Course Profile
Geography of Canada, Grade 9 applied, Public
Unit # 2: Human Systems
Activity 1 | Activity
2 | Activity 3 | Activity 4 | Activity 5 | Activity 6 | Activity
7 | Activity 8
Time: 25 hours
Unit Developer(s):
Development Date: April 7, 1999
Unit Description
Students apply the knowledge
and skills in a culminating activity in which they develop and complete a
Locality Study and Business Plan for a secondary, tertiary or quaternary
industry that incorporates demographics, future considerations, and locational
factors.
In this investigation of
human systems students are given the opportunity to develop skills in
geographic inquiry through the creation, analysis and interpretation of a
variety of geographic representations including graphs, maps, data charts and
organizers. The relationship between human systems and ecozones are also
explored.
Strand(s) and Expectations
Strand(s): Space & Systems, Human-Environment
Interactions, Global Connections, Understanding & Managing Change, Method
of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: SSV.01B, SSV.02B, SSV.03B, SSV.04B; HEV.01P;
GCV.01P, GCV.02B; UMV.01B, UMV.02B, UMV.03B, MIV.01B
Specific Expectations: SS1.01B, SS1.03B, SS1.04B, SS1.05P, SS1.07P, SS2.01P, SS2.02P,
SS2.03P, SS2.04P, SS3.02B, UM1.01B, UM1.02B, UM1.03P, UM3.03P, UM3.04P,
M11.02B, M12.01P, M12.02B, M12.03P, M12.04B, M12.05B, M12.06B, M12.09B,
M12.08P, M12.10P, M12.11P, M12.12B, M12.13B, M12.14B, M13.01B, M13.04P
Activity Titles (Time + Sequence)
|
Activity 1 |
Mapping & Graphing
Canada's Population Distribution |
250 min |
|
Activity 2 |
Mapping and Graphing
Canada's Population Density |
250 min |
|
Activity 3 |
Investigating Canada's
Changing Demographics |
250 min |
|
Activity 4 |
Investigating Immigration:
Past & Present |
75 min |
|
Activity 5 |
Who Immigrates to Canada? |
75 min |
|
Activity 6 |
Migration Within Canada |
150 min |
|
Activity 7 |
Understanding the Movement
of People, Goods and Ideas |
225 min |
|
Activity 8 |
Locality Study and
Business Plan |
225 min |
Unit Planning Notes
Prior Knowledge Required
Teaching/Learning Strategies
Assessment/Evaluation
Resources
Activity #1: Mapping and
Graphing Canada’s Population Distribution
Suggested Time: 270 minutes
Description
Students map, graph, and
examine the variations in provincial/territorial populations across Canada.
They study Canada’s ecumene and the rationale behind the distribution of our
country’s people. Students receive direct instruction focused on the concepts
of population distribution, graphing and mapping. Students use the data they
discover to analyse the factors which affect the distribution of Canadians.
Strands & Expectations
Strands: Geographic
Foundations: Space & Systems, Understanding & Managing Change, Methods
of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: SSV.02B,
SSV.04B; UMV.01B; MIV.02B, MIV.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B, SS1.07P, SS2.03P; UM1.03P; MI1.02B, MI2,01P, MI2.09B, MI2.11B
Planning Notes
This activity can be
competed using computer technology:
• Construct the graph using a spreadsheet
program such as MicroSoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry licensed).
• Construct chloropleth maps using a GIS,
such as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris
Works (both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher
should provide students with a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of
Canada. Teacher may wish to do an isodemographic map instead.
Prior Knowledge Required
From the Grade 7 and 8
curriculum, it is expected that students will be familiar with basic
cartographic, graphing and mathematical skills and will understand the concepts
of rural and urban population distribution and density, urbanization, CMAs, and
primary/secondary/tertiary industries.
Teaching/Learning Strategies:
1. Ask "Where would you like to live in Canada?" and
"Why?", and explore the factors that affect those choices: human
systems and natural systems. Focussing on where people are the teacher show
students a dot map of Canada’s population distribution (e.g. the inside cover
of the Canadian Intermediate Oxford Atlas or on p.10-11 of the Canada and the
World: An Atlas Resource, 2nd ed.), introduce the concepts of
population distribution, population density, ecumene, core and periphery,
heartland and hinterland, Quebec-Windsor axis, etc., and have students
brainstorm patterns and rationale for the demographic variations across the
country.
2. Students use a dot map showing Canada’s population distribution,
an atlas containing several thematic maps of Canada, and a base map of Canada
to construct a table showing provincial territory and population, a pie graph
and a chloropleth map to illustrate Canada's population distribution.
3. Students describe the location of the provinces/territories with
the highest and lowest populations and study the dot map of Canada’s population
distribution to complete the following table to explain why so many Canadians
live where they do:
|
Many Canadians live: |
because... |
Examples are: |
|
within 200 km. of the
Canadian-U.S. border |
* the climate is warmer,... |
* Winnipeg, ... |
|
along the ocean coastlines |
|
|
|
along major rivers |
|
|
|
along the Great Lakes and
St. Lawrence Seaway |
|
|
|
near major resource bases |
|
|
|
etc. |
|
|
4. The teacher introduces the culminating activity for the unit, a
Locality Study and Business Plan, to set the stage for the activities in the
rest of the unit which develop the skills and concepts needed.
Assessment/Evaluation Techniques
The product of this
assignment can be assessed according to the:
• accuracy, neatness, and elements of the
graph and map;
• the validity, completeness, detail, and depth
of the analysis.
Planning Notes
Prior to students completing
the above activity teachers should:
• make copies of the base map of Canada for
all students.
• book facilities if students be completing
the circle graph or chloropleth map using computers.
Resources
• Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource
(2nd Edition)
• Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th
Edition)
• E-Stats
• ArcCanada (GIS database for use with
ArcView)
• Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel
(Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet
Software)
Accommodations:
Appendices:
Activity #2: Canada’s
Population Density CGA.1P
Suggested Time: 265 minutes
Description
This activity is designed to
establish an understanding of Canada’s population distribution and of the
concept of population density. Linkages to the previous unit are provided by
the establishment of statistics for Canadian population density by ecozone.
Students are re-introduced to skills of chloropleth mapping and graphing.
Strands & Expectations
Strands: Geographic
Foundations: Space and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Methods of
Geographic Inquiry.
Overall Expectations: SSV.02B,
SSV.04B, UMV.01B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B,
SS1.05P, SS1.07P, SS2.02P, SS2.03P, UM1.03P, UM2.01B, UM3.04P, MI1.02B,
MI2.01P, MI2.02B. MI2.03P, MI2.09B, MI2.08P, MI2.11P, MI2.12B, MI2.13B,
Prior Knowledge Required
Students are expected to
have completed the distribution exercise which precedes this activity. In addition, students are expected to
have successfully completed the expectations from grades seven and eight which
deal specifically with an understanding of geographic inquiry, map and graphing
skills, the effect of physical patterns on human activity, the role of natural
resources in population distribution, and patterns in human geography.
Teaching/Learning Strategies
The teacher will:
a. Review the concept of “population density” and have students
brainstorm :
i. areas of Canada with high and low population densities and the
explanations behind each of these patterns;
ii. how Canada’s overall population density compares with that of
other countries;
iii. advantages and disadvantages of having a high or low population
density in your country.
b. Review with students the construction of a bar graph and a
choropleth map.
c. provide students with a base map of the ecozones. (See Appendix J)
Students complete the
following task:
1. a. Differentiate between the
concepts of “population distribution” and “population density”.
b. What does a low (high) number for population density mean? Where
in Canada would you expect there to be a low (high) population density? Why do
you think the population density is so low (high) in this area?
c. Refer to the following chart and:
|
Province/ Territory |
Population (people) |
Area (km2) |
Population Density (people km-2) |
% of Canada’s Total Pop. |
|
NF |
551792 |
371634.6 |
1.48 |
1.91 |
|
PEI |
134557 |
5660.4 |
23.77 |
0.47 |
|
NS |
909282 |
52840.8 |
17.21 |
3.15 |
|
NB |
738133 |
71569.2 |
10.31 |
2.56 |
|
Que |
7138795 |
1357811.7 |
5.26 |
24.75 |
|
ON |
10753573 |
916733.7 |
11.73 |
37.28 |
|
Man |
1113898 |
547703.8 |
2.03 |
3.86 |
|
Sask |
990237 |
570113.5 |
1.74 |
3.43 |
|
Alta |
2696826 |
638232.7 |
4.23 |
9.35 |
|
BC |
3724500 |
892677 |
4.17 |
12.91 |
|
Yukon |
30766 |
531843.6 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
|
NWT |
64402 |
3246389.5 |
0.02 |
0.22 |
|
Canada |
28846761 |
9203210.5 |
3.13 |
100 |
(1996).
i. Construct a
bar graph to show how population density varies across Canada.
ii. Analyse the graph and account for observations you make. (e.g.
