics box

7.     Click File in the pull-down menus

8.     Select Import Picture

9.     Change Drive to a: (make sure your disk         is in)

10.    Togle down to ?.bmp under Picture         Name and click on it

11.    Click O.K.

12.    Select Frame to fit the Picture

13.    Click O.K.

(REPEAT STEPS 6-13 for all graphics boxes)

 

NOTE: GRAPHICS AND TEXT BOXES CAN BE CREATED BY CLICKING ON PICTURE AND TEXT ICONS ON THE LEFT SIDE TOOL BAR THEN LEFT-CLICKING AND DRAGGING.

GRAPHICS AND TEXT BOXES CAN BE RESIZED BY SELECTING THEM AND GRABBING AND DRAGGING THEIR HANDLES.

WHEN RESIZING GRAPHICS BOXES, HOLD DOWN THE “SHIFT” KEY WHILE YOU CLICK AND DRAG TO PRESERVE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PICTURES. AND AVOID DISTORTION.

 

Appendix C

NATIONAL PARKS

Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve

Haida Heritage Site

P.O. Box 37

Queen Charlotte, B. C.

V0T 1S0

 

Pacific Rim National Park Reserve

Ucluelet, B.C. V0R 3A0

 

Mount Revelstoke and Glacier National Parks

Box 350

Revelstoke, B.C. V0E 2S0

 

Kootenay National Park

Box 220

Radium Hot Springs, B.C.

V0A 1M0

 

Waterton Lakes National Park

Waterton Park, Alberta T0K 2M0

 

Banff National Park

Box 900

Banff, AB T0L 0C0

 

Banff/Lake Louise Tourism Bureau

Box 1298

Jasper, AB T0E 1E0

 

Jasper National Park

Box 10

Jasper, AB T0E 1E0

 

Elk Island National Park

RR#1, Site 4

Fort Saskatchewan, AB T8L 2N7

 

Kluane National Park Reserve

P.O. Box 5495

Haines Junction, Y.T. Y0B 1L0

 

Yukon Tourism

P.O. Box 2703

Whitehorse, Y.T. Y1A 2C6

 

Ivvavik National Park

Box 1840

Inuvik, NWT X0E 0T0

 

Nahanni National Park Reserve

P.O. Box 348

Fort Simpson, N.T. X0E 0N0

 

Nahanni-Ram Tourism Association

Box 177, Dept. VG

Fort Simpson, N.T. X0E 0P0

 

Wood Buffalo National Park

Box 750

Fort Smith, N.T. X0E 0P0

 

Prince Albert National Park

Box 100

Waskesiu, SK S0J 2Y0

 

Canadian Heritage

Parks Canada

Grasslands National Park

Box 150

Val Marie, SK S0N 2T0

 

Riding Mountain National Park

Wasagaming, MB R0J 2H0

 

Pukaskwa National Park

Hwy. 627, Hattie Cove

Via: Heron Bay, ON P0T 1R0

 

Bruce Peninsula National Park

P.O. Box 189

Tobermory, ON N0H 2R0

 

Bruce Peninsula Tourist Association

RR#2

Hepworth, ON N0H 1P0

 

Fathom Five National Marine Park

P.O. Box 189

Tobermory, ON N0H 2R0

 

Georgian Bay Islands National Park

Box 28

Honey Harbour, ON P0E 1E0

 

Point Pelee National Park

RR#1

Leamington, ON N8H 3V4

 

St. Lawrence Islands National Park

RR#3

Mallorytown Landing, ON

K0E 1R0

 

Parks Canada

La Mauricie District

Place Cascade

794, 5th Street C.P. 758

Shawinigan, QC G9N 6V9

 

Chief, Visitor Services

Saguenay-St.Lawrence Marine Park

182, de l'Eglise Street

Tadoussac, QC G0T 2A0

 

Auyuittuq National Park Rserve

Box 353

Pangnirtung, N.T. X0A 0R0

 

Forillon National Park

Box 1220

Gaspe, QC G0C 1R0

 

Kouchibouguac National Park

Kouchibouguac, N.B. E0A 2A0

 

Fundy National Park

Alma, N.B. E0A 1B0

 

Department of Canadian Heritage Parks Canada

Prince Edward Island National Park

2 Palmers Lane

Charlottetown, PEI C1A 5V6

 

Kejimkujik National Park

Box 236

Maitland Bridge, N.S. B0T 1L0

 

Cape Breton Highlands National Park

Ingonish Beach

Cape Breton, N.S. B0C 1L0

 

Gros Morne National Park

Box 130

Rocky Harbour, NF A0G 2L0

 

Terra Nova National Park

Glovertown, NF A0G 2L0

 