What province or territory is most densely populated? Even though Ontario and
Quebec have large populations, their population densities are not as large as
some others, why? Why are the population densities for the Yukon and NWT so
low? etc.)
d. Does Canada’s overall population density give a clear picture of
how Canada’s population is distributed? Why/why not?
2. a. Refer to the following
chart:
|
Ecozone |
Population (People) |
Area (km2) |
Population Density (People/km2) |
% of Canada’s Total Pop. |
|
1 |
1047 |
239216 |
0.00438 |
0.00428 |
|
2 |
16328 |
1433362 |
0.0114 |
0.0667 |
|
3 |
10314 |
775734 |
0.0133 |
0.0422 |
|
4 |
21429 |
563241 |
0.038 |
0.0876 |
|
5 |
33589 |
1268623 |
0.0265 |
0.137 |
|
7 |
2510203 |
196449 |
12.8 |
10.3 |
|
8 |
14016101 |
113431 |
123.6 |
57.3 |
|
9 |
707695 |
656970 |
1.08 |
2.89 |
|
10 |
3851089 |
440537 |
8.74 |
15.7 |
|
11 |
309 |
245865 |
0.126 |
0.00126 |
|
12 |
30839 |
432128 |
0.0714 |
0.126 |
|
13 |
2504393 |
195554 |
12.8 |
10.2 |
|
14 |
751761 |
461198 |
1.67 |
3.07 |
|
15 |
9938 |
350318 |
0.0284 |
0.0406 |
i. Construct a choropleth map to show how population density varies
across Canada.
ii. Analyse the map and account for observations you make.
b. Do the population densities of the provinces/territories or the
population densities of the ecozones give you a clearer picture of where most
people live in Canada?
3. Suppose that 1000 people from all over Canada were coming to your
school to see a concert in the auditorium. Assuming that these people are a
perfect representation of Canada’s demographic make-up calculate the number
that are from:
a. each province;
b. Atlantic Canada (NF, NB, NS, PEI), Central Canada (ON, Que), the
Prairies (Man, Sask, Alta), Western Canada (BC), Northern Canada (Yukon, NWT);
and,
c. each ecozone.
Assessment/Evaluation Techniques
A rubric is provided for the
activities listed in the exercise (see Appendix E). Others may be used. In
addition to the rubrics for these activities, self and peer evaluation is suggested.
Planning Notes
Teachers should be sure to
understand all of the terminology and procedures involved in the activity
before starting. All charts and data sheets should be prepared before hand.
Copies of the distribution assignment answers should also be present.
Resources
1. Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource (2nd
Edition)
2. Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th Edition)
3. E-Stats
4. ArcCanada (GIS database for use with ArcView)
5. Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel
(Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet
Software)
Accommodations
This activity can be
competed using computer technology:
• Construct the graph using a spreadsheet
program such as MicroSoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry
licensed).
• Construct choropleth maps using a GIS, such
as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris Works
(both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher
should provide students a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of Canada.
Have students research statistics to go in chart.
Appendices
Rubric for Assessment
(Appendix B)
Activity #3: Canada’s
Changing Demographics
Suggested Time: 250 Minutes
Description
Students will understand the
terminology and concepts behind the study of Canada’s changing population. The
focus will be on the application of population change data to questions
centering on Canada and its place in the world with regards to population
change. Students will refine skills of graphing, charting, mapping and data
analysis.
Strands and Expectations
Strands: Geographic Foundations: Space and Systems
Understanding & Managing Change
Methods of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: SSV.02B, SSV.04B, UMV.01B,
UMV.02B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B,
SS2.03P, UM1.02B,UM1.03P, MI1.02B, MI2.01P, MI2.04B, MI2.09B, MI2.08P, MI2.11P,
MI2.12B, MI2.13B
Prior Knowledge Required
The student must understand
the concepts from the grade 7 and 8 curriculum:
• creating maps and graphs to organize information,
• identifying patterns of settlement,
• factors affecting population distribution,
• the terms describing population characteristics,
• the correlation between population characteristics, analysis,
synthesis and evaluation of data,
• the identification of push and pull factors in population
change.
The students must be able to
communicate the results of specific inquiries.
Teaching/Learning Strategies
a. Students:
i) brainstorm the factors that account for and influence population
change;
ii) postulate on the regions of Canada experiencing the largest and
slowest population growth rates, the rationale behind these trends, and the
problems that may result.
iii) consider how population growth in Canada compares to that in
other parts of the world and the explanations for such variations.
b. Teach the concepts of Population Growth Rate, Percentage
Population Change, Birth rate, Death rate, Rate of Natural Increase, Life
Expectancy, and Population Pyramid (Age-Sex Structure).
c. Review how to produce a multiple-line graph and chloropleth map.
d. Provide students with a base map of Canada’s Provinces and
Territories.
The student will complete
the following activity:
1. a. Produce a multiple line
graph with two vertical axis to illustrate the data below:
|
Canada |
1951 |
1956 |
1961 |
1966 |
1971 |
1976 |
1981 |
1986 |
1991 |
1996 |
|
Population ( millions) |
14.0 |
16.1 |
18.2 |
20.0 |
21.6 |
23.0 |
24.3 |
25.3 |
27.3 |
28.9 |
|
Growth Rate (%) |
|
14.8 |
13.4 |
9.7 |
7.8 |
6.6 |
5.9 |
4.0 |
7.9 |
5.7 |
b. i. Describe what has happened
to Canada’s population since 1951.
ii. Describe what has happened to Canada’s growth rate since 1951.
iii. Why do you presume the growth rate was so high from 1951-61?
iv. Why do you think the growth rate has fallen since this time?
v. What may eventually happen to Canada’s population if the growth
rates continues its decline? Why might this be a problem?
vi. How might Canada stop this from happening?
2. a. In groups of four,
construct population pyramids to represent Canada’s age-sex structure for the
following years: 1971, 1986, 2001, 2016: (projections for 2001 and 2016 are
based on medium growth rates)
|
Year |
0-4m |
0-4f |
5-9m |
5-9f |
10-14m |
10-14f |
15-19m |
15-19f |
20-24m |
20-24f |
|
1971 |
4.27% |
4.08% |
5.27% |
5.04% |
5.41% |
5.18% |
5.01% |
4.85% |
4.54% |
4.50% |
|
1986 |
3.61% |
3.43% |
3.59% |
3.40% |
3.55% |
3.39% |
3.91% |
3.70% |
4.83% |
4.61% |
|
2001 |
3.10% |
2.94% |
3.35% |
3.18% |
3.42% |
3.25% |
3.41% |
3.26% |
3.39% |
3.25% |
|
2016 |
2.84% |
2.69% |
2.87% |
2.71% |
2.92% |
2.76% |
3.04% |
2.87% |
3.28% |
3.12% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
25-29m |
25-29f |
30-34m |
30-34f |
35-39m |
35-39f |
40-44m |
40-44f |
45-49m |
45-49f |
|
1971 |
3.83% |
3.66% |
3.13% |
2.99% |
3.02% |
2.84% |
2.99% |
2.86% |
2.84% |
2.86% |
|
1986 |
4.83% |
4.70% |
4.38% |
4.38% |
3.99% |
3.92% |
3.24% |
3.14% |
2.58% |
2.53% |
|
2001 |
3.46% |
3.37% |
3.74% |
3.68% |
4.32% |
4.23% |
4.28% |
4.24% |
3.75% |
3.78% |
|
2016 |
3.40% |
3.28% |
3.47% |
3.37% |
3.45% |
3.36% |
3.41% |
3.35% |
3.47% |
3.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
50-54m |
50-54f |
55-59m |
55-59f |
60-64m |
60-64f |
65-69m |
65-69f |
70-74m |
70-74f |
|
1971 |
2.40% |
2.45% |
2.18% |
2.21% |
1.76% |
1.82% |
1.36% |
1.49% |
0.95% |
1.16% |
|
1986 |
2.39% |
2.37% |
2.32% |
2.38% |
2.05% |
2.30% |
1.61% |
1.93% |
1.25% |
1.61% |
|
2001 |
3.36% |
3.36% |
2.57% |
2.61% |
2.00% |
2.08% |
1.74% |
1.88% |
1.48% |
1.75% |
|
2016 |
3.77% |
3.75% |
3.59% |
3.65% |
3.03% |
3.19% |
2.56% |
2.75% |
1.79% |
2.04% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
75-79m |
75-79f |
80-84m |
80-84f |
85-89m |
85-89f |
90+m |
90+f |
|
|
|
1971 |
0.64% |
0.85% |
0.39% |
0.54% |
0.19% |
0.27% |
0.06% |
0.11% |
|
|
|
1986 |
0.81% |
1.17% |
0.45% |
0.75% |
0.19% |
0.40% |
0.08% |
0.21% |
|
|
|
2001 |
1.09% |
1.52% |
0.63% |
1.07% |
0.31% |
0.66% |
0.12% |
0.40% |
|
|
|
2016 |
1.18% |
1.48% |
0.78% |
1.14% |
0.44% |
0.81% |
0.22% |
0.67% |
|
|
b. Analyse the graphs and answer the following questions:
i. Explain the “bulge” in the younger age cohorts of the 1971 pyramid
(i.e. who are they, when were they born, why are there so many of them, etc.)
ii. What has happened to birth rates since this time? (i.e. Have the
“baby-boomers” had as many children as their parents did?) How can you tell by
looking at the pyramids? Why do think they have changed?
iii. What has happened to life expectancies since this time? How can
you tell by looking at the pyramids? Why do think they have changed?
iv. The “baby boomers” are now in the middle age (working-class)
cohorts. How might this be good and how might it be bad at the present time?
v. By 2016 many of the “baby boomers” have retired. How might this be
good and how might it be bad at that time?
vi. Once the baby-boomers begin to pass on, what may happen to
Canada’s population? What are the two ways that this may be avoided? Which is
Canada focusing on now? Why?
The following data tables be
helpful in answering the above questions:
|
Average Family Size |
|||||
|
1971 |
1976 |
1981 |
1986 |
1991 |
1996 |
|
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
|
Canadian Families by Number of Children
at Home |
||||||
|
YEAR |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
1976 |
30 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
12.5 |
6 |
4 |
|
1991 |
35 |
26.5 |
26 |
9.5 |
2 |
.5 |
(Notice: How have the number of children had by Canadian families changed? How might this impact Canada’s population size and structure in the future?)
|
Family Structure |
||
|
|
1976 |
1991 |
|
Husband-Wife Families |
90.2 |
87.0 |
|
Female Lone-Parent Families |
8.1 |
10.7 |
|
Male Lone-Parent Families |
1.7 |
2.3 |
(Notice: What’s happening to the traditional family structure of the past? Will this impact on the number of children families choose to have? How and why?)
|
Percentage of Married Males/Females for
Selected Age Groups |
||||||||||
|
YEAR |
20-24 |
25-29 |
30-34 |
35-39 |
40-44 |
|||||
|
|
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
|
1976 |
32 |
54 |
71 |
81 |
85 |
87 |
89 |
88 |
90 |
87 |
|
1991 |
17 |
33 |
51 |
65 |
70 |
75 |
78 |
78 |
81 |
78 |
(Notice: Are people waiting longer to get married these days? Why? and, Are a greater or lesser percentage of us getting married as compared to before? Is there a relationship between these two trends and the number of children people are having today?)
|
Life Expectancy at Birth |
|||||||||||||||
|
1920-22 |
1930-32 |
1940-42 |
1950-52 |
1960-62 |
1970-72 |
1980-82 |
1990-92 |
||||||||
|
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
m |
f |
|
59 |
61 |
60 |
62 |
63 |
66 |
66 |
71 |
68 |
74 |
69 |
76 |
72 |
79 |
75 |
81 |
(Notice: What has happened to Canada’s life expectancy? How this impact on our population structure in the future? What it mean for Canadians?)
3. a. Refer to the following
chart:
|
Province / Territory |
1996 |
1991 |
Absolute Change |
Percentage Change |
|
Canada |
28 846 761 |
27 296 859 |
1 549 902 |
5.7% |
|
Nfld |
551 792 |
568 474 |
16 682 |
-2.9% |
|
PEI |
134 557 |
129 765 |
4792 |
3.7% |
|
NS |
909 282 |
899 942 |
9340 |
1.0% |
|
NB |
738 133 |
723 900 |
14 233 |
2.0% |
|
Que |
7 138 795 |
6 895 963 |
242 832 |
3.5% |
|
ON |
10 753 573 |
10 084 885 |
668 688 |
6.6% |
|
Man |
1 113 898 |
1 091 942 |
21 956 |
2.0% |
|
Sask |
990 237 |
988 928 |
1309 |
0.1% |
|
Alta |
2 696 826 |
2 545 553 |
151 273 |
5.9% |
|
BC |
3 724 500 |
3 282 061 |
442 439 |
13.5% |
|
Yukon |
30 766 |
27 797 |
2969 |
10.7% |
|
NWT |
64 402 |
57 649 |
6753 |
11.7% |
(1996).
b. Produce a chloropleth map showing the percentage population change
for the provinces and territories.
c. Do the following:
i. Name the provinces/territories that have experienced percentage population change above and below the national average. Provide explanations for these variations.
Assessment/Evaluation Techniques
1. Summative assessments may be made of the
various products the students produce
2. The inclusion of examples of student work in
a portfolio for evaluation at the end of the unit is a suggested evaluation
technique. In this unit, such inclusions would contain a map, a graph, a chart,
a population pyramid and a sample of student analysis of the various visual
tools they have produced to display geographic data.
3. A rubric for the assessment of such
portfolios is included in Appendix E.
Planning Notes
The teacher should be
prepared in advance of this activity to teach the concepts of Population Growth
Rate, Percentage Population Change, Birth Rate, Death Rate, Rate of Natural
Increase, Life Expectancy, Population Pyramid (Age-Sex Structure), and
Dependency Ratio.
Resources
• Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource
(2nd Edition)
• Canadian Oxford School Atlas (7th
Edition)
• E-Stats
• ArcCanada (GIS database for use with
ArcView)
• Microsoft Works, Claris Works, Corel
(Ministry Licensed Desktop Publishing, Word Processing, and Spreadsheet
Software)
Accommodations
This activity can be
competed using computer technology:
• Construct the graph using a spreadsheet
program such as Microsoft Works, Corel Chart, or Claris Works (all Ministry
licensed).
• Construct chloropleth maps using a GIS,
such as ArcView, or a desktop publishing program such as Corel Draw or Claris
Works (both Ministry licensed) or Paint or SuperPaint. In this case the teacher
should provide students a .pcx or .bmp file containing a base map of Canada.
Appendices
Evaluation Rubric for
portfolios containing a map, a graph, a chart, a population pyramid and a
sample of student analysis of the various visual tools they have produced to
display geographic data. (Appendix E)
Activity #4: Immigration Past
and Present
Suggested Time:
Description
Students understand why and
how people immigrate to Canada. They understand the reasons why people move
from one place to another. The concept is expanded to a view on why people move
to new countries. Students analyse a graph showing immigration between 1851-1996.
Students then look at how people immigrate to Canada (classifications, point
system, quotas). Finally, students write a letter to their MP stating an
informed opinion about immigration.
Strands and Expectations
Strands: Geographic
Foundation: Space & Systems
Methods of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: SSV.02B,
UMV.01B, UMV.03B, MIV.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B,
SS2.03P, SS3.04P, UMV.02B, MI2.08P, MI1.06B, MI2.05B
Planning Notes
Get
the address for MP ahead of time.
Prior Knowledge Required
From
the Grade 7 & 8 curriculum
document:
• Identify factors that affect migration and
mobility.
• Demonstrate an understanding of the ways in
which cultures are affected by migration.
• Describe patterns and trends in immigration
and their effects on Canada.
• Use a variety of geographic
representations, tools and technologies to gather, process, and communicate
geographic information.
Teaching/Learning Strategies
1. Teacher polls students to see how many times they have moved
(house/apartment/dwelling). Summarize the results. Ask students for reasons a
person might move. List positive and negative factors that determine movement.
2. From the local example, determine why people immigrate (the push
and pull factors). Compare these factors to the positive and negative things
that make people move locally.
3. Show video on Canadian immigration (ex.: Canadian Immigration by
Classroom Video, 23 minutes) Discuss the video.
4. Teacher uses immigration data to have students determine trends in
immigration from a current text/atlas reference. What years have the highest
immigration? What years have the lowest immigration?
5. As a class, discuss reasons for highs and lows (poor economic
times, good economic times, depression, expansion of the West, WWI, post war
boom, WWII, Government concern over falling birth rates, etc.) Students should
add these reasons to their notes.
6. Why do people immigrate to Canada? Go over the classification
system with students - Refugee, Independent, Family. Have students complete a
chart which includes a description as well as assessment. (See appropriate
text) Go over the points system with students, looking at the different factors
and how they are assessed (see resources for web pages with up to date points
system). Finally discuss the idea of a government quota.