Ellesmere Island National Park Reserve

P.O. Box 353

Pangnirtung, NT X0A 0R0

 

Vuntut National Park

P.O. Box 390

Dawson City, Y.T. Y0B 1G0

 

Aulavik National Park

General Delivery

Sachs Harbour, N.T. X0E 0T0

 

Tuktut Nogait National Park

Box 1840

Unuvik, N.T. X0E 0T0

 

Wapusk National Park

c/o Churchill Office

P.O. Box 127

Churchill, MB R0B 0E0

 

 

Appendix D

 

Rate Structures for Specific Transportation and Communication Modes

 

Railway Transportation from Toronto

 

 

Cost from Toronto

Ottawa

 

Thunder Bay

 

Calgary

 

Vancouver

 

 

 

 

 

 

Air Transportation from Toronto

 

 

Cost from Toronto

Ottawa

 

Vancouver

 

Tokyo, Japan

 

Wellington, New Zealand

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long Distance telephone calls

 

Cost from Toronto

Ottawa

 

Halifax

 

London, England

 

Moscow, Russia

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postage Costs through the mail system

 

 

Cost from Toronto

Ottawa

 

Edmonton

 

Los Angeles, U.S.

 

Buenos Aires, Argentina

 

 

 

 

 

 

Movement – Economic & Efficient

 

In each of the destination columns, decide which mode is most economical/efficient for the movement of people, goods, and ideas. In a brief sentence, explain your decision below.

 

Mode

To Nearest City

Other Ontario City

To Vancouver

To Sydney Australia

Road

 

 

 

 

Rail

 

 

 

 

Air

 

 

 

 

Water

 

 

 

 

Pipeline

 

 

 

 

Mail

 

 

 

 

Radio

 

 

 

 

Satellite

 

 

 

 

Fax

 

 

 

 

Internet

 

 

 

 

 

Local Movement (to Toronto)

 

People:

 

Goods:

 

Ideas:

 

Provincial Movement (to Thunder Bay)

 

People:

 

Goods:

 

Ideas:

 

National Movement (to Vancouver)

 

People:

 

Goods:

 

Ideas:

 

International Movement (to Sydney, Australia)

 

People:

 

Goods:

 

Ideas:

 

 

 

Appendix E:     Rubric for Assessment

Population Density Activities Evaluation Rubric

 

Categories

50-59%

(Level 1)

60-69%

(Level 2)

70-79%

(Level 3)

80-100%

(Level 4)

Knowledge /

Understanding

The Student:

The Student:

The Student:

The Student:

 

Demonstrates a limited understanding of population density;

 

 

 

 

 

Has difficulty creating chloropleth maps;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrates a limited ability to follow the directions for the activity

Demonstrates some understanding of population density;

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrates some understanding of chloropleth maps;

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrates some ability to follow the directions for the activity

Demonstrates a considerable understanding of population density and can apply the understanding to problems;

 

Can create and explain a chloropleth map;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follows directions with very few exceptions.

Demonstrates a strong understanding of population density and is able to use the idea easily;

 

 

 

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of chloropleth mapping, could apply the concept to another project without further instruction;

 

Follows the directions for the activity

Thinking/ Inquiry

 

Weight

 

x 0.20

Is able to use information from the graphs with limited effectiveness;

 

 

Has difficulty seeing relationships between population, provinces and ecozones;

 

Is able to get some information from the graphs;

 

 

 

Is able to make some conclusions about population characteristics of provinces and ecozones;

Is able to draw facts from the graphs;

 

 

 

 

Draws clear relationships between population and the provinces and ecozones;

 

Uses the graphs to see relationships, trends and can make predictions from the graph;

 

Draws extended conclusions from the data, can make predictions for other areas based on observations.

Communication

 

Weight

 

x 0.10

Communicates information through graphs with limited clarity;

 

Can not clearly illustrate concepts through mapping ;

 

 

Has a writing style which limits expression of the main ideas.

 

Communicates information through graphs with some clarity;

 

Uses maps with some effectiveness;

 

 

 

Has a writing style which allows the expression of the main ideas.

Communicates information through graphs with considerable clarity;

 

Communicates information through maps with clarity;

 

 

Has a writing style which clearly expresses and supports the main ideas.

Is able to create maps which are clear, informative and pleasing to look at;

 

Communicates information through maps with a high degree of clarity;

 

Has a writing style which increases the reader’s understanding of the main ideas and shows strong supporting ideas.

Application

 

Weight

 

x .40

Demonstrates difficulty in applying the concepts of population density and distribution;

 

Has difficulty applying the information in graphs;

 

 

Has difficulty applying the information in chloropleth maps;

 

 

 

Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances in a limited manner.