7. Discuss the benefits of having immigrants come to Canada.
(Different foods, different languages, contacts with other countries, etc.)
8. Review the impacts of declining growth rates on Canada's population
and establish the importance of immigration. Students write a letter to the
government stating whether or not they think the Government should increase,
decrease or leave the same the number of people they allow to immigrate to
Canada. (They must refer back to the work on demographics to do this).
Assessment
|
Tool |
Purpose |
Who |
Activity |
|
rubric |
formative |
teacher |
letter to immigration
ministry |
Resources
• Contact Canada
• Canada Land of Diversity
• Websites: http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm
http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm
http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm
http://cicnet.ci.gc.ca/english/faq/ask-14c.htm
Activity #5: Who Immigrates
to Canada and where do they go?
Suggested Time: 75 minutes
Description
Students complete a graph
showing source countries for Immigrants to Canada. On a Canada map, students
illustrate, using a chloropleth map, where immigrants go when they arrive in
Canada. Students complete a graduated symbols map to illustrate metropolitan immigration
by the top ten Metropolitan Areas. Students complete a decision making matrix
for the best location to settle in Canada.
Strands & Expectations
Strands: Geographic
Foundation: Space and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Global Connections
Overall Expectations: SSV.01B,
SSV.02B, SSV.04B, UMV.01B, GCV.02B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B,
SS2.02P, SS2.04P, SS3.02B
Planning Notes
Prior Knowledge Required
Grade 7 & 8
• Identify factors that affect migration and
mobility.
• Demonstrate an understanding of the ways in
which cultures are affected by migration.
• Describe patterns and trends in immigration
and their effects on Canada.
• Use a variety of geographic
representations, tools and technologies to gather, process, and communicate
geographic information.
Teaching/Learning Strategies
1. Students discuss: Where would you want to go if you were a new
immigrant to Canada? Where do immigrants go when they arrive in Canada? Do all
immigrants go to the same place? Do many immigrants move into your community?
2. Students gather information about sources of immigrants to Canada
(see appropriate text/atlas resource) and complete the following:
a. Students complete a chloropletieth map showing immigration by
province
b. Students complete a proportional circle map showing immigration
tot he top 10 Metropolitan Centres.
Immigration by Province, 1995
|
NFLD |
PEI |
NS |
NB |
QUE |
ONT |
MAN |
SASK |
ALTA |
BC |
YK |
NWT |
|
585 |
167 |
3581 |
639 |
27182 |
115681 |
3603 |
1949 |
14329 |
44541 |
108 |
91 |
Immigration by top 10 Metropolitan Areas
|
Toronto |
Montreal |
Vancouver |
Calgary |
Edmonton |
Ottawa |
Winnipeg |
Hamilton |
Halifax |
London |
|
71964 |
38422 |
37134 |
8574 |
7530 |
6153 |
4292 |
3102 |
2471 |
2138 |
3. Students complete a decision making matrix to determine the best
place to move to in Canada. Use the template for decision making from unit one.
Ideas for criteria to use include: unemployment rate, employment types,
recreation, climate, culture, housing prices, etc. The teacher can gather the
stats ahead of time from the internet - Statistics Canada, or let the students
gather the relevant information themselves.
Assessment
|
Tool |
Purpose |
Who |
Activity |
|
Overhead of completed
graph |
formative |
self |
graph showing source
countries for immigrants |
|
Rubric |
formative |
peer/self |
graded shading map |
|
Rubric |
formative |
teacher |
graduated symbols map |
|
Rubric |
formative |
teacher |
decision making matrix |
Activity #6: Migration within Canada
Suggested Time: 150 minutes
Description
Students create a flow line map showing migration into and out of
Ontario. Students will also complete a chart showing net gains and losses due
to migration. The teacher lead a discussion on regional economic disparity as
it applies to migration, and students will finish with writing a formal
paragraph on this.
Strands &
Expectations
Strands: Space
and Systems, Understanding and Managing Change, Methods of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: MVI.01B, MVI.02B, MVI.03P
Specific Expectations: SS1.03B, SS1.04B, SS1.05P,
SS2.04P, UM1.03P, MI1.02B, MI2.02B, MI2.09B, MI2.10B, MI2.11B, MI2.14B, MI3.01B
Planning Notes
Have blank maps of Canada for each
student and an overhead of blank map of Canada.
Prior
Knowledge Required
Grade 7 & 8
• Use
a variety of geographic methods to gather, process and communicate geographic
information.
• Demonstrate
an understanding of geographic inquiry.
• Identify
and explain patterns in geography.
• Identify
factors that affect migration and mobility.
• Demonstrate
an understanding of the ways in which cultures are affected by migration.
• Describe
patterns and trends in immigration and their effects on Canada.
Teaching/Learning
Strategies
1. Teacher leads discussion: If
you could live anywhere in Canada, where would it be? Lead into a discussion on
movement/migration in Canada - people are free to move around within Canada,
Economics often decide where people go, etc.
2. Students create a flow line
map showing migration into and out of Ontario from other provinces/regions. See
Appendix A for instructions. The teacher may want to model how to do a flow
line map on the overhead to get students started.
3. Once students have completed
their flow line map, the teacher leads the class in a discussion about regional
economic disparity as it links to migration - depressed areas versus booming
areas, the types of natural resources available to an area, the economic base
(one-industry towns versus towns with a variety of industry), transportation
network in place, etc. (any good grade 9 textbook have a section on regional
disparity.)
4. Teacher and students will
generate a note on the board about the discussion, which students then copy
into their notes.
Assessment
|
Tool |
Purpose |
Who |
Activity |
|
Rubric |
formative |
teacher |
flow line map |
Resources
1. Text
(Canada Land of Diversity, Contact Canada, etc.)
2. Base
Map of Canada, overhead of base map
3. Statistics
Canada
Accommodations
• Note
on board could be produced using word processor
• Computer
generated graphs and maps
• ESL
students could share culture with class
Student Worksheet: Migration Into and Out of
Ontario
A flowline map shows the movement of goods/people/etc. from one
location to another. The width of the arrow indicates the amount of
goods/people/etc. being moved. A wider arrow means that more is being moved. A
narrower arrow means less is being moved. The width of the arrow along with
what each represents is indicated in the legend.
1. Create a flowline map to show
migration out of Ontario to other provinces in Canada.
|
# people leaving Ont. |
Destination
Province/Region |
Width of arrow (mm) |
|
7927 |
Saskatchewan and Manitoba |
__________ |
|
13 292 |
Alberta |
__________ |
|
24 280 |
British Columbia |
__________ |
|
17 177 |
Quebec |
__________ |
|
17 432 |
Atlantic Provinces |
__________ |
a. For your map, 1 mm = 1000
people.
b. You first need to round the
number of people leaving Ontario to the different destinations to the nearest
thousand. For example, the arrow for Saskatchewan and Manitoba will be 8 mm
wide because 7927 rounds up to 8000.
c. You have 5 arrows starting
from Ontario in total.
d. Colour the arrows red.
2. Add to your map the number of
people arriving in Ontario from the other provinces.
|
# people moving to Ont. |
Province/Region of Origin |
Width of arrow (mm) |
|
8882 |
Saskatchewan and Manitoba |
__________ |
|
11 528 |
Alberta |
__________ |
|
10 949 |
British Columbia |
__________ |
|
27 596 |
Quebec |
__________ |
|
19 706 |
Atlantic Provinces |
__________ |
a. 1 mm = 1 000 people
b. You have five arrows arriving
in Ontario (one from each of the provinces/regions of origin).
c. Colour the arrows green.
3. Complete the following chart
showing Provincial Migration, 1992.
|
Province/ Region |
Gained |
Subtract |
Lost |
Equals |
Net Gain/ Loss |
|
Ontario |
78 031 |
– |
80 108 |
= |
|
|
Quebec |
27 245 |
– |
41 551 |
= |
|
|
Atlantic Provinces |
30 412 |
– |
36 602 |
= |
|
|
Saskatchewan & Manitoba |
30 365 |
– |
44 515 |
= |
|
|
Alberta |
57 747 |
– |
60 142 |
= |
|
|
British Columbia |
78 831 |
– |
40 343 |
= |
|
Activity
#7: Understanding the Movement of People,
Goods, and Ideas
Suggested Time: 225 min
Description
Students investigate modes
of transportation and communication.
Strands & Expectations
Strand(s): Geographic
Foundations: Space and Systems, Human-Environment Interactions, Global
Connections, Methods of Geographic Inquiry, Understanding and Managing Change
Overall Expectations: SSV.01B,
SSV.02B, SSV.03B, SSV.04B, HEV.01P, GCV.01P, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03P,
UMV.01B,
Specific Expectations: SS1.04B,
SS1.05P, SS1.08P, SS2.01P, HE1.03B, UM3.01P, MI1.02B, MI2.03P, MI2.04B,
MI2.11P, MI2.12P, MI2.14B, MI3.02P
Planning Notes
• When brainstorming modes of transportation,
accept all creative comments (electric car, spaceship, skipping) but for the
accompanying exercises, focus on the five main modes of transportation.
• When brainstorming modes of communication,
accept all creative comments (smoke signals, morse code, body language) but for
the accompanying exercises, focus on more common modes of communication.
• Students should realize that even as
passive radio or television listeners/viewers, they are receivers in a
communication process.
Prior Knowledge Required
• demonstrate an understanding of region and
movement as well as the factors affecting transportation and communication
• produce a wide variety of graphs and charts
to organize and present information
• locate information from primary sources
• identify regions of Canada with high and
low population density
• communicate the results of inquiries using
charts and maps
• demonstrate an awareness of an economic
system and how goods are distributed
Teaching/Learning Strategies
1. “There was a
time in this fair land when the railway did not run
When the wild majestic mountains stood alone against the sun
Long before the white man, long before the wheel,
When the green dark forest was too silent to be real”
From The Railroad Trilogy,
Gordon Lightfoot
Use this quotation or play a
version of the song to lead into a discussion of Canada as an extensive area of
natural systems which we have overlaid with human systems. What are the systems
that we have built? How do we use them? How do we rely on them in our daily
life? What activities do we use them for? How have these activities changed
with time?
2. Brainstorm a list of different modes of
transportation used today.
3. Read together (or individually)
suitable text section or article on Modes of Transportation.
4. Individually or in partners, complete a
worksheet on Comparing Modes of Transportation (rail, road, water, air,
pipeline) with a column for advantages and a column for disadvantages.
5. Develop an Organizer for “Which mode is
best?” (Use the following as a starting point – using real situations, each
student will decide on a mode of transportation and provide reasoning to
support their decision along with information on principal transportation
networks from an atlas to support the decision.)
|
Cargo |
Mode of Transportation |
Reasoning
for your decision
|
Atlas Information to support decision |
|
Meat from Regina to
Winnipeg |
|
|
|
|
1000 textbooks from
Toronto to Ottawa |
|
|
|
|
Oil from Alberta to
Ontario |
|
|
|
|
Live lobsters from PEI to
Ottawa |
|
|
|
|
25 000 t of potash from
Saskatchewan to the Netherlands |
|
|
|
|
Fresh Tomatoes from
Leamington to Churchill Man. |
|
|
|
|
6 cars from Oshawa to a
dealer in Moncton NB. |
|
|
|
6. Brainstorm modes of communication and
try to get as detailed as possible to demonstrate the variety of modes. Develop
definitions for the terms direct and indirect communication (use an appropriate
textbook). Develop an organizer that displays the modes of communication,
whether each one is indirect or indirect, and the time required to receive the
information.
7. Ask the students to list their most
frequently used modes of communication. What are some factors that would
prevent you from using these modes? Have them complete an activity such as a
worksheet comparing a variety of communications (e.g., Toronto business
ordering materials from an English manufacturer; Kingston business ordering
paper supplies from a Toronto supplier; family in Smalltown, Ontario announcing
the birth of a child to their family in Ireland; student asking for information
on a university program in Boston, USA; students in Ontario communicating with
students in Alberta; sending birthday greetings to someone who lives in the
same town or city etc. ) as to how they would have been carried out 100 years
ago, today, and in the future. Have them describe how and why communications have
changed.
8. Show the need for good communication
systems by playing “telephone” – people whispering a message to each other.
Only the first person gets to see the message; the last person announces the
message to the class. This game illustrates the effects of an inadequate
communications medium.
9. Discuss the use of directories to help
us locate information so that people can communicate more easily and quickly.
Use your local phone book and the Canadian Postal Code Directory (a copy is
probably available in the school office) as examples. Give the students an
assignment to carry out a comparison of how geographically-based codes are used
for phone and postal systems using the headings: coding systems; geographic
pattern of codes; size of code areas; reason for variation of size; information
needed to use the directory (e.g., name, address etc.) codes for all Canadian
capital cities. Include questions requiring use of the directories to locate
specific information. As an extension discuss how the internet can be used to
locate address information (e.g., 411 site). And how do you find out what
someone’s e-mail address is?
10. Introduce the idea of the increasing
costs with distance traveled using e.g., a taxi’s fare. Have students examine
rate structures of various transportation and communication modes either by
giving them the data or having them collect the data by themselves as a
homework assignment (using the Internet or making some phone calls). Have each
student in a group create a scatter graph for one of the sets of data. Have
them share their results with the rest of the group, describing the correlation
the graph produces.
11. Have students use the data to consider
four destinations (local, provincial, national, and international) and decide
which mode of transportation/communication would be most economic and efficient
for the movement of people, goods, and ideas (see Appendix D). (Have students
locate the destinations on a world map.)
12. Have students compare the cost of having
five people from two different cities in two different time zones (give each
pair of students a different pair of cities) meet in person or have a
conference call. Have them describe any problems created by the different time
zones, and how they would solve them.
Assessment/Evaluation Techniques
Personal Communication:
Instructional questions
Performance Assessment
(Rubrics Checklists, Rating Scales, Anecdotal Records)
Written Assignments
Paragraph
Demonstrations (Live, Tape)
Co-operative group work
Resources
• Canada: Land of Diversity textbooks
• Canada and the World Atlases
Accommodations
• Use of peer-helpers when developing
organizer
• Provide individual assistance where needed
• Provide a set of reference notes
Appendices
Rate Structures for Specific
Transportation and Communication Modes (Appendix D)
Activity #8: Locality
Study and Business Plan
Suggested Time: 225 min
Description
Students develop and
complete Locality Study and Business Plan for a secondary, tertiary, or
quaternary industry that:
a. reflects Canada’s present demographic structure, i.e. large
percentage of populace in middle and working age cohorts.
b. contains projections for future expansion or change in function
based on projected changes to Canada’s demographic structure, i.e. the aging of
Canada’s population.
c. is located in one of Canada’s ecozones and is based on the locational factors for industry, the
ecozone data that they has been collected in Units 1 and 2, and Canada’s
existing infrastructure.
Strands & Expectations
Strands: Geographic
Foundations: Space & Systems, Understanding & Managing Change, Methods
of Geographic Inquiry
Overall Expectations: SSV.04B,
UMV.01B, MIV.01B, MIV.02B, MIV.03B
Specific Expectations: SS1.01B,
SS1.03B, SS2.01D, UM1.02B, UM3.02D, UM3.04D, UM3.05P, MI2.02B, MI2.09B,
MI2.10B, MI2.11D, MI2.12B, MI3.01B, MI3.04D
Planning Notes
Teachers should:
• invite a business teacher or community
member to discuss the writing of business plans.
• download a business plan template from the
web site of any banking institution or obtain one through visiting the local
Business Self Help Office or Economic Development Office.
• prepare a list of locational factors of industry in the event that the brainstorming
session does not reveal all of them.
• remind students that they must bring to
class all of their notes and work from Units 1 and 2 as it be used in this
activity.
• book appropriate facilities if computers
are being used as a resource for this activity.
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should:
• have the prerequisite knowledge for this
activity including the ability to differentiate between the various forms of
industry.
• be able to differentiate between the
various types of industry.
• understand Canada’s changing demographic
structure.
• know the location and general physical and
human characteristics of Canada’s ecozones.
• have an understanding of Canada’s
transportation and communications infrastructure.
Teaching/Learning Strategies
The teacher will:
• review Canada’s changing demographic structure;
• discuss with students the impacts on
consumerism that the aging of Canada’s population initiate (e.g. less demand
for goods and services required by youth and the middle-aged, greater demand
for goods and services required by the aged);
• review the differences between primary,
secondary, tertiary, and quaternary industries;
• discuss expansion or changing functions of
businesses and industry (using local examples wherever possible);
• have students brainstorm and discuss the locational factors of industry such as
nearness to water, access to utilities, proximity of market, adequate labor
force, availability of resources, proper infrastructure, appropriate climate,
etc. (Teachers may wish to separate these into site and situation factors);
• instruct students to construct a basic
business plan;
• divide the class into groups of 2 to 3
students and review the following instructions.
1. Select an important local business or industry and, using the list
constructed by the class, identify the significant locational factors that would explain why it is situated where it
is.
2. Describe the site and situation characteristics of their locality
and, by examining this list, record and provide a rationale for three
industries or businesses that would likely flourish in their area.