Demonstrates some understanding of the concepts of population density and distribution;

 

Applies the information in graphs in some instances to solve other problems

 

Applies the information in chloropleth maps in some instances to solve other problems

 

Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances with some effectiveness

Clearly understands and uses the concepts of population density and distribution;

 

 

Applies the information in graphs without any apparent difficulty.

 

Applies the information in chloropleth maps without any apparent difficulty.

 

Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances with considerable effectiveness.

Is able to use the concepts of population distribution and density in a consistent manner;

 

Applies the graph information in a highly effective manner and with ease.

 

Applies the chloropleth map information in a highly effective manner and with ease.

 

Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances in a highly effective manner.

 

Overall Level:____                                             Mark:_____                         Student Name:________________

 

Appendix F

Self and Peer Evaluation of National Parks Brochure Project

 

0---------------1---------------2---------------3---------  -----4---------------5

   Totally                        ”””Mostly             Somewhat                   Somewhat                      Mostly                                          Totally

   Disagree                    Disagree                    Disagree                       Agree                          Agree                                         Agree

Criteria

    

    

Self

I/He/She clearly understood the project and what was expected by the teacher.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She helped with planning (e.g. design, tasks, meeting times, etc.)

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She was present each time the group worked on the project.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She did my/his/her fair share of the work.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She made valuable contributions to the project.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She did what was expected of them between group meetings.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She stayed focused on the task when the group met.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She tried to keep the group focused and on task.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She got others involved by asking questions and requesting input.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She participated in group discussions, decision-making, and planning.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She did not try to dominate the group by making all of the decisions and disregarding the ideas of others.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She was receptive to the ideas and thoughts of others.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She made positive, encouraging remarks about the contributions of others.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

I/He/She expressed ideas clearly and effectively.

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

 

Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä

TOTAL

/70

/70

/70

COMMENTS

(continue on back)

 

 

 

 

Appendix G

National Parks Brochure Evaluation Rubric

 

Categories

50-59%

(Level 1)

60-69%

(Level 2)

70-79%

(Level 3)

80-100%

(Level 4)

Text

The brochure:

The brochure:

The brochure:

The brochure:

 

addresses a minimal number of ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms;

 

contains only minimal colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone;

 

contains frequent spelling and grammatical errors;

 

contains text that has all been copied directly from information sources.

addresses some ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms;

 

 

contains some colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone;

 

 

contains occasional spelling and grammatical errors;

 

contains some text that is written in the personal language of the student.

addresses most ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms;

 

 

contains considerable colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone;

 

 

contains rare spelling and grammatical errors;

 

contains text that is mostly written in the personal language of the student.

addresses all ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms;

 

 

contains a multitude of colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone;

 

 

 

is free of spelling and grammatical errors;

 

 

contains text that is all written in the personal language of the student.

Graphics

incorporates a minimal number of different types of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.;

 

rarely demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text;

 

contains graphics that reflect some of the components of the ecozone;

 

contains no student-generated graphics.

incorporates some different types of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.;

 

 

occasionally demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text;

 

contains graphics that reflect some of the components of the ecozone;

 

contains at least one student-generated graphic.

incorporates a considerable variety of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.;

 

 

frequently demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text;

 

contains graphics that reflect a variety of the components of the ecozone;

 

contains at least one well developed, student-generated graphic.

incorporates all types of graphics including pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.;

 

 

 

consistently demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text;

 

contains graphics that reflect most of the components of the ecozone;

 

contains well developed, student-generated graphics.

Organiz-ation/

Lay-out

contains frequent flaws in the logical arrangement of content;

 

contains frequent inconsistencies in font type, size, and style between similar sections;

 

does not demonstrate appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components.

contains occasional flaws in the logical arrangement of content;

 

contains occasional inconsistencies in font type, size, and style between similar sections;

 

demonstrates some degree of appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components.

frequently demonstrates a logical arrangement of content;

 

displays considerable consistency in font type, size, and style between similar sections;

 

demonstrates a high degree of appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components.

consistently demonstrates a flawless logical arrangement of content;

 

displays perfect consistency in font type, size, and style between similar sections;

 

demonstrates appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components.

Creativity

demonstrates minimal creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics;

 

demonstrates no template alterations (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes)

demonstrates occasional creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics;

 

demonstrates at least one template alteration suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes)

demonstrates some creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics;

 

 

demonstrates occasional template alterations suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes)

demonstrates frequent creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics;

 

 

demonstrates several template alterations suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes)

 

Overall Level:___                                 Mark:___

 

Appendix H

Presentation Evaluation Rubric

 

Categories

50-59%

(Level 1)

60-69%

(Level 2)

70-79%

(Level 3)

80-100%

(Level 4)

Communi- cation

The presenter(s):

 

rarely demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance or eye contact, frequently “read off”, and lacked enthusiasm and mobility;

 

 

 

did not engage the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities.