Culminating Activity
3. Choose a secondary, tertiary, or quaternary industry that produces
or provides consumer goods or services for the youth or middle-aged population
of Canada and may either expand or change in the future to reflect Canada’s
aging population. For example,
|
|
Secondary |
Tertiary |
|
Present |
Sport Shoes |
Catering Business |
|
Future |
Orthopaedic Shoes |
Home Food Service |
4. Review the:
• locational
factors for industry,
• the ecozone data collected during Units 1
and 2, and,
• the information on Canada’s existing
infrastructure from Unit 2.
Using this information,
record a list of the factors that would be most important in selecting the best
ecozone for their business or industry.
5. Construct a decision-making matrix that has the factors recorded
above as the criteria and five chosen ecozones as the alternatives; e.g.,
|
Ecozone |
Population Density |
w |
Freshwater Area |
|
Forest Resources |
|
Climate Statistics |
|
Proximity of Major Highways |
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points: |
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w - weight
r - rank
p - points
note: p = w x r
Alternatives:
Instead of using ecozones
teachers may choose to use:
• CMAs, census divisions, or cities within
the province or country (if so, Stats Can Web Site is an excellent source of
data); or,
• commercial or industrial lots within the
local community or region (if so, local planning or engineering departments
should have data on available lots or buildings, zoning, utilities, roads,
protected greenspace, slope, drainage, etc.)
6. Construct a business plan that includes:
• a description of the business (i.e.
description of the product or service, plant, basic industrial process, output,
market, and target consumer group),
• its potential location (supported by the
decision-making matrix constructed above),
• a comprehensive marketing plan, and,
• projections for future expansion or change
in function to reflect Canada’s changing demographics.
Note:
Business plans must be accompanied by at least one chloropleth map and one
graph.
7. Present their business plans to the class, complete with
supportive visuals. The teacher may choose to do this as a simulation by
selecting a group of students, colleagues, or members of the community to act as:
• representatives from a lending institution
who have the responsibility of approving a loan for the new business venture;
or,
• potential shareholders considering
investing their money into the business.
Assessment/Evaluation Techniques
1. Teacher Assessment of Business Plan
2. Teacher and Peer Assessment of Presentation
3. Teacher Assessment of Group Performance
4. Peer Assessment of Partner’s Contributions
Resources
1. Contact Canada
2. Canada: Land of Diversity
3. Canada and the World: An Atlas Resource
4. Canadian Oxford Intermediate Atlas
5. Canadian Oxford School Atlas
6. GIS (e.g. ArcView, Idrisi, MapInfo, SpansMap,
MF Teach, etc.)
7. GIS databases (e.g. ArcCanada, ArcVoyager,
etc.)
8. Stats Can Web Site
9. Estats
Accommodations
• Students could use National Parks and Park
Activities as the decision making basis for their business plan and Location
study.
Appendix A
National Parks Visit: Decision Making
Activity: Choosing the best national
park to visit in Canada, based on a selection of personal preferences
variables.
|
Materials: • Climate data from Environment Canada • Decision-making matrix • Ecozone Regions of Canada Map (student
supplies) • Data on days of sunshine for selected
locations in Canada |
• Information on tourist activities in
the National Parks • Transportation Map of Canada • Physiographic, Climate, Vegetation,
Soils Maps of Canada (student supplies) • Research notes on the different
ecozones in Canada (student
supplies) |
Task:
1. Choose 3 National Parks that may appeal to
you as a place to visit. Print each name under alternatives on a chart similar
to the one below:
|
|
Criteria and Weighting |
||||||||
|
Alternatives |
Criteria 1 |
W |
Criteria 2 |
|
Criteria 3 |
|
Criteria 4 |
|
Criteria 5 |
|
Alternative 1 |
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative 2 |
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative 3 |
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W - weighting r - rank p - points
2. The information columns represent different
types of personal preferences such as “hours of sunshine”, “type of wildlife”
or “proximity to ski areas” for each location. These are things to be
considered when making the decision about where you go. They be known as
different criteria. Select 5 criteria that you wish to evaluate for your 3
national parks. Print the description of your chosen criteria in the spaces at
the top of each column.
3. Print in the data for the three national
parks that you selected, for each type of criteria. This information should be
written to the upper left of each diagonal line.
4. Rank the national parks under each criterion
by giving them a score with “3" for the best and “1" for the worst.
Please note the highest numbers mean the best conditions for you. For example,
if a higher number of days with frost makes a location less desirable for you,
you would give this area a lower score, even though the criteria you are
measuring associates a higher value (more days with frost) with the national
park.
5. Add the total scores and write a preliminary
statement about the best national park for you to visit.
Weighted Criteria
1. Different criteria have different values to people. Some people do
not mind frost; for others, the amount of sunshine a place receives is far more
important than the amount of cold, etc. To try and make the decision-making
more accurate it is necessary to give each criteria a weighted value based on
your personal preference. Start this process by determining which of your
criteria is of least value. All scores in this column will be multiplied by 1X.
Now decide which of the criterion is the next least valued. Decide how much
more important it is than the previous criterion. If you decide it is twice as
important, all its scores be multiplied by 2X. Repeat this process for each of
the five criteria. Now add up the totals. Write a statement in which you
explain which is the best National Park for you to visit in Canada.
Writing Your Report
You must now write a report
in which you state the problem by way of introducing the report, and then write
the decision making process you followed, with a paragraph each for either each
criteria, or for each national park. Your conclusion consist of your decision
statement about which National Park in Canada most appeals to you as a place to
visit.
In summary, your report be
structured as follows:
• Introduction: make a problem statement,
state the national Park alternatives and the criterion you used
• Body: Decision making process - why did I
rank as I did? 1 paragraph per criteria, or per National Park.
• Conclusion: Decision statement.
Appendix B
Downloading jpegs
from the Internet and Converting to bmp
files to Import
into Microsoft
Publisher (Lview Pro)
|
1. Right-click on any picture
or icon on a web page 2. Select Save as... 3. Insert disk into drive
|
4. Change drive to a: 5. Type an appropriate name in the File name field 6. Click O.K. |
|
(Since most graphics on
the internet are jpeg or gif files, you must convert them into bmp or pcx format so they may be imported into Microsoft Publisher) |
|
|
1. Start LView Pro 2. Click on the File menu 3. Insert your disk into
the drive 4. Change the drive to a: 5. Change the File type to
jpeg |
6. Double-click on the file you want 7. After the picture appears, click on the File
menu again 8. Select Save as... 9. Change the File type
to bmp 10. Click O.K. |
|
(Repeat the above steps
for each of your jpeg files) |
|
Travel Brochure Assignment (scanner) (PaperPort)
|
1. Click Start 2. Go to Programs, then
PaperPort, then click the PaperPort option 3. Place picture on the Scanning
Bed and Close Lid 4. Click Scan Button on
Task Bar 5. Accept default and Click Scan
Button 6. Click Options Button 7. Click on the ruler 8. Click on Specify Custom
Size Option 9. Change the number in the Width
field so that the file fit on
your disk 10. Click O.K. button 11. Click Accept Button |
12. Click File in the
Pull-down Menus 13. Click Export Option 14. Ensure “Export Files of Type” is set to Bit Map (*.BMP) 15. Change “Drives” is to a: 16. Click in the “File Name” Field, delete “*.bmp”, and type in the a name of your picture 17. Click O.K. Button 18. Close this Window (REPEAT STEPS 3-18 FOR ALL
PICTURES) 19. Click File in the
pull-down menus 20. Click Exit Option 21. Close PaperPort Window |
Travel Brochure Assignment (importing graphics
and entering text) (Microsoft Publisher)
|
1. Start Microsoft Publisher 2. Select Use a Page
Assistant Wizard and choose three-panel brochure 3. Follow instructions on screen, then click O.K. and close the
Cue Cards 4. Click on any text box and delete contents 5. Begin entering your text (Font size, type, colour, and style can be changed in Format -Character) (REPEAT STEPS 3-5 for all
text boxes) |
6. Click on any graphics box 7. Click File in the
pull-down menus 8. Select Import Picture 9. Change Drive to a: (make sure your disk is in) 10. Togle down to ?.bmp under
Picture Name and click on it 11. Click O.K. 12. Select Frame to fit the
Picture 13. Click O.K. (REPEAT STEPS 6-13 for all
graphics boxes) |
NOTE: GRAPHICS AND TEXT BOXES CAN BE CREATED BY CLICKING ON PICTURE AND TEXT ICONS ON THE LEFT SIDE TOOL BAR THEN LEFT-CLICKING AND DRAGGING.
GRAPHICS AND TEXT BOXES CAN BE RESIZED BY SELECTING THEM AND GRABBING AND DRAGGING THEIR HANDLES.
WHEN RESIZING GRAPHICS
BOXES, HOLD DOWN THE “SHIFT” KEY WHILE YOU CLICK AND DRAG TO PRESERVE THE
DIMENSIONS OF THE PICTURES. AND AVOID DISTORTION.
Appendix C
NATIONAL PARKS
|
Gwaii Haanas
National Park Reserve Haida Heritage Site P.O. Box 37 Queen Charlotte, B. C. V0T 1S0 Pacific Rim
National Park Reserve Ucluelet, B.C. V0R 3A0 Mount
Revelstoke and Glacier National Parks Box 350 Revelstoke, B.C. V0E 2S0 Kootenay
National Park Box 220 Radium Hot Springs, B.C. V0A 1M0 Waterton
Lakes National Park Waterton Park, Alberta T0K 2M0 Banff
National Park Box 900 Banff, AB T0L 0C0 Banff/Lake
Louise Tourism Bureau Box 1298 Jasper, AB T0E 1E0 Jasper
National Park Box 10 Jasper, AB T0E 1E0 Elk Island
National Park RR#1, Site 4 Fort Saskatchewan, AB T8L 2N7 Kluane
National Park Reserve P.O. Box 5495 Haines Junction, Y.T. Y0B 1L0 Yukon Tourism P.O. Box 2703 Whitehorse, Y.T. Y1A 2C6 Ivvavik
National Park Box 1840 Inuvik, NWT X0E 0T0 Nahanni
National Park Reserve P.O. Box 348 Fort Simpson, N.T. X0E 0N0 Nahanni-Ram
Tourism Association Box 177, Dept. VG Fort Simpson, N.T. X0E 0P0 |
Wood Buffalo
National Park Box 750 Fort Smith, N.T. X0E 0P0 Prince Albert
National Park Box 100 Waskesiu, SK S0J 2Y0 Canadian Heritage Parks Canada Grasslands
National Park Box 150 Val Marie, SK S0N 2T0 Riding
Mountain National Park Wasagaming, MB R0J 2H0 Pukaskwa
National Park Hwy. 627, Hattie Cove Via: Heron Bay, ON P0T 1R0 Bruce
Peninsula National Park P.O. Box 189 Tobermory, ON N0H 2R0 Bruce
Peninsula Tourist Association RR#2 Hepworth, ON N0H 1P0 Fathom Five
National Marine Park P.O. Box 189 Tobermory, ON N0H 2R0 Georgian Bay
Islands National Park Box 28 Honey Harbour, ON P0E 1E0 Point Pelee
National Park RR#1 Leamington, ON N8H 3V4 St. Lawrence
Islands National Park RR#3 Mallorytown Landing, ON K0E 1R0 Parks Canada La Mauricie
District Place Cascade 794, 5th Street C.P. 758 Shawinigan, QC G9N 6V9 Chief, Visitor Services Saguenay-St.Lawrence
Marine Park 182, de l'Eglise Street Tadoussac, QC G0T 2A0 |
Auyuittuq
National Park Rserve Box 353 Pangnirtung, N.T. X0A 0R0 Forillon
National Park Box 1220 Gaspe, QC G0C 1R0 Kouchibouguac
National Park Kouchibouguac, N.B. E0A 2A0 Fundy
National Park Alma, N.B. E0A 1B0 Department of Canadian Heritage Parks Canada Prince Edward
Island National Park 2 Palmers Lane Charlottetown, PEI C1A 5V6 Kejimkujik
National Park Box 236 Maitland Bridge, N.S. B0T 1L0 Cape Breton
Highlands National Park Ingonish Beach Cape Breton, N.S. B0C 1L0 Gros Morne
National Park Box 130 Rocky Harbour, NF A0G 2L0 Terra Nova
National Park Glovertown, NF A0G 2L0 Ellesmere
Island National Park Reserve P.O. Box 353 Pangnirtung, NT X0A 0R0 Vuntut
National Park P.O. Box 390 Dawson City, Y.T. Y0B 1G0 Aulavik
National Park General Delivery Sachs Harbour, N.T. X0E 0T0 Tuktut Nogait
National Park Box 1840 Unuvik, N.T. X0E 0T0 Wapusk
National Park c/o Churchill Office P.O. Box 127 Churchill, MB R0B 0E0 |
Rate Structures for Specific Transportation and
Communication Modes
Railway Transportation from Toronto
|
|
Cost from Toronto |
|
Ottawa |
|
|
Thunder Bay |
|
|
Calgary |
|
|
Vancouver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Transportation from Toronto
|
|
Cost from Toronto |
|
Ottawa |
|
|
Vancouver |
|
|
Tokyo, Japan |
|
|
Wellington, New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Distance telephone calls
|
|
Cost from Toronto |
|
Ottawa |
|
|
Halifax |
|
|
London, England |
|
|
Moscow, Russia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postage Costs through the mail system
|
|
Cost from Toronto |
|
Ottawa |
|
|
Edmonton |
|
|
Los Angeles, U.S. |
|
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement – Economic & Efficient
In each of the destination
columns, decide which mode is most economical/efficient for the movement of people,
goods, and ideas. In a brief sentence, explain your decision
below.
|
Mode |
To Nearest City |
Other Ontario City |
To Vancouver |
To Sydney Australia |
|
Road |
|
|
|
|
|
Rail |
|
|
|
|
|
Air |
|
|
|
|
|
Water |
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
Mail |
|
|
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite |
|
|
|
|
|
Fax |
|
|
|
|
|
Internet |
|
|
|
|
Local Movement (to Toronto)
People:
Goods:
Ideas:
Provincial Movement (to Thunder Bay)
People:
Goods:
Ideas:
National Movement (to Vancouver)
People:
Goods:
Ideas:
International Movement (to Sydney, Australia)
People:
Goods:
Ideas:
Appendix E: Rubric
for Assessment
Population Density Activities Evaluation Rubric
|
Categories |
50-59% (Level 1) |
60-69% (Level 2) |
70-79% (Level 3) |
80-100% (Level 4) |
|
Knowledge / Understanding |
The Student: |
The Student: |
The Student: |
The Student: |
|
|
Demonstrates a limited understanding of population density; Has difficulty creating chloropleth maps; Demonstrates a limited ability to follow the directions for the activity |
Demonstrates some understanding of population density; Demonstrates some understanding of chloropleth maps; Demonstrates some ability to follow the directions for the activity |
Demonstrates a considerable understanding of population density and can apply the understanding to problems; Can create and explain a chloropleth map; Follows directions with very few exceptions. |
Demonstrates a strong understanding of population density and is able to use the idea easily; Demonstrates a thorough understanding of chloropleth mapping, could apply the concept to another project without further instruction; Follows the directions for the activity |
|
Thinking/ Inquiry Weight x 0.20 |
Is able to use information from the graphs with limited effectiveness; Has difficulty seeing relationships between population, provinces and ecozones; |
Is able to get some information from the graphs; Is able to make some conclusions about population characteristics of provinces and ecozones; |
Is able to draw facts from the graphs; Draws clear relationships between population and the provinces and ecozones; |
Uses the graphs to see relationships, trends and can make predictions from the graph; Draws extended conclusions from the data, can make predictions for other areas based on observations. |
|
Communication Weight x 0.10 |
Communicates information through graphs with limited clarity; Can not clearly illustrate concepts through mapping ; Has a writing style which limits expression of the main ideas. |
Communicates information through graphs with some clarity; Uses maps with some effectiveness; Has a writing style which allows the expression of the main ideas. |
Communicates information through graphs with considerable clarity; Communicates information through maps with clarity; Has a writing style which clearly expresses and supports the main ideas. |
Is able to create maps which are clear, informative and pleasing to look at; Communicates information through maps with a high degree of clarity; Has a writing style which increases the reader’s understanding of the main ideas and shows strong supporting ideas. |
|
Application Weight x .40 |
Demonstrates difficulty in applying the concepts of population density and distribution; Has difficulty applying the information in graphs; Has difficulty applying the information in chloropleth maps; Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances in a limited manner. |
Demonstrates some understanding of the concepts of population density and distribution; Applies the information in graphs in some instances to solve other problems Applies the information in chloropleth maps in some instances to solve other problems Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances with some effectiveness |
Clearly understands and uses the concepts of population density and distribution; Applies the information in graphs without any apparent difficulty. Applies the information in chloropleth maps without any apparent difficulty. Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances with considerable effectiveness. |
Is able to use the concepts of population distribution and density in a consistent manner; Applies the graph information in a highly effective manner and with ease. Applies the chloropleth map information in a highly effective manner and with ease. Applies calculations and data to extended circumstances in a highly effective manner. |
Overall Level:____ Mark:_____ Student
Name:________________
Appendix F
Self and Peer
Evaluation of National Parks Brochure Project
|
0---------------1---------------2---------------3--------- -----4---------------5 Totally ”””Mostly Somewhat Somewhat Mostly Totally Disagree
Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Agree
|
|||
|
Criteria |
|
|
Self |
|
I/He/She clearly understood
the project and what was expected by the teacher. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She helped with
planning (e.g. design, tasks, meeting times, etc.) |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She was present each
time the group worked on the project. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She did my/his/her
fair share of the work. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She made valuable
contributions to the project. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She did what was
expected of them between group meetings. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She stayed focused on
the task when the group met. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She tried to keep the
group focused and on task. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She got others
involved by asking questions and requesting input. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She participated in
group discussions, decision-making, and planning. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She did not try to
dominate the group by making all of the decisions and disregarding the ideas
of others. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She was receptive to
the ideas and thoughts of others. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She made positive,
encouraging remarks about the contributions of others. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
I/He/She expressed ideas
clearly and effectively. |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
Ŕ Á Â Ă Ä |
|
TOTAL |
/70 |
/70 |
/70 |
|
COMMENTS (continue
on back) |
|
|
|
Appendix G
National Parks Brochure Evaluation Rubric
|
Categories |
50-59% (Level 1) |
60-69% (Level 2) |
70-79% (Level 3) |
80-100% (Level 4) |
|
Text |
The brochure: |
The brochure: |
The brochure: |
The brochure: |
|
|