 

 

occasionally demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility;

 

rarely engaged the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities.

 

 

frequently demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility;

 

 

occasionally engaged the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities.

 

 

consistently demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility;

 

frequently engaged the audience in effective two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and participatory activities.

Presenta-tion

did not deliver an introduction that provided sufficient background information;

 

 

rarely demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing;

 

 

rarely maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing;

 

lacked uniqueness and creativity, involving only one presentation technique, and lacked usage of audios and/or visuals;

 

 

 

no apparent conclusion.

delivered an introduction that provided sufficient background information;

 

 

occasionally demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing;

 

occasionally maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing;

 

was somewhat unique, creative, and interesting, involving more than one presentation technique, and making usage an audio and/or visual;

 

 

ended with a conclusion.

delivered an introduction that caught the audience’s attention and provided sufficient background information;

 

frequently demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing;

 

 

frequently maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing;

 

was unique, creative, and interesting, involving a variety of presentation techniques, and making usage of a variety of audios and/or visuals;

 

 

ended with a conclusion that affected the audience, delivering “food for thought” and/or a “call to action”.

delivered an intriguing introduction that grasped the audience’s attention and provided ample background information;

 

consistently demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing;

 

consistently maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing;

 

was extremely unique, creative, and interesting, involving several presentation techniques, and making effective usage of a wide variety of audios and/or visuals;

 

ended with a powerful conclusion that impacted the audience, delivering compelling “food for thought” and/or an emphatic “call to action”.

Knowledge

did not provide the audience with a summary sheet;

 

 

 

rarely demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue;

 

 

provided little evidence to validate the thesis.

provided the audience with a summary sheet;

 

 

 

 

occasionally demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue;

 

provided some evidence to validate the thesis.

provided the audience with a somewhat efficient, informative, and interesting summary sheet;

 

frequently demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue;

 

 

provided sufficient evidence to conclusively validate the thesis.

provided the audience with an efficient, informative, and interesting summary sheet;

 

consistently demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue;

 

provided ample evidence to conclusively validate the thesis.

Overall Level:      ____               Mark:  ____

 

Appendix I

 

Instruction Sheet for Decision Making Matrix

 

Activity:    Choosing an ecozone that most is in need of having more land protected.

 

Materials:       Atlas

                        Ecozones Map of Canada (student supplied)

                        Ecozones Research notes (student supplied)

                        National Parks Information (student supplied)

                        Webpages for Parks Canada

 

Task:

1.   Choose five ecozones (from the 15 known in Canada), that you feel are the most threatened. Print each name under the options column on the matrix.

2.   The information columns represent different types of criteria such as "% protected land", "environmental hazards", "location in relation to populated areas", or "number of visitors". These are things to be considered when making the decision about which ecozone needs to be protected the most. Print the description of your chosen criteria in the spaces at the top of each column.

3.   Print in the data for the five ecozones you have selected, for each type of criteria. This information should be written to the upper left of each diagonal line.

4.   Rank the ecozones under each criterion by giving them a score of 5 for the best and 1 for the worst. Please note that the highest numbers mean the ecozone is under the biggest threat.

5.   Add the total scores and write a preliminary statement about the ecozone that most needs to have more land protected.

 

Weighted Criteria:

 

Different criteria have a different value to people. Some people feel that an ecozone with very little protected lands most needs to be protected, whereas others feel that an ecozone with a high population density most needs more protected lands. To try and make the decision-making more accurate it is necessary to give each criteria a weighted value based on your personal preference.

 

Start this process by determining which of your criteria is of least value. All scores in this column be multiplied by 1. Now decide which of the criterion is the next least valued. Decide how much more important it is than the previous criterion. If you decide it is twice as important, all its scores be multiplied by 2. Repeat this process for each of the five criteria. Now add up the totals.

 

Writing Your Report:

 

You must now write a report in which you state the problem by way of introducing the report, and then write the decision making process you followed, with a paragraph each for either each criteria, or for each ecozone. Your conclusion will consist of your decision statement about which ecozone in Canada most needs to have more protected land.

 

In summary, your report be structured as follows:

Introduction: Make a problem statement, state the ecozone alternatives and criteria you used.

Body: Decision making process - why did I rank as I did? 1 paragraph per criteria, or per ecozone.

      Conclusion: Decision statement.

 

 

Appendix J

 

 

Continue to Unit 3 | Back to Unit 1 | Back to Course Profiles main menu