addresses a minimal number of ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms; contains only minimal colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone; contains frequent spelling and grammatical errors; contains text that has all been copied directly from information sources. |
addresses some ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms; contains some colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone; contains occasional spelling and grammatical errors; contains some text that is written in the personal language of the student. |
addresses most ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms; contains considerable colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone; contains rare spelling and grammatical errors; contains text that is mostly written in the personal language of the student. |
addresses all ecozone components: climate, vegetation, wildlife, landforms; contains a multitude of colourful and descriptive, yet concise and accurate, language with appropriate style and a confident tone; is free of spelling and grammatical errors; contains text that is all written in the personal language of the student. |
|
Graphics |
incorporates a minimal number of different types of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.; rarely demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text; contains graphics that reflect some of the components of the ecozone; contains no student-generated graphics. |
incorporates some different types of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.; occasionally demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text; contains graphics that reflect some of the components of the ecozone; contains at least one student-generated graphic. |
incorporates a considerable variety of graphics such as pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.; frequently demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text; contains graphics that reflect a variety of the components of the ecozone; contains at least one well developed, student-generated graphic. |
incorporates all types of graphics including pictures, maps, graphs, charts, etc.; consistently demonstrates clear linkages between graphics and text; contains graphics that reflect most of the components of the ecozone; contains well developed, student-generated graphics. |
|
Organiz-ation/ Lay-out |
contains frequent flaws in the logical arrangement of content; contains frequent inconsistencies in font type, size, and style between similar sections; does not demonstrate appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components. |
contains occasional flaws in the logical arrangement of content; contains occasional inconsistencies in font type, size, and style between similar sections; demonstrates some degree of appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components. |
frequently demonstrates a logical arrangement of content; displays considerable consistency in font type, size, and style between similar sections; demonstrates a high degree of appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components. |
consistently demonstrates a flawless logical arrangement of content; displays perfect consistency in font type, size, and style between similar sections; demonstrates appropriate and balanced emphasis on the various ecozone components. |
|
Creativity |
demonstrates minimal creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics; demonstrates no template alterations (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes) |
demonstrates occasional creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics; demonstrates at least one template alteration suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes) |
demonstrates some creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics; demonstrates occasional template alterations suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes) |
demonstrates frequent creative use of colour, backgrounds, borders, textual style, and graphics; demonstrates several template alterations suitable to purpose (e.g. additions, deletions, and resizing of graphics and text boxes) |
Overall Level:___ Mark:___
Appendix H
Presentation
Evaluation Rubric
|
Categories |
50-59% (Level 1) |
60-69% (Level 2) |
70-79% (Level 3) |
80-100% (Level 4) |
|
Communi- cation |
The presenter(s): rarely demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance or eye contact, frequently “read off”, and lacked enthusiasm and mobility; did not engage the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities. |
occasionally demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility; rarely engaged the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities. |
frequently demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility; occasionally engaged the audience in two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and/or participatory activities. |
consistently demonstrated a confident voice tone with appropriate variance, maintained eye contact, an avoidance of “reading off”, and enthusiasm and mobility; frequently engaged the audience in effective two-way dialogue, thought-provoking questions, and participatory activities. |
|
Presenta-tion |
did not deliver an introduction that provided sufficient background information; rarely demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing; rarely maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing; lacked uniqueness and creativity, involving only one presentation technique, and lacked usage of audios and/or visuals; no apparent conclusion. |
delivered an introduction that provided sufficient background information; occasionally demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing; occasionally maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing; was somewhat unique, creative, and interesting, involving more than one presentation technique, and making usage an audio and/or visual; ended with a conclusion. |
delivered an introduction that caught the audience’s attention and provided sufficient background information; frequently demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing; frequently maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing; was unique, creative, and interesting, involving a variety of presentation techniques, and making usage of a variety of audios and/or visuals; ended with a conclusion that affected the audience, delivering “food for thought” and/or a “call to action”. |
delivered an intriguing introduction that grasped the audience’s attention and provided ample background information; consistently demonstrated a clear focus and effective sequencing; consistently maintained smooth flow, pace, and timing; was extremely unique, creative, and interesting, involving several presentation techniques, and making effective usage of a wide variety of audios and/or visuals; ended with a powerful conclusion that impacted the audience, delivering compelling “food for thought” and/or an emphatic “call to action”. |
|
Knowledge |
did not provide the audience with a summary sheet; rarely demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue; provided little evidence to validate the thesis. |
provided the audience with a summary sheet; occasionally demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue; provided some evidence to validate the thesis. |
provided the audience with a somewhat efficient, informative, and interesting summary sheet; frequently demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue; provided sufficient evidence to conclusively validate the thesis. |
provided the audience with an efficient, informative, and interesting summary sheet; consistently demonstrated a detailed and in-depth understanding of the issue; provided ample evidence to conclusively validate the thesis. |
Overall Level: ____ Mark: ____
Appendix I
Instruction Sheet for Decision Making Matrix
Activity: Choosing an ecozone that most
is in need of having more land protected.
Materials: Atlas
Ecozones
Map of Canada (student supplied)
Ecozones Research
notes (student supplied)
National
Parks Information (student supplied)
Webpages
for Parks Canada
Task:
1. Choose five ecozones (from the 15 known in Canada), that you feel
are the most threatened. Print each name under the options column on the
matrix.
2. The information columns represent different types of criteria such
as "% protected land", "environmental hazards",
"location in relation to populated areas", or "number of
visitors". These are things to be considered when making the decision about
which ecozone needs to be protected the most. Print the description of your
chosen criteria in the spaces at the top of each column.
3. Print in the data for the five ecozones you have selected, for
each type of criteria. This information should be written to the upper left of
each diagonal line.
4. Rank the ecozones under each criterion by giving them a score of 5
for the best and 1 for the worst. Please note that the highest numbers mean the
ecozone is under the biggest threat.
5. Add the total scores and write a preliminary statement about the
ecozone that most needs to have more land protected.
Weighted Criteria:
Different criteria have a
different value to people. Some people feel that an ecozone with very little protected
lands most needs to be protected, whereas others feel that an ecozone with a
high population density most needs more protected lands. To try and make the
decision-making more accurate it is necessary to give each criteria a weighted
value based on your personal preference.
Start this process by
determining which of your criteria is of least value. All scores in this column
be multiplied by 1. Now decide which of the criterion is the next least valued.
Decide how much more important it is than the previous criterion. If you decide
it is twice as important, all its scores be multiplied by 2. Repeat this
process for each of the five criteria. Now add up the totals.
Writing Your
Report:
You must now write a report in which you state the
problem by way of introducing the report, and then write the decision making
process you followed, with a paragraph each for either each criteria, or for
each ecozone. Your conclusion will consist of your decision statement about
which ecozone in Canada most needs to have more protected land.
In summary, your report be structured as follows:
Introduction: Make a problem
statement, state the ecozone alternatives and criteria you used.
Body: Decision making
process - why did I rank as I did? 1 paragraph per criteria, or per ecozone.
Conclusion: Decision statement.
Appendix J

Continue to Unit 3 |
Back to Unit 1 | Back to Course
Profiles main menu